Khoury, H. Jean

Abstract Abstract 2617 Introduction: ABT-348 is a potent, novel, adenosine triphospate competitive inhibitor of Aurora A, B and C kinases. ABT-348 is also a potent inhibitor of all members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) families. ABT-348 has demonstrated strong antitumor activity in a variety of preclinical cancer cell line models, in vitro and in vivo, including leukemias as monotherapy and in combination with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, azacitidine. Objectives: The primary objectives of this study are to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of orally and IV administered ABT-348 as monotherapy or in combination with azacitidine in patients (pts) with advanced hematologic malignancies. Secondary objectives include determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and exploration of biomarkers associated with ABT-348 activity. Methods: This phase 1 dose-escalation study of ABT-348 utilizes a modified continual reassessment method in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies: acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia and myelodysplasia (MDS). Adult pts with histological or cytological confirmed disease, ECOG status 0–2, adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function and without significant hypertension or proteinuria are eligible. This study has four arms consisting of ABT-348 administered on a 28-day (D) cycle. Pts receive ABT-348 monotherapy once daily (QD, Arm A) or twice daily (BID; Arm B) on Days (D) 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle under fasting conditions. In Arm C, ABT-348 is given on the same schedule as Arm A in combination with azacitidine (75 mg/m2) administered IV or SC on Days 1 – 7 of each 28-day cycle. In Arm D, pts receive ABT-348 monotherapy on the same schedule as Arm A, but via IV administration. Samples are collected for PK and biomarker analyses. Pts are treated until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse event (AE) severity is graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Results: 39 pts (median age, 66 y [45–86]) have enrolled (Arm A, n=32; Arm B, n=4; Arm C, n=3). Of these pts, 27 had AML, 11 had MDS and 1 had CML. Pts received a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1 – 8). Best response to last prior therapy was: complete or partial response in 3 pts, stable disease in 11 pts, PD in 24, and not determined in 1. Dose escalation is shown in the table. The first dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 pancreatitis was observed at 640 mg in Arm A. Due to this DLT, along with a second case of grade 3 pancreatitis, further enrollment in Arm A was held and Arms B and C were opened. A DLT of grade 4 acute kidney injury was seen at 440 mg in Arm C. ABT-348-related AEs in greater than 2 pts were proteinuria (23%), nausea (21%), diarrhea (18%), hypertension (13%), vomiting (10%) and fatigue (8%). Grade 3/4 ABT-348-related AEs were hypertension (13%), pancreatitis (5%), acute kidney injury (3%) and diarrhea (3%). One patient in Arm A achieved a CRi (640 mg). Five of 32 pts in Arm A were treated for ≥4 cycles, including 2 of 7 pts at ABT-348 doses ≥ 640 mg. Based on preliminary PK analyses, Cmax and AUC of ABT-348 were approximately dose proportional in the dose range studied (10–690 mg); co-administration of azacitidine had no apparent effect on ABT-348 PK. Evidence of dual aurora/VEGF receptor kinase inhibition has been demonstrated by induction of polyploidy and PlGF, respectively. 33 pts have discontinued and 6 remain on study. Conclusions: ABT-348 has demonstrated on-target biomarker and clinical activity in pts with advanced hematologic magnancies, and was well tolerated at doses below 640 mg in Arm A. PK appears to be dose-proportional. Dose escalation is ongoing in Arms B and C (with azacitidine); an IV formulation of ABT-348 will also be evaluated. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine in AML. Tibes:Abbott: Research Funding. Chiu:Abbott: Employment, Owns stocks Other. Xiong:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stock Other. Qin:Abbott: Employment. Ansell:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stock Other. Albert:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stock Other. Tse:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stock Other. Oliver:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stock Other. Sajwani:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stocks and participated in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation and reviewing approving study documents related to ABT-348 programs. Other. McKee:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stocks Other. Ricker:Abbott: Employment, own Abbott stocks Other.

