Back to Authors

Greenberger, Joel S

0000-0003-2271-7566

Mayo Clinic

University of Pittsburgh

Citations 2

The Inherited KRAS -variant as a Biomarker of Cetuximab Response in NSCLC
Weidhaas, Joanne B. , Hu, Chen , Komaki, Ritsuko , Masters, Gregory A. , Blumenschein, George R. , Chang, Joe Y. , Lu, Bo , Dicker, Adam P. , Bogart, Jeffrey A. , Garces, Yolanda I. , Narayan, Samir , Robinson, Clifford G. , Kavadi, Vivek S. , Koprowski, Christopher D. , Welsh, James W. , Gore, Elizabeth , MacRae, Robert M. , Bradley, Jeffrey D. , Greenberger, Joel S , Koprowski, Christopher D , Welsh, James , MacRae, Robert M , Paulus, Rebecca , Bradley, Jeffrey , Robinson, Clifford , Dicker, Adam P , Paulus, Rebecca

Cancer Research Communications | September 20, 2023 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2074-2081

10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0084 Get It

Abstract Purpose: RTOG 0617 was a phase III randomized trial for patients with unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB non–small cell lung cancer comparing standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) radiotherapy and chemotherapy, plus or minus cetuximab. Although the study was negative, based on prior evidence that patients with the KRAS-variant, an inherited germline mutation, benefit from cetuximab, we evaluated KRAS-variant patients in RTOG 0617. Experimental Design: From RTOG 0617, 328 of 496 (66%) of patients were included in this analysis. For time-to-event outcomes, stratified log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression models were used. For binary outcomes, Cochran—Mantel–Haenzel tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used. All statistical tests were two sided, and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 17.1% (56/328) of patients had the KRAS-variant, and overall survival rates were similar between KRAS-variant and non-variant patients. However, there was a time-dependent effect of cetuximab seen only in KRAS-variant patients—while the hazard of death was higher in cetuximab-treated patients within year 1 [HR = 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–10.10, P = 0.030], death was lower from year 1 to 4 (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11–0.97, P = 0.043). In contrast, in non-variant patients, the addition of cetuximab significantly increased local failure (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.28, P = 0.012). Conclusions/Discussion: Although an overall survival advantage was not achieved in KRAS-variant patients, there is potential impact of cetuximab for this genetic subset of patients. In contrast, cetuximab seems to harm non-variant patients. These findings further support the importance of genetic patient selection in trials studying the addition of systemic agents to radiotherapy. Significance: The KRAS-variant is the first functional, inherited miRNA-disrupting variant identified in cancer. Our findings support that cetuximab has a potentially beneficial impact on KRAS-variant patients treated with radiation. The work confirms prior evidence that KRAS-variant patients are a subgroup who are especially sensitive to radiation. These findings further support the potential of this class of variants to enable true treatment personalization, considering the equally important endpoints of response and toxicity.
Higher Radiation Dose to the Immune Cells Correlates with Worse Tumor Control and Overall Survival in Patients with Stage III NSCLC: A Secondary Analysis of RTOG0617
Jin, Jian‐Yue , Hu, Chen , Xiao, Ying , Ellsworth, Susannah G. , Bogart, Jeffrey A. , Dobelbower, M.C., Kavadi, Vivek S. , Narayan, Samir , Iyengar, Puneeth , Robinson, Clifford G. , Koprowski, Christopher D. , Machtay, Mitchell , Curran, Walter J. , Choy, Hak, Bradley, Jeffrey D. , Kong, Feng‐Ming , Schild, Steven E. , Kong, Feng-Ming Spring , Robinson, Clifford , Bradley, Jeffrey , Zhang, Hong , Paulus, Rebecca , Greenberger, Joel S

Cancers | December 8, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 6193

10.3390/cancers13246193 Get It

Background: We hypothesized that the Effective radiation Dose to the Immune Cells (EDIC) in circulating blood is a significant factor for the treatment outcome in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This is a secondary study of a phase III trial, NRG/RTOG 0617, in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with radiation-based treatment. The EDIC was computed as equivalent uniform dose to the entire blood based on radiation doses to all blood-containing organs, with consideration of blood flow and fractionation effect. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS). The EDIC–survival relationship was analyzed with consideration of clinical significant factors. Results: A total of 456 patients were eligible. The median EDIC values were 5.6 Gy (range, 2.1–12.2 Gy) and 6.3 Gy (2.1–11.6 Gy) for the low- and high-dose groups, respectively. The EDIC was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.12, p = 0.005) and LPFS (HR = 1.09, p = 0.02) but PFS (HR = 1.05, p = 0.17) after adjustment for tumor dose, gross tumor volume and other factors. OS decreased with an increasing EDIC in a non-linear pattern: the two-year OS decreased first with a slope of 8%/Gy when the EDIC < 6 Gy, remained relatively unchanged when the EDIC was 6–8 Gy, and followed by a further reduction with a slope of 12%/Gy when the EDIC > 8 Gy. Conclusions: The EDIC is a significant independent risk factor for poor OS and LPFS in RTOG 0617 patients with stage III NSCLC, suggesting that radiation dose to circulating immune cells is critical for tumor control. Organ at risk for the immune system should be considered during RT plan.