Kaplan, Batia

Abstract Objectives Diagnosis of light chain amyloidosis (AL) requires demonstration of amyloid deposits in a tissue biopsy followed by appropriate typing. Previous studies demonstrated increased dimerization of monoclonal serum free light chains (FLCs) as a pathological feature of AL. To further examine the pathogenicity of FLC, we aimed at testing amino acid sequence homology between circulating and deposited light chains (LCs). Methods Matched tissue biopsy and serum of 10 AL patients were subjected to tissue proteomic amyloid typing and nephelometric FLC assay, respectively. Serum FLC monomers (M) and dimers (D) were analyzed by Western blotting (WB) and mass spectrometry (MS). Results WB of serum FLCs showed predominance of either κ or λ type, in agreement with the nephelometric assay data. Abnormal FLC M–D patterns typical of AL amyloidosis were demonstrated in 8 AL-λ patients and in one of two AL-κ patients: increased levels of monoclonal FLC dimers, high D/M ratio values of involved FLCs, and high ratios of involved to uninvolved dimeric FLCs. MS of serum FLC dimers showed predominant constant domain sequences, in concordance with the tissue proteomic amyloid typing. Most importantly, variable domain sequence homology between circulating and deposited LC species was demonstrated, mainly in AL-λ cases. Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate homology between circulating FLCs and tissue-deposited LCs in AL-λ amyloidosis. The applied methodology can facilitate studying the pathogenicity of circulating FLC dimers in AL amyloidosis. The study also highlights the potential of FLC monomer and dimer analysis as a non-invasive screening tool for this disease.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is of utmost importance for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). Evidence of intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG) synthesis proves the inflammatory nature of the disease, increases diagnostic certainty and substitutes for dissemination in time according to current diagnostic criteria. The gold standard to determine intrathecal IgG synthesis is the detection of CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCBs). However, advances in laboratory methods brought up κ-free light chains (FLCs) as a new biomarker, which are produced in excess over intact immunoglobulins and accumulate in CSF in the case of central nervous system-derived inflammation. Overwhelming evidence showed a high diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal κ-FLC synthesis in MS with sensitivity and specificity of approximately 90% similar to OCB. κ-FLCs have advantages as its detection is fast, easy, cost-effective, reliable, rater-independent and returning quantitative results which might also improve the value of predicting MS disease activity. An international panel of experts in MS and CSF diagnostics developed a consensus of all participants. Six recommendations are given for establishing standard CSF evaluation in patients suspected of having MS. The panel recommended to include intrathecal κ-FLC synthesis in the next revision of MS diagnostic criteria as an additional tool to measure intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis.

Background: Intrathecal immunoglobulin-G synthesis is a hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS), which can be detected by oligoclonal IgG bands (OCB) or by κ-free light chains (κ-FLC) in cerebrospinal fluid. Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether κ-FLC index has similar diagnostic value to identify patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or MS compared to OCB, and to determine κ-FLC index cut-off. Methods: PubMed was searched for studies that assessed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of κ-FLC index and OCB to discriminate CIS/MS patients from control subjects. Two reviewers following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines performed study eligibility assessment and data extraction. Findings from studies were analyzed with bivariate mixed models. Results: A total of 32 studies were included in the meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic value of κ-FLC index. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 52% to 100% (weighted average: 88%) and 69% to 100% (89%) for κ-FLC index and from 37% to 100% (85%) and 74% to 100% (92%) for OCB. Mean difference of sensitivity and specificity between κ-FLC index and OCB was 2 and −4 percentage points. Diagnostic accuracy determined by mixed models revealed no significant difference between κ-FLC index and OCB. A discriminatory cut-off for κ-FLC index was determined at 6.1. Conclusion: The findings indicate that κ-FLC index has similar diagnostic accuracy in MS as OCB.