Gómez, Victoria

Abstract Background and study aims Risk factors for colorectal adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) have been well documented. We assessed the efficacy of the newer 190 colonoscope versus the standard 180 colonoscope for complete resection of lateral spreading lesions. Patients and methods A single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent EMR with Olympus 180 or 190 colonoscopes from January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2016. We included patients with lesions ≥ 20 mm and surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) after index EMR. A propensity score approach with inverse probability weighting was used to control for potential confounders. A secondary aim was to identify risk factors for recurrence and assess the applicability of the Sydney EMR recurrence tool (SERT) by grading each lesion of our cohort and analyzing associations with recurrence. Results Two hundred ninety-one lesions met inclusion criteria for the study. Odds ratio (OR) for recurrence with the 190 colonoscope was 1.06 (P = .85). Adenoma size (P = .02) and use of argon plasma coagulation (APC; P < .001) were risk factors for recurrence. Lesions with SERT scores > 0 had a higher recurrence risk during follow-up (32 % vs 21 %; OR 1.71; P = .05). Lesions with SERT scores = 0 reached a plateau for recurrence at 12 and 18 months in Kaplan-Meier curves. Conclusions The use of 190 colonoscopes did not measurably affect adenoma recurrence at SC1. Recurrence was associated with adenoma size, complementary APC for resection, and SERT scores > 0. Lesions with SERT scores = 0 that remain negative for recurrence at 18 months may return to routine surveillance.

ObjectiveThe effects of intragastric balloon (IGB) therapy on gastric emptying (GE) and weight loss remain to be fully understood. The effects of IGB on GE were investigated in this study.MethodsThis was a single‐center, randomized, controlled study in which subjects with obesity either underwent IGB placement or were matched controls. IGB was removed at 6 months. GE was measured at baseline and at weeks 0, 8, 16, 27, and 39. Percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) was measured at 6 and 12 months.ResultsTwenty‐nine subjects with obesity were enrolled; 15 were randomized to IGB placement and 14 to control. Two subjects had the IGB removed early. At baseline, 1‐ and 2‐h gastric retention values were comparable between the groups but increased in the IGB group at weeks 8 and 16 (during IGB treatment) and then returned to baseline levels at 27 and 39 weeks. A greater increase in gastric retention from baseline to 8 weeks was associated with higher %TBWL.ConclusionsGE in subjects with IGB is delayed but returns to normal after IGB removal. Greater changes in increased gastric retention were associated with greater %TBWL. Altering gastric motility is a significant mechanism of action by which the IGB results in weight loss.