Woldetsadik, Edom Seife

e18017 Background: Head and neck (H&N) cancers affect the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, salivary glands, nasal cavity, and sinuses. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the true burden of H&N cancers remains unclear, with available estimates suggesting approximately 47,000 new cases and 26,000 deaths annually. Limited cancer datasets hinder understanding of disease patterns and outcomes. This study explores patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes to guide regional cancer control efforts. Methods: A cancer dataset was created and implemented at 4 leading teaching hospitals in Ghana, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Rwanda to systematically collect data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment patterns. Established through competitive grant funding, the primary objective of the database was to assess the indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care. The dataset includes all cancer patients seen in consultation and/or treated between 2016 and 2023. In this study, a subset of patients diagnosed with H&N cancers was analyzed using descriptive statistics to assess clinical characteristics, treatments modalities, and patients' outcomes. Results: A total of 1,023 patients with H&N cancer were included in the analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 54 yrs (IQR 41-66), with 37% (n= 374) of the cohort being female. A total of 55% (n= 549) had no health insurance coverage. Of those with staging data, majority presented with advanced disease (89%) on presentation. Regarding treatment modality, 16% (n= 157) underwent surgery, 27% (n=279) received radiotherapy (RT), 14% (n= 143) received chemotherapy (CT), and 56% (n= 572) received no cancer therapy. Of those who received CT the timing was neoadjuvant (12%), concurrent with RT (22%), adjuvant after surgery (8.9%) or as palliative treatment (57%). Platinum-based agents (94%) were the most common CT, followed by Taxol-based (31%), and 5FU-based agents (27%). Regarding RT, planning was performed using 2D (55%) and 3D (45%) techniques. The median delivered dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. At a median follow up of 43 months, 1.6% were disease free, 10% (n= 103) were alive, 5.9% (n= 60) were confirmed dead, and 84% (n= 848) were lost to follow up. Conclusions: This study identifies key challenges in managing H&N cancers in SSA, including late-stage presentation, limited access to advanced treatment modalities, and a high lost to follow-up rate (84%). The reliance on older RT techniques such as 2D planning and the limited use of surgery highlight gaps in infrastructure and resource availability. Limited health insurance coverage suggests potential financial barriers to care and disparities in treatment access. Addressing these challenges will require greater investment in cancer care, expansion of the oncology workforce, and improvements in healthcare infrastructure to support better patient outcomes in the region.

e17511 Background: Cervical cancer is a significant public health concern in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where it remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. SSA has the highest global incidence and mortality rates, with an estimated 110,300 new cases and 76,700 deaths in 2020. Despite this burden, data on patient characteristics and treatment outcomes remain limited. This study aims to address these gaps by analyzing current treatment patterns and outcomes for cervical cancer in SSA. Methods: A cancer dataset was established at 4 major teaching hospitals in Ghana, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Rwanda to capture data on patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment modalities. The dataset encompasses all cancer patients seen between 2016-2023, with over 9,000 cases collected to date. The primary objective of the dataset was to assess impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care in SSA. This study conducted a retrospective analysis of cervical cancer cases within the dataset utilizing descriptive metrics. Results: A total of 2,326 patients were analyzed, with a median age at diagnosis of 56 y (48–65) and 53% having health insurance. The majority had squamous cell carcinoma (87%) and presented with locally advanced disease (FIGO stages IIB–IVA, 88%). Treatment primarily consisted of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT, 34%) or radiotherapy (RT) alone (30%), while smaller proportions received chemotherapy (CT) alone (1.2%) or surgery (1.3%). A total of 33% of patients received no cancer therapy. Among 1,524 patients treated with RT, 1,180 received external beam RT with a median dose of 46 Gy in 23 fractions, using 2D planning in 60% and 3D planning in 40% of cases. Additionally, 25 patients underwent brachytherapy, with 58% receiving low-dose-rate and 42% high-dose-rate treatments. Of 1,011 patients treated with CT, 85% (n=844) completed the intended course, with a median of 4 cycles, primarily delivered concurrently with RT (95%). Only a few received CT as adjuvant (4.8%), neoadjuvant (1.6%), or palliative (3.4%) therapy. Platinum-based regimens were most common, with 43% receiving platinum monotherapy and 5% receiving platinum-taxane combinations. By the end of treatment, 27% (n=633) achieved disease-free status. After a median follow-up of 47 months (range,37–55), 42% were alive, 7% had died, and 53% were lost to follow-up with unknown vital status. Conclusions: This study reveals significant challenges in management and follow-up of cervical cancer in SSA. Most patients were diagnosed at advanced stages, with 32% receiving no treatment and 53% of treated patients lost to follow-up. These findings highlight barriers to early diagnosis, treatment access, and continuity of care. Addressing these issues requires expanding early diagnostic services, increasing vaccination coverage, strengthening healthcare infrastructure, and improving patient retention.

