Hamouda, Abdelrahman

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is a common treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), but patients may require VPS revision. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized VPS placement protocol by comparing indications and rates of shunt revision compared with a historical institutional cohort. METHODS: All patients treated with VPS for “suspected” iNPH at a tertiary care center between January 2000 and January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into temporally distinct historical (before 2017) and standardized (after 2017) cohorts. Cumulative incidence and timing of VPS revision were compared using competing risks analyses. RESULTS: A total of 561 patients (median age 75.0 years) were identified with 324 (57.8%) in the historical and 237 (42.2%) in the standardized cohorts. Significant variations in surgical technique and shunt hardware were noted between the cohorts. With a median follow-up of 11.4 months for historical and 12.4 months for standardized cohort, shunt revisions occurred in 19.4% and 8.4% of patients in the historical and standardized cohorts, respectively ( P < .001). Revision indications also varied significantly with lower rates of overdrainage ( P < .001), infection ( P < .001), and proximal malfunction ( P = .042) but higher rate of distal malfunction ( P = .03) in the standardized cohort. Notably, no infections were noted in the standardized cohort. CONCLUSION: Risk of shunt revision among iNPH patients may be associated with modifiable factors related to surgical technique and shunt hardware selection. Importantly, no short-term complications such as hemorrhage, infection, or catheter malposition were observed with the standardized protocol. Development and refinement of standardized shunt protocols for iNPH patients should be commonplace to facilitate tracking, identification, and modification of modifiable technical risk factors.

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely performed procedure for treating degenerative cervical spine conditions. While it effectively addresses neural decompression and restores segmental alignment, the interplay of baseline alignment and implant-specific factors on postoperative segmental alignment remains underexplored. This study evaluates the influence of preoperative cervical alignment and interbody cage design on segmental alignment changes following 1- to 3-level ACDF. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, we identified 258 patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative pathology between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2023. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed for cervical alignment, disc height, and segmental lordosis. Cage dimensions, lordosis, and positioning relative to vertebral landmarks were recorded. Multivariable linear regression models evaluated predictors of postoperative disc height, segmental lordosis, and their respective changes. Results: Postoperative disc height was positively associated with greater cage height (β = 1.13 mm per mm, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with greater cage lordosis (β = −0.10 mm per °, p = 0.001). Segmental lordosis was positively influenced by cage height (β = 0.78° per mm, p = 0.002) and lordosis (β = 0.42° per °, p = 0.002) but was negatively correlated with the distance of the cage from the anterior edge of the cranial vertebra (β = −1.76° per mm, p = 0.004). Greater preoperative segmental kyphosis predicted more significant postoperative lordosis correction (β = −1.07° per °, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of preoperative alignment and interbody cage design in achieving optimal segmental correction following ACDF. While cage height primarily drives disc height restoration, surgical technique, particularly anterior placement of the cage, is pivotal for enhancing segmental lordosis. These findings support personalized surgical planning to optimize alignment and patient outcomes.

Abstract Background The associations between bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy with ovarian conservation and the risk of Parkinson's disease (PD) remain inconclusive. Objectives To evaluate the evidence on these two associations. Methods We conducted a systematic search across Embase, PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and Web of Science through May 15, 2024. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers, and random‐effects meta‐analyses were performed. Results Eight studies with a total of 242,275 women were included. For bilateral oophorectomy, the effect size (ES) was greater than 1.0 in 5 of 8 studies. The pooled analysis showed a significant association between premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy and an increased risk of PD in cohort studies (hazard ratio [HR] 1.32; 95% CI 1.12–1.56) but not in case–control studies or combining both cohort and case–control studies. There was a suggestive trend of increasing risk with younger age at bilateral oophorectomy. For hysterectomy with ovarian conservation, the ES was greater than 1.0 in all six studies. The pooled analysis showed a non‐significant association in cohort studies and in case–control studies; however, the association was significant when combining both cohort studies and case–control studies (ES 1.19; 95% CI 1.01–1.41). Conclusions Current studies provided low to moderate evidence for the associations between bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy with ovarian conservation and increased risk of PD. However, the evidence was only observational and there was important heterogeneity across the case–control studies. Future studies should focus on surgeries performed at younger ages and on the possible effects of estrogen replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a powerful procedure for sagittal correction and indirect decompression in the lumbar spine, though aggressive correction can cause stretch neuropraxia and implant subsidence. The aim of this study was to identify radiographic and clinical predictors of segmental correction, as well as to evaluate the degree to which segmental correction on supine intraoperative radiographs translates to postoperative upright alignment changes. METHODS: We identified patients treated with 1- or 2-level ALIF at a tertiary care center and extracted data on demographics, spinopelvic parameters, and surgical details. Patients treated with isolated ALIF and ALIF with supplementary posterior instrumentation were compared on pre- and postoperative intradiscal lordosis (IDL) and change in IDL. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative IDL. RESULTS: We included 204 patients (median age 57 years, 55.4% male) treated at 258 levels, of whom 114 (55.9%) underwent supplementary posterior fixation and 150 (73.5%) underwent single-level implantation. Across all patients, postoperative IDL was significantly greater than preoperative segmental lordosis (25.4° vs 15.3°; P < .001). Standalone ALIF achieved less ΔIDL than circumferential fusion for L5/S1 procedures (7.4° vs 11.6°; P < .001), though ΔIDL for L3/4 and L4/5 was similar between the standalone and circumferential groups. Multivariable analysis showed postoperative IDL to be predicted by greater preoperative IDL (β = 0.26° per degree; [0.15, 0.36]; P < .001), L5/S1 [vs L4/5] implantation (β = 3.97°; [2.72, 5.21]; P < .001), use of supplementary posterior fixation (β = 1.80°; [0.70, 2.89]; P < .001), and greater implant lordosis (β = 0.62° per degree; [0.44, 0.79]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative IDL after 1- or 2-level ALIF is best predicted by placement of larger interbody sizes, L5/S1 implantation, greater baseline IDL, and use of adjunct posterior fixation. Patients with higher preoperative lordosis experienced smaller postoperative increases in IDL, though this was likely influenced by a treatment bias.