Bansal, Ajay

Abstract Purpose: To assess whether MUC1 peptide vaccine produces an immune response and prevents subsequent colon adenoma formation. Patients and Methods: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial in individuals age 40 to 70 with diagnosis of an advanced adenoma ≤1 year from randomization. Vaccine was administered at 0, 2, and 10 weeks with a booster injection at week 53. Adenoma recurrence was assessed ≥1 year from randomization. The primary endpoint was vaccine immunogenicity at 12 weeks defined by anti-MUC1 ratio ≥2.0. Results: Fifty-three participants received the MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. Thirteen of 52 (25%) MUC1 vaccine recipients had a ≥2-fold increase in MUC1 IgG (range, 2.9–17.3) at week 12 versus 0/50 placebo recipients (one-sided Fisher exact P < 0.0001). Of 13 responders at week 12, 11 (84.6%) responded to a booster injection at week 52 with a ≥2-fold increase in MUC1 IgG measured at week 55. Recurrent adenoma was observed in 31 of 47 (66.0%) in the placebo group versus 27 of 48 (56.3%) in the MUC1 group [adjusted relative risk (aRR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60–1.14; P = 0.25]. Adenoma recurrence occurred in 3/11 (27.3%) immune responders at week 12 and week 55 (aRR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15–1.11; P = 0.08 compared with placebo). There was no difference in serious adverse events. Conclusions: An immune response was observed only in vaccine recipients. Adenoma recurrence was not different than placebo, but a 38% absolute reduction in adenoma recurrence compared with placebo was observed in participants who had an immune response at week 12 and with the booster injection.

Abstract Introduction: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased more than any other cancer in our lifetime. Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to EAC. At present, HER-2 and anti-PD-L1 therapies are FDA-approved for EAC, and off-label use of EGFR-directed therapy has been reported. Our study aims to use liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) to measure the expression of oncoproteins that are currently approved-drug targets in EAC and explore new promising targets for drug development and diagnostic applications for EAC and BE. Methods: EAC patients who underwent esophagectomy without chemo-radiation were identified. BE patients with subsequent progression to EAC and those without progression for >10 years were identified. Normal esophageal mucosa tissues with no history of progression were analyzed for baseline expression. Tissue sections were microdissected to isolate pure EAC, BE and normal mucosal cells from stroma. These biopsies were solubilized for LC/MS-based quantification of 80+ clinically relevant tumor markers including novel markers which are believed to play a role in the disease progression from BE to EAC. The expression trends of these markers were scrutinized by immunofluorescence (IF) in a subset of specimens/biomarkers to confirm mass spec results. Results: A total of 159 tissues were analyzed via LC-MS. In 55 EAC tissues - HER2, PD-L1 and EGFR were overexpressed in 16.3%, 0%, and 0% of patients, respectively. New markers DAD1 and S100P were noted to have high (7,634.0 and 27,222.6 attomoles/ug) and consistent (98.1% and 94.5%) overexpression in EAC samples. Expression of HER2, S100P and DAD1 were significantly higher in EAC compared to 23 normal esophageal mucosa specimens. There was no statistical difference in the expression of PD-L1 and EGFR between EAC and healthy mucosal samples. 45 BE biopsies progressed to EAC within a mean of 380 days, while the remaining 36 BE specimens did not progress over a 10-year period. 8 novel biomarkers were expressed at a higher level in BE tissue that progressed to cancer when compared to esophageal tissue that remained stable over 10 years. The expression trends observed via LC/MS were confirmed via IF in DAD1, S100P and two other novel markers. Discussion: LC-MS revealed low prevalence of target proteins in currently approved EAC therapies and high levels of newly discovered disease drivers that should be explored as possible therapy targets or diagnostic markers. The differential overexpression of the novel markers in progressive and non-progressive BE tissues, as well as the consistent overexpression of these markers in EAC tumors, demonstrates the potential for early detection of esophageal carcinogenesis and/or reveals potential therapeutic programs for an indication that lacks highly efficacious targeted therapy options. Citation Format: Christopher Hartley, Ajay Bansal, Catherine Hagen, Olivia Driscoll, Seyun Oh, Joe Abdo, Sumeet K. Mittal. Mass spectrometry detects lower frequency of routine markers and consistent overexpression of novel disease drivers in Barrett's-related esophageal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2805.