Abstract Total body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimens are considered the standard of care for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, due to concerns regarding acute and long-term toxicities, non-TBI regimens, commonly including busulfan (BU), have been increasingly explored. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis with the hypothesis that there would be equivalence of these two myeloablative approaches by reviewing outcomes for adult patients (pts), aged 18-60 years, undergoing a first, well-matched sibling, related or unrelated donor HCT in CR1 or CR2 reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) from 2005-2014. Eight hundred nineteen pts received TBI (63% 9-12 Gy, 37% ≥13 Gy) combined with etoposide (25%) or cyclophosphamide (Cy) (75%) and 299 pts received intravenous BU combined with a second alkylator Cy (15%) or melphalan (Mel) (13%), or a nucleoside analogue fludarabine (Flu) (41%) or clofarabine (Clo)(30%). The majority of the BU-based pts were treated at the Moffitt or MD Anderson Cancer Center. The BU-based regimens were grouped together for analyses since no significant differences in basic outcomes among the different chemotherapy-only regimens were noted. Patients in the BU-containing group were older but had better performance status, took longer to achieve CR1 and longer to receive HCT; more received peripheral blood than marrow grafts, peri-HCT ATG, pre- and post HCT tyrosine kinase inhibitors ( TKI), and were treated more recently than pts in the TBI-based group (Table 1). With median follow-up of 3.6 years for the BU-based group and 5.3 years for the TBI-based group, adjusted 3 year outcomes showed treatment-related mortality (TRM) BU 19% vs. TBI 25% (p=.04); relapse BU 37% vs. TBI 28% (p=.007); disease-free survival (DFS) Bu 45% vs. TBI 48% (p=.35); and overall survival (OS) BU 57% vs. TBI 53% (p=.35) (Figures A-B). Patients in the BU group had significantly more grade II-IV acute GVHD (47% vs. 40%, p=.025), but marginally less chronic GVHD (49% vs. 55% at 3 years, p=.073). In multivariate analysis, the BU group had a significantly higher rate of acute GVHD after day 50 (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.19-2.58, p=.004), but marginally less chronic GVHD (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.68-1.01 p=.059) and higher risk of relapse (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.15-1.85 p=.002) compared with TBI-based regimens. Despite the observed higher risks of acute GVHD and relapse, BU-based conditioning led to similar TRM, OS, and DFS following HCT for ALL. Table 1 Table 1. Figure Figure. Disclosures Ciurea: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Cyto-Sen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership. Seftel:Otsuka: Research Funding. Pulsipher:Medac: Other: Housing support for conference; Chimerix: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Study Steering Committee. Champlin:Ziopharm Oncology: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Intrexon: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

BACKGROUNDPatients with FMS like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)‐mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poor prognosis and are referred for early allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT).METHODSData from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) were used to evaluate 511 adult patients with de novo AML who underwent HCT during 2008 through 2011 to determine whether FLT3 mutations had an impact on HCT outcomes.RESULTSIn total, 158 patients (31%) had FLT3 mutations. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed an increased risk of relapse at 3 years in the FLT3 mutated group compared with the wild‐type (WT) group (38% [95% confidence interval (CI), 30%‐45%] vs 28% [95% CI, 24%‐33%]; P = .04; relative risk, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.15‐2.22]; P = .0048). However, FLT3 mutation status was not significantly associated with nonrelapse mortality, leukemia‐free survival, or overall survival. Although more patients in the FLT3 mutated group died from relapsed primary disease compared with those in the WT group (60% vs 46%), the 3‐year overall survival rate was comparable for the 2 groups (mutated group: 49%; 95% CI, 40%‐57%; WT group: 55%, 95% CI, 50%‐60%; P = .20).CONCLUSIONSThe current data indicate that FLT3 mutation status did not adversely impact overall survival after HCT, and about 50% of patients with this mutation who underwent HCT were long‐term survivors. Cancer 2016;122:3005‐3014. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

SummaryPre‐existing central nervous system (CNS) involvement may influence referral for autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for patients with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The outcomes of 151 adult patients with NHL with prior secondary CNS involvement (CNS+) receiving an AHCT were compared to 4688 patients without prior CNS lymphoma (CNS−). There were significant baseline differences between the cohorts. CNS+ patients were more likely to be younger, have lower performance scores, higher age‐adjusted international prognostic index scores, more advanced disease stage at diagnosis, more aggressive histology, more sites of extranodal disease, and a shorter interval between diagnosis and AHCT. However, no statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups by analysis of progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 5 years. A matched pair comparison of the CNS+ group with a subset of CNS− patients matched on propensity score also showed no differences in outcomes. Patients with active CNS lymphoma at the time of AHCT (n = 55) had a higher relapse rate and diminished PFS and OS compared with patients whose CNS lymphoma was in remission (n = 96) at the time of AHCT. CNS+ patients can achieve excellent long‐term outcomes with AHCT. Active CNS lymphoma at transplant confers a worse prognosis.