Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G.

Abstract Ketogenic diets appear promising for obesity, diabetes, cancer, and other illnesses. Because older patients are more likely to contend with such illnesses and because of a paucity of dietary outcomes among these patients, we examined ketogenic diets in older patients. This multisite study focused on patients (≥65 years of age) on a ketogenic diet. Medical records were identified with the keywords “keto,” “ketogenic,” and “Atkins.” Records were reviewed in detail with extraction of direct quotations to substantiate observations. We report on 200 consecutive patients with a median age of 70 years. Reasons for diet included weight loss, diabetes, and cancer; the majority remained on the diet for >1 month. In 134 (67%: 95% confidence interval: 60, 73%), the ketogenic diet appeared beneficial: 93 of 117 (79%) who sought weight loss lost weight (“She has lost 15 pounds and plans to lose another 8”); 36 of 67 (54%) who sought glucose control appeared to achieve the latter (“He has gone on a ketogenic diet and has been able to bring his sugars down significantly”); and 5 of 8 (63%) who sought improved cancer outcomes appeared to derive them (“He attributes part of the control of his cancer and increased QOL to adopting the keto for cancer diet”). Adverse events occurred in 30 patients (15%): dyslipidemia (n = 14), constipation (n = 9), sub-therapeutic international normalized ratio (n = 3), pancreatitis (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 1), and fatigue (n = 1). Trials that test ketogenic diets for a variety of illnesses should enroll older adults.

BACKGROUND A nocebo is an inert substance associated with adverse events. Although previous studies have examined the positive (placebo) effects of such inert substances, few have examined negative (nocebo) adverse event profiles, particularly in older patients who have higher morbidity and can experience frequent and severe adverse events from cancer therapy. METHODS This study focused on placebo/nocebo‐exposed patients who participated in 2 double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cancer therapeutic studies, namely, North Central Cancer Therapy Group trial NCCTG 97‐24‐51 and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z9001, with the goal of reporting the comparative, age‐based adverse event rates, as reported during the conduct of these trials. RESULTS Among the 446 patients who received only placebo/nocebo and who were the focus of the current report, 161 were aged ≥65 years at the time of respective trial entry, and 5234 adverse events occurred. Unadjusted adverse event rates did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥65 years and younger patients (rate ratio, 1.01; 99% confidence interval, 0.47‐2.02), and the findings were similar findings for grade 2 or worse adverse events and for all symptom‐driven adverse events (for example, pain, loss of appetite, anxiety). Adjustment for sex, ethnicity, baseline performance score, and individual trial resulted in no significant age‐based differences in adverse event rates. Similar findings were observed with an age threshold of 70 years. CONCLUSIONS Adverse events are equally common in older and younger cancer patients who are exposed to nocebo and thus require the same degree of clinical consideration regardless of age. Cancer 2017;123:4193–4198. © 2017 American Cancer Society .

BACKGROUNDAutologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) is a common management strategy for select patients with immunoglobulin light‐chain amyloidosis, but no trials have documented improved overall survival.METHODSEighty‐nine patients with biopsy‐proven immunoglobulin light‐chain amyloidosis were allowed to select treatment with melphalan plus dexamethasone (n = 34) or SCT (n = 55); all patients were transplant eligible. Treatment preference resulted in imbalanced study arms. Patients who selected SCT were younger, more frequently had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score less than 2, had lower‐stage amyloidosis, and had a lower incidence of cardiac amyloidosis.RESULTSPatients receiving melphalan plus dexamethasone had a 3‐year progression‐free survival rate of 29.1% and an overall survival rate of 58.8%. Patients undergoing SCT had a 3‐year progression‐free survival rate of 51.7% and an overall survival rate of 83.6%. An attempt to match patients between the 2 arms in terms of risk produced 24 matched triplet sets (2 SCT patients for each melphalan‐dexamethasone patient); there was no difference in hematologic response, but there was better survival after autologous SCT. A propensity score–matched analysis of the cohorts (melphalan plus dexamethasone vs SCT) showed an overall mortality hazard ratio of 2.56 (P < .01).CONCLUSIONSAlthough the study had limitations, similar hematologic responses and improved survival were observed after SCT versus melphalan plus dexamethasone. Cancer 2016;122:2197–205. © 2016 American Cancer Society.