King, Rebecca L.

Abstract Twenty percent of patients with follicular lymphoma relapse early with poor outcomes; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying this aggressive behavior are unknown. Using a multiomic approach, we show that patients with follicular lymphoma with elevated IRF4 expression (IRF4hi) have increased transformation risk, dysregulated immune signaling, and a suppressive tumor microenvironment. Loss- and gain-of-function experiments in IRF4hi lymphoma cells, along with chromatin profiling, demonstrate that IRF4 impairs their interaction with T cells by repressing antigen presentation and co-receptor gene modules while promoting the expression of cytokines that antagonize T-follicular helper cell and regulatory T-cell functions. Additionally, IRF4 rewires tumor metabolism and restricts glucose availability to immune cells. Silencing of IRF4 inhibits tumor cell growth and restores immune surveillance mechanisms, thus representing a promising target for therapy. Our data suggest that IRF4hi lymphoma cells co-opt a developmental mechanism used to exit the germinal center response in promoting a more aggressive cancer via engagement of multiple immune-evasive mechanisms. Significance: We show that IRF4 controls immune and metabolic signaling with functional effects on the cross-talk between B and T cells, resulting in a suppressive immune microenvironment when IRF4 is overexpressed in lymphoma. This underscores the importance of IRF4 as a pivotal therapeutic target to restore antitumor immunosurveillance for IRF4-associated lymphomas.

Oncogene expression can cause replication stress (RS), leading to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that require repair through pathways such as homologous recombination, nonhomologous end-joining, and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). Cyclin D1 (encoded by CCND1 ) is a well-known oncoprotein overexpressed in cancer; however, its role in RS is unknown. Using mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as a naturally occurring model of cyclin D1 overexpression, we examined the impact of cyclin D1 on RS and DSB repair mechanisms. Cyclin D1 overexpression elevated RS, increased DNA damage, especially during mitosis, and caused specific upregulation of MMEJ. Furthermore, cyclin D1 activated polymerase theta ( POLQ ) transcription by binding its promoter loci, driving POLΘ-mediated MMEJ that is essential to withstand cyclin D1–induced RS. Moreover, concurrent ATM deficiency further intensified RS, enhanced POLQ expression, and heightened reliance on MMEJ-mediated DNA damage repair. Consequently, inhibition of POLΘ in cyclin D1–overexpressed settings further exacerbated RS, causing single-strand DNA gap accumulations and chromosomal instability, ultimately leading to apoptosis, an effect amplified in ATM-deficient cells. Targeting MMEJ via POLΘ inhibition is therefore an effective strategy in the context of cyclin D1 overexpression and ATM deficiency and may provide a unique therapeutic approach for treating MCL and other malignancies characterized by similar alterations.

Mesenchymal dendritic cell neoplasms represent a distinct category of hematologic malignancies that challenge traditional classifications of histiocytic and classical dendritic/Langerhans cell neoplasms. Historically grouped under the broader umbrella of dendritic cell neoplasms, these entities differ significantly in their ontogeny, histopathologic features, molecular alterations, and clinical behavior. They are categorized into three main subtypes including follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, fibroblastic reticular cell tumor, and EBV-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma/fibroblastic reticular cell tumor. They originate from mesenchymal stromal cells, and genetic alterations activating the NF- κβ pathway are frequent in follicular dendritic cell sarcomas. Immunophenotypic characterization is critical to distinguish these from other hematologic malignancies including histiocytic and classical dendritic/Langerhans cell neoplasms and other solid (non-hematopoietic) cancers. This review recapitulates current knowledge on existing classifications, details their diverse ontogeny from classical dendritic cell neoplasms, and provides insights into their clinicopathologic characteristics to improve diagnostic accuracy. We detail two case studies that demonstrate the challenges involved in the histopathologic diagnosis of these rare tumors, necessitating a comprehensive workup. Integrating developmental biology into practical diagnostic algorithms is essential to improve recognition and classification of these underdiagnosed neoplasms, ultimately guiding timely management.

Abstract Richter transformation (RT) is defined as an aggressive lymphoma emerging in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL). Despite novel therapeutics developed in CLL, RT is associated with poor outcomes. In light of recent progress regarding the diagnostic procedures and therapeutic concepts of RT, an international group of experts, under the coordination of the European Research Initiative on CLL, has developed consensus recommendations for clinical procedures and future research on this disease. Patients with RT typically present with a rapid clinical decline, worsening B-symptoms, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and/or rapidly enlarging lymphadenopathy. Workup should include a positron emission tomography–computed tomography scan for patients with suspected RT. An excisional biopsy should be taken from an accessible lesion, preferably with the highest fluorodeoxyglucose avidity, and analyzed for the presence of aggressive lymphoma. The molecular relationship to the original CLL clone(s) should be defined. Because no effective standard treatment for RT exists, patients should be treated in a clinical trial. Response of both RT and CLL should be assessed at an early time point, and survival end points should be prioritized in trial design. We hope that these recommendations can help to harmonize clinical and translational research and improve outcomes for patients with RT.

