Wang, Xiao Jing

Abstract Introduction Clozapine-induced constipation may occur in at least 60% of patients, with first-line options typically involving polyethylene glycol or sennosides. However, there may be adherence barriers to an over-the-counter bowel regimen due to the dosage form, lack of insurance coverage, or lack of benefit. One possible solution to address these adherence barriers may include prescribing a secretagogue laxative. However, there is limited literature supporting the use of secretagogue laxatives in clozapine-associated constipation. A case series is presented in which adherence barriers impeded the use of over-the-counter laxatives, and a secretagogue laxative was implemented to manage clozapine-induced constipation. Case Report In 4 cases, lubiprostone or linaclotide was initiated, either as monotherapy or in combination with over-the-counter laxatives. Reasons for secretagogue laxative initiation included: (1) reducing a complex over-the-counter laxative regimen, (2) a lack of insurance coverage of over-the-counter laxatives, (3) dissatisfaction with polyethylene glycol’s palatability, and (4) cognitive impairment leading to decreased adherence to polyethylene glycol. Discussion It is important that clozapine-induced constipation is managed adequately to prevent severe consequences of gastrointestinal hypomotility. In addition to timely initiation and titration of constipation pharmacotherapy, adherence should be assessed. When adherence barriers to the use of over-the-counter laxatives are present, the use of a secretagogue laxative may be an option, recognizing there is limited evidence to guide this decision. Conclusion In these cases, adherence barriers to over-the-counter laxatives were identified. A secretagogue laxative was implemented, well-tolerated, and able to be continued for the duration of follow-up.

ABSTRACT Introduction Chronic gastroduodenal disorders remain challenging to manage, and new diagnostic approaches are needed to better delineate underlying causes and guide therapeutic decisions. Body Surface Gastric Mapping (BSGM) technologies combine high‐resolution gastric myoelectrical activity measurements with symptom and psychological profiling to provide mechanistic insights into gastric motor and sensory dysfunction. An International Working Group convened to derive the first consensus classification of BSGM phenotypes (the “Auckland Classification”). Methods A Technical Group conducted a systematic literature and clinical database review to identify objective test biomarkers and candidate disease mechanisms. Evidence was synthesized across 50 studies (primarily in gastroparesis, chronic nausea and vomiting, and functional dyspepsia), and BSGM phenotypes were mapped to existing treatment guidelines. Subsequently, iterative review and development of consensus was performed by a Consensus Group composed of international clinical experts familiar with BSGM. Eleven statements underlying the classification were then derived and circulated as a final survey to establish agreement. Results Six BSGM phenotypes were endorsed: three defined by myoelectrical abnormalities (Dysrhythmic, High Frequency, and Low Meal Response) and three by characteristic symptom associations (Sensorimotor, Continuous, and Delayed Onset Symptoms). Published studies plausibly linked these phenotypes to mechanisms including interstitial cell of Cajal depletion, vagal impairment, hypomotility, visceral hypersensitivity, gut‐brain dysregulation, and small bowel dysfunction. Phenotypes were also mapped to existing mechanism‐based treatment guidelines. Ten out of the eleven statements had > 80% agreement. Conclusions The Auckland Classification, derived by international consensus, presents a structured framework for BSGM‐defined patient phenotypes. Evidence and mechanism‐based treatment options are suggested for each phenotype to provide a foundation for research, further validation, and a pathway for integrating BSGM into clinical care.

