Bailey, Kent R

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves systemic metabolomic profile by enhancing left ventricular function. The observational cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of CRT on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and circulating plasma metabolites in patients who had heart failure with reduced LVEF. METHODS: We prospectively screened patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and nonischemic cardiomyopathy who received CRT with a defibrillator for LVEF ≤35% according to current guidelines. Clinical assessment included echocardiography and device interrogation. Blood samples for metabolomic analysis were collected before CRT and at 6-month follow-up. Plasma was subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic analysis. RESULTS: Totally 92 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 67.3±11.3 years (37.0% female). LVEF was significantly improved from 28.9±7.6% at baseline to 36.0±11.3% at 6 months ( P <0.001) and to 40.1±12.6% at 12 months ( P <0.001). After CRT, 42 metabolite features were significantly decreased compared with the baseline. The ketone bodies, including 3-hydroxybutyrate ( P <0.001) and acetone ( P =0.01), were reduced. A branched-chain amino acid, isoleucine, was also decreased after CRT ( P =0.01). These metabolomic changes were mainly observed in the nonischemic cardiomyopathy group, while the metabolomic profile in the ischemic cardiomyopathy group was characterized by enhanced amino acid oxidation and elevated levels of lactate and pyruvate. The improvement in LVEF positively correlated with the ratio of changes in ketone bodies and isoleucine. CONCLUSIONS: CRT may modulate the systemic plasma metabolomic profile, which correlated with improvement in left ventricular function in patients with severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Background Neprilysin is a metalloprotease involved in proteolysis of numerous peptides, including natriuretic peptides, and is of prognostic and therapeutic importance in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. No studies have investigated circulating neprilysin in the community, its clinical correlates, or its relationship to cardiovascular disease in the general population. Methods and Results Plasma neprilysin was measured in 1536 participants from Olmsted County, Minnesota, using a commercially available sandwich ELISA assay. Clinical and echocardiographic correlates and subsequent outcomes were determined. Soluble neprilysin is non‐normally distributed in the community (median: 3.9 ng/mL; interquartile range: 1.0–43.0 ng/mL). There was no relationship between plasma neprilysin and age (Spearman correlation: −0.04, P =0.16); body mass index (Spearman correlation: −0.04, P =0.16); glomerular filtration rate (Spearman correlation: −0.007, P =0.8); or A‐, B‐, or C‐type natriuretic peptides (Spearman correlation: 0.03, P =0.22; −0.001, P =0.96; 0.01, P =0.67, respectively). Among tertiles of neprilysin, the lowest tertile group had the highest prevalence of smokers ( P <0.001), hypertension ( P =0.04), dyslipidemia ( P =0.03), and diastolic dysfunction ( P =0.02). Soluble neprilysin was not prospectively associated with death or heart failure over a median of 10.7 years. Conclusions In a large community‐based cohort, for the first time, we described the distribution of circulating neprilysin in the general community. We observed that neprilysin does not correlate with natriuretic peptide levels and is not independently associated with adverse outcomes. The novel associations observed between low soluble neprilysin levels and an adverse cardiometabolic and smoking profile requires further investigation.

Endothelin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and hemodynamic and metabolic responses to 6 months treatment with atrasentan, the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist. Seventy-two patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and nonobstructive coronary artery disease on coronary angiogram were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to atrasentan or placebo. Mean aortic blood pressure decreased from 92±10 to 80±10 mm Hg ( P <0.001) in the atrasentan group and did not change in the placebo group (93±10 and 92±11 mm Hg; P =0.84). The difference between the groups was significant ( P <0.001). No effect on heart rate was observed. In a subgroup of patients not treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, creatinine level decreased in the atrasentan versus the placebo group ( P =0.011). Fasting glucose ( P =0.026), glycosylated hemoglobin level ( P =0.041), triglyceride l ( P =0.013), lipoprotein-A ( P =0.046), and uric acid levels ( P =0.048) decreased significantly in the atrasentan group compared with the placebo group. No progression of angiographic coronary disease was observed. The most common adverse effects with atrasentan were nasal stuffiness, headache, and edema. In conclusion, 6 months of treatment with atrasentan results in a reduction of blood pressure and improvement in glucose and lipid metabolism. These findings suggest the beneficial role of atrasentan in the treatment of hypertension and metabolic syndrome.