PURPOSE Management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. Recently, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has gained attention. In developing countries, patients with rectal cancer often present at advanced stages. This study assesses treatment patterns and outcomes in LARC at a largest referral center in Ethiopia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients with LARC treated at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital from January 2020 to September 2022. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis was 45.5 years (range, 20-86), with 51% male. Of the patients, 81% had no previous oncologic treatment and 75.3% was discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Up-front surgery was planned for 44.4% of patients, whereas 22.2% and 8.6% were assigned to TNT and NACRT, respectively. Among 81 treatment-naïve patients, 79 were triaged for surgery, but only 47 (59.5%) underwent surgery, achieving an 89.9% R0 resection rate. Of 36 up-front planned surgeries, 35 proceeded as planned, whereas only 12 of 43 (28%) planned after neoadjuvant treatment underwent surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was given to 37% of patients, with 16.7% (5 of 30) undergoing subsequent surgery. Radiotherapy was given to 24.2% of participants, with 56.25% undergoing surgery. Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) was given to two patients. Only 14.8% completed all planned treatments, with radiation waiting time (median, 10 months) being the main impediment. CONCLUSION Timely administration of neoadjuvant treatment is not possible in most resource-limited settings. Because of better treatment completion, up-front surgery looks a more viable option than NACT in these situations. Extended waiting time for radiotherapy can be mitigated by opting for alternatives like SCRT in selected patients.

e15640 Background: The standard management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neo-adjuvant concurrent chemo radiation (CCRT) followed by total meso-rectal excision. Recently there is an increased interest in total neo-adjuvant treatment (TNT). Most patients with rectal cancer in developing countries present in advanced stage for several reasons including lack of resources and delayed health seeking behavior. Most patients are not able to get standard management. This study tries to assess treatment patterns and outcomes in LARC. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with LARC that are treated at TASH from Jan 1, 2020 up to Sept. 2022. The data was collected from Patient’s cards using a pre-structured format that included demographic data, laboratory, pathological and imaging information. Data analysis was conducted by using IBM SPSS version 25. Results: 100 patients were included in the study, 51% were male. The median (range) age at diagnosis was 45.5 (20-86) years. 81% of patients came to our center without getting any oncologic treatment and 75.3% of them were presented on a multi-disciplinary tumor board for their treatment decision. Upfront surgery was decided in 48.1% (39/81) of patients. Standard neo-adjuvant treatment of either TNT or CCRT was decided in 23.4% (19/81) and 8.6% (7/81) of patients respectively. There is no significant association between tumor location, TNM stage, mesorectal fascia status and first treatment decision. Only 12 (14.8%) patients were able to finish their whole treatment plan. The most common reason for not finishing all treatment was prolonged radiation waiting time, with the median (range) waiting time of 10 ± 7.1 (1-26) months. From 81 treatment naive patients, 79 were decided to have surgery; and 59.5% (47/79) underwent the planned surgery with 89.9% R0 resection rate. R0 resection rate in patients who undergo upfront surgery was 91.2% (31/34). Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 34.6% (28/81); and only 18% (5/28) underwent subsequent surgery. The most common reason for not undergoing subsequent surgery was disease progression 43.5% (10/23) during or after finishing the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Only 24% of the study participants received radiotherapy. From the patients who took radiotherapy, only two patients received short course radiotherapy. Conclusions: Treatment decisions for rectal cancer in our study did not conform to standard treatment recommendations. Upfront surgery maybe a better option than neoadjuvant chemotherapy, since timely administration of standard neoadjuvant treatment is not possible. Alternative radiotherapy treatment options like short course radiotherapy may be better in resource limited setting to alleviate the longer radiotherapy waiting time.