Detomas, Mario

Abstract Context Most of the patients included in the clinical trials and real-world studies with osilodrostat only include patients with adrenocorticotropic hormone dependent Cushing syndrome (CS), while data on the efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with adrenal CS is scarce. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in adrenal CS. Methods International study of patients with adrenal CS: patients treated with osilodrostat at any time were enrolled in the safety evaluation and those treated for longer than 4 weeks, in the efficacy evaluation. Patients were classified as responders if they experienced a reduction in urinary free cortisol (UFC) >50% (complete responders when UFC levels were below the upper limit of normal [ULN] and partial responders if there was a reduction >50% but not normalization). Results Twenty-eight patients with adrenal CS were enrolled: 16 with adrenocortical carcinoma and 12 with benign disease. Osilodrostat was used in monotherapy in 22 patients and in combination with metyrapone in 6 cases. In those patients treated for longer than 4 weeks (n = 21), 66.7% were classified as responders (28.6% with complete response and 38.1% with partial response), and for those treated for longer than 12 weeks, the rate of response increased to 87.5% The use of osilodrostat as a nonfirst-line therapy (odds ratio 15.0, P = .010) was a predictor of response. Osilodrostat led to a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure and body weight (P < .05). Nine patients developed one or more adverse events and in 56% (n = 5) led to osilodrostat discontinuation. Conclusion Osilodrostat controls hypercortisolism in 66.7% of patients with adrenal CS treated for longer than 4 weeks and in 87.5% of cases treated for longer than 12 weeks, with a positive impact on blood pressure and body weight. Patients who received osilodrostat after other previous steroidogenesis inhibitors have a higher probability of response.

Abstract Objective Advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is treated with mitotane alone or combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy, yet outcomes remain poor and prognostic models in this setting are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of clinical parameters in a large cohort of patients with advanced ACC undergoing systemic therapy. Methods Multicenter, international cohort study investigating 418 patients with advanced ACC (61.5% = women, median age = 52 years) from 11 centers. Patients received mitotane monotherapy (n = 161), etoposide + doxorubicin + cisplatin ± mitotane (n = 178), or second-line regimens (gemcitabine + capecitabine ± mitotane or temozolomide + mitotane, n = 79). Variables included age, cortisol excess, performance status (ECOG-PS), tumor burden, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at start of therapy. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and best objective response. Results Tumor burden, cortisol excess, ECOG-PS, and NLR ≥5 independently predicted shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55-2.68). We developed an integrated ENSAT Risk Score for Advanced ACC combining these variables: tumor burden (0-2), cortisol excess (0/1), ECOG-PS (0-2), and NLR (0/1). A score >2 (poor-risk) was significantly associated with worse OS and TTP across all treatment groups (HRs for OS: 3.05-3.96; TTP: 2.53-3.08). It also predicted poorer response to mitotane (P < .01) and second-line therapies (P = .04). Conclusions The ENSAT Risk Score for Advanced ACC is a practical, prognostic tool for patients with advanced ACC receiving systemic therapy. Based on accessible clinical and biochemical markers, it can support treatment decisions and facilitate informed discussions in routine care.