Mankad, Rekha

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in U.S. women. Although women are becoming more aware of CV disease, there remains a dichotomy between awareness and perceived risk. We sought to characterize this dichotomy in women attracted to a CV health–screening event, in order to improve strategies to reduce CV risk. Methods: During CV health events held in Rochester, Minnesota, from 2007 through 2011, 294 women underwent screening for blood chemistry, body mass index, and blood pressure. Participants also completed surveys about knowledge of CV disease, risk factors, and perceived risk. Risk level was determined from the 2011 American Heart Association Effectiveness-Based Guidelines for Women. Results: Among participants (age, mean [standard deviation], 53 [15.3] years; white, 98%), 99% were aware that CV disease is the leading cause of death in women. Almost half (47%) perceived themselves to be at personal risk, although 65% were determined to be “at risk” and 12% to be at “high risk” according to guidelines, while 22% were uncategorized. Of the 228 participants “at risk” or “high risk,” 48% and 21%, respectively, did not perceive themselves to be at any risk. Conclusions : Women attracted to CV health events were aware that CV disease is the leading cause of death for women. However, the magnitude of awareness did not directly translate into perception or understanding of actual personal risk. To decrease the rate of CV disease in women, continued efforts are needed to personalize the importance of, and the methods for reducing, CV risk factors.

Background— Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is the intrinsic mechanism of valvular obstruction leading to aortic stenosis (AS) and is measurable by multidetector computed tomography. The link between sex and AS is controversial and that with AVC is unknown. Methods and Results— We prospectively performed multidetector computed tomography in 665 patients with AS (aortic valve area, 1.05±0.35 cm 2 ; mean gradient, 39±19 mm Hg) to measure AVC and to assess the impact of sex on the AVC–AS severity link in men and women. AS severity was comparable between women and men (peak aortic jet velocity: 4.05±0.99 versus 3.93±0.91 m/s, P =0.11; aortic valve area index: 0.55±0.20 versus 0.56±0.18 cm 2 /m 2 ; P =0.46). Conversely, AVC load was lower in women versus men (1703±1321 versus 2694±1628 arbitrary units; P <0.0001) even after adjustment for their smaller body surface area or aortic annular area (both P <0.0001). Thus, odds of high-AVC load were much greater in men than in women (odds ratio, 5.07; P <0.0001). Although AVC showed good associations with hemodynamic AS severity in men and women (all r >0.67; P <0.0001), for any level of AS severity measured by peak aortic jet velocity or aortic valve area index, AVC load, absolute or indexed, was higher in men versus women (all P ≤0.01). Conclusions— In this large AS population, women incurred similar AS severity than men for lower AVC loads, even after indexing for their smaller body size. Hence, the relationship between valvular calcification process and AS severity differs in women and men, warranting further pathophysiological inquiry. For AS severity diagnostic purposes, interpretation of AVC load should be different in men and in women.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women and more heart disease is present in elderly women than men. Risk factors for heart disease affect men and women differently, with a greater impact of diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking in women. Diagnosis of heart disease can be more challenging in women, especially when elderly, as symptoms may be vague. Understanding the appropriate use of diagnostic testing and appropriate treatment is essential, given the high burden of disease in elderly women. This article will discuss the current guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of heart disease in women and will discuss the appropriate role of prevention strategies.