Hoppe, Bradford S.

ImportanceRetrieval strategies for children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) aim to maintain efficacy while minimizing long-term toxic effects. Children, adolescents, and young adults with low-risk, relapsed cHL may benefit from replacing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant with less intensive involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT).ObjectiveTo evaluate a risk-stratified, response-adapted, transplant-free approach for treatment of children, adolescents, and young adults with low-risk relapsed cHL with nivolumab plus brentuximab vedotin (BV) followed by BV plus bendamustine for patients with suboptimal response and ISRT (30.0 to 30.6 Gy).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsCheckMate 744 (R1 cohort) was a phase 2, nonrandomized, single-arm study enrolling children, adolescents, and young adults aged 5 to 30 years with low-risk cHL between September 25, 2017, and December 16, 2020, across the US, Canada, and Europe. Data were analyzed from September 2017 to November 2022.ExposuresPatients received 4 cycles of nivolumab plus BV induction; patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) received an additional 2 cycles of nivolumab plus BV while patients with suboptimal response received 2 cycles of BV plus bendamustine intensification. Patients with CMR after induction or intensification received ISRT consolidation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrespecified coprimary end points were CMR rate (Lugano 2014 classification) any time before ISRT and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate, per blinded independent central review (BICR).ResultsOf 28 included patients treated in the low-risk cohort, 18 (64%) were female, and the median (range) age was 17 (6-27) years. At a median (range) follow-up of 31.9 (2.2-55.3) months, CMR per BICR any time before ISRT was 93% (26 of 28; 90% CI, 79.2-98.7; objective response rate [ORR], 100%), and 23 of 28 (82%) achieved CMR per BICR after 4 cycles of nivolumab plus BV (ORR, 96.4%). Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS and progression-free survival rates at 3 years were 87% (3 of 18; 90% CI, 69.5-94.7) and 95% (1 of 18; 90% CI, 76.7-99.0), respectively. During induction, 22 patients (79%) had treatment-related adverse events, including 7 with grade 3 or 4 adverse events, 2 with anemia, 1 with neutropenia, and 6 with immune-mediated adverse events. Serious adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 2 patients.Conclusions and RelevanceThis nonrandomized clinical trial found that for children, adolescents, and young adults with low-risk, relapsed cHL, a transplant-free, risk-adapted, response-based approach with nivolumab plus BV and ISRT offered high CMR rates and high 3-year EFS rate, with a safety profile consistent with that of each agent used.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02927769

This nonrandomized clinical trial reports outcomes for children with low-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma treated with second-line chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy without autologous stem cell transplant.

Purpose In lymphomas, the Deauville score (DS) standardizes 18F-FDG PET treatment response assessments. We assessed interobserver agreement of the DS and developed a quantitative PET-based parameter to minimize subjectivity of response assessments. Methods PET scans performed within the Children’s Oncology Group AHOD0831 study were analyzed. One hundred one scans obtained after the first cycle of chemotherapy (PET1) and 83 obtained after the second cycle (PET2) were eligible for inclusion. Each scan was assigned a DS by 2 nuclear medicine radiologists and a Hodgkin lymphoma index (HLI), defined as the ratio of the tumor’s SUVmax or SUVpeak to the liver’s SUVmean. Cohen κ coefficient measured the rate of agreement of the DS assigned by the 2 radiologists. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index were used with the consensus DS to identify an optimal HLI cutoff value to distinguish PET-negative from PET-positive images. For each HLI cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. Results Interobserver agreement in DS was moderate (PET1: κ = 0.480, P < 0.001; PET2: κ = 0.428, P < 0.001). On PET1, the optimal cutoff values for HLImax were 1.19 for DS2/DS3 and 1.78 for DS3/DS4, and for HLIpeak were 1.19 for DS2/DS3 and 1.44 for DS3/DS4. On PET2 images, the corresponding values were 1.18, 1.58, 0.94, and 1.26. The most accurate predictor was HLImax on PET2 when scans were dichotomized as DS1–DS3 versus DS4–DS5 (accuracy, 92.8%; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 91.8%). Conclusion The HLI provides an objective, quantitative measure of disease response and thus may improve interreader agreement for lymphoma response assessments.

