Spiller, Robin

AbstractIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a gut‐brain disorder in which symptoms are shaped by serotonin acting centrally and peripherally. The serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4 has been implicated in IBS pathophysiology, but the underlying genetic mechanisms remain unclear. We sequenced the alternative P2 promoter driving intestinal SLC6A4 expression and identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were associated with IBS in a discovery sample. Identified SNPs built different haplotypes, and the tagging SNP rs2020938 seems to associate with constipation‐predominant IBS (IBS‐C) in females. rs2020938 validation was performed in 1978 additional IBS patients and 6,038 controls from eight countries. Meta‐analysis on data from 2,175 IBS patients and 6,128 controls confirmed the association with female IBS‐C. Expression analyses revealed that the P2 promoter drives SLC6A4 expression primarily in the small intestine. Gene reporter assays showed a functional impact of SNPs in the P2 region. In silico analysis of the polymorphic promoter indicated differential expression regulation. Further follow‐up revealed that the major allele of the tagging SNP rs2020938 correlates with differential SLC6A4 expression in the jejunum and with stool consistency, indicating functional relevance. Our data consolidate rs2020938 as a functional SNP associated with IBS‐C risk in females, underlining the relevance of SLC6A4 in IBS pathogenesis.

AbstractBackgroundTo date, genetic‐association studies of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in selected candidate genes with the symptom phenotype of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have typically involved hundreds to 2000 patients. SNPs in immune‐related genes, such as cytokine and cytokine receptor encoding genes, have been reported to associate with IBS risk.MethodsWe conducted two independent case–control studies on 16 SNPs in IL1R1, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL23R, TNFA, and TNFSF15, one from the UK (194 patients and 92 healthy volunteers) and one from the USA (137 patients and 96 healthy volunteers). The main aim was to examine the relationship between inherited immunological diversity and IBS risk in a meta‐analysis which included 12 additional, earlier studies. The meta‐analysis comprised a total of 2894 patients (839 IBS‐C, 1073 IBS‐D, 502 IBS‐M), and 3138 healthy volunteers with self‐reported Caucasian ancestry.Key ResultsThe association of SNP rs4263839 (TNFSF15) was investigated in four studies and confirmed in the meta‐analysis: IBS (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08–1.31), and IBS‐C (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08–1.42). No additional SNPs residing in immunogenes associated with IBS symptom phenotypes.Conclusions & InferencesOur meta‐analysis could not confirm a major role of most investigated SNPs, but a moderate association between rs4263839 TNFSF15 and IBS, in particular IBS‐C. The analysis emphasizes the importance of definition and phenotype homogeneity, adequate study size and representativeness of the patient and control collective.

AbstractDiarrhea is best defined as passage of loose stools often with more frequent bowel movements. For clinical purposes, theBristolStoolFormScale works well to distinguish stool form and to identify loose stools. Laboratory testing of stool consistency has lagged behind. Acute diarrhea is likely to be due to infection and to be self‐limited. As diarrhea becomes chronic, it is less likely to be due to infection; duration of 1 month seems to work well as a cut‐off for chronic diarrhea, but detailed scientific knowledge is missing about the utility of this definition. In addition to duration of diarrhea, classifications by presenting scenario, by pathophysiology, and by stool characteristics (e.g. watery, fatty, or inflammatory) may help the canny clinician refine the differential diagnosis of chronic diarrhea. In this regard, a careful history remains the essential part of the evaluation of a patient with diarrhea. Imaging the intestine with endoscopy and radiographic techniques is useful, and biopsy of the small intestine and colon for histological assessment provides key diagnostic information. Endomicroscopy and molecular pathology are only now being explored for the diagnosis of chronic diarrhea. Interest in the microbiome of the gut is increasing; aside from a handful of well‐described infections because of pathogens, little is known about alterations in the microbiome in chronic diarrhea. Serological tests have well‐defined roles in the diagnosis of celiac disease but have less clearly defined application in autoimmune enteropathies and inflammatory bowel disease. Measurement of peptide hormones is of value in the diagnosis and management of endocrine tumors causing diarrhea, but these are so rare that these tests are of little value in screening because there will be many more false‐positives than true‐positive results. Chemical analysis of stools is of use in classifying chronic diarrhea and may limit the differential diagnosis that must be considered, but interpretation of the results is still evolving. Breath tests for assessment of carbohydrate malabsorption, small bowel bacterial overgrowth, and intestinal transit are fraught with technical limitations that decrease sensitivity and specificity. Likewise, tests of bile acid malabsorption have had limited utility beyond empirical trials of bile acid sequestrants.