Martini, Michael

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a powerful procedure for sagittal correction and indirect decompression in the lumbar spine, though aggressive correction can cause stretch neuropraxia and implant subsidence. The aim of this study was to identify radiographic and clinical predictors of segmental correction, as well as to evaluate the degree to which segmental correction on supine intraoperative radiographs translates to postoperative upright alignment changes. METHODS: We identified patients treated with 1- or 2-level ALIF at a tertiary care center and extracted data on demographics, spinopelvic parameters, and surgical details. Patients treated with isolated ALIF and ALIF with supplementary posterior instrumentation were compared on pre- and postoperative intradiscal lordosis (IDL) and change in IDL. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative IDL. RESULTS: We included 204 patients (median age 57 years, 55.4% male) treated at 258 levels, of whom 114 (55.9%) underwent supplementary posterior fixation and 150 (73.5%) underwent single-level implantation. Across all patients, postoperative IDL was significantly greater than preoperative segmental lordosis (25.4° vs 15.3°; P < .001). Standalone ALIF achieved less ΔIDL than circumferential fusion for L5/S1 procedures (7.4° vs 11.6°; P < .001), though ΔIDL for L3/4 and L4/5 was similar between the standalone and circumferential groups. Multivariable analysis showed postoperative IDL to be predicted by greater preoperative IDL (β = 0.26° per degree; [0.15, 0.36]; P < .001), L5/S1 [vs L4/5] implantation (β = 3.97°; [2.72, 5.21]; P < .001), use of supplementary posterior fixation (β = 1.80°; [0.70, 2.89]; P < .001), and greater implant lordosis (β = 0.62° per degree; [0.44, 0.79]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative IDL after 1- or 2-level ALIF is best predicted by placement of larger interbody sizes, L5/S1 implantation, greater baseline IDL, and use of adjunct posterior fixation. Patients with higher preoperative lordosis experienced smaller postoperative increases in IDL, though this was likely influenced by a treatment bias.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) allows for direct and indirect decompression and segmental lordosis in sagittal plane correction. This study compares the effectiveness of “Bullet” type and “Banana” type devices for sagittal plane correction. METHODS: Patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level TLIF for degenerative pathology at a single tertiary care center were identified. Details were extracted on demographics, interbody dimensions, and preoperative and postoperative lumbopelvic parameters from upright radiographs. Cages were categorized as “Bullet” or “Banana” type based on morphology and manufacturer description of optimal position. Univariable comparisons between levels treated with “Bullet” and “Banana” type interbodies were performed. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative segmental lordosis and change in segmental lordosis. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety eight unique patients (median 66.6 years; [IQR 59.5, 73.7]; 56.6% female) were included with 241 levels treated, of which 114 (52.7%) were treated with “Banana” type interbodies and 127 (47.3%) with “Bullet” type. “Banana” type interbodies afforded both greater postoperative segmental lordosis (8.1 [6.2, 10.7] vs 7.5 [5.2, 9.6]; P = .048) and greater increase in segmental lordosis (3.3 [0.7, 7.0] vs 2.3 [0.1, 4.2]; P = .015). On multivariable linear regression, only preoperative segmental lordosis (β = 0.322 per degree; [0.244, 0.399]; P < .001), implant listed lordosis (β = 0.146 per degree; 95% CI [0.048, 0.244]; P = .004), preoperative pelvic incidence (0.072 per degree; [0.034, 0.111]; P < .001), and use of bilateral TLIF windows (β = 3.133; [1.213, 5.053]; P = .001) were predictive of postoperative segmental lordosis. CONCLUSION: The present analysis suggests that baseline lumbopelvic anatomy, interbody lordosis, and the use of bilateral TLIF windows are the most important predictors of postoperative segmental lordosis. Use of “Banana” vs “Bullet” type interbodies was not predictive of segmental lordosis achieved on immediate postoperative upright radiographs. Further work is merited to determine whether the 2 interbody types demonstrate differences regarding subsidence risk or maintenance of correction.

Background: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a powerful tool for sagittal plane correction in patients with rigid adult spinal deformity (ASD); however, it is associated with high intraoperative blood loss and the increased risk of durotomy. The objective of the present study was to identify intraoperative techniques and baseline patient factors capable of predicting intraoperative durotomy. Methods: A tri-institutional database was retrospectively queried for all patients who underwent PSO for ASD. Data on baseline comorbidities, surgical history, surgeon characteristics and intraoperative maneuvers were gathered. PSO aggressiveness was defined as conventional (Schwab 3 PSO) or an extended PSO (Schwab type 4). The primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of durotomy intraoperatively. Univariable analyses were performed with Mann–Whitney U tests, Chi-squared analyses, and Fisher’s exact tests. Statistical significance was defined by p < 0.05. Results: One hundred and sixteen patients were identified (mean age 61.9 ± 12.6 yr; 44.8% male), of whom 51 (44.0%) experienced intraoperative durotomy. There were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities between those who did and did not experience durotomy, with the exception that baseline weight and body mass index were higher in patients who did not suffer durotomy. Prior surgery (OR 2.73; 95% CI [1.13, 6.58]; p = 0.03) and, more specifically, prior decompression at the PSO level (OR 4.23; 95% CI [1.92, 9.34]; p < 0.001) was predictive of durotomy. A comparison of surgeon training showed no statistically significant difference in durotomy rate between fellowship and non-fellowship trained surgeons, or between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. The PSO level, PSO aggressiveness, the presence of stenosis at the PSO level, nor the surgical instrument used predicted the odds of durotomy occurrence. Those experiencing durotomy had similar hospitalization durations, rates of reoperation and rates of nonroutine discharge. Conclusions: In this large multisite series, a history of prior decompression at the PSO level was associated with a four-fold increase in intraoperative durotomy risk. Notably the use of extended (versus) standard PSO, surgical technique, nor baseline patient characteristics predicted durotomy. Durotomies occurred in 44% of patients and may prolong operative times. Additional prospective investigations are merited.