Johnson, Benny

4047 Background: BRAFV600E mutations occur in fewer than 10% of all patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and arise from sessile serrated adenomas. Despite efficacy with targeted therapies against MAPK signaling and with immunotherapies in this population, survival outcomes for pts with BRAFV600E mCRC in general are poor. Characteristics distinguishing pts with BRAFV600E mCRC with favorable versus unfavorable outcomes have not been well annotated. Methods: Records of 188 pts with BRAFV600E mCRC evaluated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 3/2010-1/2020 were reviewed. Pts with the shortest and longest metastatic survival (N = 25 for each group) were compared. Associations between prognostic group and clinical/pathologic features were measured by odds ratio and for median survival by log-rank testing. Results: Median metastatic survival differed between the 2 BRAFV600E mCRC populations (8.6 vs 84 months, p < .0001). Pts with poor survival more commonly had primary tumors arising from the hepatic flexure/proximal transverse colon (44% vs 16%, p = .04) and more frequent hepatic involvement (75% vs 28%, p = .001). Pts with favorable survival were more likely to develop metachronous metastases (52% vs 16%, p = .01), have fewer distant organ involvement (median 1 vs 2, p = .02), and undergo definitive locoregional therapy to metastatic disease (44% vs 0%, p = .01). Microsatellite instability (36% vs 4%, p = .008) and a history of tobacco use (44% vs 16%, p = .04) were associated with a favorable prognosis. Durable responses to MAPK-targeted therapies (5/25) and immunotherapy (3/25) were noted in the favorable group. Conclusions: Pts with BRAFV600E mCRC can achieve excellent long-term survival which belies conventional context and is driven by locoregional and systemic treatment options alike. Anatomic localization of the primary tumor and prior exposures may highlight environmental influences on tumor biology which account for the clinical heterogeneity of pts with BRAFV600E mCRC.

e15055 Background: An increasing number of pt and tumor c have predictive and prognostic implications in mCRC. However, there is no consensus on their reporting in trial results. Methods: Pt c and SF from 136 phase III trials of systemic therapies (Rx) in mCRC published between 1988 and 2018 (68,326 pts) were collected. Trials were also grouped per publication date (G1: 1988-97; G2: 98 – 2007; G3: 08-18). Patterns of reporting and trends across G were evaluated. Results: Pt c consistently reported were performance status, PS (98.5%), age (92.6%) and gender (90.4%); race (20.6%) & weight/BMI/BSA were not (13.2%). Tumor c frequently reported were metastatic (met) spread (70.6%) while time intervals related to disease course (25%) and synchronous met vs not (19.1%) were omitted. Of note, primary site was largely reported as colon vs rectum (69%) and sidedness or anatomical location was discernable only in 10.3%. Prior Rx reporting focused on chemo (58.5%) with radiation and surgery and reported in 34% & 28.7%. Reporting of prognostic factors was variable and limited: histology grade CEA, alk phos, LDH (range 10.3-15.4%). Only 11.8% of trials reported genomic factors - KRAS MT was included in all with BRAF MT in 4.4%. Of 140 trials used for SF analysis, 115 had ≥ 1 (range 1-7). Common SF were PS (60%), geography /institution (55.7%). Prior Rx (27%), met spread (24.3%) were sometimes used while primary site (7.8%), genomic factors (6.1%) rarely were. Trends across G are per Table. Conclusions: There is marked inconsistency in pt c & SF reporting in mCRC trials. Consensus guidelines will aid in standardization of trial interpretation and future meta-analyses; and will need to be updated based on emerging data. [Table: see text]

