Sharaf, Basel A

Background: Despite increased adoption of virtual surgical planning (VSP) in various craniofacial indications, the incorporation of VSP/3DP into facial trauma care remains limited. Therefore, Expedited Preoperative Point of Care for Fracture Reduction to Normalized Anatomy and 3DP to Improve Surgical Outcomes (EPPOCRATIS) was introduced in 2021. This study evaluates our experience with EPPORATIS in craniomaxillofacial trauma over 10 years. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent facial trauma repair between September 2014 and September 2024 was conducted. For each VSP/3DP case, a patient with similar facial trauma patterns, who was treated without VSP, was selected. Evaluation metrics included operative time, blood loss, length of stay, complication rates, and fracture reduction accuracy through 3D heatmap analyses. Operative metrics were normalized by implant (i.e., fracture plates and screws) count to account for fracture complexity. A value of p < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Results: The VSP group presented with more complex injuries and higher involvement of various surgical specialties (p < 0.5) and demonstrated longer operative times (p < 0.03). Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.4), when adjusted for implant count, the VSP group had shorter operative times (median: 15.4 vs. 19.3 min/implant) and reduced blood loss compared to non-VSP cases (median: 3.4 mL/implant vs. 4.2 mL/implant). Complications, revision rates, and length of stay showed no significant differences. Conclusions: The use of VSP/3DP (EPPOCRATIS) in craniomaxillofacial trauma reconstruction demonstrated operative efficiency and accurate fracture reduction in complex cases. Further studies are needed to examine the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care VSP/3DP in trauma centers.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a major risk after abdominal contouring surgery, impacting morbidity and mortality. Despite various preventative strategies, surgeons are cautious about using enoxaparin for extended postoperative periods. This study aims to determine if a 7-day postoperative course of enoxaparin increases bleeding risks compared with a single dose of intraoperative unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing abdominal contouring surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients who underwent abdominoplasty or panniculectomy from August 2017 to October 2023. Patients were split into 2 groups: Group 1 received 5000 units of intraoperative unfractionated heparin in addition to 7 days of postoperative enoxaparin (40 mg daily); group 2 received only the intraoperative heparin dose. Primary outcomes included bleeding events and VTE incidence. Secondary outcomes were seroma, infection, surgical site dehiscence, necrosis, drain duration, and reoperation rates. Results: The study included 121 patients (111 women, 10 men), with 61 patients in group 1 and 60 in group 2. The average age was 49 ± 12 years, and the average body mass index was 29.8 ± 5 kg/m². No cases of VTE were reported. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.9%) in group I and 2 patients (3.3%) in group 2, showing no statistically significant difference (P = 0.66). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: Our study of 121 patients undergoing either abdominoplasty or panniculectomy demonstrated that administering enoxaparin for 7 days postoperatively is safe and does not increase the risk of bleeding.

Background: Facial shape is significantly influenced by the underlying facial bony skeleton. Sexual dimorphisms in these structures are crucial for craniofacial, aesthetic, and gender-affirming surgery. Previous studies have examined the orbits and upper face, but less is known about the midface. This study aimed to elucidate the sexual dimorphism in the midface region, focusing on the maxilla and zygomatic bones. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted using facial computed tomography scans from 101 White patients aged 20–79 years, using Materialise Mimics and 3-Matics for segmentation and 3D reconstruction. Measurements and statistical shape modeling of the midfacial skeleton were performed. Results: Our results show a distinct sexual dimorphism in the midfacial skeletal structure across all age groups. Women typically had a narrower bizygomatic width by 1.5 mm (P = 0.04), a shallower maxillary depth by 1.6 mm (P < 0.01), and a midfacial vertical height that was 4 mm shorter than that of men (P = 0.018). In contrast, men exhibited a greater distance between the frontozygomatic sutures by 5.4 mm (P < 0.01), a 3-mm greater interorbitale distance (P < 0.01), and a 2.1-mm wider infraorbital foramina distance (P = 0.007). There were no significant differences in the pyriform and maxillary angles (P = 0.15 and P = 0.52, respectively). Conclusions: Our analysis of midfacial skeletal anatomy revealed sexual dimorphism differences. Men exhibited more pronounced facial features than women, with a broader horizontal midfacial skeleton, a longer midfacial vertical height, and greater maxillary depths compared with women.

