Parikh, Namrata

Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent among patients with cirrhosis and has major implications for management, prognostication, and liver transplant decision-making. Both acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) occur frequently in this population and are driven by a complex interplay of hemodynamic derangements, systemic inflammation, and intrinsic or functional renal injury. Accurate assessment of kidney function is essential, as serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculations directly influence MELD-based transplant allocation, eligibility for simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation (SLKT), and clinical decisions such as drug dosing and peri-transplant immunosuppression strategies. However, creatinine-based assessments are fundamentally limited in cirrhosis due to reduced creatinine production, sarcopenia, expanded volume of distribution, increased tubular secretion, and assay interference from hyperbilirubinemia, resulting in frequent overestimation of true GFR. Alternative methods, including cystatin C-based equations, combined creatinine–cystatin C equations, timed urine clearances, and direct GFR measurement using exogenous filtration markers (iohexol, iothalamate), offer potential advantages but also carry important limitations, particularly in decompensated disease with ascites or inflammation. Newer cirrhosis-specific eGFR equations such as the GRAIL and Royal Free Hospital formulas attempt to address these shortcomings, yet validation studies demonstrate inconsistent accuracy across patient cohorts. This review summarizes the pathophysiologic contributors to renal dysfunction in cirrhosis, evaluates the performance and pitfalls of existing kidney function assessment tools, and highlights the ongoing need for reliable, validated methods tailored to this unique population. Until improved approaches are widely accessible, serum creatinine remains the most practical—albeit imperfect—marker guiding clinical decision-making in cirrhotic patients.

ABSTRACTBackground and AimsOne strategy to minimize the risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is to avoid an Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) mismatch through kidney paired donation. We aimed to estimate the incidence of PTLD in EBV‐negative kidney transplant recipients with EBV‐positive donors (D+/R−) and evaluate the excess risk of death following the occurrence of PTLD.MethodsWe included adult patients in OPTN database who underwent kidney transplants between 2012 and 2022. Cox regression analysis was employed to evaluate the impact of EBV serostatus on the development of PTLD, and to assess mortality following PTLD diagnosis in D+/R− individuals.ResultsA total of 179 068 patients were included, with 92.8% in the R+, 6.4% in the D+/R−, and 0.8% in the D−/R− group. D+/R− exhibited a significantly higher risk of PTLD compared to R+ and D−/R− groups. D+/R− had a greater risk of PTLD when compared to D−/R− recipients (aHR: 3.82; p < 0.001). Among D+/R− recipients, those who developed PTLD had a significantly higher risk of mortality (aHR: 2.28; p < 0.001 in deceased donor kidney transplant [DDKT] and aHR: 5.22; p < 0.001 in living donor kidney transplant [LDKT]).ConclusionsD+/R− recipients have nearly a fourfold higher risk of PTLD compared to D−/R− recipients, suggesting that choosing an EBV D−/R− transplant could reduce the PTLD risk by about 73%. This data is crucial for counseling EBV‐negative patients considering kidney paired donation to avoid an EBV serostatus mismatch.