3579 Background: BRAFV600E ( BRAF) mutations (mts) portend poor prognosis in mCRC and patients (pts) may die before ascertainment. Since 2014, Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) has performed reflex hereditary screening of CRCs with BRAF and mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC). We evaluated this BRAF mt population-based cohort ( BRAFPOP) to establish the true prognosis of BRAF mts in mCRC. Methods: We reviewed all mCRCs from VCH between 4/2014 and 5/2018 for BRAF by IHC (VE1 antibody). Overall survival (OS) from stage IV diagnosis was compared to mCRCs with next generation sequencing (NGS) determined BRAF mts ( BRAFNGS) from BC Cancer & MD Anderson. BRAFNGS OS did not differ by center (p = 0.77). Results: See table for BRAF cohort baseline characteristic comparison. BRAFPOP pts had worse OS than BRAFNGS pts (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 – 3.9, P < 0.0001). Median OS for all BRAF mt pts was 17.9 mos. Both groups had worse OS than wild type pts (P < 0.0001). 52 (81%) of BRAFPOP pts were referred to oncology, 40 (63%) received chemotherapy, and 12 (19%) had NGS BRAF testing. BRAFPOP pts who had NGS testing with BRAF mts had OS comparable to other BRAFNGS pts (P = 0.89) and better OS than BRAFPOP pts that never had NGS testing (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.76, P = 0.030). Pts with BRAF mts and MMR deficiency (dMMR) (n = 40) had worse OS than MMR proficiency (pMMR, n = 202) (1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.5, P = 0.011). This was driven by BRAFPOP dMMR pts (HR 1.9, 95% CI 0.9-4.0, P = 0.036) as no difference was seen by MMR in BRAFNGS pts (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.2, P = 0.30). Conclusions: Current estimates of prognosis for mCRC with BRAF mts likely underestimate its impact due to referral bias for NGS testing. BRAF mts with dMMR are associated with worse prognosis than pMMR. This appears driven by BRAFPOP pts. [Table: see text]

656 Background: Despite multiple trials of new agents in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), long term outcomes remain poor. This study explores the changing trends in the design, interpretation and outcomes of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCT) in mCRC over time. Methods: Phase III RCTs of systemic therapy for mCRC with enrollment between 1986 and 2016 were identified through 4 electronic databases and grouped into 3 time periods (1986-1996 – T1; 1997-2006 – T2 & 2007-2016 – T3). Study selection, quality appraisal and data collection were performed by 2 independent investigators. Study characteristics, primary and secondary endpoints, and authors’ interpretation of results and conclusions were analyzed. Improvement in overall survival (OS) was the difference between experimental and control arms. A study was deemed positive if it met its end point, was recommended for further study or for adoption for clinical use (p ≤ 0.05 significant for all analyses). Results: One hundred fifty trials (T1=36, T2=62, T3=52) with 77494 patients (T1=12406, T2=39158, T3=25930) were included. Although 1st line therapy trials continued to be the most common across all T, the percentage (%) of trials evaluating 3rd line and beyond (T1=0, T2=3, T3=27) have increased significantly over time as have trials with targeted agents (T1=11, T2=34, T3=79). Although OS remains the most common primary end point, more trials in T2 & T3 have used progression-free survival instead (14 vs 47 & 44). The % of trials with negative results but interpreted as positive increased over time (T1=18; T2=42; T3=35). Across all T, the median improvement in OS (months, m) of these trials was significantly lower compared to the trials that met primary end point across all T (T1 = 0 vs 1.8 m, T2 = -0.1 vs 3.25, T3 = -0.25 vs 2.55). Conclusions: A significant shift has occurred over the past three decades in the design and interpretation of phase III trials in advanced CRC. Any interpretations of potential survival benefits from trials that have not met primary end point must be made with significant caution.

e15797 Background: Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor representing approximately 0.3% of all gastrointestinal tract cancers. Prognostic factors in relation to survival outcomes for these patients are sporadically reported in the medical literature. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticojejunostomy treated at Mayo Clinic Rochester from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2016. Methods: Clinicopathological data of 52 duodenal cancer patients were collected. JMP software was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis, and multivariate cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the prognostic effect of pertinent clinical variables. All tests were two sided and a P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 65.9 years (range 39-81). The median overall survival was 51 months (95% CI 31.3-105.4) and the median progression free survival was 30.4 months with median follow up of 73.4 months. There were 3, 9, 21, and 19 patients with stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. Depth of tumor invasion (p = 0.0156) and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0441) were associated with overall survival on multivariate analysis. Advanced clinical staging influenced overall survival in univariate analysis, but lost prognostic significance in multivariate analysis. Age, gender, surgical technique, presence of metastases, tumor size, number of lymph nodes removed, location of duodenal segment involvement, and adjuvant treatment had no significant impact on overall survival. Laparoscopic approach did not influence survival but was associated with less hospital days (p = 0.0437). Conclusions: Depth of tumor invasion and lymph node status were associated with improved overall survival in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma. Laparoscopic procedure decreased the hospital stay without affecting outcomes.