Background: With neck, aging the cervicomental angle becomes obtuse and may be influenced by hyoid bone aging. An understanding of hyoid position changes with aging will further our understanding of its role in neck contour changes. Methods: A 3D volumetric reconstruction of 282 neck computed tomography scans was performed. The cohort was categorized into three groups based on age: 20 years or older and younger than 40 years, 40 years or older and younger than 60 years, and 60 years or older and younger than 80 years. The vertical and horizontal hyoid distances in relation to the mandible were calculated for each patient. Results: A total of 282 patients (153 women, 129 men) were included in the cohort. The age groups were evenly distributed in men and women. Mean hyoid vertical and horizontal distances differed between women and men in all age groups. There was a significant difference in the hyoid vertical distance between 20–39 years old to 40–59 years old in men (P < 0.01), and 20–39 years old to 60–79 years old in both genders (women P = 0.005, men P < 0.01). Hyoid horizontal distance was not affected by age and sex (age and sex: P > 0.05), but rather by body mass index (BMI). Every 5 BMI points corresponded to a forward movement of 2 mm. Conclusions: As individuals age, the hyoid bone descends in both sexes, and an increase in BMI is associated with forward movement. Additional studies are needed to assess the correlation of the hyoid position between upright and supine positions.

Abstract Facial feminization surgery (FFS) improves gender dysphoria. The brows and eyes are crucial in perceived gender, yet brow and eyelid surgeries are relatively underutilized. This study aimed to determine rates of brow and eyelid surgeries as part of FFS and characterize pre- and postoperative periocular features. We conducted a retrospective review to identify all patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria who underwent FFS at a single academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Thirty-four patients comprising 38 surgical cases were included. Twelve (35%) eyelid surgeries and 27 (79%) brow lifts were performed. Baseline eyelid measurements did not differ between brow lift and nonbrow lift cases. Those undergoing brow lift and eyelid surgery were older in age (p = 0.022), had a higher rate of negative canthal tilt (p = 0.050), and smaller baseline margin-reflex distance 1 (p = 0.014) than patients who had brow lift alone. Brow lift increased tarsal platform show (p ≤ 0.001) and lash-to-brow distance (p ≤ 0.001), and upper blepharoplasty increased tarsal platform show (p = 0.01). Rates of brow lift are high at our institution, and patients are appropriately selected for eyelid surgery in FFS. Brow lift and upper blepharoplasty can feminize anatomical features when using standards described for cisgender cohorts. The impact of periocular features on gender perception in transgender patients warrants further study.

OBJECTIVE Conventional frame-based stereotactic systems have circumferential base frames, often necessitating deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery in two stages: intracranial electrode insertion followed by surgical re-preparation and pulse generator implantation. Some patients do not tolerate awake surgery, underscoring the need for a safe alternative for asleep DBS surgery. A frame-based stereotactic system with a skull-mounted "key" in lieu of a circumferential base frame received US FDA clearance. The authors describe the system’s application for single-stage, asleep DBS surgery in 8 patients at their institution and review its workflow and technical considerations. METHODS Eight patients underwent DBS lead insertion and IPG implantation in a single surgical preparation under general anesthesia using the system. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed lead placement. RESULTS Eight patients underwent implantation of 15 total leads targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (4 patients), globus pallidus internus (GPi; 3 patients), and subthalamic nucleus (STN; 1 patient). Intraoperative microelectrode recording was conducted for GPi and STN targets. Postoperative CT imaging revealed a mean ± SD radial error of 1.24 ± 0.45 mm (n = 15 leads), without surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS The stereotactic system facilitated safe and effective asleep, single-stage DBS surgery, maintaining traditional lead accuracy standards.

Abstract Introduction The implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) can have esthetic and psychological consequences on patients. We explore a heart team model for care coordination and discuss esthetic approaches for improved cosmetic outcomes in patients undergoing (CIED)‐related procedures or de novo implantation. Methods Patients undergoing CIED surgery for approved indications between June 2015 and June 2022 were identified. Patients were included when surgical care was provided by a collaborative relationship between the primary electrophysiologist and the plastic surgeon. Patient demographics, details of the surgical procedure, information on breast implants, complications, and outcomes related to cosmesis were recorded. Results Twenty‐two female patients were included in this study. The mean age was 50.2 ± 18.2 years. The mean follow‐up duration was 2.2 ± 5.5 months. The top two indications for the procedure included CIED generator change ( n = 9, 41%) and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) implantation ( n = 7, 32%). The most common reasons for involving plastic surgery in the procedure included surgery near breast implants ( n = 10, 45%) and device displacement or discomfort ( n = 8, 36%). CIED pocket position was prepectoral in 10 cases (45%), subpectoral in 11 patients (50%), and intramuscular in one patient (4.5%). The majority of the patients (20, 91%) had cosmetically acceptable results postprocedure. One patient (4.5%) had breast asymmetry on the CIED side, and another continued to have skin erosion over the CIED and leads. Conclusion A heart team approach incorporating the expertize of cardiac electrophysiology and plastic surgery is essential for providing optimal care for patients with breast implants and patients requesting esthetic appeal.

