Packiriswamy, Nandakumar

2500 Background: Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel immunomodulatory therapeutic approach for relapsed refractory hematologic malignancies. The Indiana strain of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus was engineered to encode interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS) to produce VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Virally encoded IFNβ serves as an index of viral proliferation and enhances host anti-tumor immunity. NIS was inserted to noninvasively assess viral biodistribution using SPECT/PET imaging. We present the results of the phase 1 clinical trial NCT03017820 of systemic administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS among patients (pts) with relapsed refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM), T cell Lymphoma (TCL) and Acute myeloid Leukemia (AML). Methods: VSV-IFNβ-NIS was administered at 5x109 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) dose level 1 to dose level 4, 1.7x1011 TCID50. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS as a single agent. Secondary objectives were determination of safety profile and preliminary efficacy of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Correlative objectives included monitoring viremia and virus shedding. Adverse events (AEs) are reported based on CTCAE V4; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading was based on Lee (Blood 2014) criteria. Results: 15 pts received VSV-IFNβ-NIS: MM (7), TCL(7) and AML(1); 3 pts were treated at each dose level (DL) 1 through 3 (respectively 0.05, 0.17, and 0.5 x 1011 TCID50), & 6 pts were treated at dose level 4 (1.7x1011 TCID50). There were no dose limiting toxicities. The most frequent grades 3 & 4 AEs were hematologic: lymphopenia (46.6 & 26.6%), neutropenia (13.3% & 6.7%). CRS grades 1 (6.7%) and 2 (46.6%) were the non-hematologic AEs of note; mostly at DL 4. Only 1 pt required transient pressor support. Responses were seen in pts with T cell lymphoma. At DL2, there was a partial response (PR) lasting 3 months in a pt, post 12 prior lines of therapy. At DL4 there was a 6 month PR in a pt with PTCL and another pt with cutaneous relapse of PTCL who enjoys an ongoing CR, more than 1 year post VSV infusion; both pts received 5 prior lines of therapy. Viremia was detected in all pts at the end of infusion only up to 72 hrs post infusion; no infectious virus was recovered in buccal swabs or urine. Neutralizing anti-VSV antibodies were present by day 29. IFN levels were detectable within 30 mins of infusion, peaking between 4 & 48 hrs. TCL pts mounted higher hIFNβ levels within 48 hrs; the pt with CR mounted peak hIFNβ response of 18213.3pg/ml at 48 hrs post infusion, 15-fold higher than any other pt. Conclusions: VSV-IFNβ-NIS can be safely administered by IV infusion among heavily pretreated pts with hematologic malignancies. VSV-IFNβ-NIS as a single agent appears to be most effective at DL4 among patients with TCL, with an ongoing CR in a patient at DL4 more than 1 year post administration. Future trials of combination strategies with immune-modulatory drugs are currently being planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03017820.

Background: Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel immunomodulatory therapeutic approach for relapsed refractory hematologic malignancies. The Indiana strain of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) has been engineered to encode interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS) to produce VSV-IFNβ-NIS. The virally encoded IFNβ serves as an index of viral proliferation and enhances host anti-tumor immunity. The NIS is inserted as a reporter gene into the viral genome to enable noninvasive monitoring of viral spread using PET/CT imaging. Here we present results of Arm A (patients with low tumor burden) of the Phase I clinical trial (NCT03017820) of intravenous administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS for patients (pts) with relapsed refractory hematological malignancies: MM, AML, and TCL. Methods: This was a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5x10^9 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) level 1 through 1.7x10^11 TCID50 dose level 4 given as a single IV dose. The primary objective was determining the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS alone; secondary objectives include estimating the safety profile and preliminary efficacy. Correlative objectives include monitoring the pharmacodynamics of viral replication through SPECT/CT imaging with NIS gene, viremia, virus shedding and changes in the immune profile of peripheral blood leukocytes. Adverse events (AEs) are reported based on CTCAE v4; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading was based on Lee (Blood 2014; 124(2):188-195) criteria. Results: From April 2017, 12 pts have received IV VSV-IFNβ-NIS in Arm A: MM (7), TCL(4) and AML(1); 3 pts were treated at each dose level (DL) 1 to 4. At DL1, there were five grade 3 hematologic AEs (leukopenia [1], neutropenia [1], lymphopenia [3]) and no grade 3+ non-hematologic AEs. At DL2, three grade 3 hematologic AEs (anemia [2], lymphopenia [1]), four grade 4 hematologic AEs (neutropenia [1], leukopenia [1], lymphopenia [1] and thrombocytopenia [1]). There was 1 event of grade 2 CRS at DL2, two grade 3 non-hematologic AEs (nausea [1], dehydration [1]). At DL3, there was one grade 4 hematologic AE (neutropenia [1]), three grade 3 hematologic AEs (lymphopenia [2], leukopenia [1]), and one grade 3 non-hematologic AE (vasovagal reaction [1]). One grade 2 and grade 1 CRS by Lee criteria were observed. At DL4, there were three grade 3 hematologic AEs (lymphopenia [1], neutropenia [1], thrombocytopenia [1]), and three grade 3 non-hematologic AEs (AST increase [1], skin infection [1], soft tissue infection [1])and two grade 2 CRS. There were no dose limiting toxicities. There was one partial response (DL2) and one complete response (DL4); 