Wellings, Elizabeth P

Abstract Objective: Determine if automated struts can successfully power a balanced cable transport (BCT) during tibial bone transport and thus benefit from the advantages of automation. Design: Retrospective observational case series. Setting: Level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: A retrospective analysis of 7 tibial BCTs using automated struts was performed with an average defect size of 102 mm. Outcomes: Union rate, complications, external fixation index, bone healing index, and mechanical alignment. Results: The average bone healing index was found to be 21.9 days/cm in bifocal BCT and 13.7 days/cm in trifocal BCT. Automated struts successfully powered 7 BCTs but were not without complications. Four patients had strut malfunctions necessitating unscheduled return to clinic. Other complications not secondary to the struts included pin tract infections (n = 4) and unplanned return to the operating room (n = 2, docking site nonunion and revision ankle arthrodesis). Conclusions: Automated struts powering BCT is feasible but not without complications. This treatment strategy combines the advantages of automation with the advantages of BCT. Incorporating automation into these complex constructs will allow for ease of use for patient and caregiver during the long process of bone transport, theoretically decrease noncompliance, which otherwise can cause severe complications, and increased segmentation, which may improve quality of regenerate bone formation. Level of Evidence: Level 4.

Background: Acquired and congenital limb length discrepancies often coexist with deformities of the distal femur. Lengthening of the femur along its anatomic axis changes the limb's mechanical alignment. Angular correction and lengthening can be achieved at the same site if a retrograde lengthening nail is used with a specific preoperative planning method (“reverse planning”) which permits patient-specific selection of the final mechanical axis. Methods: A consecutive cohort series of children, adolescents, and young adults (mean 15.6 ± 4.8 years) undergoing retrograde implantable femoral lengthening between the years 2011 and 2024 were analyzed. Surgical details, lengthening parameters, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society (LLRS)–AIM index, accuracy of final correction, and complications were reviewed and classified. Patients were eligible only if the distal femoral physis was closed. Results: Seventy-three lengthening were eligible in the study period. Average lengthening was 4.2 ± 1.4 cm (range 2.0-8.0 cm), and consolidation index was 39.4 ± 21.9 days/cm. Deformities and length discrepancies were moderately complex, with a mean LLRS AIM score of 6 (range 1-13). Complication rates were similar to previous reports of intramedullary femoral lengthening, comparable between congenital (12 of 31, 39%) and acquired etiologies (16 of 42, 38%). Preoperative coronal alignment ranged from 14° varus to 20° valgus, while final coronal alignment was 0.4° ± 3.4° of neutral (range 7° valgus to 13° varus). Coronal deformities up to 20° and sagittal deformities up to 23° were corrected acutely at the lengthening site. Conclusions: Retrograde intramedullary femoral lengthening with acute deformity correction at the same site is an alternative to antegrade lengthening with separate osteotomy of the distal femur in children and adolescents. The reverse planning method allows reproducible length and deformity correction at the same location. Specific intraoperative technical adjuncts are used to achieve and maintain the desired alignment. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Case: A 42-year-old African-American woman sustained a type IIIA open pilon fracture requiring open reduction internal fixation complicated by wound dehiscence. Acute shortening for primary wound closure was performed followed by relengthening in a circular frame. Owing to the patient's intolerance to the circular frame, pre-existing osseous deformity, large body habitus, and soft tissue compromise, conversion to intramedullary stabilization with standard nailing was deemed exceedingly difficult. We describe the use of a photodynamic bone stabilization system allowing for percutaneous entry and implant flexibility for the purpose of early circular frame removal. Conclusion: This case demonstrates successful protection of immature regenerate using a photodynamic bone stabilization system, offering another tool to minimize time spent in a circular frame.

Background: Sacral tumor resections require a multidisciplinary approach to achieve a cure and a functional outcome. Currently, there is no accepted classification system that provides a means to communicate among the multidisciplinary teams in terms of approach, osseous resection, reconstruction, and acceptable functional outcome. The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of sacral tumor resection based on our classification system. Methods: In this study, 196 patients (71 female and 125 male) undergoing an oncologic en bloc sacrectomy were reviewed. The mean age (and standard deviation) was 49 ± 16 years, and the mean body mass index was 27.2 ± 6.4 kg/m 2 . The resections included 130 sarcomas (66%). The mean follow-up was 7 ± 5 years. Results: Resections included total sacrectomy (Type 1A: 20 patients [10%]) requiring reconstruction, subtotal sacrectomy (Type 1B: 5 patients [3%]) requiring reconstruction, subtotal sacrectomy (Type 1C: 104 patients [53%]) not requiring reconstruction, hemisacrectomy (Type 2: 29 patients [15%]), external hemipelvectomy and hemisacrectomy (Type 3: 32 patients [16%]), total sacrectomy and external hemipelvectomy (Type 4: 5 patients [3%]), and hemicorporectomy (Type 5: 1 patient [1%]). The disease-specific survival was 66% at 5 years and 52% at 10 years. Based on the classification, the 5-year disease-specific survival was 34% for Type 1A, 100% for Type 1B, 71% for Type 1C, 65% for Type 2, 57% for Type 3, 100% for Type 4, and 100% for Type 5 (p < 0.001). Tumor recurrence occurred in 67 patients, including isolated local recurrence (14 patients), isolated metastatic disease (31 patients), and combined local and metastatic disease (22 patients). At 5 years, the local recurrence-free survival was 77% and the metastasis-free survival was 68%. Complications occurred in 153 patients (78%), most commonly wound complications (95 patients [48%]). Following the procedure, 154 patients (79%) were ambulatory, and the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS93) score was 60% ± 23%. Conclusions: Although resections of sacral malignancies are associated with complications, they can be curative in a majority of patients, with a majority of patients ambulatory with an acceptable functional outcome considering the extent of the resection. At our institution, this classification allows for communication between surgical teams and implies a surgical approach, staging, reconstruction, and potential functional outcomes. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.