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is clinically heterogeneous, and gene expression profiling has identified at least two biologically distinct DLBCL subtypes defined by their cell of origin (COO): germinal center B cell (GCB) and activate B cell (ABC) or non-GCB. We evaluated a variety of putative DLBCL risk factors for etiologic heterogeneity by the COO in a clinic-based study of newly diagnosed DLBCL cases (N = 638) and frequency-matched controls (N = 2,253). Methods: The COO was determined on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue, with DLBCL classified as GCB (N = 283), non-GCB (N = 188), or undetermined/missing (N = 167; mainly because of lack of tissue). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified heterogeneity by the COO for low socioeconomic status (SES), which was only associated with non-GCB DLBCL (OR = 1.88 for low vs. average SES; 95% CI, 1.08–3.27); alcohol use, which was only associated with GCB DLBCL (OR = 0.48 for former drinkers; 95% CI, 0.29–0.80 and OR = 0.47 for current drinkers; 95% CI, 0.32–0.71); and borderline heterogeneity for the regular use of regular/extra-strength aspirin, which was only associated with non-GCB DLBCL (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16–0.85). In contrast, there was no significant heterogeneity by the COO for family history, medical history, or other lifestyle factors. Conclusions: Although requiring confirmation, most risk factors for DLBCL did not show etiologic heterogeneity by the COO, with some notable exceptions including alcohol use, SES, and perhaps regular use of regular/extra-strength aspirin showing associations. Impact: Mechanistically, these findings suggest that most of the DLBCL risk factors evaluated here influence lymphomagenesis prior to differentiation into COO subtypes, with selected factors acting later.

Background: FL3B is the least common among FL subtypes, accounting for 5-10% of cases. Almost half of FL3B tumors have concurrent diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the diagnostic tissue biopsy, while FL3B rarely coexists with FL1-2 or FL3A. Several lines of evidence suggest that FL3B displays distinct biological and clinical characteristics resembling aggressive DLBCL rather than the indolent FL1-3A. Accordingly, DLBCL anthracycline-containing regimens, such as R-CHOP, are the mainstay of therapy for FL3B with or without coexisting DLBCL. However, while some studies show that R-CHOP therapy in FL3B was associated with 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 54%, others report outcomes comparable to FL3A with 79-90% survival. Additional controversy involves the clinical implication of pure FL3B (FL3Bp) vs FL3B with concurrent DLBCL (FL3Bc). Thus, it remains unclear if FL3B clinically resembles DLBCL or lower-grade FL and whether FL3Bp has a different prognosis from FL3Bc. To address these questions, we performed a pooled study of two large prospective multicenter study cohorts to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed FL3B with FL1-2, FL3A and DLBCL patients, all of whom were uniformly treated with frontline R-CHOP. Patients and Methods: Weevaluated 469 newly diagnosed patients with FL1-2 (n=216), FL3A (n=170) and FL3B (n=83) who received R-CHOP within 6 months of diagnosis and 739 de novo DLBCL (GCB n=455 and non-GCB n=284) who were prospectively enrolled into the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) and the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohorts between 2002 and 2021. FL3B cases were designated as FL3Bc and FL3Bp based on the presence or absence of coexisting DLBCL, respectively. Histologic diagnosis was determined by an expert pathologist at each participating center and centrally reviewed. Event free survival (EFS) and OS were defined as time from diagnosis to progression, relapse, retreatment or death, and early progression defined as failing to achieve EFS at 24 months (EFS24). Associations between clinical features and EFS or OS were evaluated using Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models unadjusted and adjusted for age and FLIPI (comparisons with FL1-2 and FL3A) or IPI (comparisons with DLBCL). Results: The median age was 61 years (range, 18-94 years). Among FL3B patients, 21 (25%) had FL3Bc and 62 (75%) FL3Bp. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were broadly similar between the two FL3B subtypes. We then compared all FL3B patients to those with lower-grade FL. Patients with FL3B showed similar clinical features to those with FL1-2 and FL3A, with exception for a lower tumor burden. After R-CHOP, FL1-2 patients had an inferior EFS (HR 2.13 95%CI 1.31-3.46) than those with FL3B, whereas there was no difference compared to FL3A. OS was similar across all FL grades. Although FL1-2 patients failed to achieve EFS24 more frequently than FL3B and FL3A (34% vs 18% and 15%, p<0.001), FL3B patients who did fail EFS24 had almost three folds higher risk of subsequent mortality (HR 2.84 95%CI 1.35-6.01) than other FLs. At 5-year follow-up, FL3B patients had twice the risk of relapse with an aggressive subtype (i.e., DLBCL, high-grade B-cell lymphoma) than those with FL1-2 and FL3A, who instead often recurred with indolent disease (i.e., FL1-2, FL3A; p<0.001). We further compared FL3B patients to those with DLBCL classified based on cell-of-origin into GCB and non-GCB subtypes. At diagnosis, patients with FL3B had more favorable clinical features than those with GCB and non-GCB DLBCL. Compared to FL3B, patients with non-GCB DLBCL had an inferior EFS (HR 1.73 95%CI 1.07-2.79) and OS (HR 2.04 95%CI 1.11-3.75), while those with GCB DLBCL did not show a significant difference in EFS (HR 1.41 95%CI 0.88-2.25) or OS (HR 1.69, 95%CI 0.93-3.06) likely due to insufficient statistical power. Patients with FL3B failed EFS24 less frequently than patients with GCB or non-GCB DLBCL (17% vs 25% and 32%; p=0.01). Among patients who failed EFS24, those with FL3B had a similar subsequent OS as both GCB (HR 1.41 95%CI 0.73-2.72) and non-GCB DLBCL (HR 1.27 95%CI 0.65-2.47). Conclusions: We report that FL3Bp and FL3Bc appear clinically similar. While most FL3B patients have a prognosis comparable to FL1-2 and FL3A, 18% exhibit aggressive behavior with poor outcome reminiscent of DLBCL. Future studies with a larger population will be needed to confirm our findings.

