Zingeta, Girum Tessema

PURPOSE Management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. Recently, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has gained attention. In developing countries, patients with rectal cancer often present at advanced stages. This study assesses treatment patterns and outcomes in LARC at a largest referral center in Ethiopia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 patients with LARC treated at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital from January 2020 to September 2022. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis was 45.5 years (range, 20-86), with 51% male. Of the patients, 81% had no previous oncologic treatment and 75.3% was discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Up-front surgery was planned for 44.4% of patients, whereas 22.2% and 8.6% were assigned to TNT and NACRT, respectively. Among 81 treatment-naïve patients, 79 were triaged for surgery, but only 47 (59.5%) underwent surgery, achieving an 89.9% R0 resection rate. Of 36 up-front planned surgeries, 35 proceeded as planned, whereas only 12 of 43 (28%) planned after neoadjuvant treatment underwent surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) was given to 37% of patients, with 16.7% (5 of 30) undergoing subsequent surgery. Radiotherapy was given to 24.2% of participants, with 56.25% undergoing surgery. Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) was given to two patients. Only 14.8% completed all planned treatments, with radiation waiting time (median, 10 months) being the main impediment. CONCLUSION Timely administration of neoadjuvant treatment is not possible in most resource-limited settings. Because of better treatment completion, up-front surgery looks a more viable option than NACT in these situations. Extended waiting time for radiotherapy can be mitigated by opting for alternatives like SCRT in selected patients.

e15640 Background: The standard management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neo-adjuvant concurrent chemo radiation (CCRT) followed by total meso-rectal excision. Recently there is an increased interest in total neo-adjuvant treatment (TNT). Most patients with rectal cancer in developing countries present in advanced stage for several reasons including lack of resources and delayed health seeking behavior. Most patients are not able to get standard management. This study tries to assess treatment patterns and outcomes in LARC. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with LARC that are treated at TASH from Jan 1, 2020 up to Sept. 2022. The data was collected from Patient’s cards using a pre-structured format that included demographic data, laboratory, pathological and imaging information. Data analysis was conducted by using IBM SPSS version 25. Results: 100 patients were included in the study, 51% were male. The median (range) age at diagnosis was 45.5 (20-86) years. 81% of patients came to our center without getting any oncologic treatment and 75.3% of them were presented on a multi-disciplinary tumor board for their treatment decision. Upfront surgery was decided in 48.1% (39/81) of patients. Standard neo-adjuvant treatment of either TNT or CCRT was decided in 23.4% (19/81) and 8.6% (7/81) of patients respectively. There is no significant association between tumor location, TNM stage, mesorectal fascia status and first treatment decision. Only 12 (14.8%) patients were able to finish their whole treatment plan. The most common reason for not finishing all treatment was prolonged radiation waiting time, with the median (range) waiting time of 10 ± 7.1 (1-26) months. From 81 treatment naive patients, 79 were decided to have surgery; and 59.5% (47/79) underwent the planned surgery with 89.9% R0 resection rate. R0 resection rate in patients who undergo upfront surgery was 91.2% (31/34). Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 34.6% (28/81); and only 18% (5/28) underwent subsequent surgery. The most common reason for not undergoing subsequent surgery was disease progression 43.5% (10/23) during or after finishing the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Only 24% of the study participants received radiotherapy. From the patients who took radiotherapy, only two patients received short course radiotherapy. Conclusions: Treatment decisions for rectal cancer in our study did not conform to standard treatment recommendations. Upfront surgery maybe a better option than neoadjuvant chemotherapy, since timely administration of standard neoadjuvant treatment is not possible. Alternative radiotherapy treatment options like short course radiotherapy may be better in resource limited setting to alleviate the longer radiotherapy waiting time.