Willrich, Maria Alice V.

Abstract Objectives Free light chain (FLC) assays and the ratio of κ/λ are recommended for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD). Limited data exists on FLC clinical specificity in patients diagnosed with other conditions. Methods We assessed the κ, λ, and κ/λ FLC ratio using the FreeLite assay and the Sebia FLC ELISA assay in 176 patients with clinical presentations of fatigue, anemia, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, joint disorders, kidney disease and non PCD-cancers with no monoclonal protein observed on serum protein electrophoresis or MASS-FIX immunoglobulin isotyping. Manufacturer defined reference intervals (RI) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) specific RI (renal RI) were utilized. Results For the κ/λ ratio, 68.7 % (121/176) of specimens on the FreeLite and 87.5 % (154/176) of specimens on the Sebia assay were within RI. For κ, 68.2 % (120/176) and 72.2 % (127/176) of results were outside RI for FreeLite and Sebia respectively. For λ, 37.5 % (66/176) and 84.1 % (148/176) of FreeLite and Sebia results were outside RI. With FreeLite and Sebia, patients with kidney disease (n=25) had the highest κ/λ ratios. 44 patients (25.0 %) had GFR <60 mL/min/BSA. When renal RI were applied, 13.6 % had a FLCr outside the renal RI with FreeLite, and 4.5 % with Sebia. Conclusions In a cohort of patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of PCDs, but ultimately diagnosed with other conditions, Sebia FLC had improved clinical specificity relative to FreeLite, if one was using an abnormal κ/λ ratio as a surrogate for monoclonality.

Abstract Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (“Mass-Fix”) has replaced serum immunofixation at our institution for detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins. One advantage of Mass-Fix is the ability to differentiate pathogenic endogenous monoclonal antibodies from therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mabs), which are often the first-line treatment for multiple myeloma, by reviewing the light chain signature mass. The objective of this study was to describe the distribution of t-mabs and other key characteristics of clinical serum samples analyzed by Mass-Fix in 2022. Comprehensive results for each sample were extracted retrospectively from the laboratory information system. Of 66,710 total analyzed, 30,701 (46%) samples were reported as “positive” (i.e., contains a monoclonal protein), given the tertiary nature of our institution and reference laboratory services. The positive samples were further subdivided by t-mab (detected by Mass-Fix), with a total of 7,769 (25.3%) t-mabs reported. The top five IgG kappa t-mabs reported include daratumumab (n=6,537), elotuzumab or REGN5458/5459 (n=499), isatuximab (n=348), and rituximab (n=102). Rare observations included monoclonal proteins consistent with tixagevimab/ cilgavimab, for COVID-19 infection (n=7), obinutuzumab, an anti-CD20 t-mab for multiple sclerosis (n=1) and evolocumab, an IgG lambda anti-PCSK9 inhibitor (n=6). Of the 7,769 samples, the t-mab was the only reported clone in 47.7% of cases and was found along with the original disease-associated clone in remaining cases. When the original disease clone was present, it was an IgG kappa isotype 31% of the time and could have confounded the definition of complete therapy response for patients. 69% were non-IgG kappa original clones. Mass-Fix test orders have a multiple-choice prompt to provide any current therapy to aid in the patient’s result interpretation. For those samples where a t-mab was reported, the answer to this question regarding administered therapy was often discrepant from the report: only 38.5% of daratumumab-positive samples had an affirmation of daratumumab administration. The remaining 61.5% of daratumumab-positive samples reported an assortment of therapies, including bone marrow transplant, other t-mabs, no active therapy, or the field was left blank, highlighting poor compliance. Additionally, 154/36,009 samples where the provider affirmed daratumumab administration were reported as negative (i.e., no monoclonal protein observed on Mass-Fix). Often, the send-out laboratory does not have medical record access where treatment information is detailed. In conclusion, we reported the presence of a t-mab in 11.6% of all samples tested with Mass-Fix, suggesting that t-mabs have entered the clinical practice to stay, and accurately determining their presence in the challenging environment of poor compliance to prompt questions and evolving treatment regimens is something that cannot be ignored by clinical laboratories. Mass-Fix allows detection of a t-mab in the same routine run as other testing, without need of a second immunofixation to rule out the IgG kappa finding is not a t-mab.

