Hamilton, Erika

3519 Background: An understanding of the mechanisms of acquired resistance to CDK4 & 6 inhibitors, either alone or with endocrine therapy (ET), is an unmet need. Abemaciclib is a CDK4 & 6 inhibitor approved for treatment of HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC). Here we evaluated acquired genomic alterations detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients (pts) treated with abemaciclib + nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) or placebo + AI in MONARCH 3 or abemaciclib monotherapy in nextMONARCH 1. Methods: MONARCH 3 randomized postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC with no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting to abemaciclib (150 mg Q12H) or placebo + AI. nextMONARCH 1 randomized women with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on or after prior ET and CT to abemaciclib (150 mg Q12H) + tamoxifen, abemaciclib (150 mg Q12H), or abemaciclib (200 mg Q12H) + loperamide. Plasma from pts in the abemaciclib or placebo + AI arms (MONARCH 3) or abemaciclib monotherapy arms (nextMONARCH 1) was analyzed by the Guardant360 assay to identify potential tumor-related genomic alterations including point mutations, indels, amplifications, and fusions acquired at EOT in comparison with baseline. Results: For MONARCH 3, commonly acquired alterations at EOT included ESR1 (17%), TP53 (10%), EGFR (8%), FGFR1 (7%), and PDGFRA (7%) in the abemaciclib + AI arm, and ESR1 (31%), TP53 (10%), and BRCA1 (7%) in the placebo + AI arm. Acquired alterations more frequent for abemaciclib + AI pts included RB1 (6%), MYC (5%), and AR (5%), compared to 0% in the placebo + AI arm (p = 0.008 RB1; p = 0.015 MYC or AR). In contrast, acquired ESR1 alterations were less frequent with abemaciclib + AI vs placebo + AI (17% vs 31%, p = 0.038). In nextMONARCH 1, the most commonly acquired alterations with abemaciclib monotherapy were in TP53 (10%), EGFR (9%), RB1 (9%), MYC (9%), and MET (8%). In addition, acquired alterations in ESR1 (6%) and AR (3%) were also found. PIK3CA alterations were not frequently acquired (abemaciclib + AI 1%, placebo + AI 6%, abemaciclib monotherapy 5%). Conclusions: Acquired genomic alterations potentially associated with emerging mechanisms of resistance to abemaciclib alone or in combination with AI may include RB1, MYC, or AR alterations, while the acquisition of ESR1 alterations was less common in pts treated with abemaciclib + AI compared to placebo + AI. These findings are hypothesis-generating and provide insight into mechanisms of resistance to abemaciclib vs ET. Clinical trial information: NCT02246621, NCT02747004 .

Abstract Background: Niraparib is a selective poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor that has demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in combination with a programmed cell death 1 inhibitor, with the greatest clinical activity seen in tumors with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. Pharmacologically, niraparib has demonstrated a wide volume of distribution and high cell membrane permeability. In breast and ovarian cancer xenograft mouse models, niraparib achieved tumor exposures that were 3.3 times greater than plasma exposure. The objective of this study is to evaluate the antitumor activity of single-agent niraparib in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with localized, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. The relative concentration of niraparib in tumor versus plasma was also assessed. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, with HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated (germline or somatic) resectable breast cancer with a tumor size of ≥1 cm who had not received prior treatment for the current malignancy. Patients received niraparib 200 mg once daily for 2 months. At the end of 2 months, at their treating physician’s discretion, patients proceeded directly to surgery, received additional cycles of niraparib (maximum of 6 months), or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was tumor response rate measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after 2 months of treatment. Response was defined as a ≥30% reduction in tumor volume from baseline. Secondary endpoints included tumor response rate measured by ultrasound, quantified percent change in tumor volume measured by MRI or ultrasound, pathological complete response, and safety and tolerability. Additionally, niraparib concentrations were measured in tumor and plasma samples using qualified liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. As of June 2019, 18 patients had both an MRI and ultrasound scan at the end of month 2 and were evaluable for response. Ten patients are currently on treatment. The median age of patients was 43 years (range, 21-73). Fourteen patients had a BRCA1 mutation, 6 patients had a BRCA2 mutation, and 1 patient had both. Fifteen patients had TNBC, and 6 patients had hormone receptor-positive disease. All 18 response-evaluable patients had a clinical response after 2 months of treatment by at least one imaging modality; no patient experienced disease progression. Tumor response rate measured by MRI after 2 months of treatment was 89% (n/N = 16/18). Results measured by ultrasound were similar, with a 94% response rate at cycle 2 (n/N = 17/18). The median percent decrease in tumor volume after 2 months of treatment was 88% (range, 26-100%) and 89% (range, 23-100%) as measured by MRI and ultrasound, respectively. In the 5 samples measured thus far, niraparib concentrations in tumor biopsies after 2 months of treatment ranged from approximately 4-131-fold higher than those in corresponding plasma samples. Efficacy and tumor concentration data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were nausea, fatigue, anemia, insomnia, and decreased appetite. The only drug-related grade ≥3 toxicity in ≥10% of patients was anemia (3 patients). Three patients had a dose reduction due to a TEAE; no patient discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. Conclusion: Niraparib was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with localized HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Niraparib achieved 4-131-fold higher concentrations in tumor than in plasma. Clinical trial information: NCT03329937. Funding: TESARO: A GSK Company (Waltham, MA, USA) sponsored the study. Citation Format: Hyo Han, Minetta C Liu, Erika Hamilton, Hanna Irie, Cesar A Santa-Maria, James Reeves, Andre Liem, Adrianna Milillo Naraine, Julie Nangia, David Page, Meghan Duncan, Ming Shan, Yongqiang Tang, Julie R Graham, Leif W Ellisen, Steven Isakoff, Laura Spring. Pilot neoadjuvant study of niraparib in HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated resectable breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-03.