Background: Overall survival rates now exceed 90% for children, adolescents, and young adults with cHL, but patients with slow early response (SER) to front-line chemotherapy are at an increased risk of relapse. The approaches used historically to treat patients with SER included dose intensification and radiotherapy (RT), which can be associated with long-term toxicity. The open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-667study (NCT03407144) is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of consolidation with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance in patients with cHL and SER to front-line chemotherapy. The study includes 2 groups: patients with low-risk cHL (stage IA, IB, or IIA without bulky disease) and patients with high-risk cHL (stage IIEB-IVB). Prior analysis of the high-risk group showed that consolidation with pembrolizumab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone/prednisolone, and dacarbazine (COPDAC-28) followed by pembrolizumab maintenance had manageable safety and promising activity in patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line vincristine, etoposide, prednisone/prednisolone, and doxorubicin (OEPA). Here, we present updated results for patients with high-risk cHL and SER to OEPA. Methods: Patients eligible for the high-risk group were aged 3-25 years and had newly diagnosed stage IIEB, IIIEA, IIIEB, IIIB, IVA, or IVB cHL; measurable disease; and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale (aged &lt;16 years) or a Karnofsky Performance Status (aged ≥16 years) score of ≥50. All patients in the high-risk group received 2 cycles of OEPA followed by early response assessment (PET and CT/MRI). Patients with a rapid early response (ie, Deauville score [DS] 1-3) received nonstudy therapy. Patients with a SER (ie, DS 4 or 5) received consolidation therapy with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg (aged 3-17 years) or 200 mg (aged 18-25 years) IV Q3W plus COPDAC-28 for 4 cycles. Patients then underwent late-response assessment (LRA; PET and CT/MRI). Patients with PET-positive disease at LRA (ie, DS 4 or 5) received RT (28.8 Gy) to late PET-positive residua. Patients with PET-negative disease (ie, DS 1-3) received no RT. All patients received maintenance pembrolizumab for up to 17 cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria. Secondary end points included the rate of PET negativity after consolidation and safety. Results: 84 patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line OEPA received consolidation with pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28. Median time from treatment allocation to data cutoff (Feb 29, 2024) was 24.3 months (range, 5.7-48.4). As of the data cutoff, 55 patients had completed consolidation and maintenance therapy, 20 were ongoing, and 9 had discontinued treatment (due to adverse events [AE], n = 3; progressive disease, n = 2; withdrawal by patient, n = 2; complete response [CR], n = 1; physician decision, n = 1). Patients received a median of 17 doses of pembrolizumab (range, 2-17) and the median time on pembrolizumab was 11.1 months (range, 0.5-11.8). The median age of patients was 14 years (range, 4-22), 78 (93%) were aged 3-17 years, 45 (54%) were male, 44 (52%) had bulky disease, and 53 (63%) had Ann Arbor stage IV disease. Of 84 patients who received consolidation, 80 (95%) had an LRA. The ORR among these patients was 99% (95% CI, 93-100; 57 CR and 22 partial response). 56 patients (70%) with a LRA were PET negative by BICR; 55 (69%) were PET negative by investigator review and did not receive RT. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 61 patients (73%); grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 16 patients (19%). Three patients (4%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-related AEs. No patients died due to treatment-related AEs. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 10 patients (12%). Conclusion: After additional follow up, consolidation with pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28 with or without RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance continued to demonstrate promising activity and manageable safety in patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line OEPA. Among the 80 patients with an LRA, 70% were PET negative by BICR and 69% were PET negative by investigator review and were spared RT. These results continue to support pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28 consolidation as a treatment option that may augment response in patients with high-risk CHL and SER to front-line OEPA.