Abstract Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is the most common plasma cell dyscrasia, present in ~3% of the population over 50yo. MGUS carries a 1% per year risk of malignant transformation for the rest of the affected individual’s life; long-term followup is recommended for all patients with MGUS. Different risk stratification models exist to evaluate potential for progression to malignancy. The Mayo risk model, published in 2005, uses the presence of 3 risk factors (abnormal free light chain (FLC) kappa/lambda ratio (KLr), M-spike ≥1.5 g/dL, non-IgG isotype) to confer a 3% per year risk of progression instead of the average 1%. For many years, the only FDA-approved measurement of FLC was the FreeLite assay (Binding Site), which uses polyclonal sheep antibodies. Recently, other FLC assays have become available in the US, including the Sebia FLC ELISA, which employs rabbit polyclonal antibodies. The assays have similar reference intervals (RI), however differences in analytical performance between the FreeLite and Sebia were previously reported. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the Sebia FLC assay in the Mayo risk stratification model of MGUS patients for progression in comparison to FreeLite. Cryopreserved serum samples from a cohort of 923 MGUS patients with available long-term clinical followup (median follow-up time: 7.7years, range: 0.0 to 46.9) was used to measure FLC using Sebia ELISA on a DS2 automated platform (Dynex) and FreeLite on a Siemens BNII nephelometer. Passing-Bablok (P-B) regression and Spearman correlation were used to compare the KLr between assays. Cox proportional hazards models for progression to multiple myeloma or a related plasma cell malignancy were used to estimate the prognostic effect and ability to discriminate low and high risk of abnormal KLr for each assay. Analyses were carried out in R software. Correlation between Sebia and FreeLite KLr had a Spearman r = 0.796; P-B fit: Sebia KLr = 0.825*(FreeLite KLr) – 0.048, 95% CI of slope: 0.810-0.839). With FreeLite, 32.9% of patients had a KLr outside RI for the method. For Sebia, 48.0% of patients had a KLr outside the method specific RI. Despite the individual samples analytical disagreement, both assays showed similar clinical performance for risk stratification: Sebia abnormal KLr was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.77 (95%CI: 1.79-4.28 c-statistic=0.6505) for progression, while FreeLite abnormal KLr was associated with a HR of 3.31 (95%CI: 2.20-5.00, c-statistic=0.6529), and the difference in c-statistics was not statistically significant (p=0.93). The risk assessment is performed only once per patient, at the initial diagnosis of MGUS. The similarity in clinical performance between FreeLite and Sebia assays support the use of either method as a predictor for risk of progression for MGUS patients.

Abstract Background Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody developed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), used for the treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. Immunogenicity to this drug may lead to therapeutic failure. Various laboratory assays are used for measuring serum adalimumab and anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to adalimumab, for therapeutic monitoring and evaluation of clinical non-responsiveness. This study compared the performance of 2 clinical assays used by different reference laboratories. Methods In total, 120 residual clinical samples were tested at both laboratories. A sandwich ELISA for adalimumab detecting free drug and a bridging ELISA capable of detecting both free and bound ADA were performed at the Mayo Clinic. A functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA) was used at ARUP Laboratories for measuring bioactive serum drug concentrations, and neutralizing ADA. Results Seventy-eight samples had measurable concentrations of adalimumab by both methods and yielded a correlation coefficient r = 0.93, slope = 0.886, and intercept = 0.950. Overall agreement of 92.5% was observed between the assays, with most discrepant drug results being attributed to a higher positivity rate with ELISA (8/9). One outlier positive with RGA and negative with ELISA was confirmed by LC-MS/MS to be attributed to infliximab. Overall agreement of 79.2% was observed between the ADA assays. Differences in ADA results may be due to the bridging ELISA detecting total ADA (free, drug-bound, neutralizing, and non-neutralizing), while RGA detects free, neutralizing ADA only. Conclusions Although the assays are fundamentally different, the results show significant concordance between the clinically validated tests performed in different laboratories.