Background: Immunochemotherapy is the current standard-of-care frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Our group previously reported that addition of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to R-CHOP resulted in excellent efficacy in the Alliance N1085 trial (Witzig TE et al, Blood Cancer J, 2017, 7(6):e576), with 23 of 24 patients achieving event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24), supporting further investigation of PI3K/mTOR targeting in DLBCL. New insights into molecular classification of DLBCL suggest that multiple genetic subtypes of DLBCL (eg, MCD, BN2, ST2, and EZB per LymphGen classification) may be susceptible to PI3K/mTOR targeting. Therefore, we conducted a phase 1/1b trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with a novel PI3K inhibitor parsaclisib and standard immunochemotherapy. Methods: Adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were eligible if any of the following was present: 1) non-GCB subtype per the Hans algorithm; 2) protein expression of either MYC (≥40%) or BCL2 (≥50%) by immunohistochemistry; or 3) MYC rearrangement by FISH. Patients with high grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements were also eligible. Phase 1 followed a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of parsaclisib (plus R-CHOP) to be used in Phase 1b (dose expansion). The primary efficacy endpoint in phase 1/1b was complete response (CR) rate by PET. A polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) safety lead-in cohort was added later to explore the safety and efficacy of parsaclisib (at MTD) plus Pola-R-CHP. Results: From July 2020 to May 2023, 50 patients were enrolled; 1 patient withdrew consent before study treatment and was excluded from this analysis. Nine patients were treated in Phase 1, 33 in Phase 1b, and 7 in the Pola cohort. The median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 20-86), and 20 (41%) were female. Two (4%) patients had ECOG PS ≥2, 26 (53%) had elevated LDH, 19 (39%) had >1 extranodal site, 37 (76%) had stage III/IV, and 25 (51%) had high-intermediate or high-risk International Prognostic Index (3-5). 23 (47%) had non-GCB subtype, 23 (46.9%) had MYC or BCL2 single expression, 21 (42.9%) had MYC/BCL2 double expression, and 6 (12%) had MYC rearrangement (2 with BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements). In Phase 1, 3 patients were treated at dose level 1 (parsaclisib 20 mg QD, d1-10) and 6 at dose level 2 (parsaclisib 20 mg QD, d1-14). No dose limiting toxicity was observed. Therefore, dose level 2 for parsaclisib was the MTD and was used in Phase 1b. In the Pola cohort (n=7), only 1 of 6 evaluable patients experienced significant toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea). Among all 49 patients, the most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) of any grade included neutropenia (83.7%), thrombocytopenia (79.6%), leukopenia (77.6%), lymphopenia (71.4%), anemia (71.4%), nausea (63.3%), fatigue (40.8%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (36.7%), constipation (24.5%), and diarrhea (22.4%), and the most common grade ≥3 TRAE included neutropenia (71.4%), leukopenia (69.4%), lymphopenia (49.0%), thrombocytopenia (20.4%), anemia (16.3%), febrile neutropenia (6.1%), and diarrhea (6.1%). In Phase 1/1b (n=42), the overall response rate (ORR) to parsaclisib plus R-CHOP was 97.6%, and the CR rate was 90.5%. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months (95% CI 27.7-32.7), the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 84.6% (95% CI 73.9-96.8), and the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 95.1% (95% CI 88.7-100.0). In the Pola cohort, the ORR to parsaclisib plus Pola-R-CHP was 100% and the CR rate was 100%. After a median follow-up of 15.6 months (95% CI 13.5-NE), 1 patient had disease relapse at 11.95 months, and all patients were alive. Conclusions: Addition of the PI3K inhibitor parsaclisib to R-CHOP or Pola-R-CHP immunochemotherapy is considered safe in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Combination of parsaclisib and standard immunochemotherapy resulted in high ORR and CR rate and encouraging preliminary PFS and OS outcomes patients with high-risk DLBCL. These data support further investigation of PI3K/mTOR targeting in newly diagnosed DLBCL in future trials.

