Stark, Mark E.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of isolated small bowel Crohn’s disease (CD) can be challenging. Symptoms are non-specific and both imaging and capsule endoscopy (CE) may be misleading as several diseases may mimic CD. Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) allows a more extensive endoscopic and histologic evaluation of the small bowel. Our aim was to describe the diagnostic utility and impact of DBE on management of patients with known CD and in patients with suspected/rule-out CD. METHODS: Retrospective review of our institution’s DBE database from February 2009 to May 2013. Adult patients referred for DBE for further evaluation of known or suspected CD (due to symptoms, abnormal imaging and/or CE) were included. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, imaging and CE results, prior DBE, indication for DBE, DBE findings, DBE adverse events, pathology findings, final diagnosis, treatment prior and post DBE and follow-up DBE were abstracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were included, 61 (56%) females, mean age 52 years (range 20-83). Indications for DBE included: disease activity assessment/therapeutic in 10 patients with established diagnosis of CD and for diagnostic purposes in 98 patients with suspected CD (31 patients due to abnormal imaging, 29 due to abnormal CE and 26 due to both abnormal imaging and CE). Upper, lower, bidirectional upper and lower, and stomal DBE were performed in 21, 24, 62 and 1 patients, respectively. DBE revealed active disease in 8/10 patients with known CD with one patient undergoing dilation of a stricture. Changes in management were recommended for all patients with active disease – start thiopurine (2), optimize thiopurine dose (1), start biologics (3) change biologics (1), systemic steroids (1) and budesonide (1). The patient who underwent stricture dilation ultimately required surgery. A definitive diagnosis of CD (both endoscopic and histologic) was reached in only 39/98 (40%) patients who were referred for suspected CD. Changes in management were recommended in 32/39 (82%) patients. Interestingly, 24/98 patients had been diagnosed with CD at outside institutions and were recommended to initiate therapy for CD. Of these, CD was confirmed in only 15/24 (63%) patients. Adverse events included perforation in 1 patient (1%) who required surgical management and mouth swelling/abrasion in 3 patients (3%). Follow-up DBE to re-assess disease activity was performed in 10/49 (20%) patients with definitive diagnosis of CD, average time between procedures 4.5 years (range 0.7-11.6). One patient with CD was diagnosed with lymphoma 2.4 years after initial DBE. Changes in management were recommended in 6 patients: de-escalation of therapy (3, two underwent surgery), start thiopurine and/or biologic (2) and switch biologics (1). No complications were seen at follow-up DBE. CONCLUSION: DBE is a useful technique to confirm a diagnosis in patients who have suspected CD and can help establish a diagnosis of several diseases that may mimic CD on CT scan or CE. Additionally, DBE in patients with established diagnosis of small bowel CD is an effective tool to assess disease activity and guide therapy. Serious complications are infrequent.

Abstract Background and study aims Anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding after double balloon enteroscopy (DBE); however, limited data are currently available regarding the incidence. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical characteristics of post-DBE bleeding in patients on AC and AP therapy. Patients and methods The medical records of patients who underwent DBE between 2009 and 2013 at Mayo Clinic, Florida, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups: 1) continued AP therapy; 2) AC therapy; and 3) neither AP nor AC at the time of DBE. Follow-up data were collected at 60 days and 1 year. Results A total of 683 patients were identified; 43 on AC, 183 on AP and 457 not on AP or AC therapy. The most common indication for DBE was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in the groups on and not on AP (85.3 % vs 70.9 %, P < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in post-DBE bleeding rates in patients on AP vs not on AP at 60 days (11.5 % vs 7.5 %, P = 0.12) or 1 year (19.9 % vs 15.7 %, P = 0.23). Rates of bleeding in patients on AC were 11.6 % within 60 days and 22.5 % within 1 year. Multivariate analysis reflected American Society of Anesthesiologist > 3 and indication for DBE of GI bleeding were independent risk factors for post-DBE bleeding within 1 year. Conclusions Continued antiplatelet use at the time of DBE was not an independent risk factor for bleeding post-DBE at 60 days or 1 year of follow up.

Abstract Abstract 2230 Background: Heyde syndrome describes patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who have bleeding diathesis, especially gastrointestinal bleeding. Although acquired won Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) due to loss of the highest molecular weight multimers (HMWM) presents in most patients with severe AS, not all such patients develop Heyde syndrome. The goal of this study was to explore whether the severity of HMWM loss was significantly associated with Heyde syndrome. Methods: We first performed chart reviews on patients referred for double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for GI bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia (GIB/FeDefic) in two time periods, from 2005–2008, and from 2009–2011. Next, patients who could have AVWS due to AS or other cardiovascular or hematologic disorders were identified. Laboratory tests including VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity or VWF latex immunoturgidic activity (VWF:Ltx) and/or VWF multimer analysis were performed as requested by physicians. From this population, patients with Heyde syndrome were identified. Their clinical and VWF laboratory testing results were compared to a separated group of patients with severe AS patients who had no clinically significant bleeding, but had matched gender and hemodynamic severity by echocardiogram (Matched AS Controls). These patients all had VWF:Ag, VWF:Ltx, and VWF multimers performed. In both Heyde syndrome patients and Matched AS controls, VWF multimer densitometry ratio of the HMWM (>15 mers) to low to intermediate multimers (2–15 mers) was assessed (VWF:multi ratio). Results: Overall, 437 patients underwent DBE for GIB/FeDef. Between 2005 and 2008, 1% of 318 patients had VWF testing. From 2009 to 2011, 23% of 119 patients were tested. Heyde syndrome was noted in 15 patients. Of the 437 patients, 134 patients (31%) likely had AVWS based on diagnoses of moderate-severe AS (30%), moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (25%), moderate to severe pulmonary hypertension (16%), prosthetic valve regurgitation or stenosis (13%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (10%), and hematologic disorders (4%). Among these 134 patients, 29 patients had VWF tests performed, and 22 had VWF multimer analysis. VWF antigen levels were similar in Heyde syndrome and Matched AS Controls (176±89% versus 155±77% respectively). Despite similar hemodynamic severity, more severe HMWM loss as indicated by lower VWF:Ltx/Ag and VWF:multi ratios was present in Heyde syndrome patients than matched AS controls (table, P<0.0007). Conclusion: If AVWS is suspected in patients with GIB/FeDef, laboratory testing for VWF indices is important to confirm the diagnosis of AVWS. Despite similar hemodynamic severity, Heyde syndrome patients have more severe VWF HMWM loss indicated by significantly decreased VWF:Ltx/VWF:Ag and VWF:multi ratios. Conversely, though highly sensitive for AVWS, PFA-CADP does not predict bleeding tendency in patients with severe AS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.