Back to Authors

Cohn, David

0000-0002-3036-6172

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH.

Citations 2

Identification of Patients With Ovarian Cancer Experiencing the Highest Benefit From Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting on the Basis of Their Tumor-Intrinsic Chemosensitivity (KELIM): The GOG-0218 Validation Study
You, Benoît , Purdy, Christopher, Copeland, Larry J. , Swisher, Elizabeth M. , Bookman, Michael A. , Fleming, Gini F. , Coleman, Robert L. , Randall, Leslie M. , Tewari, Krishnansu S. , Monk, Bradley J. , Mannel, Robert S., Walker, Joan L. , Cappuccini, Fabio, Hendrickson, Andrea E. Wahner , Colomban, Olivier , Burger, Robert A. , Fleming, Gini , Coleman, Robert , Cohn, David , Muzaffar, Mahvish , Mutch, David G. , Wahner Hendrickson, Andrea E , Swisher, Elizabeth M , Copeland, Larry J , Cohn, David E. , Martin, Lainie P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 17, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 34 | Pages: 3965-3974

10.1200/jco.22.01207 Get It

PURPOSE In patients with high-grade ovarian cancer, predictors of bevacizumab efficacy in first-line setting are needed. In the ICON-7 trial, a poor tumor intrinsic chemosensitivity (defined by unfavorable modeled cancer antigen-125 [CA-125] ELIMination rate constant K [KELIM] score) was a predictive biomarker. Only the patients with high-risk disease (suboptimally resected stage III, or stage IV) exhibiting unfavorable KELIM score < 1.0 had overall survival (OS) benefit from bevacizumab (median: 29.7 v 20.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78). An external validation study in the GOG-0218 trial was performed. METHODS In GOG-0218, 1,873 patients were treated with carboplatin-paclitaxel ± concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab/placebo. Patient KELIM values were calculated with CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days by the Lyon University team. The association between KELIM score (favorable ≥ 1.0, or unfavorable < 1.0) and bevacizumab benefit for progression-free survival (PFS)/OS was independently assessed by NGR-GOG using univariate/multivariate analyses. RESULTS KELIM was assessable in 1,662 patients with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. An unfavorable KELIM score was associated with bevacizumab benefit compared with placebo (PFS: HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82; OS: HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.03), whereas a favorable KELIM was not (PFS: HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.17; OS: HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.39). The highest benefit was observed in patients with a high-risk disease exhibiting unfavorable KELIM, for PFS (median: 9.1 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.78), and for OS (median: 35.1 v 29.1 months; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97). CONCLUSION This GOG-0218 trial investigation validates ICON-7 findings about the association between poor tumor chemosensitivity and benefit from concurrent-maintenance bevacizumab, suggesting that bevacizumab may mainly be effective in patients with poorly chemosensitive disease. Bevacizumab may be prioritized in patients with a high-risk and poorly chemosensitive disease to improve their PFS/OS (patient KELIM score calculator available on the Biomarker Kinetics website).
REO-10: A Phase I Study of Intravenous Reovirus and Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Comins, Charles, Spicer, James , Protheroe, Andrew , Roulstone, Victoria , Twigger, Katie, White, Christine , Vile, Richard G. , Melcher, Alan , Mettinger, K.L., Nuovo, Gerard J., Cohn, David E. , Phelps, Mitch A. , Harrington, Kevin J. , Pandha, Hardev , Coffey, Matt C. , Melcher, Alan A , Harrington, Kevin , Cohn, David , Phelps, Mitch

Clinical Cancer Research | October 7, 2010 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 5564-5572

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1233 Get It

Abstract Purpose: REOLYSIN (Oncolytics Biotech) consists of a wild-type oncolytic reovirus, which has selective cytotoxicity for tumor cells while sparing normal cells. In a phase I study as a single agent, repeated infusions of reovirus were safe with evidence of antitumor activity. Preclinical studies indicate potential for synergy between reovirus and chemotherapeutic agents. A multicenter, phase I dose escalation study was designed to assess the safety of combining reovirus with docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. Experimental Design: Patients received 75 mg/m2 docetaxel (day 1) and escalating doses of reovirus up to 3 × 1010 TCID50 (days 1-5) every 3 weeks. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, and 24 patients were exposed to treatment, with 23 completing at least one cycle and 16 suitable for response assessment. Dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 neutropenia was seen in one patient, but the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Antitumor activity was seen with one complete response and three partial responses. A disease control rate (combined complete response, partial response, and stable disease) of 88% was observed. Immunohistochemical analysis of reovirus protein expression was observed in posttreatment tumor biopsies from three patients. Conclusion: The combination of reovirus and docetaxel is safe, with evidence of objective disease response, and warrants further evaluation in a phase II study at a recommended schedule of docetaxel (75 mg/m2, three times weekly) and reovirus (3 × 1010 TCID50, days 1-5, every 3 weeks). Clin Cancer Res; 16(22); 5564–72. ©2010 AACR.