Al‐Kali, Aref

AbstractBackgroundScreening for vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus (VRE) is performed at many transplant centers, but data on the impact of VRE colonization and bloodstream infection (BSI) on hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes remain conflicting.MethodsConsecutive adults with acute myeloid leukemia who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were screened by perirectal PCR swabs targeting vanA and vanB twice weekly while inpatient.ResultsOf a total of 203 patients (median age 54 years), 73 (36%) were VRE colonized prior to HCT, 23 (11%) became colonized within the first 100 days, and 107 (53%) remained non‐colonized through day 100 post HCT. A landmark analysis on HCT day 0 revealed no significant difference in overall survival according to pre‐transplant colonization status (P=.20). However, patients with subsequent VRE colonization within the first 100 days of HCT had a significantly worse survival on both univariable (P=.04) and multivariable (P=.03) analyses. During the first 30 days post HCT, 11 (5% of total and 11% of the VRE colonized) patients developed VRE BSI. Ten (91%) of these had screened positive for VRE colonization before the bacteremia. Age ≥60 years, HCT‐comorbidity index ≥3, and VRE colonization were independent risk factors for VRE BSI on multivariable analysis (P=.04, .03, .003, respectively). Only 1 (9%) patient with VRE BSI died within the first 100 days post HCT.ConclusionVRE colonization is a surrogate marker and not an independent predictor of worse outcomes post HCT. VRE BSI is associated with increased morbidity, but does not impact post‐HCT survival.

BACKGROUNDRAS/RAF/mitogen‐activated protein kinase activation is common in myeloid malignancies. Trametinib, a mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1)/MEK2 inhibitor with activity against multiple myeloid cell lines at low nanomolar concentrations, was evaluated for safety and clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory leukemias.METHODSThis phase 1/2 study accrued patients with any relapsed/refractory leukemia in phase 1. In phase 2, this study accrued patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with NRAS or KRAS mutations (cohort 1); patients with AML, MDS, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) with a RAS wild‐type mutation or an unknown mutation status (cohort 2); and patients with CMML with an NRAS or KRAS mutation (cohorts 3).RESULTSThe most commonly reported treatment‐related adverse events were diarrhea, rash, nausea, and increased alanine aminotransferase levels. The phase 2 recommended dose for Trametinib was 2 mg orally daily. The overall response rates were 20%, 3%, and 27% for cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and this indicated preferential activity among RAS‐mutated myeloid malignancies. Repeated cycles of trametinib were well tolerated with manageable or reversible toxicities; these results were similar to those of other trametinib studies.CONCLUSIONSThe selective, single‐agent activity of trametinib against RAS‐mutated myeloid malignancies validates its therapeutic potential. Combination strategies based on a better understanding of the hierarchical role of mutations and signaling in myeloid malignancies are likely to improve the response rate and duration. Cancer 2016;122:1871–9. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the initial treatment for majority of newly diagnosed patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) and are associated with marked improvement in hematological, cytogenetic, molecular response and survival rates compared with other therapies. In this review, we summarize the evidence of TKI efficacy for patients with newly diagnosed CP‐CML. Six trials at low risk of bias evaluating TKIs as an initial treatment in adults with newly diagnosed CP‐CML and enrolling 2,456 patients were included. Follow‐up times ranged from a median of 3 months to 5 years. Direct comparison showed statistically higher rates of major molecular response (MMR ≤ 0.1%IS) achievement with second‐generation TKIs at 12 months which was sustained throughout treatment period. Bayesian mixed‐treatment comparison (MTC) analysis demonstrated superiority of both nilotinib and dasatinib over imatinib in terms of efficacy. Nilotinib was associated with higher deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 ≤ 0.0032%IS) at 60 months than dasatinib but no difference in MMR. The differences between nilotinib and dasatinib are likely clinically trivial. Among TKIs, nilotinib was found to have the best survival profile. Both nilotinib and dasatinib are associated with significantly better MMR compared to imatinib that is sustained over 60 months. This analysis shows that new‐generation TKIs are not only showing faster response but also maintaining a more potent one through longer follow‐up period. It is important to note out that MTC is not a substitute for well‐conducted RCTs investigating direct comparisons.

BACKGROUNDABO incompatibility is not a contraindication to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but it has been associated with additional risks including delayed engraftment, pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), and higher transfusion needs. Data on these events and on patient survival after reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT are limited.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSA total of 127 consecutive patients, 86 with acute myeloid leukemia and 41 with myelodysplastic syndromes, who underwent HLA‐matched peripheral blood RIC allogenic HCT between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.RESULTSEighty ABO‐compatible, 26 major/bidirectional, and 21 minor‐ABO‐mismatch HCT were identified. Compared to the ABO‐compatible group, major/bidirectional mismatches had increased red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement during the first 100 days (p = 0.009), delayed RBC and PLT engraftment (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.005, respectively), and higher incidence of grade II to IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGVHD; p = 0.037). In multivariable analysis, major/bidirectional mismatches had significantly higher non‐relapse mortality (NRM) and inferior disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with ABO‐compatible patients (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, and p = 0.035, respectively). Minor ABO mismatch had no impact on survival (p = 0.99). Four (15%) of 26 major/bidirectional mismatches developed PRCA. There was a significant association between fludarabine plus busulfan conditioning and PRCA (p = 0.0046).CONCLUSIONMajor/bidirectional ABO mismatch is associated with higher NRM and shortened DFS and OS in the setting of RIC HCT. Increased transfusion need, delayed RBC and platelet engraftment, PRCA, and increased severity of aGVHD are additional complications contributing to the morbidity.

