Seisler, Drew K.

e21545 Background: A nocebo is an inert substance that causes adverse events. Although previous studies have examined the favorably positive (placebo) effects of an inert substance, few studies have examined negative (nocebo) effects, particularly in older patients who sometimes experience frequent and severe adverse events from cancer therapy. Methods: This study focused on placebo/nocebo-exposed patients who participated in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, cancer therapeutic studies, namely, North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) 97-24-51 and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z9001, with the goal of reporting comparative, age-based adverse event rates. Results: Among the 446 patients who received placebo/nocebo exclusively, 161 were 65 years of age or older at the time of respective trial entry; 5234 adverse events occurred. Unadjusted adverse event rates did not differ significantly between patients 65 years of age or older and those younger: rate ratio (99% confidence intervals (CI): 1.01 (0.47, 2.02) with similar findings for grade 2 or worse adverse events and for all symptom-driven adverse events (for example, pain, loss of appetite, anxiety). Adjustment for sex, ethnicity, baseline performance score, and trial resulted in no significant age-based rate differences in adverse event rates. Similar findings were observed with an age threshold of 70. Conclusions: A nocebo effect appears to occur irrespective of age. This observation suggests that adverse events should be taken no less seriously in older than in younger cancer patients and that education to manage patients’ expectations from cancer therapy might improve tolerability. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Immunotherapy targeting tumor-associated antigens aberrantly expressed on colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps offers the potential for a relatively non-invasive and non-toxic prevention strategy, and because of the specificity of the immune response and its long-term memory, the potential for prolonged protection. In a double-blind randomized trial in patients with a diagnosis of advanced colorectal adenomas within the previous year, we are evaluating MUC1 vaccine with the TLR-3 agonist polyICLC (Hiltonol®) as an adjuvant, for its immunogenicity and effect on colorectal adenoma recurrence at follow up colonoscopy. Aim: We report on a primary endpoint, MUC1 immunogenicity at week 12 (following vaccine or placebo administration at 0, 2, and 10 weeks), and on determinants of the immune response and vaccine toxicity. Methods: Subjects with an advanced adenoma (defined as ≥1cm, tubulovillous or villous histology, or with HGD) were randomized. Response to the vaccine was assessed by monitoring IgG anti-MUC1 antibody titer ratio; defined as t12/t0, where t0 is the initial titer measured prior to vaccination, and t12 is the titer drawn at 12 weeks. A ratio of 2.0 was used as the primary definition of a significant immune response. T Regulatory and myleoid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) levels at baseline were assessed in relation to vaccine response. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Results: 102 subjects were randomized at 6 centers, 52 received MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. Subjects had a mean age of 59.4±7.0 (range 40-70) years, 60.8% were male, 88.2% were white, and 18.6% Hispanic or Latino. At 12 weeks the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 13/52 (25%) of patients receiving vaccine (ratio range 2.9-17.3), vs. 0/50 in placebo group (P=.0001), and was ≥1.5 in 19/52 (36.5%) of patients receiving vaccine compared to 1/50 (2%) in placebo group (P<.0001). In the vaccinated group, the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 45% of women (9/20) vs. 12.5% of men (4/32) (P=0.009) and ≥1.5 in 55% of women (11/20) vs. 25% of men (8/32) (P=0.03). In the vaccinated group, reduced levels of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) pre-vaccination were associated with response, 0.2±0.1 among responders (n=13) vs. 0.8±1.1 among non-responders (N=39) (p=0.0006) whereas monocytic MDSC and T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25, Foxp3) were not. There were no grade 3 adverse events (AE) possibly or probably related to the vaccine. The most common AE was an injection site reaction (grade 1 or 2) which occurred in 80.8% (n=42/52) in vaccine group vs. 6.0% in the placebo group (3/50). Conclusions: Subjects with an advanced adenoma receiving MUC1 vaccine compared with a placebo are significantly more likely to develop an anti-IgG MUC1 immune response at 12 weeks. Women and subjects with lower circulating PMN-MDSC levels at baseline were more likely to respond. The vaccine was well tolerated. Follow up for the effect of the vaccine on adenomatous polyp recurrence is ongoing. Citation Format: Robert E. Schoen, Lisa A. Boardman, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Ajay Bansal, Pamela L. Beatty, David Kastenberg, Chin Hur, Lynda Dzubinski, Luz Rodriguez, Andres Salazar, John McKolanis, Drew Seisler, Nathan R. Foster, May-Yin Polley, Paul J. Limburg, Olivera J. Finn. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled immunoprevention trial with MUC1 vaccine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced adenomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-305.

