Pinsky, Alexa M.

AbstractIntroductionLong QT syndrome (LQTS) is a cardiac channelopathy characterized by QT prolongation and a potential for arrhythmic syncope, sudden cardiac arrest or deaths (SCA/SCD). It has been speculated that patients with LQTS might have a primary sinoatrial node (SAN) phenotype of chronotropic insufficiency (CI). This has not been demonstrated convincingly before because of the potentially confounding effects of beta blocker (BB) therapy. Herein, we set out to determine whether untreated patients with LQTS demonstrate intrinsic CI.Methods and ResultsA retrospective review of all treadmill exercise stress tests (TEST) was performed on patients with one of the three most common LQTS genotypes: LQT1, LQT2, and LQT3. For each patient, the first TEST completed while off BB was analyzed. Patients with prior left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) therapy were excluded. CI was defined as having an age‐ and gender‐predicted peak heart rate (HR) < 85% and/or a predicted HR reserve (HRR) < 80%. Overall, 463 LQTS patients (245 LQT1, 125 LQT2, and 93 LQT3) were included (267 female [58%]; mean age at time of TEST [29 ± 17 years]). Mean % predicted peak HR for all LQTS patients was 87.6% (range 42.9% ‐ 119.1%) and mean % predicted HRR was 80% (range 19.1% ‐ 153%). Overall, half of all LQTS patients (n = 234; 51%) displayed CI; 64% of patients with LQT1 (n = 157), 37% with LQT2 (n = 46), and 33% with LQT3 (n = 31). Patients with LQT1 were most likely to exhibit CI compared to patients with LQT2 (p < .0001) and LQT3 (p < .0001). CI was significantly more common in LQT1 compared to controls (p < .0001), while there was no difference between LQT2 (p = .5) or LQT3 and controls (p > .9). Presence of CI was not a predictor of LQTS‐associated symptoms, BB side effects or likelihood of future breakthrough cardiac events (BCE).ConclusionsPatients with LQTS, particularly LQT1, demonstrate a SAN phenotype of CI. If assessing BB therapy effect by impact on peak HR, the patient's pretreatment peak HR, rather than an age‐ and gender‐predicted maximum HR, should be used.

AbstractBackgroundLong QT syndrome (LQTS) is a sudden death predisposing condition characterized by ECG‐derived prolongation of the QT interval. Previous studies have demonstrated that the supine‐stand test may aid in the diagnosis of LQTS as patients fail to shorten their QT interval in response to standing up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ECG data derived from standard protocol, clinically performed treadmill exercise stress tests (TESTs) in their ability to mimic the formal supine‐stand test.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 478 TESTs from patients evaluated for LQTS. Patients referred for evaluation of LQTS but who were dismissed as normal served as controls. Heart rate & QT values were obtained from standard protocol TESTs.ResultsOverall, 243 patients with LQTS (125 LQT1, 63 LQT2, 55 LQT3; 146 [60%] female, mean age at TEST 30 ± 17 years) and 235 controls (142 [60%] female, mean age 24 ± 15 years) were included. The paired ΔQTc (QTcStand‐QTcSupine) was similar between LQTS (−5 ± 26) and controls (−2 ± 25; p = .2). During position change, the QT interval shortened by ≥20 ms in 33% of LQTS patients, remained unchanged in 62%, and increased in 5% of LQTS patients which was similar to controls (shortened in 40%, unchanged in 54%, and increased in 6% of controls; p = .2). Receiver‐operator curve analysis to test the diagnostic ability of supine‐stand ΔQT performed poorly in differentiating LQTS from controls with an of AUC 0.52 (p = .4).ConclusionTESTs should be used with caution when trying to interpret supine‐stand changes for diagnosis of LQTS.

Background: Sex hormones influence the arrhythmogenic risk for various genetic heart diseases (GHDs) including long QT syndrome (LQTS), Brugada syndrome (BrS), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF). Although exogenous hormones are used frequently in transgender medicine for gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), the effect of such treatments on sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk in transgender patients with a GHD is unknown. Objective: To describe the prevalence and spectrum of transgender patients with GHD and to evaluate the impact of GAHT on the treatment and outcomes of their underlying GHD. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients seen and evaluated in Mayo Clinic’s Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic from January 1999-2022 to identify transgender patients. Clinical notes were reviewed for sex, gender identity, GAHT, and details of their GHD, therapy, and outcomes. Results: Among 1990 patients with a GHD, we found 7 patients (0.35%) who self-identify as a gender different from their chromosomal sex (transgender). Specifically, there were 4 patients who identified as transgender women (XY males at birth) and 3 as transgender men (XX females at birth). Five of seven patients (71%) have used forms of GAHT, with 2 patients on estradiol and 3 patients on testosterone. GHDs identified include LQT1 (2 transgender women), LQT3 (1 transgender man), LQT3/BrS overlap syndrome (1 transgender woman), genotype negative LQTS (1 transgender man), CPVT (1 transgender woman), and IVF (1 transgender man). Guideline-directed GHD therapy was optimized, not altered nor escalated, for all patients and no patients were advised against initiating GAHT due to perceived interactions. One of seven patients (transgender man with IVF) experienced a breakthrough cardiac event (BCE) while on GAHT, while the other 6 patients have had no BCEs. Conclusion: Although less than 0.5% of patients seen over 20+ years self-identified as transgender, their holistic care must include a careful discussion of the possible cardiac risks associated with GAHT. Additional studies are needed to determine the potential pro-arrhythmic risk of GAHT.

Background: Type 2 long QT syndrome (LQT2) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in the KCNH2 gene which result in QT prolongation and confers susceptibility to arrhythmic syncope/seizures and sudden cardiac arrest/death. Oral progestin-based contraceptives increase the risk of cardiac events in women with LQT2 and we previously reported the case of a LQT2 woman with recurrent cardiac events attributed to the use of the progestin-based contraceptive, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (“Depo-Provera”, Depo). Objective: To evaluate the arrhythmic-risk of Depo in a LQT2-specific, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte (iPSC-CM) model. Methods: An iPSC-CM line was generated from the previously reported woman (KCNH2-G1006A*fs) as well as a control line. Voltage-sensing dye was used to assess the optical action potential duration (APD) with 10 μM Depo. 3-D erratic beating patterns were then assessed using multiple electrode array (MEA) with Depo and isoproterenol (ISO) to mimic an adrenergic surge. Results: Addition of Depo to the G1006A*fs iPSC-CMs decreased the optical APD from baseline 438±14 ms (n=6) to 363±35 ms (n=12; p=0.0001). Despite the APD shortening at baseline, in the setting of ISO, Depo administration induced erratic beating patterns in MEA, characterized as alternating spike amplitudes, alternans, or early after depolarization-like phenomena. Combined Depo and ISO treatment increased the percent of electrodes displaying erratic beating in G1006A*fs [baseline 8%±13 vs. Depo + ISO 38%±40 (p=0.0097)] but not in controls [baseline 2%±5 vs. Depo + ISO 7%±11 (p=0.14)]. Neither Depo nor ISO alone changed beating patterns in G1006A*fs [baseline 8%±13, Depo 30%±41 (p=0.08), ISO 21%±30, (p=0.17)] and controls [baseline 2%±5, Depo 3%±7 (p=0.61), ISO 0%±0 (p=0.4)]. Conclusion: This patient-specific, re-engineered heart cell study provides a potential mechanism for the patient’s clinically documented, Depo-associated episodes of recurrent ventricular fibrillation. This in-vitro data should prompt a large-scale clinical assessment of Depo’s potential pro-arrhythmic effect in women with LQT2.