Stewart, Michael W.

Surgery has long been an important treatment for limiting optic nerve damage and minimising visual loss in patients with glaucoma. Numerous improvements, modifications, and innovations in glaucoma surgery over recent decades have improved surgical safety, and have led to earlier and more frequent surgical intervention in glaucoma patients at risk of vision loss. This review summarises the latest advancements in trabeculectomy surgery, glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation, and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, alongside subsequent hand searches—limited to the past 10 years for trabeculectomy and GDDs, and the past 5 years for MIGS—yielded 2283 results, 58 of which were included in the final review (8 trabeculectomy, 27 GDD, and 23 MIGS). Advancements in trabeculectomy are described in terms of adjunctive incisions, Tenon’s layer management, and novel suturing techniques. Advancements in GDD implantation pertain to modifications of surgical techniques and devices, novel methods to deal with postoperative complications and surgical failure, and the invention of new GDDs. Finally, the popularity of MIGS has recently promoted modifications to current surgical techniques and the development of novel MIGS devices.

Importance Recently, several states have granted optometrists privileges to perform select laser procedures (laser peripheral iridotomy, selective laser trabeculoplasty, and YAG laser capsulotomy) with the aim of increasing access. However, whether these changes are associated with increased access to these procedures among each state’s Medicare population has not been evaluated. Objective To compare patient access to laser surgery eye care by estimated travel time and 30-minute proximity to an optometrist or ophthalmologist. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort database study used Medicare Part B claims data from 2016 through 2020 for patients accessing new patient or laser eye care (laser peripheral iridotomy, selective laser trabeculoplasty, YAG) from optometrists or ophthalmologists in Oklahoma, Kentucky, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Missouri. Analysis took place between December 2021 and March 2023. Main Outcome and Measures Percentage of each state’s Medicare population within a 30-minute travel time (isochrone) of an optometrist or ophthalmologist based on US census block group population and estimated travel time from patient to health care professional. Results The analytic cohort consisted of 1 564 307 individual claims. Isochrones show that optometrists performing laser eye surgery cover a geographic area similar to that covered by ophthalmologists. Less than 5% of the population had only optometrists (no ophthalmologists) within a 30-minute drive in every state except for Oklahoma for YAG (301 470 [7.6%]) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (371 097 [9.4%]). Patients had a longer travel time to receive all laser procedures from optometrists than ophthalmologists in Kentucky: the shortest median (IQR) drive time for an optometrist-performed procedure was 49.0 (18.4-71.7) minutes for YAG, and the the longest median (IQR) drive time for an ophthalmologist-performed procedure was 22.8 (12.1-41.4) minutes, also for YAG. The median (IQR) driving time for YAG in Oklahoma was 26.6 (12.2-56.9) for optometrists vs 22.0 (11.2-40.8) minutes for ophthalmologists, and in Arkansas it was 90.0 (16.2-93.2) for optometrists vs 26.5 (11.8-51.6) minutes for ophthalmologists. In Louisiana, the longest median (IQR) travel time to receive laser procedures from optometrists was for YAG at 18.5 (7.6-32.6) minutes and the shortest drive to receive procedures from ophthalmologists was for YAG at 20.5 (11.7-39.7) minutes. Conclusions and Relevance Although this study did not assess impact on quality of care, expansion of laser eye surgery privileges to optometrists was not found to lead to shorter travel times to receive care or to a meaningful increase in the percentage of the population with nearby health care professionals.

Purpose: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of eyes with idiopathic full-thickness macular holes that underwent initial medical management. Methods: This retrospective study included eyes with full-thickness macular holes that were initially managed with 1 month of topical therapy. Eligible subjects were treated with dorzolamide 2% three times a day, nepafenac 0.1% twice a day, and prednisolone acetate 1% four times a day. The primary end points was hole closure at one month and secondary end point was change in best-corrected visual acuity. Results: Ten subjects (mean age: 62.80 years; female: 50%) with unilateral full-thickness macular holes were studied. The mean basal diameter of the entire cohort at baseline was 824.1 µm (median 828 µm). Four (40%) of the smaller holes (mean 698 µm; median 698.50 µm) closed after 1 month of topical therapy, whereas larger holes (mean 908.17 µm; median 889.50 µm) did not close. In one eye, the hole reopened 4 months after stopping the medication but closed again at 1 month after restarting the topical treatment. Median best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.35 logMAR at baseline to 0.05 logMAR in eyes that closed but remained at 0.70 logMAR at 1 month in eyes that did not close. Conclusion: Topical corticosteroid, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor therapy may promote closure of small full-thickness macular holes, but large holes are less likely to respond. One month of topical therapy might avoid subjecting some patients to complex vitreoretinal surgery without compromising visual outcomes. Macular hole may reopen after stopping the topical therapy.