3 pts had stable disease, 7 pts progressed. The MM pts receiving VSV-IFNβ-NIS at DL4 had stable disease. Six of the 7 MM pts demonstrated transient reduction in serum level of involved free light chain (LC) after VSV-IFNβ-NIS infusion, with median 20.4% reduction of the involved LC within 48 hrs. Viremia was detectable in all pts at the end of infusion, to varying levels at 30 mins, 1, 2, 4, 24, 48h or 72 hrs post infusion. No persistent viremia was observed. No infectious virus was recovered in buccal swabs or urine and neutralizing anti-VSV antibodies were present by day 29. The IFN levels were detectable within 30 minutes of infusion and peaked between 4 and 48 hrs. The pts with a diagnosis of TCL mounted higher hIFNβ levels within 48 hrs. Remarkably, the TCL pt with CR (DL4) mounted a peak hIFNβ response of 18213.3pg/ml at 48 hrs post infusion, approximately 15-fold higher than any other pt enrolled in the study; and highest neutralizing antibody titer (1:40960). Conclusion: VSV-IFNβ-NIS can be safely administered by intravenous infusion in pts with hematological malignancies, up to a dose level of 1.7 x 1011 TCID50, without dose limiting toxicities and no CRS higher than grade 2. In this small phase 1 study, pts with T-cell lymphoma demonstrated the strongest signal of response, with one confirmed partial response at DL2 and one complete response at DL4. IFNβ is an early biomarker of tumor susceptibility; the magnitude of IFNβ elevation appears to correlate with treatment response. There were no confirmed responses in pts with MM, but the 20.4% transient reduction in LC suggests that combination strategies with VSV-IFNβ-NIS may result in deeper and sustained responses in MM. Future trials investigating combination strategies with immune modulatory drugs are being planned. Disclosures Peng: Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. Witzig:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; MorphSys: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Intellia: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:Celgene: Consultancy; Annexon: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Appellis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Data Safety Monitoring board from Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI SPORE MM: Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; Advisory Board for Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Consultancy; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; i3Health: Consultancy; Advisory Board for Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding. Dingli:Rigel: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy. Kapoor:Cellectar: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Lin:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vineti: Consultancy. Kumar:Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Cellectar: Other; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Sanofi: Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; MedImmune: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding. Russell:Imanis: Other: Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: This describes of administration of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Genetically Engineered to Express NIS and human interferon, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic malignacies

TPS3172 Background: Bladder cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Over 90% of bladder cancer cases are urothelial carcinomas (UC) that may present as a non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) or muscle-invasive disease (MIBC). Standard of care for NMIBC includes transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), intravesical chemotherapy and immunotherapy with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Patients (pts) with high-grade BCG-refractory NMIBC or MIBC undergo RC, which involves complete bladder removal and pelvic lymphadenectomy. RC severely impacts quality of life with significant morbidity. Oncolytic viruses are showing promise in UC, and MV-NIS has proven efficacy in other tumor types. MV-NIS is an investigational oncolytic measles virus with an excellent safety profile, irrespective of route of administration (n > 100). MV-NIS-related adverse events are limited to infusion reactions and transient CBC changes, and little local toxicity is anticipated with intravesical therapy. Clinical efficacy of this oncolytic may be related to absence of measles immunity. Based on this, the clinical strategy for MV-NIS is focused on targeting immune-privileged sites via intra-tumoral or intravesical routes, alone or in combination with checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesize that intravesical therapy with oncolytic MV-NIS can improve clinical outcomes for (a) BCG refractory NMIBC pts to avoid or delay the need for RC; and (b) MIBC pts undergoing RC. Methods: This study is enrolling pts undergoing RC who are ineligible to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The trial has 2 stages to (a) determine the safety and tolerability of intravesical MV-NIS, and (b) assess preliminary efficacy. Part (a) includes 4-24 pts in a timing cohort with doses administered at increasing durations (1-4 weeks) prior to RC to establish safety of a single MV-NIS dose. Part (b) includes an expansion cohort (n = 12) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 intravesical doses of MV-NIS at 2-week intervals prior to RC. Safety is assessed using NCI-CTCAE V5 and Clavien-Dindo grading of operative complications. The efficacy endpoint is pathologic stage at time of RC (pT0 rate), which can be compared to pre-study TURBT stage. Additional exploratory studies include PK and PD analyses in urine, blood and tumor. Enrollment is ongoing at 2 Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, MN and Jacksonville, FL) and the study has now progressed from the timing cohort into the expansion cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT03171493 .