e15703 Background: The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors and effects of adjuvant therapy for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who had pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: A cohort of 123 consecutive patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2006, through August 31, 2016 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Only patients with ampullary carcinoma by pathology review were included and were histologically classified as pancreaticobiliary or intestinal subtypes. Median follow-up duration was 41.0 months. Patient survival and its correlation with patient and tumor variables were tested by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Pancreatoduodenectomy was curative-intent in 120 out of 123 patients. All 123 patients underwent radical surgery, 32 patients (26.0%) had laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Among 123 patients, there were 76 men (61.8%).Median age at diagnosis was 67.2 years. 54 patients (45%) without metastatic disease upon surgery had adjuvant therapy (35 patients had chemotherapy only while 19 patient also had radiation). Median overall survival (OS) was 91.8 months. Poor performance status at disease diagnosis (ECOG > = 1), old age ( > = 70 years), primary tumor infiltration (T), lymph node metastasis (N), and advanced disease stage (TNM) had a significant negative impact on survival (p < 0.05 by univariate analysis). Gender, diabetes at disease diagnosis, laparoscopic surgery approach, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, and tumor size did not influence survival. In multivariate analysis, ECOG score > = 1, adjuvant treatment, primary tumor infiltration (T) and lymph node metastasis (N) remained statistically significant. Adjuvant therapy was independently associated with improved disease free survival (P = 0.0388) and overall survival (p = 0.030) for patients with advanced disease (stage IIB and above). Conclusions: Poor performance status and advanced disease stage are associated with decreased survival in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. Patients with advanced disease should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy.

e15045 Background: BRAF V600E mutations are present in 7% of mCRC patients (pts) and portend a poor prognosis. Data guiding initial treatment decisions are limited. This study investigates the management approach and clinical impact of utilizing metastasectomy for pts with BRAF V600E mCRC. Methods: By using prospective clinical and molecular data from Mayo Clinic, pts with BRAF V600E mCRC were analyzed for clinical characteristics, treatment and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: 164 pts with BRAF V600E mCRC were identified between 6/1999-8/2015. Complete follow up data were available for 52 pts. Median age of 65 years, 61% female, ECOG PS ≤ 1, 71% of pts had right sided tumors and 28% presented with liver limited metastasis. Only 7% (4/52) received FOLFOXIRI/BEV (average of 8 cycles). Peripheral neuropathy, pending BRAF status , and prior progression on FOLFOX, were the most common reasons documented for avoiding FOLFOXIRI/BEV. FOLFOX/BEV was the most common 1st line regimen used (32% of pts). Median overall survival (mOS) for all 52 pts was 25 months (mo) with median progression free survival (PFS) of 9.3 mo, reflecting worse survival when compared to BRAF wild-type control patients treated at Mayo Clinic (249 pts, mOS: 43 mo). With median follow up of 18.3 mo, 21 pts who underwent metastasectomy had improved OS (29.1mo vs. 22.7mo, HR = 0.33; CI: 0.12-0.78; p = 0.01) and PFS (13.6mo vs. 6.2mo, HR = 0.53, CI: 0.28-0.97; p = 0.03) when compared to the non-metastasectomy cohort, respectively. In multivariate analysis, metastasectomy remained statistically significant for improved survival outcomes (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.07-1.02; p = 0.02). Median relapse-free survival after metastasectomy was 9.7 mo (95% CI, 5.5 mo-19.5 mo). Only 2 pts remain disease free at the time of last follow up, with 1 pt without recurrent disease for greater than 2 years (28.9 mo). Conclusions: The use of multimodality therapy incorporating metastasectomy for BRAF V600E mCRC is a critical component for enhanced survival outcomes.

