Back to Authors

Kulkarni, Veda K

Mayo Clinic

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (Division of Heart Rhythm Services), Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 2

Frequency and Genotype‐Dependence of intrinsic chronotropic insufficiency among patients with congenital long QT syndrome
Kulkarni, Veda, Pinsky, Alexa M. , Bos, J. Martijn , Bains, Sahej , Giudicessi, John R. , Allison, Thomas G. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Kulkarni, Veda K, Bains, Sahej , Giudicessi, J R , Ackerman, Michael J , Bos, Johan M , Neves, Raquel

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | October 21, 2024 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 17-23

10.1111/jce.16471 Get It

AbstractIntroductionLong QT syndrome (LQTS) is a cardiac channelopathy characterized by QT prolongation and a potential for arrhythmic syncope, sudden cardiac arrest or deaths (SCA/SCD). It has been speculated that patients with LQTS might have a primary sinoatrial node (SAN) phenotype of chronotropic insufficiency (CI). This has not been demonstrated convincingly before because of the potentially confounding effects of beta blocker (BB) therapy. Herein, we set out to determine whether untreated patients with LQTS demonstrate intrinsic CI.Methods and ResultsA retrospective review of all treadmill exercise stress tests (TEST) was performed on patients with one of the three most common LQTS genotypes: LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3. For each patient, the first TEST completed while off BB was analyzed. Patients with prior left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) therapy were excluded. CI was defined as having an age‐ and gender‐predicted peak heart rate (HR) < 85% and/or a predicted HR reserve (HRR) < 80%. Overall, 463 LQTS patients (245 LQT1, 125 LQT2, and 93 LQT3) were included (267 female [58%]; mean age at time of TEST [29 ± 17 years]). Mean % predicted peak HR for all LQTS patients was 87.6% (range 42.9% ‐ 119.1%) and mean % predicted HRR was 80% (range 19.1% ‐ 153%). Overall, half of all LQTS patients (n = 234; 51%) displayed CI; 64% of patients with LQT1 (n = 157), 37% with LQT2 (n = 46), and 33% with LQT3 (n = 31). Patients with LQT1 were most likely to exhibit CI compared to patients with LQT2 (p < .0001) and LQT3 (p < .0001). CI was significantly more common in LQT1 compared to controls (p < .0001), while there was no difference between LQT2 (p = .5) or LQT3 and controls (p > .9). Presence of CI was not a predictor of LQTS‐associated symptoms, BB side effects or likelihood of future breakthrough cardiac events (BCE).ConclusionsPatients with LQTS, particularly LQT1, demonstrate a SAN phenotype of CI. If assessing BB therapy effect by impact on peak HR, the patient's pretreatment peak HR, rather than an age‐ and gender‐predicted maximum HR, should be used.
Proceed with caution: Standard protocol exercise stress tests fail to replicate the diagnostic utility of supine‐stand tests for long QT syndrome
Pinsky, Alexa M. , Kulkarni, Veda, Bos, J. Martijn , Allison, Thomas G. , Ackerman, Michael J. , Kulkarni, Veda K, Bos, Johan M , Neves, Raquel

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | February 13, 2024 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 455-461

10.1111/pace.14945 Get It

AbstractBackgroundLong QT syndrome (LQTS) is a sudden death predisposing condition characterized by ECG‐derived prolongation of the QT interval. Previous studies have demonstrated that the supine‐stand test may aid in the diagnosis of LQTS as patients fail to shorten their QT interval in response to standing up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ECG data derived from standard protocol, clinically performed treadmill exercise stress tests (TESTs) in their ability to mimic the formal supine‐stand test.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 478 TESTs from patients evaluated for LQTS. Patients referred for evaluation of LQTS but who were dismissed as normal served as controls. Heart rate & QT values were obtained from standard protocol TESTs.ResultsOverall, 243 patients with LQTS (125 LQT1, 63 LQT2, 55 LQT3; 146 [60%] female, mean age at TEST 30 ± 17 years) and 235 controls (142 [60%] female, mean age 24 ± 15 years) were included. The paired ΔQTc (QTcStand‐QTcSupine) was similar between LQTS (−5 ± 26) and controls (−2 ± 25; p = .2). During position change, the QT interval shortened by ≥20 ms in 33% of LQTS patients, remained unchanged in 62%, and increased in 5% of LQTS patients which was similar to controls (shortened in 40%, unchanged in 54%, and increased in 6% of controls; p = .2). Receiver‐operator curve analysis to test the diagnostic ability of supine‐stand ΔQT performed poorly in differentiating LQTS from controls with an of AUC 0.52 (p = .4).ConclusionTESTs should be used with caution when trying to interpret supine‐stand changes for diagnosis of LQTS.