Abstract Introduction. Voyager-V1 (VV1) is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express human interferon beta (IFNβ) to enhance cellular antitumor immune responses and tumor selectivity. VV1 also contains the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as an imaging gene. We report here the novel use of virus-encoded IFNβ as a PD marker using correlative data from three Phase I trials of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in patients with refractory cancers (n=46). Methods. 46 patients with solid tumors (n=34) and hematological malignancies (n=12) received 1 dose of VV1 either intratumorally (ITu) or intravenously (IV) at doses ranging from 3 x 106 to 5 x 1010 TCID50. Plasma IFNβ levels were collected pre-treatment, 4 hours post-infusion, Day 2 (24-hour), Day 3, 8, 15 and 29 (IT only). Samples were processed using a standard IFNβ specific ELISA kit. Results. ITu dose escalation is complete with 27 patients treated and no DLTs. IV escalation is ongoing at 5 x 1010 TCID50 with 19 patients treated to date. In the ITu study, plasma IFNβ levels at 24h were undetected at the lowest dose levels (up to 1 x 107 TCID50), and became detectable from 3 x 107 TCID50. In the IV patients, IFNβ was detectable at all dose levels (5 x 109 through 5 x 1010 TCID50) with the highest peak and longest duration in a patient with metastatic endometrial cancer coincident with shrinkage of multiple tumors. The IFNβ produced by virus-infected cells can be differentiated from the acute innate antiviral responses by magnitude of response and AUC as the majority of the inflammatory cytokines returned to baseline by 48h. Peak IFNβ levels were variable between patients, likely reflecting heterogeneity in tumor susceptibility to VV1, ranging from 1.4pg/mL to 656pg/mL across 6 patients (mean 153pg/ml) at the highest ITu dose. Plasma IFNβ 24 hours post-therapy of >20pg/mL appears to predict for RECIST 1.1-evaluated SD vs PD, p=0.048 in the ITu patients. Peak IFNβ ranged from 18 to 1700 pg/mL across 9 patients (mean=442pg/ml) at 1.7 x 1010 in the IV study. Peak IFNβ was highest in two cases of endometrial cancer (1500 and 1700 pg/ml). The patient with the highest IFNβ levels on the IV trial showed 16.7% tumor shrinkage at the first tumor evaluation. SPECT imaging, which shows location of viral replication, was positive in 50% of ITu injected tumors, also validating of VV1 infection of target cells. To date, SPECT images were negative in the IV trial despite IFNβ positivity, reflecting IFNβ as a more sensitive PD marker of viral infection. IHC staining of tumor biopsies collected pre-treatment and 1 month after VSV showed increased numbers of CD3, CD8, CD68, PDL1 or PD1 in some injected or noninjected tumors. Other immune markers and tumor gene signatures are also being evaluated. Conclusions. Plasma IFNβ has emerged as a simple and convenient biomarker of viral replication in tumors. IFNβ will be used in future studies as a PD marker to assess the impact of immune-modulating combination drugs with VV1. Citation Format: Timothy P. Cripe, Jamie Bakkum-Gamez, Jaime R. Merchan, Martha Q. Lacy, Manish R. Patel, Steven Powell, James Strauss, Lianwen Zhang, Toshie Sakuma, Memy Diaz, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Deepak Upreti, Bethany Brunton, Dragan Jevremovic, Stephen J. Russell, Alice Bexon, Kah-Whye Peng. Rational design of an oncolytic virus permits use of interferon beta as a pharmacodynamic marker for clinical application [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT090.