Abstract Purpose This study explores how new residents experienced the transition to residency, examines factors that made the transition process more or less difficult, and identifies potentially modifiable program features that enhanced or would have enhanced transition experiences. Method The authors conducted a qualitative interview study of postgraduate year (PGY) 1 residents in emergency medicine, family medicine, general surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatric and adolescent medicine, and psychiatry at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin between December 2020 and March 2021. Open-ended questions explored residents’ transition experiences. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded inductively, and analyzed iteratively using general thematic analysis from an epistemologically constructivist perspective. Results Forty-five residents (25 women, 20 men) from 12 programs, 7 specialties, and 4 states participated. PGY-1 residents experienced the transition to residency as a confluence of overlapping and interconnected transitions that unfolded over time, spanned multiple life domains, and generated numerous personal and professional demands. Residents appraised demands based on their effects on patient care, professional growth, and personal well-being and struggled when coincident demands forced tradeoffs among these concerns. Residents who experienced many difficulties during the transition to residency reported high demands (eg, due to transition-related discontinuities, depleted resources from prior transitions or a difficult match experience, structural and systemic barriers, coincident personal or situational stressors) and/or fewer resources (eg, insufficient residency or life skills, limited social support, financial strain). Preparedness and supportive relationships eased the transition process. Residency program features that enhanced or would have enhanced the transition experience included monitoring and limiting overall demands, minimizing unhelpful and harmful demands, calibrating constructive demands, and increasing holistic support. Conclusions Study findings illuminate transition experiences of PGY-1 residents, reveal person-centered considerations to inform ongoing improvement efforts, and identify potentially actionable steps programs can take to improve resident transition experiences.

This pilot, randomized, double-blind trial in a relatively small sample of patients with IBS-related pain shows rimegepant significantly reduced sensations of gas, urgency, and pain during rectal distention and decreased rectal compliance. Decrease in compliance implies that changes in physical properties or distensibility of rectum did not contribute to alterations in rectal sensation. Same dose of rimegepant did not significantly impact daily abdominal pain, BM frequency, or colonic transit. There were no serious adverse events.

ABSTRACT Background Microbial overgrowth (MO) in the small intestine can cause gastrointestinal symptoms and may arise from stasis, such as dysmotility. Microtypes of MO include small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO). Dyssynergic defecation (DD) is associated with constipation and slow colonic transit (STC). Our aim was to assess the relationship between DD and MO. Methods We retrospectively identified patients who underwent both anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion testing (BET) for DD, and MO testing using either small intestinal aspirate culture or breath testing. SIBO was analyzed using two culture thresholds: ≥ 10 5 CFU/mL and ≥ 10 3 CFU/mL. Chi‐square tests compared positive vs. negative results. Key Results 436 patients underwent culture of SB aspirates. At the ≥ 10 5 CFU/mL threshold, 41.7% were diagnosed with SIBO, and 87.4% at ≥ 10 3 CFU/mL. At ≥ 10 5 CFU/mL, percent anal relaxation was significantly lower in SIBO‐positive patients. SIBO patients were more likely to have reduced anal relaxation ( p = 0.032), but no other ARM parameters or BET > 60 s. At ≥ 10 3 CFU/mL, a more negative recto‐anal pressure differential (RAPD) was observed, along with a combination of RAPD < −45 mmHg and resting anal pressure > 90 mmHg. 637 patients underwent breath testing for MO, with 174 positive results, predominantly showing IMO (73%). In this group, BET was significantly longer, and anal relaxation was significantly lower. SIBO at ≥ 10 3 CFU/mL was more prevalent in DD than STC (85.5% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.002). IMO was more common in DD than STC ( p = 0.021). Conclusion/Inferences DD may be a risk factor for MO, often with evidence of methanogenesis.

