Back to Authors

Lin, Yi

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8644-614X

Mayo Clinic

Fred Hutch Cancer Center

Citations 32

Abstract 4831: Additive and multiplicative gene-environment interactions for colorectal cancer risk.
Du, Mengmeng , Berndt, Sonja I. , Brenner, Hermann , Casey, Graham , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Conti, David V. , Duggan, David , Figueiredo, Jane C. , Gallinger, Steven , Gong, Jian , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Hayes, Richard B. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Hutter, Carolyn M., Jacobs, Eric J. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Jiao, Shuo , Kolonel, Laurence N. , Lemire, Mathieu , Lindor, Noralane M. , Seminara, Daniela, Slattery, Martha L. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Win, Aung Ko , Zanke, Brent W., Peters, Ulrike , Caan, Bette J. , Campbell, Peter T. , Chan, Andrew T. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Haile, Robert W. , Hopper, John L. , Hsu, Li , Hudson, Thomas J , Kraft, Peter , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lin, Yi , Newcomb, Polly A. , Potter, John D. , Schoen, Robert E. , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , White, Emily E. , Win, Aung K , Hoffmeister, Michael , Jenkins, Mark A , Harrison, Tabitha A , Brenner, Hermann , Hayes, Richard B , Conti, David V

Cancer Research | August 14, 2014 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 4831-4831

10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4831 Get It

Abstract Background: Genetic and environmental factors influence colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Previous studies have provided additional etiologic insight by examining multiplicative gene-environment interactions for individual susceptibility loci. However, individual loci confer only modest risks, which may limit statistical power and clinical significance. A genetic risk score comprising known CRC loci may provide a more comprehensive assessment of risk. Further, there is a paucity of data on the role of additive gene-environment interactions, which may have greater public health implications than multiplicative interactions. We thus evaluated both additive and multiplicative interactions between a genetic risk score and 15 key environmental factors on risk of CRC. Methods: We conducted an analysis of 10,491 CRC cases and 10,725 controls of European ancestry in 7 cohort and 6 case-control studies participating in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) or Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). To provide a global measure of genetic predisposition, information across multiple risk variants was combined by calculating a genetic risk score based on 24 polymorphisms near 21 genetic loci identified in previous genome-wide association studies. For the genetic score and environmental factors, the reference category corresponded to that associated with lower CRC risk. We tested for additive interactions by estimating relative excess risk due to interactions (RERIs) using logistic regression; for multiplicative interactions we used an empirical-Bayes approach. Nominal P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: After adjustment for age, sex, center, study, principal components, and total energy, as appropriate, we observed super-additive gene-environment interactions for CRC risk between the genetic risk score and body mass index (RERI=0.15; 95% CI: 0.00-0.31), ever smoking (RERI=0.14; 95% CI: 0.00-0.28), pack-years of smoking (RERI=0.23; 95% CI: 0.05-0.41), postmenopausal hormone therapy use (RERI=0.38; 95% CI: 0.17-0.59), and intake of processed meat (RERI=0.23; 95% CI: 0.06-0.40). Of the 15 environmental risk factors, 12 showed RERIs > 0 – suggesting an overall trend toward super-additive interactions for these factors. In addition, we observed evidence of sub-multiplicative interactions for use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There were no other statistically significant multiplicative interactions. Conclusions: We observed evidence for super-additive effects of genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors on risk of CRC. Our findings suggest that certain environmental risk factors have stronger effects on absolute risk among individuals with higher genetic risk of CRC. If confirmed in future studies, these results may have implications for targeted prevention strategies. Citation Format: Mengmeng Du, Sonja I. Berndt, Hermann Brenner, Bette J. Caan, Peter T. Campbell, Graham Casey, Andrew Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J. Chanock, Nilanjan Chatterjee, David V. Conti, David Duggan, Jane C. Figueiredo, Steven Gallinger, Jian Gong, Robert W. Haile, Tabitha A. Harrison, Richard B. Hayes, Michael Hoffmeister, John L. Hopper, Li Hsu, Thomas J. Hudson, Carolyn M. Hutter, Eric J. Jacobs, Mark A. Jenkins, Shuo Jiao, Laurence N. Kolonel, Peter Kraft, Loic Le Marchand, Mathieu Lemire, Yi Lin, Noralane M. Lindor, Polly A. Newcomb, John D. Potter, Robert E. Schoen, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Daniela Seminara, Martha L. Slattery, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Aung Ko Win, Emily White, Brent W. Zanke, Ulrike Peters. Additive and multiplicative gene-environment interactions for colorectal cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4831. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4831
Pleiotropic effects of genetic risk variants for other cancers on colorectal cancer risk: PAGE, GECCO and CCFR consortia
Kocarnik, Jonathan , Lindor, Noralane M. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Caberto, Christian, Love, Shelly-Ann, Slattery, Martha L. , Hindorff, Lucia A. , Park, Sungshim Lani, Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Hoffmeister, Michael , Duggan, David , Hou, Lifang , Carlson, Chris , Carty, Cara L. , Mann, Sue, Giovannucci, Edward L. , Fuchs, Charles S. , Jenkins, Mark A. , Haile, Robert W. , Conti, David V. , Potter, John D. , Caan, Bette J. , Hayes, Richard B. , Berndt, Sonja I. , Küry, Sébastien , Bezieau, Stéphane , Ambite, José Luis , Kumaraguruparan, Gowri, Richardson, Danielle , Goodloe, Robert, Dilks, Holli H., Baker, Paxton, Zanke, Brent W., Lemire, Mathieu , Gallinger, Steven , Jiao, Shuo , Harrison, Tabitha A. , Seminara, Daniela, Haiman, Christopher A. , Hutter, Carolyn M., Crawford, Dana C. , Heiss, Gerardo , Brenner, Hermann , Bush, William S. , Casey, Graham , Peters, Ulrike , Cheng, Iona C. , Dumitrescu, Logan , Avery, Christy L. , Chan, Andrew T. , Baron, John A. , Kraft, Peter , Butler, Anne Marie E. , Monroe, Kristine R. , Lin, Yi , Ma, Jing , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Campbell, Peter T. , Schoen, Robert E. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Hsu, Li , Kooperberg, Charles , Wilkens, Lynne R. , White, Emily E. , Hudson, Thomas J , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Hoffmeister, Michael , Jenkins, Mark A , Haile, Robert W , Harrison, Tabitha A , Potter, John D , Kury, Sebastien , Brenner, Hermann , Hayes, Richard B , Bézieau, Stéphane , Conti, David V , Hou, Lifang , Caan, Bette J , Bush, William S