Abstract Background: The live attenuated non-pathogenic Edmonston MV vaccine strain has advantages as an oncolytic platform given its tumor specificity, potent bystander effect, and ability to be engineered and retargeted. MV-NIS expresses the human thyroidal sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) and is selectively oncolytic, entering tumor cells through CD46 (overexpressed on many cancers, including breast cancer of all subtypes) and Nectin-4. NIS expression in MV-NIS infected cells permits noninvasive monitoring of virus spread by SPECT-CT imaging of Tc-99m pertechnetate or I-123 uptake. Methods: NCT01846091 is a standard 3+3 phase I trial of a single IT administration of MV-NIS in pts with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Primary objectives are (a) safety and tolerability and (b) maximally tolerated single dose. The secondary clinical objective is to preliminarily assess antitumor efficacy at and away from the MV injection site. Key eligibility criteria were: absence of standard therapy with life prolonging intent; at least one lesion >1 cm amenable to percutaneous injection; and no impending visceral crisis. MV-NIS was administered on D1 with mandatory SPECT-CT at baseline (BL) and on D3&D8; repeat SPECT-CT on D15&D21 if the prior result was positive; mandatory tumor biopsies on D3&D21; optional tumor biopsies on D8&D15; assessments for viremia and viral shedding at BL and on D3,D8,D15,D21; and standard imaging for restaging at BL,D21,W6,W12. Results: Accrual completed with 12 evaluable pts (6 SCCHN and 6 MBC) at 3 dose levels (108, 3x108, 109 TCID50). The MBC group included 5 HR+/HER2- pts and 1 pt with mixed HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+ disease. 5 pts had evidence of disease progression prior to study participation. No dose limiting toxicities were observed among the MBC pts; AEs possibly related to MV-NIS in this group were gr2 fatigue, gr1 flu-like illness, gr2 lymphopenia (all n=1). No SCCHN responses were observed. Best response for the MBC pts was: stable disease (SD) >6 wks, n=4; clinical response, n=1; progression, n=1. One MBC pt with SD for 12 wks had positive SPECT/CT imaging at and away from the injection site on D3&D8 and was the only pt seronegative for measles IgG antibodies prior to MV-NIS exposure. The MBC pt who responded after initial MV-NIS exposure was the only pt with low viral RNA in blood (D3); she received additional doses at W9&W13 without toxicity through an expanded access protocol exemption and had disease progression by W19. No viral shedding was detected from mouth rinse or urine in any pt. MV was detected in tumor samples from all pts treated at the highest dose level. Additional blood and tissue analyses are in progress. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the safety of IT MV-NIS administration, provide early evidence of biologic activity in MBC, and support the possibility of viral replication in tumors remote from the IT injection site. A MV strain encoding the immunomodulatory neutrophil activating protein transgene has been constructed (MV-s-NAP) with preclinical evidence of improved antitumor activity and immunogenicity. The phase I MV-s-NAP trial will start recruitment in Fall 2018. Citation Format: Liu MC, Peng K-W, Federspiel MJ, Russell SJ, Brunton BA, Zhou Y, Packiriswamy N, Hubbard JM, Loprinzi CL, Peethambaram PP, Ruddy KJ, Allred JB, Galanis E, Okuno SH. Phase I trial of intratumoral (IT) administration of a NIS-expressing derivative manufactured from a genetically engineered strain of measles virus (MV) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-21-03.