ABSTRACTBackground/AimsMany patients with digestive symptoms describe underlying urinary or gynecologic symptoms, which may increase visceral sensitivity in the abdominopelvic region and amplify distress around digestive symptoms. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of urinary and gynecologic symptoms in patients with disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI).MethodsConsecutive adult patients with a female reproductive tract who were referred for GI behavioral medicine evaluation for DGBI at a tertiary care center between 2022 and 2023 were prospectively evaluated for symptoms associated with urinary and gynecologic dysfunction. Descriptive statistics were conducted to assess the prevalence of these symptoms within this population by anatomic region affected (esophagus, stomach, and bowel).ResultsA total of 432 patients were included in our cohort with a mean (SD) age of 40.0 years [Q1;Q3 29.0–52.0], with a predominantly White population (86.1%). Dysmenorrhea (61.0%) and menorrhagia (58.6%) were commonly reported among women with digestive symptoms. Urinary symptoms were less common, with 18.7% reporting pain with urination, 33.0% reporting difficulty voiding urine, and 26.1% reporting a history of frequent UTIs. 23% of women experienced ≥ 4 urinary/gynecologic symptoms. There were no significant differences in the type of urogynecologic symptoms reported based on the affected area of the GI tract.ConclusionUrogynecologic symptoms are common among patients with DGBIs affecting the entirety of the GI tract. We presume the presence of these comorbid symptoms is likely to impact symptom severity, quality of life, and could affect treatment response. Future studies are necessary to understand the mechanisms behind these shared conditions as well as develop effective treatments that address their overlap.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal bloating is a difficult symptom to treat. Hypnotherapy and diaphragmatic intervention have separately shown benefit on bloating in prior work but have not been united into a single intervention. We aimed to obtain data on the potential therapeutic impact of a novel audio-recorded bloating treatment for bloating integrating hypnosis and diaphragmatic breathing, with proposed synergistic effect. METHODS: Patients with nonorganic bowel disorders with predominant bloating symptoms completed a digitally delivered 7-session audio-recorded hypnotherapy program without clinician involvement. The intervention combined bloating-targeted hypnotic suggestions and guided diaphragmatic breathing delivered under hypnosis, and was supplemented with interval self-guided breathing exercises. Participants completed online REDCap assessments at baseline, midtreatment, at end of treatment, and 3-month follow-up, evaluating symptom severity, gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety, overall anxiety/depression, and quality of life. Outcomes were assessed in an intention-to-treat manner with repeated measures analysis of variances (ANOVAs) with Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise post hoc tests. RESULTS: Of 23 patients who started treatment, 22 (95.6%) completed follow-up. Bloating severity on Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Symptom Severity Scale and Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index showed reduction in bloating with large effect sizes (Cohen d of ∼0.8) at the end of treatment, as did Visceral Sensitivity Index bloating-related anxiety. At the end of treatment, 16 patients (69.6%) were Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Symptom Severity Scale treatment responders (≥30% symptom reduction) on bloating and 17 (73.9%) on overall bowel symptom severity. Anxiety, depression, and quality-of-life scores were unchanged. Outcome measures were fully maintained at the 3-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Results suggest the therapeutic utility of a new cost-effective self-administered bloating intervention. A randomized controlled trial is planned to confirm these therapeutic effects.

AbstractBackgroundAbsent “organic” disease, dyspeptic symptoms may arise from abnormal gastric sensation, accommodation, motility or emptying (GE). Extensive gastric sensorimotor evaluation is rarely undertaken because testing is prolonged, invasive, poorly tolerated or unavailable.AimsTo investigate whether gastric antral motor function, evaluated with scintigraphy, predicts GE. To explore whether motor testing with symptom recording predicts day‐to‐day symptoms in patients with dyspepsia.MethodsGE was determined using a scintigraphic solid‐meal protocol (296 kcal, 35% fat). Antral motility was estimated from 10 min of scintigraphic time‐activity curves acquired 40 min after meal consumption. An antral motility index (MI) was derived from contraction amplitude and frequency. Intra‐gastric distribution of the meal on scintograms at 1 h (IGD1) was determined. Meal‐induced symptoms were evaluated by questionnaire. Patients completed the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary (GCSI‐DD) for 14 days.ResultsTwelve healthy participants and 23 prospectively recruited patients completed the study. Nine patients had delayed, and 2 had rapid, GE. In univariate analysis MI explained 42% of GE half‐time. In multivariate analysis MI and GE half‐time explained 25% of the variance in meal‐induced symptoms. While scintigraphic evaluation of gastric motor function with symptom recording explained 80% of the variance in the GCSI‐DD, meal‐induced symptoms were the only significant predictor. However, among patients with delayed GE, MI, GE half‐time, IGD1, and meal‐induced symptoms all significantly predicted GCSI‐DD.ConclusionsAntral motility predicts GE. In exploratory analyses, only meal‐induced symptoms predicted daily symptoms among patients with dyspepsia. However, motor function also predicted symptoms in patients with delayed GE.