Coleman, Jonathan Ri

Abstract Antidepressants are widely prescribed for major depressive disorder, yet only one-third of patients achieve remission after initial treatment. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of clinically assessed antidepressant response combined multiple antidepressant classes, potentially obscuring class-specific effects. This study focused on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), often first-line due to better tolerability. Data from 15 cohorts across four ancestries were integrated: European (N = 3887; 11 studies), East Asian (N = 1068; 4), African (N = 277; 1), and Admixed American (N = 250; 1). GWAS of non-remission and percentage improvement were conducted within cohorts, followed by ancestry-specific meta-analyses and trans-ancestry meta-regression. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based heritability was estimated in European samples. Polygenic scores were used for leave-one-out prediction and to assess shared genetic architecture with psychiatric traits. Gene-level and gene-set enrichment analyses were also performed. No genome-wide significant variants were identified for either outcome in any ancestry-specific or trans-ancestry analyses. However, trans-ancestry meta-regression yielded eight independent loci with suggestive associations (p < 1 × 10 −5 ) for non-remission and 17 for percentage improvement. Gene-set analyses revealed nominal enrichment of the serotonergic synapse pathway for non-remission. SNP-based heritability estimates were not significantly different from zero for either outcome. Better SSRI response was nominally associated with lower genetic predisposition to major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia. This study represents the largest trans-ancestry GWAS of SSRI response, highlighting emerging biological signals. Limited power emphasises the need for larger and ancestrally diverse cohorts to better characterise the genetic architecture of antidepressant response.

ABSTRACT Bipolar disorder’s (BD) clinical heterogeneity has an unresolved genetic basis. We meta-analyzed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of 16 BD subphenotypes in 226,032 individuals from 57 cohorts (38,022 cases); 10 advanced to multivariate and multi-trait analyses. Four factors (compulsive, psychotic, dysregulated, internalizing) explained 82.8% of shared genetic variance. BD1 and BD2 loaded on distinct factors despite a high genetic correlation; 87.0% of common-factor loci were significant in neither subtype. Unipolar mania aligned with psychosis over internalizing, and was distinguishable from BD1, and rapid cycling showed heritable cross-domain liability. We identified 356 risk loci, 158 novel, including the first univariate-GWAS associations for psychosis, unipolar mania, rapid cycling and schizoaffective disorder—and 249 credible genes (89 high-confidence), 12 with approved-drug or clinical-phase annotations. Cell-type association showed a midbrain dopaminergic–GABAergic gradient along the psychotic factor. BD’s genetic architecture appears hierarchical—a general liability resolving into dimensions of course and comorbidity beyond diagnostic subtypes.

Abstract Eating disorders and substance use disorders frequently co‐occur. Twin studies reveal shared genetic variance between liabilities to eating disorders and substance use, with the strongest associations between symptoms of bulimia nervosa and problem alcohol use (genetic correlation [ r g ], twin‐based = 0.23‐0.53). We estimated the genetic correlation between eating disorder and substance use and disorder phenotypes using data from genome‐wide association studies (GWAS). Four eating disorder phenotypes (anorexia nervosa [AN], AN with binge eating, AN without binge eating, and a bulimia nervosa factor score), and eight substance‐use‐related phenotypes (drinks per week, alcohol use disorder [AUD], smoking initiation, current smoking, cigarettes per day, nicotine dependence, cannabis initiation, and cannabis use disorder) from eight studies were included. Significant genetic correlations were adjusted for variants associated with major depressive disorder and schizophrenia. Total study sample sizes per phenotype ranged from ~2400 to ~537 000 individuals. We used linkage disequilibrium score regression to calculate single nucleotide polymorphism‐based genetic correlations between eating disorder‐ and substance‐use‐related phenotypes. Significant positive genetic associations emerged between AUD and AN ( r g = 0.18; false discovery rate q = 0.0006), cannabis initiation and AN ( r g = 0.23; q < 0.0001), and cannabis initiation and AN with binge eating ( r g = 0.27; q = 0.0016). Conversely, significant negative genetic correlations were observed between three nondiagnostic smoking phenotypes (smoking initiation, current smoking, and cigarettes per day) and AN without binge eating ( r gs = −0.19 to −0.23; qs < 0.04). The genetic correlation between AUD and AN was no longer significant after co‐varying for major depressive disorder loci. The patterns of association between eating disorder‐ and substance‐use‐related phenotypes highlights the potentially complex and substance‐specific relationships among these behaviors.