343 Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) continues to have extremely poor prognosis despite advances in surgical and oncological regimens. Targeted and immune therapy hold promise to improve outcomes in solid tumors including EAC. At present HER-2 and anti-PD-L1 therapies are approved by the FDA for EAC. Additionally, off-label use of EGFR directed therapy has been reported. The aim of this study is to measure expression of 80+ oncoproteins in EAC using multiplexed mass spectrometry to elucidate expression of currently approved-drug targets and explore promising new targets for drug development. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval (Mayo Clinic and KUMC), EAC patients whose tumors were resected via esophagectomy before chemotherapy and/or radiation were identified. Normal esophageal mucosa samples with no history of EAC were also retrieved for analysis. Tissue sections were microdissected to exclude stroma from adenocarcinoma cells. Isolated EAC cells were solubilized for mass spectrometry-based quantitation of more than 80 clinically relevant tumor markers. Results: 55 EAC tissues were analyzed. HER2, PD-L1 and EGFR were overexpressed only in 16.3%, 0%, and 0% of patients, respectively. New oncoproteins #2 and #6 were noted to have high (7,634.0 and 27,222.6 attomoles/ug) and consistent (98.1% and 94.5%) overexpression in EAC samples. Expression of HER2, oncoproteins #2 and #6 were significantly higher in EAC compared to normal esophageal mucosa. There was no statistical difference in the expression of PD-L1 and EGFR between EAC and normal samples. Conclusions: Mass spectrometry revealed a very low prevalence of target oncoproteins in EAC for currently used drugs. Our study potentially reveals alternate markers which are near universally present at high levels and should be further explored for targeted treatment.[Table: see text]

249 Background: Since 1975, Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) incidence has increased more than any other cancer (̃700%). Pre-malignant metaplastic tissue, or Barrett's Esophagus (BE), is the only known precursor for EAC. Periodic histological assessment of endoscopic biopsy along dysplasia-carcinoma sequence is used to assess progression risk. Current surveillance protocols have clinical limitations as 80% of patients still present with stage II-IV EAC. The aim of this study is to compare novel proteomic expression patterns to distinguish stable BE patients from those who developed EAC using the STLA101 assay. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval patients with BE/GERD were identified. Two cohorts were selected: progressors (progressed to EAC at subsequent interval of 0.5-3 years) and non–progressors (̃10 yrs of f/u surveillance without progression along dysplasia/carcinoma path). 24 normal esophageal mucosa samples with no h/o of BE were also retrieved for baseline expression levels. Tissue sections were microdissected to isolate pure BE cells from surrounding stromal cells. BE cells underwent a multi-step process where tissue was heated and digested to produce a liquid biopsy for mass spec. Isotopically labeled control peptides representing the STLA101 panel were spiked in with digested tissue samples to quantify all of the markers simultaneously using a Triple-quad mass spectrometer. Results: A total of 95 tissues were analyzed. 29 BE biopsies progressed to EAC within a mean of 380 days while the remaining 28 BE and 14 GERD specimens did not progress over a 10-yr period. All 8 biomarkers were expressed at a higher level in BE tissue that progressed to cancer when compared to BE/GERD tissue that remained stable over 10 years. The assay had a 100% technical success rate as no samples yielded “non-detectable” data points. Conclusions: The differential overexpression of the STLA101 panel on progressive and non-progressive BE tissues demonstrates the clinical utility of STLA101 as a predictive biomarker panel for early detection of esophageal carcinogenesis. Non-progressive BE tissues were similar to normal mucosa, therefore, patients whose BE tissue samples resemble this profile may receive a reduced screening cadence. On the other hand, patients with overexpression of the STLA101 panel may be eligible to receive more frequent screening or therapeutic intervention.