Chorioretinal vascular diseases are among the leading causes of blindness in industrialised countries. The recent development and widespread adoption of intravitreal pharmacotherapy enables surgeons to not only stabilise disease in most cases, but also improve visual acuity (VA). Inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have become first-line therapy for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO), and oedema due to retinal vein occlusions (RVO). The pivotal Phase III registration studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of monthly or bimonthly injections of anti-VEGF drugs, and remain the standard against which other treatments and injection regimens are compared. Adhering to a regimen of monthly drug injections requires considerable patient compliance and allocation of substantial healthcare resources, therefore most physicians use individualised treatment strategies. As-needed (PRN) and treat and extend (T&E) regimens reduce the number of clinic visits, intravitreal injections, or both, and are less expensive than monthly therapy. Both regimens reduce unwanted macular oedema and improve VA, but compared to monthly therapy over the course of 1 year, may be 1–3 letters less effective. Trials of 5-year duration suggest that PRN treatment modulates the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and stabilises vision in patients with DR. Long-term data comparing these strategies in patients with nAMD and RVO are lacking, but VA frequently declines when observation periods and treatment intervals are extended beyond 4 weeks. Current observations suggest that aggressive long-term therapy with frequent injections may produce the best VA results in patients with nAMD and RVO.

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is the leading cause of vision loss in working aged individuals. Macular laser photocoagulation was the primary DMO treatment for several decades, but has recently been replaced by intravitreal injections of corticosteroids and drugs that inhibit the actions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In Phase III trials, anti-VEGF drugs improve best corrected visual acuity by a mean of +12 letters, but up to 40% of patients have sub-optimal responses to therapy. The new anti-VEGF drugs abicipar and brolucizumab may possess extended durations of action in Phase III neovascular age-related macular degeneration trials, and DMO trials are being planned. Angiopoietin-2 inhibitors, both as co-formulations with anti-VEGF drugs and as bispecific antibodies, are in Phase II trials for DMO. Drugs that stimulate the Tie2 receptor are administered via subcutaneous injections. Intravenously administered antibodies that decrease diabetes-mediated inflammation, such as tocilizumab and teprotumumab, are entering early phase studies. Other drugs with topical (mecamylamine) and oral (minocycline) delivery routes are being developed. Several of these drugs may become available to patients within the next 5–10 years.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and therapeutic effects of orally administered AKST4290 (formerly BI 144807 and ALK4290) in treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2a pilot clinical study, 30 patients with newly diagnosed neovascular age-related macular degeneration self-administered AKST4290 (400 mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks. Patients were examined weekly for safety, to measure best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and to perform exploratory morphologic assessments. The primary endpoint was the mean change in BCVA from baseline to end of treatment, and the secondary endpoint was safety. Exploratory endpoints investigated potential changes in macular morphology. Results: Mean BCVA improved by +7.0 letters (95% CI, 2.2–11.7); 24 patients (82.8%) had stable or improved BCVA, with 6 (20.7%) gaining ≥15 letters. No patients experienced severe or serious adverse events. Conclusion: In this 6-week study, AKST4290 treatment was associated with improved BCVA scores in patients with treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no safety issues were identified. Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with AKST4290 warrants further investigation in randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Introduction: Retinal microvascular abnormalities have been associated with stroke, but their association with dementia and death is less well described. We tested the hypothesis that retinopathy is associated with stroke, dementia, and age-adjusted mortality. Methods: Data were obtained from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 2005 to 2008, with linked mortality through 2015. Severity of retinopathy was defined as no retinopathy, mild nonproliferative retinopathy (NPR), moderate-severe NPR, and proliferative retinopathy. Logistic regression models were performed to evaluate the relationships between retinopathy, stroke, and dementia, respectively. Independent relationships between retinopathy and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox regression models, before and after adjusting for covariates. All analyses were adjusted for the complex survey design. Results: Of 5,543 participants aged ≥18 years with gradable retinal imaging, 696 had retinopathy, 289 had stroke, and 597 had dementia. Mean age of subjects was 56.3 ± 11.7 years. Retinopathy was associated with higher risk of stroke (adj OR 2.39, P <0.001) and dementia (adj OR 1.68, P =0.005). Over a median duration of 118 months (IQR 111-125), there was a dose-dependent relationship between severity of retinopathy and all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratios were 1.0, 1.5, 2.4, 3.4 across retinopathy severity; P =0.021). The Figure shows the age-adjusted cumulative mortality curves by retinopathy severity. Conclusions: Participants with retinopathy have a greater than 2-fold increase in stroke risk and a 1.7-fold increase in dementia risk. Having more severe retinopathy confers a higher risk of death after adjusting for age and vascular risk factors. The retina may serve as a tissue biomarker in intervention trials for cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases.

AbstractZiv‐aflibercept (Zaltrap®), a recombinant fusion protein that binds diffusible vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Its molecular structure is the same as aflibercept (Eylea®), thus making it an attractive option for the off‐label treatment of chorioretinal vascular conditions. Ziv‐aflibercept is distributed in 4 and 8 ml vials for intravenous use, and its cost after compounding is similar to bevacizumab. Studies with retinal pigment epithelium cytotoxicity, animal histologic sections and electroretinography have demonstrated its safety, and mathematical modelling combined with over four dozen clinical publications from different ophthalmic centres throughout the world attest to its efficacy. No appreciable differences in visual or anatomic outcomes between 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) and 2.5 mg (1.0 ml) doses have been noted. The long duration of action combined with the low cost make ziv‐aflibercept an attractive anti‐VEGF treatment option, especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries where its popularity is increasing.