Introduction: Outcomes from multidisciplinary lymphoma tumor boards in the molecular era are limited, and the effects of transitioning to virtual formats during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well-documented. This study evaluates how the transition of the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board to a virtual format has impacted its effectiveness and operations. The board, part of the International Mayo Clinic Care Network (MCCN), involves case presentations, subspecialist reviews, and collaborative recommendations. Methods: The Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board, an integral part of the Mayo Clinic Care Network (MCCN), conducted a comprehensive review of lymphoma cases from 2014 to 2024. The board's review process involves a structured approach including the presentation of clinical case details, radiology and hematopathology findings, proposed treatment options, relevant literature review, and discussions. From 2014 to 2024, the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board reviewed a total of 722 patients. The review process involves a multidisciplinary team, including physicians, pharmacists, clinical research associates, and trainees. Recommendations and changes related to radiology interpretation, pathologic diagnosis, and treatment approaches were documented and tracked prospectively. In March 2020, the board transitioned to a virtual format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This shift allowed for remote participation and continued collaborative review while maintaining the board's structured approach and documentation practices. Results: In a total of 722 patients, changes in care were identified in 423 patients, including 287 with newly diagnosed lymphoma and 136 with relapse or refractory disease. Among those who experienced changes, 94 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 49 had follicular lymphoma, 39 had marginal zone lymphoma, 36 had classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and 29 had mantle cell lymphoma. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 431 patients were analyzed, with 217 (50.3%) experiencing changes. A total of 268 changes were documented among these patients. Changes in radiologic interpretation occurred in 9 patients (2.1% of 431 total patients). Pathologic diagnosis changes were noted in 42 patients (9.7%). Additional testing was recommended for 73 patients (16.9%), and clinical management was altered for 144 patients (33.4%). After transitioning to a virtual format, 291 patients were reviewed post-COVID, with 206 (70.8%) having recommended changes. The total number of change recommendations was 322, reflecting increases across all components compared to previous data, with adjustments for varying numbers of patients reviewed. Specifically, radiologic interpretation changes occurred in 21 patients (7.2%), pathologic diagnosis changes in 57 patients (19.6%), additional testing recommendations for 85 patients (29.2%), and clinical management alterations in 159 patients (54.7%). Conclusion: Transitioning to a virtual format in the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board's continued to demonstrate the effectiveness, with increased changes in diagnostic interpretations and clinical management. These results illustrate the potential of virtual tumor boards to improve collaborative decision-making and adapt to evolving clinical needs.

