Tosto, Giuseppe

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) missing heritability remains extensive despite numerous genetic risk loci identified by genome‐wide association or sequencing studies. This has been attributed, at least partially, to mechanisms not currently investigated by traditional single‐marker/gene approaches. Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) aggregate sparse genetic information across the genome to identify individual genetic risk profiles for disease prediction and patient risk stratification. Recent advancements have pivoted on innovative approaches utilizing OMICS data to construct such risk scores.MethodWe employed a random forest algorithm to identify a list of gene candidates from bulk RNA sequencing data in prefrontal cortex from 565 AD brain samples (non‐Hispanic Whites, n = 399; Hispanics, n = 113; African American, n = 12) across six U.S. brain banks. Subsequently, we calculated their effect size on Braak staging using regression models to construct a polytranscriptomic risk score (PTRS). We employed two distinct models: “Ethnicity‐Agnostic” Model (randomly assigning samples to training and testing samples) and “Ethnicity‐Aware” Model (assigning NHW samples to training and Hispanics to testing sample). Analysis of variance and the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC AUC) was used to evaluate PTRS’s classification performances. We validated findings using the Religious Orders Study/Memory and Aging Project study (ROS/MAP, n = 1,095).ResultWe found a significant difference in PTRS between samples with low vs. high Braak stages (≤4 vs. ≥5, p = 1*E‐04; Figure 1 upper panel). AUC was found to be 79‐81%, consistently in both Ethnicity‐Agnostic and Ethnicity‐Aware models (Figure 1 lower panel). Finally, the PTRS in ROS/MAP yielded a similar classification performance (p = 2*E‐04, AUC = 77%).Conclusioncontrary to prior studies, we developed a PTRS with optimal transferability across ethnicities. This underscores the importance of developing novel tools to stratify and harmonize large brain repositories for AD.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s Disease (AD) presents complex molecular heterogeneity, influenced by a variety of factors including heterogeneous phenotypic, genetic, and neuropathologic presentations. Regulation of gene expression mechanisms is a primary interest of investigations aiming to uncover the underlying disease mechanisms and progression.MethodWe generated bulk RNA‐sequencing in prefrontal cortex from 565 AD brain samples (non‐Hispanic Whites, n = 399; Hispanics, n = 113; African American, n = 12) across six U.S. brain banks, and conducted differential gene expression and enrichment analyses. We sought to identify cross‐ancestry and ancestry‐specific differentially expressed genes (DEG) and pathways across Braak stages, adjusting for sex, age at death, and RNA quality metrics. We validated our findings using the Religious Orders Study/Memory and Aging Project study (ROS/MAP, n = 1,095). Lastly, we validated top DEG using publically‐available human single‐nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) data.ResultAD‐known genes VGF (LFC = ‐0.661, padj = 3.78) and ADAMTS2 (padj = 1.21) were consistently differentially expressed across statistical models, ethnic groups, and replicated in ROS/MAP (Figure 1). Genes from the heat shock protein (HSP) family, e.g. HSPB7 (padj = 3.78), were the top DEG, also replicated in ROS/MAP. Ethnic‐stratified analyses prioritized TNFSF14 and SPOCD1 as top DEG in Hispanic samples. Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted several significantly pathways, including “TYROBP causal network in microglia” (WP3945; padj = 1.68) and “Alzheimer Disease” (WP5124; padj = 4.24). snRNAseq validated several DEG, including VGF downregulated in neurons (padj = 1.1).ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the largest diverse transcriptome study for AD in post‐mortem tissue. We identified perturbated genes and pathways resulting in cross‐ethnic and ethnic‐specific findings, ultimately highlighting the importance of diversity in AD investigations.

AbstractBackgroundGenetic variations have emerged as crucial players in the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and they serve for a better understanding of the disease mechanisms; yet the specific roles of these genetic variants remain uncertain. Animal models with reminiscent disease pathology could uncover previously uncharacterized roles of these genes. Therefore, we generated zebrafish models for AD variants to analyze the in depth molecular and biological functions of these variants.MethodUsing CRISPR/Cas9, we generated a knockout model for abca7, orthologous to human ABCA7. We performed single cell transcriptomics and analyzed the altered genes and molecular pathways in zebrafish. We leveraged data from multiethnic AD cohorts at Mayo Clinic and Columbia University, to perform genetic association studies, co‐expression analyses, in silico interaction mapping, family based variant segregation analyses and epigenetic association studies, and the functional and histological studies in zebrafish.ResultThe abca7± zebrafish reduced astroglial proliferation, synaptic integrity, and microglial response after Aβ42 toxicity. We found that the abca7 loss‐of‐function (LOF) reduced neuropeptide Y (npy) expression as well as Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (bdnf) and Nerve growth factor receptor (ngfr). Human brain analysis showed reduced NPY in AD, regulatory interaction between NPY and BDNF, genetic variants in NPY associated with AD, and segregation of variants in ABCA7, BDNF and NGFR in families. ABCA7 variants altered the epigenetic codes in NPY, BDNF, and NGFR promoter regions. Human results paralleled with zebrafish findings to indicate an evolutionarily conserved disease mechanism through ABCA7‐NPY signalling axis. NPY administration to zebrafish rescued the phenotypes in abca7 knockout, suggesting a true biological relevance.ConclusionOur results demonstrate a previously unknown link between ABCA7 and NPY in regulation of synaptic integrity and neurogenesis in AD. We propose that ABCA7‐dependent NPY is a resilience factor in vertebrate brains, and this reserve mechanism is impaired in AD.