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered to patients with operable breast cancer to downstage the tumor to allow for less extensive surgery and to provide prognostic information about drug efficacy and risk of disease recurrence. Patients who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment have a more favorable outcome than patients with residual invasive disease. Single-agent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have clinical efficacy in BRCA-mutated breast cancer. Niraparib, a potent and selective PARP1/2 inhibitor, is approved for maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and has demonstrated strong antitumor activity in in vivo studies with BRCA1-mutant breast cancer. The objective of this study is to evaluate the antitumor activity of single-agent niraparib in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with localized, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, BRCAmut breast cancer. Trial Design: This is an open-label, single-arm pilot study with a target enrollment of 20 evaluable patients. Eligible patients are those ≥18 years old with histologically-confirmed HER2-negative localized breast cancer and either a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (germline or somatic) and no prior anti-cancer therapies for the current malignancy. Patients will receive 200 mg of oral niraparib once daily for 2 months, after which they may either proceed directly to surgery or receive chemotherapy at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoint is tumor response rate based on the change in tumor volume as measured by breast MRI after 2 months of treatment with niraparib; a response is defined as ≥30% reduction of tumor volume from baseline. Secondary endpoints include pCR rate, tumor response rate based on the change in tumor volume as measured by breast ultrasound, and safety and tolerability. Data will be summarized in a descriptive nature by frequency distributions (number and percentage of patients) for categorical variables and by the mean, median, and standard deviation for continuous variables. Tumor response rate will be tabulated together with its 95% binomial exact confidence interval. Funding: TESARO, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA sponsored the study. Citation Format: Han H, Hamilton E, Irie H, Isakoff S, Jelovac D, Liem A, Liu MC, Milillo A, Nangia J, Page D, Reeves J, Santa-Maria C, Duncan M, Graham JR, Chen J, Dezube BJ, Spring L. Open-label, single-arm study evaluating the antitumor activity and safety of niraparib as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with localized, HER2-negative, BRCA-mutant breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-03-01.

Abstract Purpose: Basal-like breast tumors are typically (ER/PR/HER2) triple-negative and are associated with a high incidence of brain metastases and poor clinical outcomes. The molecular chaperone αB-crystallin is predominantly expressed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and contributes to an aggressive tumor phenotype in preclinical models. We investigated the potential role of αB-crystallin in brain metastasis in TNBCs. Experimental Design: αB-crystallin expression in primary breast carcinomas and brain metastases was analyzed by immunohistochemistry among patients with breast cancer with brain metastases. αB-crystallin was overexpressed or silenced in two different TNBC cell lines. The effects on cell adhesion to human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMEC) or extracellular matrix proteins, transendothelial migration, and transmigration across a HBMEC/astrocyte coculture blood–brain barrier (BBB) model were examined. In addition, the effects of overexpressing or silencing αB-crystallin on brain metastasis in vivo were investigated using orthotopic TNBC models. Results: In a cohort of women with breast cancer brain metastasis, αB-crystallin expression in primary breast carcinomas was associated with poor overall survival and poor survival after brain metastasis, even among patients with TNBC. Stable overexpression of αB-crystallin in TNBC cells enhanced adhesion to HBMECs, transendothelial migration, and BBB transmigration in vitro, whereas silencing αB-crystallin inhibited these events. αB-crystallin promoted adhesion of TNBC cells to HBMECs, at least in part, through an α3β1 integrin–dependent mechanism. αB-crystallin overexpression promoted brain metastasis, whereas silencing αB-crystallin inhibited brain metastasis in orthotopic TNBC models. Conclusion: αB-crystallin is a novel regulator of brain metastasis in TNBC and represents a potential biomarker and drug target for this aggressive disease. Clin Cancer Res; 20(1); 56–67. ©2013 AACR.