Back to Authors

Phelps, Mitch

0000-0002-1615-5280

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Citations 5

A Randomized Phase II Study of Combination Atezolizumab and Varlilumab (CDX-1127) with or without Cobimetinib in Previously Treated Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer
Heumann, Thatcher , Lu, Jiayun , Wang, Hao , Phelps, Mitch A. , Zhu, Qingfeng , Anders, Robert A. , Mitchell, Sarah , Leatherman, James M. , Abbott, Nicole , Kim, Kyeongmin , Imhof, Teresa , Xie, Zhiliang , Partey, Alexandra , Kunk, Paul R. , Iyer, Renuka , Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu , Kalyan, Aparna , Gbolahan, Olumide B., Javle, Milind , Davis, S. Lindsey , Spencer, Kristen , Azad, Nilofer S. , Heumann, Thatcher Ross , Phelps, Mitch , Anders, Robert , Leatherman, James , Li, Daneng , Kunk, Paul Raymond , Iyer, Renuka , Dayyani, Farshid , Fonkoua, Lionel Aurelien A Kankeu , Kalyan, Aparna , Gbolahan, Olumide B , Javle, Milind M , Davis, S Lindsey , Florou, Vaia , Spencer, Kristen , Sharon, Elad , Yarchoan, Mark , Lesinski, Gregory B , Azad, Nilofer , Wang, Hao , Mitchell, Sarah , Li, Daneng , Dayyani, Farshid , Sharon, Elad , Yarchoan, Mark

Clinical Cancer Research | June 30, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: OF1-OF12

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4893 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The addition of MEK inhibition (MEKi) to programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Although MEK inhibitors may increase tumor cell immunogenicity, they can impair T-cell priming/effector function, limiting combination efficacy. We hypothesized that the addition of a CD27 agonist could restore T-cell function and enhance antitumor immunity in this combination. Patients and Methods: We conducted a randomized, phase II trial evaluating atezolizumab (840 mg, intravenously, days 1 and 15) in combination with the CD27 costimulatory monoclonal antibody [CDX-1127/varlilumab (3 mg/kg, intravenously, days 1 and 15)], with/without the addition of an MEK inhibitor [cobimetinib (60 mg, orally, daily, days 1–21, off days 22–28)] in unresectable biliary tract cancer following at least one metastatic therapy. Overall response rate (ORR) and PFS were coprimary endpoints. Treatment-related changes in CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were the primary correlative outcomes. Results: The trial was closed early following interim preplanned ORR analysis. At closure, 57 patients had been enrolled [n = 29 in the cobimetinib + atezolizumab + varlilumab (CAV) arm; n = 28 in the atezolizumab + varlilumab (AV) arm]. A majority (67%) had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 32% were immunotherapy experienced. Both regimens were well tolerated without new safety signals. Objective responses were rare [0% (CAV); 3.8% (AV)]. The median PFS (mPFS) was 2.40 (CAV) and 1.84 (AV) months [hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.38–1.18]. Among immunotherapy-experienced patients, the mPFS was 3.62 (CAV) and 1.84 (AV) months (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.18–1.62). Treatment with CAV increased intratumoral CD8+ T-cell density compared with treatment with AV. Conclusions: The combinations of atezolizumab and varlilumab with/without cobimetinib were safe, but neither meaningfully improved outcomes in biliary tract cancer treated in the later lines. Correlative tissue studies validated preclinical work that MEKi increases CD8+ TILs.
Phase 2 study of ibrutinib in classic and variant hairy cell leukemia
Rogers, Kerry A. , Andritsos, Leslie A. , Wei, Lai , McLaughlin, Eric , Ruppert, Amy S. , Anghelina, Mirela , Blachly, James S. , Call, Timothy G. , Chihara, Dai , Dauki, Anees M. , James, Lacey, Kreitman, Robert J. , Lozanski, Gerard , Lucas, David , Ngankeu, Apollinaire, Phelps, Mitch A. , Schiffer, Charles A. , Carson, William E. , Jones, Jeffrey A. , Grever, Michael R. , Call, Timothy, Dauki, Anees , Carson, William E , Wei, Lai , Chihara, Dai , Blachly, James , Phelps, Mitch , Guo, Ling Jun , Ivy, S. Percy , Jones, Daniel R. , Ravandi, Farhad