Abstract Background: Immunoprevention via targeting antigens aberrantly expressed on colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps offers the potential for a less invasive prevention strategy than endoscopic surveillance. Specificity of the immune response and long-term memory provide the potential for prolonged protection. Leveraging the infrastructure of the NCI-funded Cancer Prevention Network (CPN) consortium, we are conducting a double-blind randomized trial in individuals with a diagnosis of advanced colorectal adenomas within the previous year. We are evaluating MUC1 vaccine with the TLR-3 agonist polyICLC as an adjuvant, for its immunogenicity, ability to elicit immune memory and prevent recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Aims: We previously reported on the vaccine immunogenicity at week 12 (vaccine administered at 0, 2, and 10 weeks) compared to placebo. Here we report the ability of the vaccine to elicit long-term memory by measuring increase in anti-MUC1 antibody levels following a booster administered at one year. Methods: Subjects with endoscopically resected advanced adenoma (defined as ≥1cm, tubululovillous or villous histology, or with high grade dysplasia) were randomized. The primary endpoint was the response to the vaccine at week 12 assessed by monitoring anti-MUC1 IgG antibody titer ratio defined as t12/t0, where t0 was the titer pre-vaccination, and t12 was the titer at week 12. The key secondary endpoint was to assess anti-MUC1 IgG response at week 55 to a booster at week 52 in the vaccine arm compared to placebo. Results: 102 eligible subjects were randomized at 6 centers, 52 received MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. The mean age was 59.4±7.0 (range 40-70), 60.8% male, 88.2% white, and 18.6% Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. At 12 weeks the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 13/52 (25%) of individuals receiving vaccine (ratio range -0.5-17.3), vs. 0/50 in placebo group (2-sided p=.0001), and was ≥1.5 in 19/52 (36.5%) individuals receiving vaccine compared to 1/50 (2%) in placebo group (P<.0001). To evaluate immune memory, 1-year booster data available for 95 patients (51-MUC1, 44-placebo) were analyzed. 10/13 (76.9%) of the week 12 vs. week 0 vaccine responders showed a response at week 52 vs. baseline and 11/13 (84.6%) at week 55 vs. week 52. Using an IgG ratio of 2 (per-protocol), the response rate was 33% for MUC1 vs. 5% for placebo (1-sided p=0.0003). Using a ratio of 1.5 yielded similar results (37% MUC1 vs. 9% Placebo (1-sided p=0.0008). The MUC1 arm had significantly higher IgG at week 52 (1-sided p=0.0294), week 55 (1-sided p=0.0048), and significantly higher week 55 to week 52 IgG ratio values (1-sided p=0.0293). Conclusions: Subjects with a recent history of advanced adenoma receiving a MUC1 vaccine compared with a placebo were significantly more likely to develop an immune response at week 12, confirming the vaccine’s immunogenicity, and to respond again at week 55 to a booster injection on week 52, confirming the vaccine’s ability to elicit immune memory. Follow-up colonoscopy to evaluate the vaccine’s potential to lower adenomatous polyp recurrence rates are in progress. Citation Format: Olivera J. Finn, Lisa Boardman, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Ajay Bansal, David Kastenberg, Chin Hurr, Sharon Kaufman, Colleen Akerley, Lynda Dzubinski, April Felt, Karrie Fursa, L.M. Rodriguez, Ellen Richmond, Asad Umar, Eva Szabo, John McKolanis, Ryan McMurray, Nathan Foster, Andres Salazar, Paul Limburg, Robert Schoen. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of preventative MUC1 vaccine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced adenomas: Results from one-year booster [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT236.

