Binks, Sophie N M

Abstract Objective Autoimmune encephalitis is a cause of brain inflammation characterized by auto‐antibodies, which target cell surface neuronal proteins and lead to neuronal dysfunction. The most common form is associated with auto‐antibodies to leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1 (LGI1) protein, the presentation of which includes frequent focal seizures. The exact cause of these auto‐antibodies remains unknown, but established predispositions include overrepresented human leukocyte antigen ( HLA ) alleles. Yet, these HLA alleles are themselves common in the healthy ancestry‐matched population. One potential etiological hypothesis is that an environmental trigger, such as the gut microbiome, interacts with a genetically predisposed individual. Methods To investigate this, we studied 42 patients with LGI1‐antibody encephalitis (LGI1‐Ab‐E) and 27 familial/environmentally matched controls, and performed metagenomic shotgun sequencing, to describe the compositional and functional differences in the gut microbiome. Results We observed that LGI1‐Ab‐E gut microbiomes exhibited a significant reduction in the ratio of Firmicutes (or Bacillota) and Bacteroidetes phyla, which is associated with the dosage of HLA susceptibility allele count in patients with LGI1‐Ab‐E. Furthermore, we identified differences in functional gene profiles in the gut microbiome that led to a reduction of neuroinflammatory protective short‐chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in LGI1‐Ab‐E patients. Significance Taken together, our results suggest that a compositional shift in the gut microbiome of LGI1‐Ab‐E associates with a neuroinflammatory state, possibly through the reduction of SCFA production. Our study highlights the potential of the gut microbiome to explain some of the complex condition and unravel etiological questions. Validation studies with greater sample sizes are recommended.

Background N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis (NMDAR-Ab-E) can have an onset during, after or prior to a pregnancy. In animal models, transplacental NMDAR immunoglobulin G transfer can affect neurodevelopment. In contrast, clinical reports of mothers affected by NMDAR-Ab-E typically are reassuring. We systematically reviewed maternal, infant and childhood clinical data pertaining to NMDAR-Ab-E with an onset before, during or after pregnancy and compared this to our single autoimmune neurology centre experience. Methods After pre-registration on PROSPERO (CRD42023408447), we searched PubMed and Scopus for NMDAR-Ab-E case reports/series with an onset before, during or after pregnancy (last search 19/10/2023). We extracted maternal, neonatal and childhood outcomes using an idealised checklist to derive summary statistics. Results After quality control, we identified 66 pregnancies in 61 women from 48 reports or series. 72% of women recovered with minimal or no neurological deficits, comparable to non-pregnancy-associated NMDAR-Ab-E. Likewise, 80% of pregnancies resulted in live births with a single neonatal death reported. Data on neonatal outcome measures were frequently unreported, and childhood follow-up was provided in only 60%. Our centre’s experience is consistent: 3/4 mothers recovered with no functional deficits and 7/8 children without evidence of compromise at a median follow-up of 2 years. Conclusions Current evidence does not overall suggest unfavourable maternal, fetal or childhood outcomes after NMDAR-Ab-E. However, the available sample is small, predominantly single case reports with modest follow-up, lacks standardisation, and data are often incomplete. Future approaches should address these caveats: developing multi-centre collaboration towards an international registry.

Abstract Patient‐reported quality‐of‐life (QoL) and carer impacts are not reported after leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1‐antibody encephalitis (LGI1‐Ab‐E). From 60 patients, 85% (51 out of 60) showed one abnormal score across QoL assessments and 11 multimodal validated questionnaires. Compared to the premorbid state, QoL significantly deteriorated ( p < 0.001) and, at a median of 41 months, fatigue was its most important predictor ( p = 0.025). In total, 51% (26 out of 51) of carers reported significant burden. An abbreviated five‐item battery explained most variance in QoL. Wide‐ranging impacts post‐LGI1‐Ab‐E include decreased QoL and high caregiver strain. We identify a rapid method to capture QoL in routine clinic or clinical trial settings.

ImportanceAutoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis can lead to harm.ObjectiveTo determine the diseases misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis and potential reasons for misdiagnosis.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective multicenter study took place from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, at autoimmune encephalitis subspecialty outpatient clinics including Mayo Clinic (n = 44), University of Oxford (n = 18), University of Texas Southwestern (n = 18), University of California, San Francisco (n = 17), Washington University in St Louis (n = 6), and University of Utah (n = 4). Inclusion criteria were adults (age ≥18 years) with a prior autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis at a participating center or other medical facility and a subsequent alternative diagnosis at a participating center. A total of 393 patients were referred with an autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis, and of those, 286 patients with true autoimmune encephalitis were excluded.Main Outcomes and MeasuresData were collected on clinical features, investigations, fulfillment of autoimmune encephalitis criteria, alternative diagnoses, potential contributors to misdiagnosis, and immunotherapy adverse reactions.ResultsA total of 107 patients were misdiagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, and 77 (72%) did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis. The median (IQR) age was 48 (35.5-60.5) years and 65 (61%) were female. Correct diagnoses included functional neurologic disorder (27 [25%]), neurodegenerative disease (22 [20.5%]), primary psychiatric disease (19 [18%]), cognitive deficits from comorbidities (11 [10%]), cerebral neoplasm (10 [9.5%]), and other (18 [17%]). Onset was acute/subacute in 56 (52%) or insidious (&amp;gt;3 months) in 51 (48%). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was suggestive of encephalitis in 19 of 104 patients (18%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis occurred in 16 of 84 patients (19%). Thyroid peroxidase antibodies were elevated in 24 of 62 patients (39%). Positive neural autoantibodies were more frequent in serum than CSF (48 of 105 [46%] vs 7 of 91 [8%]) and included 1 or more of GAD65 (n = 14), voltage-gated potassium channel complex (LGI1 and CASPR2 negative) (n = 10), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor by cell-based assay only (n = 10; 6 negative in CSF), and other (n = 18). Adverse reactions from immunotherapies occurred in 17 of 84 patients (20%). Potential contributors to misdiagnosis included overinterpretation of positive serum antibodies (53 [50%]), misinterpretation of functional/psychiatric, or nonspecific cognitive dysfunction as encephalopathy (41 [38%]).Conclusions and RelevanceWhen evaluating for autoimmune encephalitis, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered and misdiagnosis occurs in many settings including at specialized centers. In this study, red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses included an insidious onset, positive nonspecific serum antibody, and failure to fulfill autoimmune encephalitis diagnostic criteria. Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis leads to morbidity from unnecessary immunotherapies and delayed treatment of the correct diagnosis.