Background: Cure rates for children, adolescents, and young adults with cHL are high, but patients with a slow early response (SER) to front-line chemotherapy are at an increased risk of relapse compared with patients who have a rapid early response (RER). To avoid long-term toxicity while optimizing outcomes, treatment for pediatric cHL is now shifting to a response-adapted approach. KEYNOTE-667 (NCT03407144) is an open-label phase 2 study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy consolidation with or without radiotherapy (RT) followed by pembrolizumab maintenance in patients with cHL and SER to front-line chemotherapy. The study includes 2 groups of patients: those with low-risk cHL (stage IA, IB, and IIA without bulky disease) and those with high-risk cHL (stage IIEB-IVB cHL). Prior analysis of the low-risk group showed that consolidation with pembrolizumab plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) and RT followed by maintenance pembrolizumab had manageable safety and promising antitumor activity in patients with low-risk cHL and SER to front-line doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). We present updated results for patients with low-risk cHL and SER to ABVD. Methods: Patients eligible for the low-risk group were aged 3-25 years and had newly diagnosed stage IA, IB, or IIA cHL without bulky disease, measurable disease, and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale score of ≥50 (aged &lt;16 years) or a Karnofsky Performance Status score of ≥50 (aged ≥16 years). All patients in the low-risk group received 2 cycles of ABVD followed by early response assessment (PET and CT/MRI). Patients with a RER (ie, Deauville score [DS] 1-3) received nonstudy therapy. Patients with SER (ie, DS 4 or 5) received consolidation with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg (aged 3-17 years) or 200 mg (aged 18-25 years) IV Q3W plus 2 cycles of AVD. Patients then underwent late response assessment (LRA; PET and MRI/CT). All patients with SER received involved-site RT: 21.6 Gy for complete PET response (ie, DS 1-3) or 30.6-36 Gy for partial PET response (ie, DS 4 or 5). All patients received maintenance pembrolizumab for up to 17 cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria. Secondary end points included PET negativity after consolidation and safety. Results: 78 patients with low-risk cHL received front-line ABVD. As of the data cutoff date (February 29, 2024), 10 of 78 patients had SER to ABVD and received consolidation with pembrolizumab plus AVD; 4 had completed consolidation and maintenance, 1 was continuing to receive treatment, and 5 had discontinued because of complete response (CR). Median time from allocation to data cutoff was 19.9 months (range, 5.6-44.8). Patients had received a median of 11.5 doses of pembrolizumab (range, 5-17) and the median time on pembro was 7.4 months (range, 3.5-11.3). The median age of patients was 16 years (range, 7-20), 6 (60%) were male, and 8 (80%) had Ann Arbor stage II disease. Of 10 patients who received consolidation, all (100%) had an LRA. The ORR was 100% (95% CI, 69-100; 9 CR and 1 partial response). Six patients (60%) were PET negative by BICR. Seven patients (70%) were PET negative by investigator review, all of whom received a reduced dose of RT. During consolidation, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 8 patients (80%); grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 4 patients (40%). No patients discontinued or died due to treatment-related AEs. Seven patients (67%) had pembrolizumab-related AEs, 3 of whom (30%) had a grade 3 event (vomiting, lymphocyte count decreased, white blood cell count decreased). Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 3 patients (30%; all grade 1 or 2 hypothyroidism). Conclusion: After additional follow-up, consolidation withpembrolizumab plus AVD and RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance continued to demonstrate promising activity and manageable safety in patients with low-risk cHL and SER to ABVD. Of patients with a LRA, 60% were PET negative by BICR; 70% of patients were PET negative by investigator review and received a reduced dose of RT. These results support further evaluation of pembrolizumab plus AVD consolidation as a treatment option for patients with low-risk CHL and SER to front-line ABVD.

Abstract Unirradiated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) have a predominant localized pattern of relapse, the significance of which is heightened in individuals with limited/localized disease before CART. This study reports on the outcomes of patients with R/R NHL and limited (&lt;5 involved sites) disease bridged with or without radiotherapy. A multicenter retrospective review of 150 patients with R/R NHL who received CART with &lt;5 disease sites before leukapheresis was performed. Bridging treatment, if any, was administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. Study end points included relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival. Before CART infusion, 48 patients (32%) received bridging radiotherapy (BRT), and 102 (68%) did not. The median follow-up was 21 months. After CART infusion, BRT patients had higher objective response (92% vs 78%; P = .046) and sustained complete response rates (54% vs 33%; P = .015). Local relapse in sites present before CART was lower in the BRT group (21% vs 46%; P = .003). BRT patients had improved 2-year RFS (53% vs 44%; P = .023) and 2-year EFS (37% vs 34%; P = .039) compared with patients who did not receive BRT. The impact of BRT was most prominent in patients who had ≤2 pre-CART involved disease sites, with 2-year RFS of 62% in patients who received BRT compared with 42% in those who did not (P = .002). BRT before CART for patients with limited (&lt;5 involved disease sites) R/R NHL improves response rate, local control, RFS, and EFS without causing significant toxicities.