Abstract Background: Immunotherapy targeting tumor-associated antigens aberrantly expressed on colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps offers the potential for a relatively non-invasive and non-toxic prevention strategy, and because of the specificity of the immune response and its long-term memory, the potential for prolonged protection. In a double-blind randomized trial in patients with a diagnosis of advanced colorectal adenomas within the previous year, we are evaluating MUC1 vaccine with the TLR-3 agonist polyICLC (Hiltonol®) as an adjuvant, for its immunogenicity and effect on colorectal adenoma recurrence at follow up colonoscopy. Aim: We report on a primary endpoint, MUC1 immunogenicity at week 12 (following vaccine or placebo administration at 0, 2, and 10 weeks), and on determinants of the immune response and vaccine toxicity. Methods: Subjects with an advanced adenoma (defined as ≥1cm, tubulovillous or villous histology, or with HGD) were randomized. Response to the vaccine was assessed by monitoring IgG anti-MUC1 antibody titer ratio; defined as t12/t0, where t0 is the initial titer measured prior to vaccination, and t12 is the titer drawn at 12 weeks. A ratio of 2.0 was used as the primary definition of a significant immune response. T Regulatory and myleoid derived suppressor cell (MDSC) levels at baseline were assessed in relation to vaccine response. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Results: 102 subjects were randomized at 6 centers, 52 received MUC1 vaccine and 50 placebo. Subjects had a mean age of 59.4±7.0 (range 40-70) years, 60.8% were male, 88.2% were white, and 18.6% Hispanic or Latino. At 12 weeks the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 13/52 (25%) of patients receiving vaccine (ratio range 2.9-17.3), vs. 0/50 in placebo group (P=.0001), and was ≥1.5 in 19/52 (36.5%) of patients receiving vaccine compared to 1/50 (2%) in placebo group (P<.0001). In the vaccinated group, the IgG ratio was ≥2.0 in 45% of women (9/20) vs. 12.5% of men (4/32) (P=0.009) and ≥1.5 in 55% of women (11/20) vs. 25% of men (8/32) (P=0.03). In the vaccinated group, reduced levels of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) pre-vaccination were associated with response, 0.2±0.1 among responders (n=13) vs. 0.8±1.1 among non-responders (N=39) (p=0.0006) whereas monocytic MDSC and T regulatory cells (CD4+CD25, Foxp3) were not. There were no grade 3 adverse events (AE) possibly or probably related to the vaccine. The most common AE was an injection site reaction (grade 1 or 2) which occurred in 80.8% (n=42/52) in vaccine group vs. 6.0% in the placebo group (3/50). Conclusions: Subjects with an advanced adenoma receiving MUC1 vaccine compared with a placebo are significantly more likely to develop an anti-IgG MUC1 immune response at 12 weeks. Women and subjects with lower circulating PMN-MDSC levels at baseline were more likely to respond. The vaccine was well tolerated. Follow up for the effect of the vaccine on adenomatous polyp recurrence is ongoing. Citation Format: Robert E. Schoen, Lisa A. Boardman, Marcia Cruz-Correa, Ajay Bansal, Pamela L. Beatty, David Kastenberg, Chin Hur, Lynda Dzubinski, Luz Rodriguez, Andres Salazar, John McKolanis, Drew Seisler, Nathan R. Foster, May-Yin Polley, Paul J. Limburg, Olivera J. Finn. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled immunoprevention trial with MUC1 vaccine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced adenomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-305.

ABSTRACTThe rapid increase and poor survival of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) have led to significant efforts to promote early detection. Given that the premalignant lesion of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the major known risk factor for EAC, multiple investigators have studied biomarker signatures that can predict malignant progression of BE to EAC. MicroRNAs, a novel class of gene regulators, are small non‐coding RNAs and have been associated with carcinogenesis. MicroRNAs are ideal biomarkers because of their remarkable stability in fixed tissues, a common method for collection of clinical specimens, and in blood either within exosomes or as microRNA‐protein complexes. Multiple studies show potential of microRNAs as tissue and blood biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of EAC but the results need confirmation in prospective studies. Although head‐to‐head comparisons are lacking, microRNA panels require less genes than messenger RNA panels for diagnosis of EAC in BE. MicroRNA diagnostic panels will need to be compared for accuracy against global measures of genome instability that were recently shown to be good predictors of progression but require sophisticated analytic techniques. Early studies on blood microRNA panels are promising but have found microRNA markers to be inconsistent among studies. MicroRNA expression in blood is different between various microRNA sub‐compartments such as exosomes and microRNA‐protein complexes and could affect blood microRNA measurements. Further standardization is needed to yield consistent results. We have summarized the current understanding of the tissue and blood microRNA signatures that may predict the development and progression of EAC. J. Cell. Biochem. 117: 1288–1295, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.