Abstract Nilotinib has been approved to treat newly diagnosed, imatinib-resistant or -intolerant leukemia, but the mechanisms underlying its antileukemia actions remain elusive. Here, we report that nilotinib blocks AML growth through its DNA hypomethylating activity. We showed that, in addition to inducing a reduction of KIT and FLT3 protein expression and phosphorylation, nilotinib downregulated DNMT1, 3a and 3b in Kasumi-1, MV4-11 and C1498 cells. Since DNMT1 is maintenance and de novo DNMT, we focused on DNMT1 and proved that nilotinib impaired DNMT1 expression via Sp1 dysfunction, since the luciferase activity driven by DNMT1 promoter containing Sp1 binding sites was decreased by 2.6 fold by nilotinib, while increased by 10.6 fold after Sp1 overexpression. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay disclosed that nilotinib abolished Sp1 binding on DNMT1 promoter. Dotblot using 5mC antibody revealed global DNA hypomethylation and qPCR showed p15INK4B upregulation in Kasumi-1 (3.4 fold) or MV4-11 (5.2 fold). Bisulfite sequencing found a decrease of DNA methylation on p15INK4B promoter from 100% to 89% in Kasumi-1 or 13% to 0% in MV4-11. The functional assays showed a decrease of colony formation in Kasumi-1 (60%) or MV4-11 (58%), and an increase of cell apoptosis in Kasumi-1 (6.9 fold) or MV4-11 (3.2 fold). We verified these findings in AML patient blasts (n = 3) by showing that nilotinib treatment led to the dephosphorylation of KIT, the downregulation of DNMT1, 3a, 3b and Sp1, the reduction of global DNA methylation and the re-expression of p15INK4B (4.4 fold) via promoter demethylation (from 14% to 6%), which was followed by suppressed colony formation (77%), promoted cell apoptosis (1.84 fold) and increased caspase-3 and caspase-8. To test if nilotinib induces AML regression via DNA hypomethylation in vivo, 0.1×106 C1498 cells were injected into C57BL/6 mice (n = 3 mice/group) via the tail vein. The leukemic mice were treated with 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg of nilotinib in PEG400 plus saline via intraperitoneal injection twice a week for a total of 6 doses. No toxicity was observed for the tested drug dosage and schedule, because of no evident change of mouse body weight. Compared to the control group, nilotinib-treated mice had a decrease in spleen size. H&E staining showed that the control mice exhibited increased infiltration of AML cells into the spleen, lung and liver of recipients. The bone marrow (BM) histopathology identified a higher degree of mature post-mitotic cells containing metamyelocytes, bands and segmented neutrophils in nilotinib-treated mice than control. DNMT1 was downregulated (39%), p15INK4B was upregulated and global DNA methylation was reduced (60%) in BM cells from nilotinib-treated mice. Thus, our findings unveil DNA methylation machinery as an innovative target behind nilotinib's anticancer activities, and provide a new therapeutic avenue for nilotinib in overcoming aberrant epigenetics in AML. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Na Shen, Fei Yan, Jiuxia Pang, Naseema Gangat, Mark R. Litzow, Aref Al-Kali, Shujun Liu. Nilotinib abrogates DNMT1-depenent DNA methylation: A novel mechanism for induction of AML leukemia regression. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2945. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2945

SummaryMomelotinib (a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor) induces both anaemia and spleen responses in myelofibrosis (MF). Momelotinib treatment‐emergent peripheral neuropathy (TE‐PN) was documented in 44 (44%) of 100 MF patients treated at our institution; median time of TE‐PN onset was 32 weeks and duration 11 months. Improvement after drug dose reduction or discontinuation was documented in only two patients. TE‐PN was significantly associated with treatment response (P = 0·02) and longer survival (P = 0·048) but significance was lost during multivariate analysis that included treatment duration. TE‐PN did not correlate with initial or maximum momelotinib dose or previous treatment with JAK inhibitor or thalidomide.

RAS is an oncogene frequently mutated in human cancer. RAS mutations have been reported in 10–15% of cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but they appear to be less frequent among patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The impact of RAS mutations in patients with MDS is unclear. We conducted a retrospective study in 1,067 patients with newly diagnosed MDS for whom RAS mutational analysis was available. Overall, 4% of patients carried mutant RAS alleles. Notably, FLT3 mutations, which were found in 2% of patients, were mutually exclusive with RAS mutations. Patients with RAS mutations had a higher white blood cell count as well as bone marrow blasts compared with patients carrying wild‐type RAS. However, no differences were observed between both groups regarding the risk of AML transformation (9% vs. 7%) and overall survival (395 days vs. 500 days, P = 0.057). In summary, RAS mutations are infrequent in patients with MDS and do not appear to negatively impact their outcome. Am. J. Hematol. 88:365–369, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.