Back to Authors

Sadiq, Maaz Tahir

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5906-8363

Mayo Clinic

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Citations 1

Clinical predictors of outcome in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma: a multicenter international ENSAT study
Mangone, Alessandra , Altieri, Barbara , Ferrante, Emanuele , Bancos, Irina, Luconi, Michaela , Ziółkowska, Barbara, Nekić, Anja Barač , Libe, Rossella, Pittaway, James F H, Laganà, Marta, Dalmazi, Guido Di , Kimpel, Otilia , Fard, Bahar Bahrani , Kotecka-Blicharz, Agnieszka, Kastelan, Darko, Bennett, Gillian , Schauer, Marc P, Elhassan, Yasir , Detomas, Mario, Zanatta, Lorenzo, Sadiq, Maaz Tahir , Mantovani, Giovanna, Ronchi, Cristina L, Ronchi, Cristina L. , Luconi, Michaela , Bancos, Irina , Ceccato, Filippo , Di Dalmazi, Guido , Kimpel, Otilia , Canu, Letizia , Kastelan, Darko , Bouys, Lucas , Elhassan, Yasir S , Detomas, Mario , Mantovani, Giovanna , Ronchi, Cristina L , Bancos, Irina , Ziółkowska, Barbara , Libé, Rossella , Ceccato, Filippo , Pittaway, J , Laganà, Marta , Peverelli, Erika , Canu, Letizia , Kotecka-Blicharz, Agnieszka , Kaštelan, Darko , Tizianel, Irene , Schauer, Marc Philipp , Zanatta, Lorenzo

European Journal of Endocrinology | March 5, 2026 | Volume: 194 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 381-392

10.1093/ejendo/lvag046 Get It

Abstract Objective Advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is treated with mitotane alone or combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy, yet outcomes remain poor and prognostic models in this setting are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of clinical parameters in a large cohort of patients with advanced ACC undergoing systemic therapy. Methods Multicenter, international cohort study investigating 418 patients with advanced ACC (61.5% = women, median age = 52 years) from 11 centers. Patients received mitotane monotherapy (n = 161), etoposide + doxorubicin + cisplatin ± mitotane (n = 178), or second-line regimens (gemcitabine + capecitabine ± mitotane or temozolomide + mitotane, n = 79). Variables included age, cortisol excess, performance status (ECOG-PS), tumor burden, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at start of therapy. Outcomes were overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and best objective response. Results Tumor burden, cortisol excess, ECOG-PS, and NLR ≥5 independently predicted shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55-2.68). We developed an integrated ENSAT Risk Score for Advanced ACC combining these variables: tumor burden (0-2), cortisol excess (0/1), ECOG-PS (0-2), and NLR (0/1). A score >2 (poor-risk) was significantly associated with worse OS and TTP across all treatment groups (HRs for OS: 3.05-3.96; TTP: 2.53-3.08). It also predicted poorer response to mitotane (P < .01) and second-line therapies (P = .04). Conclusions The ENSAT Risk Score for Advanced ACC is a practical, prognostic tool for patients with advanced ACC receiving systemic therapy. Based on accessible clinical and biochemical markers, it can support treatment decisions and facilitate informed discussions in routine care.