Abstract Background Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry coupled to immune enrichment (MASS-FIX) as an alternative to serum immunofixation electrophoresis has demonstrated increased sensitivity in monoclonal protein (MP) detection with improved laboratory workflow. This study explored similar replacement of urine immunofixation electrophoresis (u-IFE) with urine MASS-FIX (u-MASS-FIX) by method comparison. Methods Residual urine (n = 1008) from Mayo Clinic patients with a known plasma cell disease were assayed neat by u-MASS-FIX analysis. Each sample was paired with the following: u-IFE, urine total protein, urine protein electrophoresis, serum κ/λ free light chain (LC) ratio (rFLC), and serum MASS-FIX (s-MASS-FIX). Analytical sensitivities were measured in pooled urine spiked with daratumumab. Results u-IFE and u-MASS-FIX had 91% agreement in determining the presence/absence of MPs (Cohen kappa = 0.8200). In discrepant cases, serum rFLC statistically aligned more closely with positive u-MASS-FIX cases than u-IFE. Patients positive by both s-MASS-FIX and u-MASS-FIX had matching MP masses (±20 daltons) in 94% of cases. The u-MASS-FIX spectra further identified κ/λ LC fragments and glycosylated LCs not appreciated on u-IFE. The unconcentrated u-MASS-FIX limit of detection of 0.156 mg/mL was determined equivalent to 100× concentrated u-IFE. Conclusion u-MASS-FIX is a reliable alternative to u-IFE with the added benefits of LC glycosylation detection and MP mass tracking between serum and urine. Furthermore, u-MASS-FIX is performed using neat urine. Eliminating the need to concentrate urine for u-IFE has potential to increase productivity by decreasing labor minutes per test.

Abstract Background Multiple laboratory tests are employed for detection of monoclonal proteins in patients and include serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), immunofixation electrophoresis, free light chain (FLC) immunoassay, and mass spectrometry (Mass-Fix). Recently, reports on a drift in FLC quantitation results have been brought to light. Methods We studied a cohort of 16 887 patients whose sera were tested for a monoclonal protein by a FLC assay, serum protein electrophoresis, and Mass-Fix. This is a retrospective study designed to assess the impact of a drift on the performance of FLC ratio (rFLC) in groups of patients with and without detectable plasma cell disorders (PCDs). Results The results demonstrated that 63% of patients with monoclonal protein equal or higher than 2 g/L (by SPEP) had an abnormal rFLC (reference range 0.26–1.65). Conversely, 16% of patients with undetectable monoclonal protein by other methods (i.e., SPEP and Mass-Fix) who also had no record of treated PCD had an abnormal rFLC. In these cases, there was an imbalance in the number of kappa high rFLCs to lambda low rFLCs of 201 to 1. Conclusions The results of this study suggest decreased specificity of rFLC for a monoclonal kappa FLC in the 1.65 to 3.0 range.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is of utmost importance for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). Evidence of intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG) synthesis proves the inflammatory nature of the disease, increases diagnostic certainty and substitutes for dissemination in time according to current diagnostic criteria. The gold standard to determine intrathecal IgG synthesis is the detection of CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCBs). However, advances in laboratory methods brought up κ-free light chains (FLCs) as a new biomarker, which are produced in excess over intact immunoglobulins and accumulate in CSF in the case of central nervous system-derived inflammation. Overwhelming evidence showed a high diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal κ-FLC synthesis in MS with sensitivity and specificity of approximately 90% similar to OCB. κ-FLCs have advantages as its detection is fast, easy, cost-effective, reliable, rater-independent and returning quantitative results which might also improve the value of predicting MS disease activity. An international panel of experts in MS and CSF diagnostics developed a consensus of all participants. Six recommendations are given for establishing standard CSF evaluation in patients suspected of having MS. The panel recommended to include intrathecal κ-FLC synthesis in the next revision of MS diagnostic criteria as an additional tool to measure intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis.