Aghazadeh Mohandesi, Nessa

AbstractDevelopment of pemphigus foliaceus (PF) following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection has only been reported in one patient who had received Bamlanivimab and thus might be considered as a drug‐induced case of PF. Here, we reported the first case of PF arising solely after COVID infection without taking any culprit drug.

AbstractBackground/ObjectiveAutoimmune progesterone dermatitis (APD) is a rare autoimmune hypersensitivity reaction that occurs cyclically at the peak of endogenous progesterone production during the menstrual cycle in women. No study characterizing APD in the adolescent population is found; it appears likely to be underdiagnosed and undertreated.MethodsA retrospective, single‐center, review of all adolescent and pediatric patients (<20 years old at onset) with documented diagnosis of APD.ResultsSeventeen adolescent APD patients were included (mean age at diagnosis: 14.4 ± 2 years, mean interval of 13.6 ± 11.1 months between symptom onset and diagnosis). Twelve patients presented with urticaria, two with fixed drug eruption. Erythema multiforme, eczema, and recurrent aphthous stomatitis were present in one patient each. Exposure to exogenous progestin was present in two patients prior to disease onset. Progesterone skin test was performed in six patients with positive results in two. Fourteen patients received antihistamines and/or a topical corticosteroid. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) were given to eleven patients, in seven via continuous daily dosing. Gonadotropin‐releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) was used in five, progesterone desensitization in four, omalizumab in two, and danazol in one patient.ConclusionsAdolescent APD is associated with a significant delay in diagnosis. The most common manifestation is urticaria. Exogenous exposure to progestins is uncommon in adolescent APD. Continuous COC, GnRHa, and progesterone desensitization have been used to control symptoms. Large, multicenter studies are required to better define, diagnose, and treat this under recognized condition among adolescent patients.

AbstractThe microscopic features of patch stage Kaposi sarcoma (KS) and interstitial granuloma annulare (GA) may be difficult to differentiate, because both may exhibit a subtle “busy” dermis due to infiltration of spindled cells between collagen bundles. The clinical distinction is particularly challenging in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐affected individuals, as the incidence of GA appears to be greater in the HIV‐infected population. KS is the most common neoplasm in this population. Despite the significant decrease in the incidence of KS since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), KS tends to occur with late onset and indolent progression in patients with preserved immune function and minimal viral load. We present a 47‐year‐old homosexual HIV‐positive man, under virologic and immunologic control on long‐term HAART therapy, with a 5‐year history of progressive red‐brown patches and plaques on the legs, feet, hands, and trunk. Prior skin biopsy specimens were interpreted as interstitial GA. Histopathology on new skin biopsy specimens along with review specimens supported the diagnosis of plaque and patch stages of KS, respectively, supported by immunohistochemical expression of human herpes virus‐8 (HHV‐8). This case underscores the importance of maintaining a high suspicion for KS in progressive, treatment‐recalcitrant skin lesions, particularly in HIV‐infected individuals.