Abstract Introduction Voyager-V1TM is derived from VSV, a bullet-shaped negative sense RNA virus with very low human seroprevalence; it is engineered to selectively replicate in and kill human cancer cells. Voyager-V1 encodes the human IFNβ gene to boost antitumoral immune responses and the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter NIS gene to permit noninvasive imaging of virus spread. FIH studies are underway via both IV and IT routes. Here we report safety and preliminary correlative data from the FIH IT study. Methods and objectives This is a classical 3+3 phase 1 design, using escalating single IT viral doses from 3 x 106 to 3 x 109 TCID50 into one target lesion. The primary objective is safety and tolerability, monitored by committee. Other objectives include PK by RT-PCR for viral genomes, serum IFNβ levels, Tc-99m SPECT/CT imaging to monitor virus infection in injected lesions, peripheral blood immunophenotyping with 11-color flow cytometry for activation markers on T cells, T-regs, NK cells, and MDSCs, and serial biopsies to assess the tumor microenvironment (TME). IHC was performed on tumor biopsies for CD3, CD8, CD4, FoxP3, CD68, PD-1 and PDL-1 pre and post treatment in non-injected and injected lesions. CD45 staining is ongoing. Results Dose level 3 is ongoing (n=8+). No DLTs have been observed to date. Most patients were male (75%), white (100%), with ECOG PS1 (75%) and a median of >6 lines of prior systemic therapy. AEs (in 63% patients) reported as related to study drug were mild-moderate, short-lived, and consisted of G1 fever, chills, hot flashes, nausea, vomiting, hyperhidrosis and G2 fatigue. Most patients had some mild AEs (pain, bruising, subclinical pneumothorax) related to biopsy and IT injection procedures and one had an SAE related to biopsy (G2 pneumothorax). There was no difference in incidence, intensity or duration of related AEs between dose levels so far. In patients analyzed to date, at the first three dose levels of 3 x 106, 1 x 107 and 3 x 107 TCID50 (n=7), viremia and serum IFNβ were below levels of detection after IT injection. There is evidence in all patients of an increase in PD-1 expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells, suggesting T cell activation post- single virus injection. One patient at dose level 2 had increased CD4 and CD8 T cells in the peripheral blood. TME analysis revealed increased infiltration of CD3 and CD8 cells in tumors of some patients. In addition, there are changes in numbers of FoxP3 and CD68 positive cells in the injected lesions compared to the pre-treatment and non-injected lesion. Two patients at dose level 3, one with an injected adrenal metastasis of colorectal cancer and another with a chest wall lesion from a head of pancreas primary, have positive SPECT/CTs on days 3-15 showing viral replication in tumor plus concomitant lymphocyte/neutrophil trafficking in the periphery. Conclusions IT injection of a single dose of the novel oncolytic virotherapy Voyager-V1 has proven safe at doses up to 3 x 107 TCID50. There was evidence of T cell activation with increased PD-1 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes after a single IT injection. Tumor biopsies indicate increased lymphocyte infiltration. Two patients at the highest dose tested show signs of viral replication in the injected lesion plus evidence of systemic impact on leukocyte populations. Citation Format: Steven Powell, Manish R. Patel, Jaime R. Merchan, Timothy P. Cripe, James Strauss, Rosa M. Diaz, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Bethany A. Brunton, Deepak Upreti, Rehan Khan, Lukkana Suksanpaisan, Rianna Vandergaast, Stephen J. Russell, Alice S. Bexon, Kah Whye Peng. Preliminary correlative and clinical data from a first-in-human (FIH) study of the intratumoral (IT) oncolytic virotherapy, Voyager-V1, in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT051.

218 Background: Evidence from mouse studies shows that Oncolytic viral mode of tumor cell killing can boost the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against tumor associated antigens (TAA), leading to ‘bystander’ killing of uninfected tumor cells. Methods: To investigate whether oncolytic virotherapy can boost immune responses to tumor antigens in human subjects we studied T cell responses to 10 different TAA reported to have high expression in patients with multiple myeloma (n = 10) before and after intravenous administration of an oncolytic measles virus (MV-NIS). Baseline and 6 week post-therapy PBMC samples were stimulated with peptides specific to each of the selected TAA and their responses to this antigenic stimulation were measured using IFNγ ELISPOT. Results: Despite their prior exposure to multiple immunosuppressive treatment regimens, some of the tested patients had higher T cell responses to some of the TAA even prior to MV-NIS. Baseline T cell responses against MAGEc1 were present in 50% of the patients, and against hTERT and NYESO-1 in 30% of the patients. Furthermore, MV-NIS treatment significantly boosted T cell responses against NYESO-1, MAGEc1, MAGEA1 and MUC1 in 40% of the patients. Interestingly, in one outlier patient who achieved a stringent and durable complete disease remission after MV-NIS therapy, strong baseline T cell responses were present against 8 of the 10 tested TAA but did not change significantly after virotherapy. Based on the T cell responses to the TAA, three distinct phenotypes can be identified. Phenotype 1 was characterized by positive T cell responses to TAA prior and post therapy, Phenotype 2 was characterized by positive T cell responses to TAA only post therapy and phenotype 3 was characterized by negative T cell responses to TAA prior and post therapy. Conclusions: Our data suggests oncolytic measles virotherapy boosted the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against tumor associated antigens in some of the patients. Identifying patient’s phenotype based on responsiveness to the TAA could be useful marker for identifying the immune responsive state in multiple myeloma patients and identify patients who can be most responsive to oncolytic measles virotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00450814.