Back to Authors

Surawicz, Christina M.

Mayo Clinic

Dartmouth College

Citations 3

Burnout Among US Gastroenterologists and Fellows in Training
Anderson, Joseph C. , Burke, Carol A. , Gaidos, Jill , López, Rocío González, Surawicz, Christina M., Burke, Carol A , Bilal, Mohammad , Lopez, Rocio, Oxentenko, Amy S.

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology | December 7, 2022 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1063-1069

10.1097/mcg.0000000000001781 Get It

Background: Consequences of physician burnout include medical errors, higher rate of staff turnover, and decreased patient satisfaction. We examined the prevalence of burnout and identified the contributing factors in gastroenterologists and fellows in training. Methods: We performed 3 separate surveys through the American College of Gastroenterology. (1) A national survey of practicing gastroenterologists in the United States that measured burnout and contributing factors, (2) a survey of gastroenterology fellows in training to determine self-identified burnout, as well as mitigating and exacerbating factors, and (3) a follow-up survey of fellows during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: One thousand and twenty-one persons responded (9.2% response rate) to the first survey, including 756 individuals who completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory survey. Overall, the prevalence of high burnout was 49.3%. Factors associated with high burnout included female sex, younger age, shorter duration in practice, considering the electronic health record non–user-friendly, 2 or more hours of patient-related work at home per day, 8 or more hours of outpatient time per day, 6 or more inpatient consults per day, taking call with procedures 10 or more times per year, and having children at home. With regard to lifestyle factors, taking 20 days or more of vacation time was associated with a lower rate of burnout. The level of burnout for fellows was observed to be high (42.7% in survey 2 and 35.3% in survey 3). Conclusions: Burnout is high in gastroenterologists and fellows in training. Specific contributing factors were both systems based and personal and provide insight into changes that can be made to address burnout.
S1274 A National Survey of Burnout Among Gastroenterology Fellows in the United States
Bull-Henry, Kathy, Kane, Sunanda V. , Keswani, Rajesh N. , Surawicz, Christina M., Bilal, Mohammad , Barnes, Edward L. , Burke, Carol A. , Anderson, Joseph C.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 24, 2020 | Volume: 115 | Issue: 1 | Pages: S639-S639

10.14309/01.ajg.0000707144.37368.d1 Get It

Gastro 2013 APDW/WCOG Shanghai Working Party Report: Chronic diarrhea: Definition, classification, diagnosis
Schiller, Lawrence R. , Pardi, Darrell S. , Spiller, Robert E. , Semrad, Carol E. , Surawicz, Christina M., Giannella, Ralph A., Krejs, Guenter J. , Farthing, Michael J.G., Sellin, Joseph H., Spiller, Robin

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | October 12, 2013 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 6-25

10.1111/jgh.12392 Get It

AbstractDiarrhea is best defined as passage of loose stools often with more frequent bowel movements. For clinical purposes, theBristolStoolFormScale works well to distinguish stool form and to identify loose stools. Laboratory testing of stool consistency has lagged behind. Acute diarrhea is likely to be due to infection and to be self‐limited. As diarrhea becomes chronic, it is less likely to be due to infection; duration of 1 month seems to work well as a cut‐off for chronic diarrhea, but detailed scientific knowledge is missing about the utility of this definition. In addition to duration of diarrhea, classifications by presenting scenario, by pathophysiology, and by stool characteristics (e.g. watery, fatty, or inflammatory) may help the canny clinician refine the differential diagnosis of chronic diarrhea. In this regard, a careful history remains the essential part of the evaluation of a patient with diarrhea. Imaging the intestine with endoscopy and radiographic techniques is useful, and biopsy of the small intestine and colon for histological assessment provides key diagnostic information. Endomicroscopy and molecular pathology are only now being explored for the diagnosis of chronic diarrhea. Interest in the microbiome of the gut is increasing; aside from a handful of well‐described infections because of pathogens, little is known about alterations in the microbiome in chronic diarrhea. Serological tests have well‐defined roles in the diagnosis of celiac disease but have less clearly defined application in autoimmune enteropathies and inflammatory bowel disease. Measurement of peptide hormones is of value in the diagnosis and management of endocrine tumors causing diarrhea, but these are so rare that these tests are of little value in screening because there will be many more false‐positives than true‐positive results. Chemical analysis of stools is of use in classifying chronic diarrhea and may limit the differential diagnosis that must be considered, but interpretation of the results is still evolving. Breath tests for assessment of carbohydrate malabsorption, small bowel bacterial overgrowth, and intestinal transit are fraught with technical limitations that decrease sensitivity and specificity. Likewise, tests of bile acid malabsorption have had limited utility beyond empirical trials of bile acid sequestrants.