AbstractObjectiveTo compute penetrance and recurrence risk using a genome‐wide PRS (including and excluding the APOE region) in families with Alzheimer's disease.MethodsGenotypes from the National Institute on Aging Late‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease Family‐Based Study and a study of familial Alzheimer's disease in Caribbean Hispanics were used to compute PRS with and without variants in the 2 MB region flanking APOE. PRS was calculated in using clumping/thresholding and Bayesian methods and was assessed for association with Alzheimer's disease and age at onset. Penetrance and recurrence risk for carriers in highest and lowest PRS quintiles were compared separately within APOE‐ε4 carriers and non‐carriers.ResultsPRS excluding the APOE region was strongly associated with clinical and neuropathological diagnosis of AD. PRS association with AD was similar in participants who did not carry an APOE‐ε4 allele (OR = 1.74 [1.53–1.91]) compared with APOE‐ε4 carriers (1.53 [1.4–1.68]). Compared to the lowest quintile, the highest PRS quintile had a 10% higher penetrance at age 70 (p = 0.0006) and a 20% higher penetrance at age 80 (p < 10e‐05). Stratifying by APOE‐ε4 allele, PRS in the highest quintile was significantly more penetrant than the lowest quintile, both, within APOE‐ε4 carriers (14.5% higher at age 80, p = 0.002) and non‐carriers (26% higher at 80, p < 10e‐05). Recurrence risk for siblings conferred by a co‐sibling in the highest PRS quintile increased from 4% between the ages of 65–74 years to 39% at age 85 and older.InterpretationPRS can be used to estimate penetrance and recurrence risk in familial Alzheimer's disease among carriers and non‐carries of APOE‐ε4.

Abstract Introduction There is increasing interest in plasma amyloid beta (Aβ) as an endophenotype of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Identifying the genetic determinants of plasma Aβ levels may elucidate important biological processes that determine plasma Aβ measures. Methods We included 12,369 non‐demented participants from eight population‐based studies. Imputed genetic data and measured plasma Aβ1‐40, Aβ1‐42 levels and Aβ1‐42/Aβ1‐40 ratio were used to perform genome‐wide association studies, and gene‐based and pathway analyses. Significant variants and genes were followed up for their association with brain positron emission tomography Aβ deposition and AD risk. Results Single‐variant analysis identified associations with apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) for Aβ1‐42 and Aβ1‐42/Aβ1‐40 ratio, and BACE1 for Aβ1‐40. Gene‐based analysis of Aβ1‐40 additionally identified associations for APP , PSEN2 , CCK , and ZNF397 . There was suggestive evidence for interaction between a BACE1 variant and APOE ε4 on brain Aβ deposition. Discussion Identification of variants near/in known major Aβ‐processing genes strengthens the relevance of plasma‐Aβ levels as an endophenotype of AD.

ObjectiveWhite matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are areas of increased signal on T2‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that most commonly reflect small vessel cerebrovascular disease. Increased WMH volume is associated with risk and progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These observations are typically interpreted as evidence that vascular abnormalities play an additive, independent role contributing to symptom presentation, but not core features of AD. We examined the severity and distribution of WMH in presymptomatic PSEN1, PSEN2, and APP mutation carriers to determine the extent to which WMH manifest in individuals genetically determined to develop AD.MethodsThe study comprised participants (n = 299; age = 39.03 ± 10.13) from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, including 184 (61.5%) with a mutation that results in AD and 115 (38.5%) first‐degree relatives who were noncarrier controls. We calculated the estimated years from expected symptom onset (EYO) by subtracting the affected parent's symptom onset age from the participant's age. Baseline MRI data were analyzed for total and regional WMH. Mixed‐effects piece‐wise linear regression was used to examine WMH differences between carriers and noncarriers with respect to EYO.ResultsMutation carriers had greater total WMH volumes, which appeared to increase approximately 6 years before expected symptom onset. Effects were most prominent for the parietal and occipital lobe, which showed divergent effects as early as 22 years before estimated onset.InterpretationAutosomal‐dominant AD is associated with increased WMH well before expected symptom onset. The findings suggest the possibility that WMHs are a core feature of AD, a potential therapeutic target, and a factor that should be integrated into pathogenic models of the disease. Ann Neurol 2016;79:929–939