e15030 Background: Deficiencies in the DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system cause errors during DNA replication, which in turn give rise to microsatellite instability (MSI-H). MSI-H in mCRC is rare and its prognostic and predictive impact on outcome is unclear. This cohort study aims to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of MSI-H in metastatic CRC prior to the immune therapy era. Methods: 75 MSI-H mCRC patients (pts) and 75 matched (age, gender, disease sidedness, metachronous) MSS mCRC pts were identified from 1268 mCRC who had MSI/MMR test results at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1992 and 7/2016. A retrospective review was conducted by using data from electronic medical records (EMR). Statistical analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In the MSI-H group, there were 39 male (52%) and 36 female (48%) pts. Median age at metastatic disease diagnosis was 54.7 years. 35 patients presented with stage IV CRC. Primary tumors location: 38 right side, 11 transverse colon, 15 left side, 11 rectum. The MSS group was well matched (3 mismatches for gender and 1 mismatch for metachronous metastatic disease). Median overall survivals (OS) were 28.1 and 37.4 months for MSI-H and MSS pts, respectively ( p= 0.098). 98.7% MSS pts and 94.7% MSI-H pts had Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease and there was no median OS difference between these two groups (37.4 vs. 32.3 months p= 0.91). 43 MSI-H and 39 MSS pts had metastasectomy including ablation ( p= 0.51) with longer median OS (82.0 and 69.9 months, p= 0.90) compared to pts without metastasectomy (13.9 and 19.7 months, p= 0.15). Age < 65, metastasectomy, asymptomatic metastatic lesions, BRAF wild type, and multiple metastasectomy were associated with better survival in univariate analysis. Only metastasectomy remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis ( p< 0.0001). Conclusions: MSI-H mCRC do not appear to have improved prognosis compared with MSS cancers, in fact, there is a trend toward inferior outcome. In both groups, metastasectomy including multiple metastasectomy should be considered to optimize OS.

3556 Background: To define and update survival rates and relapse patterns in patients (pts) with isolated advanced abdominal nodal metastasis secondary to colorectal cancer (CRC), treated with curative intent using aggressive trimodality therapy. Methods: Fifty-seven pts with isolated advanced abdominal lymph node metastasis (retroperitoneal and mesenteric) secondary to colorectal cancer received trimodality therapy defined as chemotherapy delivered in conjunction with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by lymphadenectomy and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). Infusional 5-FU was the most common radiosensitizer used (66%, 38 pts). The median dose of EBRT was 50 Gy & the median dose of intraoperative radiotherapy was 12.5 Gy. End points included distant metastasis, toxicities, local failure within EBRT field, recurrence within the intraoperative radiotherapy field, and survival. Results: 49% of pts were male, median age 50.5 yrs. All patients had ECOG ≤ 1. 27 pts had primary right sided colon cancer, 16 left sided colon cancer and 14 rectal primaries. Median time from initial CRC diagnosis to development of abdominal lymph node metastatic disease was 24 months (95% CI, 23.5-45.1 months). 84% (48 pts) had paraaortic nodal metastases, 12% (7 pts) had mesenteric nodal metastases, and 3% (2 pts) had both. With a median follow up of 89.4 months, the median overall survival and 5-year estimated survival rate were 53.2 months (95% CI, 46.4-78.8 months) and 42%, respectively. Median progression free survival was 19.3 months (95% CI, 15.6-32.8 months). 21 (37%) pts never developed distant disease. Outcome was not affected by disease sidedness, rectal primary, or mutational profile. Treatment was well tolerated without any grade 3/4 toxicities. Conclusions: The use of trimodality therapy including EBRT with radiosensitizing chemotherapy, lymphadenectomy and IORT produces sustainable long-term survival in selected metastatic CRC pts presenting with isolated retroperitoneal/mesenteric nodal relapse.