e19075 Background: Orbital diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a rare entity accounts for less than 1% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases. Large-scale studies describing and evaluating the effect of different type of treatments on survival outcome are lacking. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with primary orbital DLBCL between 2004 and 2020. All patients aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with primary orbital DLBLC were included. We excluded patients with unknown chemotherapy and radiation therapy status or lost to follow-up (unknown vital status of last contact). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were used in the analyses. Results: The total cohort consisted of 404 patients with primary orbital DLBCL. Out of whom 233 (58%) were females, 326 (81%) were White non-Hispanic, 29 (7%) were White Hispanic and 16 (4%) were African Americans. 113 (28%) received chemotherapy only, 76 (19%) received radiation only, 113 (28%) received chemoradiation, 79 (20%) did not receive any treatment and 23 (6%) had unknown treatment status. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years (range 28-90). The median follow-up time was 132 months (95%CI 117-147), the median overall survival (mOS) for the whole cohort was 110 months (95%CI 82-138). Among patients with known treatment status and vital status of last contact (N=381), patient who received chemoradiation had significantly better mOS compared to patients who received radiation only (169 vs 67 months, P=0.002), but there was no statistically significant difference in mOS between chemoradiation and chemotherapy only (169 vs 124 months, P=0.068) or between chemotherapy only and radiation only (124 vs 67 months, P=0.213). On multivariate analysis, older age and Charlson-Deyo score of 2 were associated with worse OS (HR 1.072 95%CI 1.055-1.089; P<0.001, HR 2.292 95%CI 1.099-4.778; P=0.027, respectively). Compared to no treatment, only chemoradiation was associated with better OS (HR 0.509 95%CI 0.332-0.778; P=0.002), whereas chemotherapy only and radiation only did not add a survival benefit (HR 0.909 95%CI 0.598-1.381; P=656 and HR 0.766 95%CI 0.496-1.185; P=0.231). Conclusions: This large real-world analysis shows a survival benefit with combined treatment of chemoradiation in primary orbital DLBCL compared to single treatment modality.

e19074 Background: Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PCDLBCL-LT) is an uncommon type of lymphoma predominantly affects elderly patients and is associated with poor outcome. Large-scale studies describing and evaluating the effect of different type of treatments on survival outcome are lacking. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with PCDLBCL-LT between 2004 and 2020. All patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with PCDLBL-LT were included. We excluded patients with unknown chemotherapy and radiation therapy status or lost to follow-up (unknown vital status of last contact). Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were used in the analyses. Results: The total cohort consisted of 967 patients with PCDLBCL-LT. Out of whom 516 (53%) were females, 841 (87%) were White non-Hispanic, 41 (4%) were White Hispanic and 37 (4%) were African Americans. 276 (29%) received chemotherapy, 203 (21%) received radiation only, 293 (30%) received chemoradiation, 147 (15%) did not receive any treatment and 48 (5%) had unknown treatment status. The median age at diagnosis was 78 years (range 23-90). The median follow-up time was 87 months (95% CI 74-99), the median overall survival (mOS) for the whole cohort was 42 months (95%CI 37-47). Among patients with known treatment status and vital status of last contact (N=841), patient who received chemoradiation had significantly better mOS compared to patients who received chemotherapy only, radiation only and no treatment (64 vs 41, 39 and 9 months, respectively P<0.001). Patient who received chemotherapy only and radiation only as first line therapy had significantly better mOS compared to patients who received no treatment (41 and 39 vs 9 months, respectively P<0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference in the mOS between chemotherapy only and radiation only (41 vs 39 months, P=0.359). On multivariate analysis, older age, male gender, and Charlson-Deyo score 2 and ≥3 were associated with worse OS (HR 1.061 95%CI 1.050-1.072; P<0.001, HR 1.241 95%CI 1.093-1.482; P=0.017, HR 1.396 95%CI 1.004-1.941; P=0.047 and HR 2.454 95%CI 1.619-3.719; P<0.001 respectively), all type of treatments including chemotherapy only, chemoradiation, and radiation only were associated with better OS (HR 0.576 95% CI 0.443-0.749; P<0.001, HR 0.379 95%CI 0.290-0.495; P<0.001 and HR 0.443 95%CI 0.339-0.578; P<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: This large real-world analysis shows a survival benefit with combined treatment of chemoradiation in this uncommon type of lymphoma compared to single treatment modality.