123 Background: Lymph node dissection, axillary or sentinel, often results in restrictions of arm movement, including range of motion (ROM), either temporarily or permanently. The objective of this secondary analysis was to determine if a lymphedema (LE) prevention program would also impact ROM in both the affected arm as well as the unaffected arm. Methods: As part of the Lymphedema Education and Prevention study (CALGB 70305), women from participating sites (N=41) were randomized to either the “education only” (n=253) arm (information about LE signs and symptoms and risk reduction strategies) or “education + exercise” (n=315) arm (education plus arm stretching and breathing exercises and a visit with a physical therapist). Self-administered surveys asking for how high the patient can reach with each arm at pre-surgery, 12 and 18 months after surgery were used to assess self-reports of ROM for each arm (5 categories in total: very little, about half, nearly full, overhead, and full). Differences in ROM between study groups for each arm were compared using chi-square tests before surgery, and 12 and 18 months after surgery. Results: Before surgery, women in the “education + exercise” group were less likely to report full ROM for both arms (left: 58% vs 75%; right: 57% vs 76%; p=0.0004 for both arms) compared to women in the “education only” group, while at 12 months, women in the “education + exercise” group reported greater ROM (left: 91% vs 84% p=0.16; right: 90% vs 83%; p=0.02) compared to women in the “education only” group. By 18 months, both groups approached 93% with full ROM for both arms. Conclusions: Women who participated in a LE prevention intervention that included exercise and a visit to a physical therapist regained full ROM in both arms sooner than women who did not receive the exercise intervention. All women receiving lymph node dissection should receive physical therapy to regain ROM quickly after surgery and to help maintain physical functioning. Support: UG1CA189823, UG1CA189817, UG1CA189819, U10CA180790, U10CA180836, U10CA180850, and UL1TR001409; Clinical trial information: NCT00376597.

BACKGROUND A nocebo is an inert substance associated with adverse events. Although previous studies have examined the positive (placebo) effects of such inert substances, few have examined negative (nocebo) adverse event profiles, particularly in older patients who have higher morbidity and can experience frequent and severe adverse events from cancer therapy. METHODS This study focused on placebo/nocebo‐exposed patients who participated in 2 double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cancer therapeutic studies, namely, North Central Cancer Therapy Group trial NCCTG 97‐24‐51 and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z9001, with the goal of reporting the comparative, age‐based adverse event rates, as reported during the conduct of these trials. RESULTS Among the 446 patients who received only placebo/nocebo and who were the focus of the current report, 161 were aged ≥65 years at the time of respective trial entry, and 5234 adverse events occurred. Unadjusted adverse event rates did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥65 years and younger patients (rate ratio, 1.01; 99% confidence interval, 0.47‐2.02), and the findings were similar findings for grade 2 or worse adverse events and for all symptom‐driven adverse events (for example, pain, loss of appetite, anxiety). Adjustment for sex, ethnicity, baseline performance score, and individual trial resulted in no significant age‐based differences in adverse event rates. Similar findings were observed with an age threshold of 70 years. CONCLUSIONS Adverse events are equally common in older and younger cancer patients who are exposed to nocebo and thus require the same degree of clinical consideration regardless of age. Cancer 2017;123:4193–4198. © 2017 American Cancer Society .