Back to Authors

Sharma, Pragya

0000-0001-6405-7872

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

B-291 Validation of a Simple Qualitative Immunoassay for 21 Drugs of Abuse in Meconium on a Single Biochip Array
Lahr, Richard G. , Lightfoot, Alison, Langman, L, Jannetto, Paul J. , Sharma, Pragya

Clinical Chemistry | October 2, 2024 | Volume: 70 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.648 Get It

Abstract Background Drugs use during pregnancy is a major social and medical issue, which may lead to significant pre- and post-natal complications, such as preterm birth and newborn mortality. Exposed newborns may have long-term behavioral, cognitive, and developmental problems. Accurate detection of in utero drug exposure is crucial for timely medical intervention for the newborn and the mother. Meconium is the ‘gold standard' matrix for detection of drugs in newborn which reflects drug exposure during pregnancy. This study aims to develop and optimize a clinical assay for simultaneous screening of 21 drugs in meconium using a custom biochip array. Methods Custom biochip array (Randox Laboratories Ltd.) included 21 discrete test regions (DTRs) for amphetamine, methamphetamine, opioids/opiates (targeting morphine, oxymorphone, oxycodone, hydrocodone, 6-monoacetyl morphine, tramadol, buprenorphine, fentanyl, and methadone), phencyclidine (PCP), cocaine (targeting benzoylecgonine), benzodiazepines (targeting oxazepam, lorazepam, and clonazepam), zolpidem, barbiturates (targeting phenobarbital), ethyl glucuronide, methylphenidate, and marijuana metabolite (targeting Delta-9-Carboxy-Tetrahydrocannabinol [THC-COOH]). Patient samples were obtained from the residual meconium samples that had been previously used for other tests. Blank meconium samples were spiked at in-house cutoff, negative and positive assay control levels. All samples were extracted in specimen diluent using Biotage® Lysera and centrifuged. The supernatant was analyzed on a fully automated Randox Evidence+® Analyzer. A robotic arm pipetted 60 µL sample on to a biochip and then the analyzer performed a competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay. The results were generated as relative light units (RLUs). Results The sample results were determined to be “positive” or “negative” based on average RLU of cutoff controls for each analyte on an assay. The intra-assay (CV ≤ 15%) and inter-assay (CV ≤ 18%) precision was 100% agreement for positive and negative controls and there was no observed carryover for any of the analytes. The sample recovery was excellent with minimal to no matrix suppression for all analytes. Accuracy was performed by comparing spiked analyte results from Randox Evidence+® Analyzer with the expected results and all the spiked samples matched (positive or negative). When authentic patient or spiked results were compared with external laboratory test results, some discordant results were obtained. However, the discrepancies could be explained based on the different cutoffs (e.g., the Randox assay had lower cutoffs) or the known assay cross reactivities within the analytes of same class. These deviations did not affect clinical utility of the assay. Conclusions We validated a novel and simple qualitative chemiluminescent immunoassay in meconium using a custom biochip array. Unlike other routine screening/ELISA methods, which require separate assays for detection of similar drug targets, the custom biochip array offers a convenient, rapid and efficient method that utilizes only a single sample preparation for the screening of all 21 drug targets. Therefore, this technology has potential to be utilized as high-throughput screening assay. Like all qualitative assays, the limitation of this test is that all positive results will need to be assessed quantitatively for a definitive interpretation.
Characterization of the alcohol biomarker phosphatidylethanol in donor whole blood and apheresis red blood cells: Implications for transfusion recipients
Kinard, Theresa N. , Alegria, Kathy N., Langman, Loralie J., Jannetto, Paul J. , Snozek, Christine L.H. , Sharma, Pragya, Sharma, Pragya

Transfusion | July 9, 2024 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1617-1622

10.1111/trf.17942 Get It

AbstractIntroductionPhosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a long‐term marker of alcohol consumption used frequently in clinical scenarios such as liver transplant evaluation. Recent cases have demonstrated that packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion creates the potential for artificial elevation or decrease of observed PEth concentrations in recipients. Very little is known about the prevalence or stability of PEth in pRBCs.MethodsApheresis and whole‐blood (WB) donations were tested for PEth using liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry with limit of quantitation 10 ng/mL. Units were stored under routine blood bank conditions to evaluate the stability of PEth and the impact of irradiation.ResultsOver 40% of apheresis and WB donors had PEth ≥10 ng/mL (maximum observed 587 ng/mL). As WB units were processed into component pRBCs, PEth concentrations increased and were higher than donor WB levels (EDTA sample) prior to collection (maximum observed 711 ng/mL). Storage for up to 5 weeks post donation resulted in mean 17.3% decrease in PEth‐positive units; in contrast to a prior report, we observed no PEth formation in units with negative (<10 ng/mL) baseline concentrations. Irradiation of pRBCs did not substantially affect PEth concentrations in either PEth‐positive or PEth‐negative units.DiscussionPEth concentrations in healthy blood donors may potentially confound alcohol use or abstinence assessment in pRBC recipients. Transfusion medicine services and clinical practices such as transplantation and behavioral medicine should recognize this phenomenon and collaborate on testing protocols to appropriately interpret PEth in pRBC recipients.