Background: Eyelid ptosis may present with upper lid dermatochalasis and brow ptosis. When indicated, ptosis correction (PC) is advocated during upper blepharoplasty (UB). In this study, the authors aimed to report their outcomes following UB and PC. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent UB from November of 2018 to March of 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and revisions were recorded. Cox regression was performed to assess predictors of revision. Results: Overall, 278 patients with 533 UB were included. The mean patient age was 67.3 years. The mean follow-up was 8.3 months. In 169 cases (31.7%), a brow lift was performed. UB and PC were performed in 109 cases (20.5%), of which 60 (55%) involved Müller muscle conjunctival resection and 49 (45%) were levator repairs. New dry eye symptoms lasting 3 months or longer occurred in 4 cases (0.8%), all of which resolved. The revision rate was 3.8% after UB (residual skin [ n = 11], hypertrophic scar [ n = 4], and Herring law–related ptosis [ n = 1]) versus 9.2% after UB and PC (overcorrection [ n = 4], residual skin [ n = 4], and asymmetry [ n = 2]). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased revision rates after UB and PC ( P = 0.008). There was no difference in revision rates between different techniques of PC. Conclusions: In this study of 278 patients presenting for dermatochalasis, up to 21% of cases required ptosis correction in addition to upper blepharoplasty. Ptosis correction is a safe procedure when combined with upper blepharoplasty, regardless of technique used. The revision rate in our series was 9.2% after the combined procedure, which is greater than the revision rate of upper blepharoplasty only but comparable to that in the literature. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Background: The Schnur scale used body surface area (BSA) to determine the amount of breast tissue resection in reduction mammaplasty, resulting in a greater requirement of breast weight removal in patients with larger BSA. The authors aimed to demonstrate BSA variance among women with similar mastectomy weights and the range of mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSAs. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent mastectomy from October of 2021 to June of 2022 was performed. Patients were included if they underwent skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with a minimum specimen weight of 700 g. Patient’s BSA, body mass index (BMI), mastectomy weight, and Schnur weight requirement (SWR) were collected. Results: A total of 130 patients (194 breasts) were included. There was significant variance in mean BSA, BMI, SWR, and SWR-to–mastectomy weight ratio among women with similar mastectomy weights. BSA varied by as much as 0.82 units, BMI varied by as much as 32 kg/m2, and SWR varied by as much as 1365 g within the same mastectomy weight group. There was also significant variance in mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSA, especially in BSA groups greater than 2.20, with the greatest range in mastectomy weights being 1684 g. Conclusions: Analysis of mastectomy patients showed no predictable relationship between BSA and breast weight. There was significant variance in the BSA of patients with similar breast weights, and conversely in breast weights of patients with comparable BSA. Therefore, strict adherence to the Schnur weight requirement can prevent patients with macromastia from receiving breast reductions.

Background: Upper facial third morphometrics are an important consideration in aesthetic facial surgery and facial gender-affirming surgery. Although there are generally accepted sexual dimorphic differences, an in-depth analysis of forehead morphometrics in attractive individuals is lacking. Methods: Thirty white female and 30 white male celebrities were included. Three full-face front-view photographs of each celebrity were evaluated by a facial analysis program, using Vision framework and MATLAB. After converting pixel distances to absolute distances, midline and lateral forehead heights were calculated and compared between men and women. Results: Forehead height was similar between attractive men and women, but forehead width was shorter in women. Analysis of forehead height at various points along the hairline demonstrated that forehead measurements above the lateral brow and brow peak were significantly greater in men. Mean forehead height above the lateral eyebrow was 3.51 cm in women and 4.16 cm in men (P = 0.017). Forehead height above the eyebrow peak was 4.34 cm in women and 5.55 cm in men (P < 0.001). Medial forehead height was similar between men and women, indicating that the greatest difference in attractive male and female foreheads is in the lateral forehead and forehead width. Conclusions: Analysis of attractive white celebrities demonstrated no significant differences in central forehead heights between men and women. Forehead width and lateral forehead height were significantly smaller in women, with an overall downward slanting contour. Male hairlines were more horizontal and slanting upward laterally. These results have implications in facial rejuvenation and facial gender-affirming surgery.