Gut | August 10, 2013 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 800-807

10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305189 Get It

Objective Genome-wide association studies have identified a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a wide array of cancer sites. Several of these variants demonstrate associations with multiple cancers, suggesting pleiotropic effects and shared biological mechanisms across some cancers. We hypothesised that SNPs previously associated with other cancers may additionally be associated with colorectal cancer. In a large-scale study, we examined 171 SNPs previously associated with 18 different cancers for their associations with colorectal cancer. Design We examined 13 338 colorectal cancer cases and 40 967 controls from three consortia: Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE), Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer (GECCO), and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). Study-specific logistic regression results, adjusted for age, sex, principal components of genetic ancestry, and/or study specific factors (as relevant) were combined using fixed-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the association between each SNP and colorectal cancer risk. A Bonferroni-corrected p value of 2.92×10 −4 was used to determine statistical significance of the associations. Results Two correlated SNPs—rs10090154 and rs4242382—in Region 1 of chromosome 8q24, a prostate cancer susceptibility region, demonstrated statistically significant associations with colorectal cancer risk. The most significant association was observed with rs4242382 (meta-analysis OR=1.12; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.18; p=1.74×10 −5 ), which also demonstrated similar associations across racial/ethnic populations and anatomical sub-sites. Conclusions This is the first study to clearly demonstrate Region 1 of chromosome 8q24 as a susceptibility locus for colorectal cancer; thus, adding colorectal cancer to the list of cancer sites linked to this particular multicancer risk region at 8q24.