Flórez, Silvia Juliana Villabona

Background: Rib remodeling, particularly targeting ribs 11 and 12, is gaining popularity in aesthetic body contouring to reduce waist circumference. Although rib manipulation techniques have been applied in other surgical fields, their use in plastic surgery has focused on achieving aesthetic goals. This study investigates the complications associated with rib remodeling techniques to enhance waistline contouring. Methods: A global cross-sectional survey was conducted among board-certified plastic surgeons who perform rib remodeling. Data from 2351 patient records (2018–2024) were collected, including demographic details, surgical information, and complications. Rib remodeling techniques assessed included surgical greenstick fracture modification and osteosynthesis. Results: The overall complication rate was 3.7% (86 of 2351 patients). Hyperpigmentation (17.4%), nonconsolidation (15.1%), burns (12.7%), and corset-related pressure ulcers (12.7%) were the most common complications. Major complications such as pneumothorax were rare (0.17%) and occurred only in RibXcar cases. Rib extraction/removal techniques had no reported complications, whereas Riboss had the lowest complication rate (1.96%) due to the use of osteosynthesis material for fracture stabilization. Conclusions: The incidence of complications related to the rib remodeling procedures in our study was 3.7%. However, some procedure-related complications—such as pneumothorax and hemothorax—can pose serious risks to the patient’s life. Nevertheless, when performed by a well-trained surgeon with an adequate learning curve, these procedures can be considered safe.

Background: Body contouring is an increasingly common trend in aesthetic plastic surgery. In the pursuit of ideal body proportions, anterior thoracic cage deformities, especially lower rib cartilage prominence have emerged as a frequent source of dissatisfaction. To address this concern, the anterior aesthetic rib cage remodeling with osteosynthesis (ARCO) technique was developed as an innovative method to reshape the anterior rib cage. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Colombia on patients who underwent the ARCO procedure. Preoperative and postoperative rib cage perimeter measurements were recorded. Spirometry was performed preoperatively and during long-term follow-up to assess potential changes in respiratory volumes. Intraoperative peak pressure and pulmonary compliance values were monitored to evaluate procedural safety. Postoperative satisfaction was assessed using the BODY-Q questionnaire, and all complications were documented. Results: A total of 34 patients were included, with a mean age of 34 years. A significant reduction in the inferior rib cage perimeter at the level of the eighth rib was observed (Mann-Whitney U =190, P < 0.001), with a mean decrease of 2 cm. Intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure and pulmonary compliance remained stable across all procedural stages. Spirometric analyses revealed no restrictive changes in respiratory volumes. Conclusions: The ARCO technique offers an effective approach for reducing chest circumference and enhancing the aesthetic contour of the anterior rib margin while achieving high patient satisfaction. It involves a controlled greenstick fracture followed by osteosynthesis to create a stable and natural rib curvature, reducing the risk of malunion and eliminating the need for postoperative corsets.

Background: Rib cage remodeling has shown promising aesthetic results as a new technique for body contouring, and yet risks and complications associated with the procedure have not been well established. The aim of the authors’ study was to assess safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction rate associated with a new surgical technique for waistline definition. Methods: The authors looked into their records for patients who underwent waist narrowing through a new rib remodeling procedure with osteosynthesis of ribs XI and XII from October of 2022 to June of 2023. Follow-up was carried out at 1 and 3 months after surgery. Outcomes were evaluated based on waist and hip measurements, body image, pain, and a patient satisfaction survey. Results: A total of 27 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. The authors’ technique resulted in a significant reduction in waist circumference, as evidenced by a decrease of 12.1 cm and 13.0 cm at the first and third months, respectively ( P < 0.005). A reduction of hip circumference of 6.2 cm and 8.7 cm at the first and third months, respectively, was also reported. A high patient satisfaction rate was reported. Postoperative complications included only 1 case of wound dehiscence and 1 case of mild pain. Pain levels were also reduced, with a mean pain score of 2.4 at week 1 and 0.26 at month 1. Conclusions: Rib osteotomy with osteosynthesis emerges as an innovative, safe, and reliable approach for waist narrowing. The authors’ results suggest that this technique can be applied to a wide variety of patients, and it might entail significant advantages compared with other techniques. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Background: High-definition liposculpture allowed plastic surgeons to achieve better aesthetic results by carving the underlying muscles and contours in a new way. Several authors have improved the original technique by adding other procedures and new technologies. We designed a new improvement by incorporating bone transformation surgery to overcome the lack of silhouette at the waist and, as a result, optimize the breast-waist-hip ratios. Methods: We carried out a prospective multicenter study, with five different surgeons performing the same rib remodeling technique for waist definition. We used an ultrasonic piece for costal corticotomy and real-time ultrasound imaging to perform green-stick fractures over the last two or three floating ribs. Ours is a new technique based on the prior one described by Kudzaev. Results: We reported 131 consecutive patients who were enrolled in this study. Waistline diameter decreased an average of 8 cm after surgery ( P < 0.05). Most patients were women (n = 125, 95.4%). No major complications were reported. Most common complication was prolonged pain, with only three cases of contour asymmetry, all of which were attributable to noncompliance of constantly wearing the corset + compressive garments. Patients reported a high satisfaction rate and fast recovery (Body-QoL survey). Conclusions: Ultrasonic- and ultrasound- assisted indentation surgery of the thorax is a safe and reliable technique for waistline definition, with a high satisfaction rate, almost-invisible scars, and minimal risk for complications. Incorporation of high-definition liposculpture to rib remodeling opens up a new horizon for bone structure modification surgery (S-high-definition remodeling) that can be safely performed for patients who seek better aesthetic outcomes in body contouring.