Barajas-Gamboa, Juan Sebastian

Background: Body contouring is an increasingly common trend in aesthetic plastic surgery. In the pursuit of ideal body proportions, anterior thoracic cage deformities, especially lower rib cartilage prominence have emerged as a frequent source of dissatisfaction. To address this concern, the anterior aesthetic rib cage remodeling with osteosynthesis (ARCO) technique was developed as an innovative method to reshape the anterior rib cage. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Colombia on patients who underwent the ARCO procedure. Preoperative and postoperative rib cage perimeter measurements were recorded. Spirometry was performed preoperatively and during long-term follow-up to assess potential changes in respiratory volumes. Intraoperative peak pressure and pulmonary compliance values were monitored to evaluate procedural safety. Postoperative satisfaction was assessed using the BODY-Q questionnaire, and all complications were documented. Results: A total of 34 patients were included, with a mean age of 34 years. A significant reduction in the inferior rib cage perimeter at the level of the eighth rib was observed (Mann-Whitney U =190, P < 0.001), with a mean decrease of 2 cm. Intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure and pulmonary compliance remained stable across all procedural stages. Spirometric analyses revealed no restrictive changes in respiratory volumes. Conclusions: The ARCO technique offers an effective approach for reducing chest circumference and enhancing the aesthetic contour of the anterior rib margin while achieving high patient satisfaction. It involves a controlled greenstick fracture followed by osteosynthesis to create a stable and natural rib curvature, reducing the risk of malunion and eliminating the need for postoperative corsets.

Introduction: The safety of conversional bariatric procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for weight recurrence (WR) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) is debated due to limited evidence. Conversion options include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). We aimed to compare serious complications and mortality rates between these procedures within 30 days. Methods: Using the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, we identified patients who underwent a conversion from SG to RYGB, SADI, or BPD-DS. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of 30-day complications and mortality. Results: Among 7388 patients (77.6% RYGB, 8.7% SADI, 13.7% BPD-DS), those undergoing SADI and BPD-DS had higher preoperative body mass index. Conversion reasons included WR (63.0%) and IWL (37.0%). SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative times (p < 0.001) and higher leak rates (p = 0.001). Serious complications, reoperations, readmissions, and 30-day mortality were similar across groups. Conversion procedure type was not an independent predictor of complications. Conclusion: RYGB was the most performed conversional procedure after SG. The study indicated a similar safety profile for revisional RYGB, SADI, and BPD-DS, with comparable 30-day complications and mortality rates. However, SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative time and higher leak rates.