Abstract Introduction/Objective Distinguishing follicular lymphoma (FL) from marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) can be challenging, as the morphology and immunophenotype can overlap particularly in CD10-negative cases or those with marginal zone differentiation (MZD). MEF2B (Myocyte enhancer binding factor B) is a transcription factor that controls BCL6 expression in germinal center (GC) B-cells. Previous studies report MEF2B to have a high sensitivity and specificity for FL compared to other GC markers. We investigated the expression of MEF2B in low grade B cell lymphomas (LGBCL) to evaluate its utility in classifying diagnostically challenging cases and FL with MZD. Methods/Case Report Our archives were searched from 2005-2023 to identify excisional biopsies of LGBCL with MZD, including (FL), splenic MZL (SMZL), MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), nodal MZL (NMZL) and difficult-to-classify (DTC) cases with a differential diagnosis of MZL and FL. MEF2B immunohistochemistry was performed retrospectively (Atlas Antibodies). Two hematopathologists assigned a pre-and post-MEF2B diagnosis to DTC cases. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) 57 cases were included: 21 FL (12 with MZD), 11 SMZL, 13 MALT, 4 NMZL, and 8 DTC cases. 19/21 FL cases (90%) were positive for MEF2B, including 11/12 (92%) cases with MZD. However, MEF2B expression was restricted to the follicles and negative in MZD areas in 7/11 cases (64%), while 4 cases showed partial weak expression in the areas of MZD. 0/11 SMZL (0%), 0/13 MALT (0%), and 0/4 (0%) NMZL were positive for MEF2B. 6/8 DTC cases (75%) were positive for MEF2B. Within DTC cases, retrospective inclusion of MEF2B results helped to render a more definitive diagnosis in 5 cases (2 negative/3 positive). Conclusion MEF2B immunohistochemistry can aid in distinguishing FL from MZL in challenging cases. However, it is often negative in areas of FL with MZD so care must be taken on interpretation in small biopsies.

Abstract Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) includes extranodal MZL (EMZL), splenic MZL (SMZL), and nodal MZL (NMZL) subtypes. Histologic transformation (HT) to large B-cell lymphomas is well documented but with a large variability in published cumulative incidence rates. We report results from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort on the cumulative incidence of HT (with death as competing risk) and the associated risk factors and outcomes. We also conducted a meta-analysis of available studies on the cumulative incidence of HT. From 2002 to 2015, 529 patients with MZL were enrolled in the MER study (69% EMZL, 16% SMZL, and 15% NMZL). The 10-year overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 66%. HT occurred in 21 patients with a 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.05) and 3.6% (95% CI, 0.02-0.06), respectively. HT was associated with an increased risk for death (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR], 3.95; 95% CI, 2.06-7.55). Predictors of HT were ≥2 extranodal sites and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue International Prognostic Index score ≥2. The OS was 79% at 5 years and 55% at 10 years after HT. In the meta-analysis of 12 studies (6161 patients), the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of HT across all subtypes were 5% (95% CI, 0.05-0.06) and 8% (95% CI, 0.07-0.09), respectively. These rates were lower in EMZL (3% and 5%) than in SMZL (7% and 13%) and NMZL (9% and 13%). Although HT is relatively uncommon in the first decade after MZL diagnosis, it is associated with an inferior outcome and needs new approaches for prevention and management.