Mao, Shennen A.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsOne strategy to minimize the risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is to avoid an Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) mismatch through kidney paired donation. We aimed to estimate the incidence of PTLD in EBV‐negative kidney transplant recipients with EBV‐positive donors (D+/R−) and evaluate the excess risk of death following the occurrence of PTLD.MethodsWe included adult patients in OPTN database who underwent kidney transplants between 2012 and 2022. Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the impact of EBV serostatus on the development of PTLD, and to assess mortality following PTLD diagnosis in D+/R− individuals.ResultsA total of 179 068 patients were included, with 92.8% in the R+, 6.4% in the D+/R−, and 0.8% in the D−/R− group. D+/R− exhibited a significantly higher risk of PTLD compared to R+ and D−/R− groups. D+/R− had a greater risk of PTLD when compared to D−/R− recipients (aHR: 3.82; p < 0.001). Among D+/R− recipients, those who developed PTLD had a significantly higher risk of mortality (aHR: 2.28; p < 0.001 in deceased donor kidney transplant [DDKT] and aHR: 5.22; p < 0.001 in living donor kidney transplant [LDKT]).ConclusionsD+/R− recipients have nearly a fourfold higher risk of PTLD compared to D−/R− recipients, suggesting that choosing an EBV D−/R− transplant could reduce the PTLD risk by about 73%. This data is crucial for counseling EBV‐negative patients considering kidney paired donation to avoid an EBV serostatus mismatch.

The 2024 Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) was from May 1–4 in Houston, Texas, USA, under the theme “Liver Disease and Transplantation: Breaking Barriers and Exploring New Frontiers.” In addition to a robust scientific program, the congress also hosted a hands-on cadaveric robotic liver surgery course, a machine perfusion workshop, and a transesophageal echocardiography course. In this report, the ILTS Vanguard and Basic Sciences Committees present a summary of the congress proceedings.

BACKGROUND: Although most transplant centers preferentially offer minimally invasive approaches to donor nephrectomies, there remains less standardization specific to the kidney extraction site. This study aimed to evaluate incisional hernia occurrence in living kidney donors based on kidney extraction site location. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of all donors who underwent minimally invasive living donor nephrectomies at the Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2011 and 2023 with a 2-year external validation cohort from Mayo Clinic Florida and Mayo Clinic Minnesota. The cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the kidney extraction site type: midline infraumbilical and Pfannenstiel. RESULTS: In the primary cohort, incisional hernia occurrence was observed in 1.2% of donors with an infraumbilical midline kidney extraction site compared with 0.1% with a Pfannenstiel extraction site (p = 0.04). Donors with an infraumbilical midline kidney extraction site were more likely to be men (50.8% vs 23.3%, p < 0.0001), have a higher BMI (mean 27.2 vs 26 kg/m2, p < 0.0001), and have current or former tobacco use (p = 0.002). There were no differences in incisional hernia occurrence when comparing minimally invasive surgical techniques (p = 0.52). In the external validation cohort, hernia occurrence was observed in 4.5% of donors with a midline incision compared with 0.0% with a Pfannenstiel incision (p = 0.09). Using combined data from the 3 sites, the use of a Pfannenstiel incision as the extraction site was associated with significantly lower odds of developing a hernia compared with the infraumbilical midline incision (odds ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.008 to 0.456). CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of hernia in living kidney donors is generally low, the use of a Pfannenstiel incision for kidney extraction appears to offer an additional incremental reduction in risk.

Background. The availability of in situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) or ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has revolutionized donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplant (LT). While some have suggested that NRP and NMP may represent competing technologies for DCD LT, there are many scenarios where these technologies can function in a complementary manner. Methods. Between January 2022 and March 2024, 83 DCD LTs were performed using NRP (62 NRP alone and 21 NRP + NMP) and were compared with 297 static cold storage (SCS) DCD LTs. NRP + NMP was used in scenarios with (1) long travel distances, (2) complicated transplant recipients, or (c) the need for additional liver graft recovery in “marginal” cases. Results. Ischemic cholangiopathy was lower in the NRP alone group (0%) and the NRP + NMP group (0%) compared with the SCS group (16.8; P < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). In addition, early allograft dysfunction, number of packed red blood cells transfused, and acute kidney injury were lower in the NRP alone and NRP + NMP groups compared with the SCS group. Graft survival was higher in cases where NRP was used than in cases where SCS was used ( P = 0.016). In all the cases where lactate remained elevated at the end of NRP (mean 8.2 ± 2.0), it ultimately normalized at the end of NMP (0.92 ± 0.56). Conclusions. The present study demonstrates lower rates of ischemic cholangiopathy and improved graft survival with NRP alone or NRP + NMP compared with SCS when using liver grafts from DCD donors. It also demonstrates that excellent outcomes can be achieved with sequential NRP + NMP in cases with prolonged travel distances, complicated recipients, or when there is a need for additional liver recovery in “marginal” cases.

There is a paucity of data on the impact of cold ischemia time before the initiation of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), particularly in more susceptible organs such as livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. The present analysis aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged time from cross-clamp until NMP start on early allograft dysfunction and other peri–liver transplant (LT) outcomes. All DCD LT performed and placed on NMP at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Rochester from January 2022 to March 2024 were included. The decision was made a priori to divide the population into 2 groups based on terciles: typical cross-clamp to on-pump time (lower 2 terciles) versus prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump time (upper tercile; >2 h 45.6 min). Three hundred eighty-four DCD LT undergoing NMP met the inclusion criteria. The rate of early allograft dysfunction was significantly higher in the prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump group (51.2%) compared to the typical cross-clamp to on-pump group (37.6%) (p = 0.01). The prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump group also had higher rates of acute kidney injury and the number of packed red blood cells transfused during LT. No significant difference in ischemic cholangiopathy (2.4% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.68) or graft survival at 12 months was seen between the prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump and typical cross-clamp to on-pump group, respectively. Following cross-clamp, DCD liver grafts should be placed on the NMP pump as quickly as is safely and logistically possible. In cases where delays are unavoidable, such as waiting for biopsy results or liver reallocation with another center, acceptable results can still be achieved, and therefore, livers with prolonged times should still be used.

Background. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) has emerged as a vital technique in organ procurement, particularly in donation after circulatory death (DCD) cases, offering the potential to optimize organ utilization and improve posttransplant outcomes. Recognizing its significance, the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) convened a work group to develop standardized recommendations for abdominal NRP in the United States. Methods. The workgroup, comprising experts in NRP, DCD, and transplantation, formulated recommendations through a collaborative process involving revisions and approvals by relevant committees and the ASTS council. Four key areas were identified for standardization: Preprocedure communication, NRP procedure, Terminology and documentation, and Mentorship/credentialing. Results. The recommendations encompass a range of considerations, including preprocedure communication protocols to facilitate informed decision-making by transplant centers and organ procurement organizations, procedural guidelines for NRP teams, uniform terminology to clarify the NRP process, and standards for mentorship and credentialing of NRP practitioners. Specific recommendations address logistical concerns, procedural nuances, documentation requirements, and the importance of ongoing quality assurance. Conclusions. The standardized recommendations for abdominal NRP presented in this article aim to ensure consistency, safety, and efficacy in the organ procurement process. By establishing clear protocols and guidelines, the ASTS seeks to enhance organ utilization, honor donor wishes, and uphold public trust in the donation process. Implementation of these recommendations can contribute to the advancement of NRP practices and improve outcomes for transplant recipients.