Shir, Dror

Background: The National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework proposes defining Alzheimer’s disease by grouping imaging and fluid biomarkers by their respective pathologic processes. The AT(N) structure proposes several neurodegenerative fluid biomarkers (N) including total tau (t-tau), neurogranin (Ng), and neurofilament light chain (NfL). However, pathologic drivers influencing each biomarker remain unclear. Objective: To determine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-neurodegenerative biomarkers (N) map differentially to Alzheimer’s disease pathology measured by Aβ 42 (an indicator of amyloidosis, [A]), p-tau (an indicator of tau deposition, [T]), and MRI vascular pathology indicators (measured by white-matter integrity, infarcts, and microbleeds [V]). Methods: Participants were from Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) with CSF measures of NfL, Ng, t-tau, Aβ 42 , and p-tau and available MRI brain imaging. Linear models assessed associations between CSF neurodegeneration (N) markers, amyloid markers (A), tau (T), and vascular pathology (V). Results: Participants ( n = 408) had a mean age of 69.2±10.7; male, 217 (53.2%); cognitively unimpaired, 359 (88%). All three neurodegeneration biomarkers correlated with age ( p < 0.001 for NfL and t-tau, p = 0.018 for Ng). Men had higher CSF-NfL levels; women had higher Ng ( p < 0.001). NfL and t-tau levels correlated with infarcts ( p = 0.009, p = 0.034 respectively); no biomarkers correlated with white-matter integrity. N biomarkers correlated with p-tau levels (T, p < 0.001). Higher Aβ 42 levels associated with higher N-biomarker levels but only among cognitively unimpaired (A, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The influence of vascular pathology in the general population on CSF (N) biomarkers is modest, with greater influence of infarcts than white-matter disruption. Neurodegeneration markers more closely correlated with tau than amyloid markers.

AbstractBackgroundPosterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is one of the atypical Alzheimer's disease variants, characterized by predominant visuospatial and visuoperceptual deficits, with established dorsal and ventral subtypes. A third primary occipital (caudal) variant has been suggested. We aimed to determine its demographics, clinical manifestations, and biomarker findings.MethodsFifty‐two PCA patients were investigated. Patients underwent neuropsychological assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)‐, amyloid‐, and tau‐positron emission tomography (tau‐PET) scans. Normalized regional FDG‐PET values were represented as z‐scores relative to a control population. Patients were divided into “primary occipital” and “other PCA” subgroups according to FDG‐PET‐defined criteria, with primary occipital defined as patients in which the z‐scores for occipital subregions were at least one standard deviation lower (SD) (i.e., more abnormal) than the z‐scores in all other brain regions. Global amyloid‐PET, temporo‐parietal FDG‐PET, and temporal tau‐PET regions‐of‐interest (ROIs) were calculated.ResultsNine patients were classified as primary occipital; they were older (p = 0.034) and had more years of education (p = 0.007) than other PCA patients. The primary occipital group performed worse on the Ishihara test for color perception (p < 0.001), while other PCA patients performed worse on the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) praxis scale (p = 0.005). Overall neuropsychiatric symptom burden was lower in the primary occipital group (p < 0.001). The FDG‐PET meta‐ROI was higher in the primary occipital subtype (p = 0.006), but no differences were observed in amyloid‐ and tau‐PET.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that primary occipital PCA is characterized by an older age at onset, more color perception dysfunction, less severe ideomotor apraxia, and less hypometabolism in temporo‐parietal meta‐ROI compared to established phenotypes.

Abstract Introduction : Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) may be associated with amyloid burden, neurodegeneration, and stroke but its specificity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population is unclear. We examined associations of plasma GFAP with amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET), cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Methods : The study included 200 individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent amyloid and tau PET and magnetic resonance imaging and had plasma GFAP concurrently assayed; multiple linear regression and hurdle model analyses were used to investigate associations controlling for age and sex. Results : GFAP was associated with amyloid and tau PET in multivariable models. After adjusting for amyloid, the association with tau PET was no longer significant. GFAP was associated with cortical thickness, WMH, and lobar CMBs only among those who were amyloid‐positive. Discussion : This cross‐sectional analysis demonstrates the utility of GFAP as a plasma biomarker for AD‐related pathologies.

Purpose of review Does neuroinflammation promote neurodegeneration? Does neurodegeneration promote neuroinflammation? Or, is the answer to both questions, yes? These questions have proven challenging to answer in patients with typical age-related neurodegenerative diseases in whom the onset of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration are largely unknown. Patients recovering from diseases associated with abrupt-onset neuroinflammation, including rare forms of antibody-mediated encephalitis (AME) and common complications of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), provide a unique opportunity to untangle the relationship between neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. This review explores the lessons learned from patients with AME and COVID-19. Recent findings Persistent cognitive impairment is increasingly recognized in patients recovering from AME or COVID-19, yet the drivers of impairment remain largely unknown. Clinical observations, neuroimaging and biofluid biomarkers, and pathological studies imply a link between the severity of acute neuroinflammation, subsequent neurodegeneration, and disease-associated morbidity. Summary Data from patients with AME and COVID-19 inform key hypotheses that may be evaluated through future studies incorporating longitudinal biomarkers of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in larger numbers of recovering patients. The results of these studies may inform the contributors to cognitive impairment in patients with AME and COVID-19, with potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications in patients with age-related neurodegenerative diseases.