Rezai Jahromi, Behnam

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage are associated with neuroinflammation and increased morbidity and mortality. Rapid clearance of blood from the cerebrospinal fluid space may mitigate neuroinflammatory cascades and improve clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of active cerebrospinal fluid exchange, including neuroendoscopic lavage and IRRAflow systems, versus external ventricular drainage in patients with intraventricular hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS: The study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and thoroughly assessed databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science, up to September 18, 2025. Statistical analysis, both fixed-effect and random-effect model analyses, was performed by the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. In addition, the Cochran Q test was conducted to determine the statistical heterogeneity. In terms of low heterogeneity, the fixed-effect model is reported. RESULTS: This review included 7 studies with a total sample size of 834. Our analysis showed that active cerebrospinal fluid exchange was associated with significantly higher hematoma clearance (odds ratio, 2.72 [95% CI, 1.22–6.08]; P =0.015), better functional outcomes (odds ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.12–2.48]; P =0.012), lower shunt dependency (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.10–0.50]; P <0.001), and reduced infection rates (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.12–0.42]; P <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that neuroendoscopic lavage was most effective for hematoma clearance, while IRRAflow reduced infection rates. Also, younger patients had better neurological recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Active cerebrospinal fluid exchange techniques demonstrated superior outcomes over external ventricular drainage in managing intraventricular hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, particularly in clot resolution and neurological recovery. Large-scale trials are warranted.

ABSTARCT BACKGROUND: IRRAflow is a novel active cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exchange system for the treatment of hemorrhagic strokes and intracranial infections. It is a closed system that irrigates various medications dissolved in irrigation solutions at a speed of up to 180 mL/h, expediting resolution. Disrupting this closed system to withdraw CSF samples or infuse medications is necessary in certain circumstances. We report our novel approach for maintaining the sterility of the closed IRRAflow system using a needleless extension and assess the compatibility and safety of this technology throughout treatment. METHODS: We used a needleless extension to withdraw CSF samples and deliver medications to 5 patients treated with the IRRAflow system. We used 1 stopcock with a 3-way valve, 2 neutral needleless connectors, and 2 antiseptic caps. The stopcock was connected between the irrigation and drainage ports of the catheter. The needleless connectors were mounted at the 12 o’clock position of the attached stopcock and the irrigation port with antiseptic caps covering the distal ends. To initiate fluid exchange, the 2 needleless connectors were separated. The extra stopcock valve was connected between the drainage arm, the cassette, and the irrigation arm. The needleless connectors remained mounted at the 12 o’clock position of the stopcock and irrigation port throughout treatment. RESULTS: The needleless connectors mounted on the 12 o’clock position of the stopcock and irrigation port on the drainage and irrigation arms, respectively, provided efficient management of fluid exchange, CSF fluid sampling, and medication delivery. Our needleless extension was compatible with the IRRAflow device and prevented secondary infections despite repeated CSF sampling and medication delivery. CONCLUSION: The needleless extension facilitated a simple and safe interaction with the closed IRRAflow system without compromising the sterile environment during CSF sampling and medication delivery.