Blood | March 23, 2021 | Volume: 137 | Issue: 25 | Pages: 3473-3483

10.1182/blood.2020009688 Get It

Abstract Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare B-cell malignancy, and there is a need for novel treatments for patients who do not benefit from purine analogs. Ibrutinib, an oral agent targeting Bruton tyrosine kinase in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway, is highly effective in several malignancies. Its activity in HCL was unknown, so we conducted a multisite phase 2 study of oral ibrutinib in patients with either relapsed classic or variant hairy cell leukemia. The primary outcome measure was the overall response rate (ORR) at 32 weeks, and we also assessed response at 48 weeks and best response during treatment. Key secondary objectives were characterization of toxicity and determination of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-seven patients were enrolled at 2 different doses (24 at 420 mg, 13 at 840 mg). The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (range, 0-5.9 years). The ORR at 32 weeks was 24%, which increased to 36% at 48 weeks. The best ORR was 54%. The estimated 36-month PFS was 73% and OS was 85%. The most frequent adverse events were diarrhea (59%), fatigue (54%), myalgia (54%), and nausea (51%). Hematologic adverse events were common: anemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (41%), and neutropenia (35%). Ibrutinib can be safely administered to patients with HCL with objective responses and results in prolonged disease control. Although the initial primary outcome objective of the study was not met, the observation of objective responses in heavily pretreated patients coupled with a favorable PFS suggests that ibrutinib may be beneficial in these patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01841723.
Phase I study of AR-42 and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia
Liva, Sophia G. , Coss, Christopher C. , Wang, Jiang , Blum, William , Klisovic, Rebecca B. , Bhatnagar, Bhavana , Walsh, Katherine, Geyer, Susan M. , Zhao, Qiuhong , Garzon, Ramiro , Marcucci, Guido , Phelps, Mitch A. , Walker, Alison R. , Phelps, Mitch

Leukemia & Lymphoma | February 8, 2020 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1484-1492

10.1080/10428194.2020.1719095 Get It

miR-221 Silencing Blocks Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Promotes Survival
Park, Jong Kook , Kogure, Takayuki , Nuovo, Gerard J., Jiang, Jinmai , He, Lei , Kim, Ji Hye , Phelps, Mitch A. , Papenfuss, Tracey L. , Schmittgen, Thomas D. , Croce, Carlo Maria , Patel, Tushar , Phelps, Mitch

Cancer Research | October 18, 2011 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 7608-7616

10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1144 Get It

Abstract Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) face a dismal prognosis because of a lack of any effective therapies. To address this situation, we conducted a preclinical investigation of the therapeutic efficacy of oligonucleotides directed against the oncogenic microRNA miR-221, which has been implicated in HCC. Of 9 chemistries evaluated, we determined that a 2′-O-methyl phosphorothioate-modified anti-miR-221 oligonucleotide was most effective at reducing proliferation in vitro. A cholesterol-modified isoform of anti-miR-221 (chol-anti-miR-221) exhibited improved pharmacokinetics and liver tissue distribution compared with unmodified oligonucleotide. Chol-anti-miR-221 significantly reduced miR-221 levels in liver within a week of intravenous administration and in situ hybridization studies confirmed accumulation of the oligonucleotide in tumor cells in vivo. Within the same period, chol-anti-miR-221 reduced tumor cell proliferation and increased markers of apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest, elevating the tumor doubling time and increasing mouse survival. Taken together, our findings offer a preclinical proof of efficacy for chol-anti-miR-221 in a valid orthotopic mouse model of HCC, suggesting that this targeted agent could benefit treatment for patients with advanced HCC. Cancer Res; 71(24); 7608–16. ©2011 AACR.
REO-10: A Phase I Study of Intravenous Reovirus and Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Comins, Charles, Spicer, James , Protheroe, Andrew , Roulstone, Victoria , Twigger, Katie, White, Christine , Vile, Richard G. , Melcher, Alan , Mettinger, K.L., Nuovo, Gerard J., Cohn, David E. , Phelps, Mitch A. , Harrington, Kevin J. , Pandha, Hardev , Coffey, Matt C. , Melcher, Alan A , Harrington, Kevin , Cohn, David , Phelps, Mitch

Clinical Cancer Research | October 7, 2010 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 5564-5572

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1233 Get It

Abstract Purpose: REOLYSIN (Oncolytics Biotech) consists of a wild-type oncolytic reovirus, which has selective cytotoxicity for tumor cells while sparing normal cells. In a phase I study as a single agent, repeated infusions of reovirus were safe with evidence of antitumor activity. Preclinical studies indicate potential for synergy between reovirus and chemotherapeutic agents. A multicenter, phase I dose escalation study was designed to assess the safety of combining reovirus with docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. Experimental Design: Patients received 75 mg/m2 docetaxel (day 1) and escalating doses of reovirus up to 3 × 1010 TCID50 (days 1-5) every 3 weeks. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, and 24 patients were exposed to treatment, with 23 completing at least one cycle and 16 suitable for response assessment. Dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 neutropenia was seen in one patient, but the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Antitumor activity was seen with one complete response and three partial responses. A disease control rate (combined complete response, partial response, and stable disease) of 88% was observed. Immunohistochemical analysis of reovirus protein expression was observed in posttreatment tumor biopsies from three patients. Conclusion: The combination of reovirus and docetaxel is safe, with evidence of objective disease response, and warrants further evaluation in a phase II study at a recommended schedule of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, three times weekly) and reovirus (3 × 1010 TCID50, days 1-5, every 3 weeks). Clin Cancer Res; 16(22); 5564–72. ©2010 AACR.