Back to Authors

Levesque, Marc C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7398-5136

Mayo Clinic

Duke Medical Center

Citations 2

Family-Associated Monoclonal B Lymphocytosis Is Commonly Oligoclonal and Expresses Markers Associated with Adverse Risk in CLL
Lanasa, Mark C., Camp, Nicola J. , Rassenti, Laura Z., Gockerman, Jon P., Goodman, Barbara K. , Strom, Sara S., Call, Timothy G. , Leis, José F., Goldin, Lynn R. , Marti, Gerald E., Weinberg, J. Brice , Caporaso, Neil E. , Levesque, Marc C. , Allgood, Sallie D. , Slager, Susan L. , Spector, Logan G. , Kay, Neil E. , Volkheimer, Alicia D. , Cerhan, James R.

Blood | April 18, 2020 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 3144-3144

10.1182/blood.v112.11.3144.3144 Get It

Abstract Background and Significance : Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most heritable hematologic malignancy; however, no common CLL predisposition genes are known. Monoclonal B lymphocytosis (MBL) is a hematologic syndrome characterized by small accumulations of B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. MBL has a CLL-like immunophenotype, may progress to overt CLL, and is over represented in CLL families. Therefore, MBL observed in the context of familial CLL may be a marker of inherited risk for development of CLL. Detailed characterization of family-associated MBL may also provide mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis of familial CLL. Our strategy was to detail the biologic characteristics of CLL in family-associated MBL. Methods : Persons with MBL were identified by flow cytometric screening of peripheral blood from unaffected members of CLL kindreds ascertained by Genetic Epidemiology of CLL Consortium (GEC) sites. Flow cytometry was used to determine the surface immunophenotype including CD38 and intracellular ZAP-70. We defined MBL as populations of CD19+, CD5+, CD20lo, CD23+ B cells that comprised at least 2% of the CD19+ peripheral B cell compartment and did not exceed 5.0 × 109 MBL cells/L. RNA and genomic DNA from single MBL cells isolated by flow cytometric sorting were analyzed using PCR to determine immunoglobulin heavy and light chain sequences. MBL cells were sorted in bulk for FISH for loci associated with clinical CLL. Results : Twenty-two out of 190 (12%) unaffected family members were found to have MBL. We observed significant variability in the size of the MBL clone as a percentage of the CD19+ B cell compartment (mean 32%; range 2%–97%). Nonetheless, the absolute size of the MBL clone was small, 15 of 17 individuals had < 200 × 106 MBL cells/L. CD38 expression (defined as CD38 surface expression in ≥30% of MBL cells) was observed in 8 of 18 subjects tested. ZAP-70 (defined as intracellular expression in ≥ 20% of MBL cells) was expressed in 4 of 12 participants. Among 12 subjects tested, 5 MBL expressed both surface IgD and IgM, 3 expressed IgD only, 2 expressed IgM only, and 2 did not express IgD or IgM. Analysis of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains has been completed in 8 individuals. Both immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IgVH) region mutated (n = 12) and unmutated (n = 4) sequences were observed. Four of 8 individuals had 2 or more unrelated MBL clones (range 2–5), including one individual with both unmutated and mutated clones. Among the 16 MBL clones identified in these 8 subjects, VH3 or VH4 rearrangements were observed in all MBL clones. The most commonly rearranged IgVH genes were 3–07 (3 MBL clones), 3–15 (3), and 4–34 (3). No VH1 family gene rearrangements were observed. In one individual, a VH3–07 MBL clone showed intraclonal diversification suggestive of antigen driven immunoglobulin sequence changes. Twenty productive light chain rearrangements were identified among the 16 MBL clones, with 11 Vλ and 9 Vκ genes used. We observed 6 productive rearrangements of Vλ1–51. MBL cells were bulk sorted for FISH from 9 subjects. Mono or biallelic deletion of 13q14.3 was observed in 5 subjects, the other 4 were normal. Conclusions : Our findings confirm that MBL is commonly observed among the unaffected family members from CLL kindreds. We found that some MBL clones express ZAP-70, CD38 or have unmutated IgVH genes and thus are similar to clinical CLL. The clinical outcome of these MBL clones in relation to our baseline prognostic characterization will be of interest. Small MBL clones are commonly oligoclonal. Importantly, although the immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes rearranged in these MBL clones are all commonly used in CLL, the absence of VH1 and abundance of Vλ1–51 rearrangements do suggests differences in BCR usage between CLL and MBL. Further investigation of family associated MBL may clarify the genetics and immunobiology of familial CLL.
Predictors of Clinical Improvement in Rituximab‐Treated Refractory Adult and Juvenile Dermatomyositis and Adult Polymyositis
Bandos, Andriy I. , Reed, Ann M. , Ascherman, Dana P. , Miller, Frederick W. , Rider, Lisa G. , Harris‐Love, Michael O. , Levesque, Marc C. , Group, the RIM Study, Oddis, Chester V., Aggarwal, Rohit , Barohn, Richard J. , Feldman, Brian Michael , Group, the RIM Study, Oddis, Chester V.

Arthritis & Rheumatology | November 18, 2013 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 740-749

10.1002/art.38270 Get It

Objective To identify the clinical and laboratory predictors of clinical improvement in a cohort of myositis patients treated with rituximab. Methods We analyzed data for 195 patients with myositis (75 with adult polymyositis [PM], 72 with adult dermatomyositis [DM], and 48 with juvenile DM) in the Rituximab in Myositis trial. Clinical improvement was defined as 20% improvement in at least 3 of the following 6 core set measures of disease activity: physician's and patient's/parent's global assessment of disease activity, manual muscle testing, physical function, muscle enzymes, and extramuscular disease activity. We analyzed the association of the following baseline variables with improvement: myositis clinical subgroup, demographics, myositis damage, clinical and laboratory parameters, core set measures, rituximab treatment, and myositis autoantibodies (antisynthetase, anti–Mi‐2, anti–signal recognition particle, anti–transcription intermediary factor 1γ [TIF‐1γ], anti‐MJ, other autoantibodies, and no autoantibodies). All measures were univariately assessed for association with improvement using time‐to‐event analyses. A multivariable time‐dependent proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association of individual predictive factors with improvement. Results In the final multivariable model, the presence of an antisynthetase, primarily anti–Jo‐1 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.08, P < 0.01), anti–Mi‐2 (HR 2.5, P < 0.01), or other autoantibody (HR 1.4, P = 0.14) predicted a shorter time to improvement compared to the absence of autoantibodies. A lower physician's global assessment of damage (HR 2.32, P = 0.02) and juvenile DM (versus adult myositis) (HR 2.45, P = 0.01) also predicted improvement. Unlike autoantibody status, the predictive effect of physician's global assessment of damage and juvenile DM diminished by week 20. Rituximab treatment did not affect these associations. Conclusion Our findings indicate that the presence of antisynthetase and anti–Mi‐2 autoantibodies, juvenile DM subset, and lower disease damage strongly predict clinical improvement in patients with refractory myositis.