Al‐Kali, Aref

Abstract Background: Over the last decade there have been three FDA-approved agents available for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS); azacitidine was approved in 2004 for all subtypes of MDS; lenalidomide in 2005 for MDS with del(5q); and decitabine in 2006 for intermediate/high risk MDS. However the ability of these drugs to improve survival outside of clinical trials remains controversial (Neukirchen J, Leuk Res 2015, Bernal T, Leukemia 2015). Objectives : i) Evaluate trends in overall survival (OS) and leukemic transformation (LT) rate amongst primary MDS patients (pts) by year of diagnosis and, ii) Evaluate trends in OS by treatment received. Methods : The Mayo Clinic database was used to identify pts with primary MDS in whom bone marrow histologic and cytogenetic information was obtained at the time of diagnosis. WHO criteria were used for MDS diagnosis and LT. A comparative analysis was performed based on year of diagnosis commensurate with the approval of the aforementioned drugs (Group 1- diagnosis prior to the year 2000, Group 2- year 2001-2004, Group 3- year 2005-2009, and Group 4- year 2010-2014). Results : i) Patient characteristics: A total of 1000 pts met the above-stipulated criteria. 85% of pts were above 60 years of age (median 72 years) with 69% being males. The distribution of pts by year of diagnosis was as follows: Group 1 (n=281)(28%), Group 2 (n=250)(25%), Group 3 (n=264)(26%), and Group 4 (n=205 (21%). Median follow-up of our cohort was 27 months (range; 0-300 months) during which time 808 (81%) deaths and 129 (13%) LT were documented. ii) Comparison of patient characteristics by year of diagnosis: Pts in group 1 and 2 compared with groups 3 and 4 were more likely to present with anemia defined as hemoglobin < 10 g/dl (61%/59% vs 50%/55%)(P =.04). In addition, groups 1 and 2 displayed a higher incidence of RA (5%/4% vs 1% each), and RARS (17%/16% vs 9%/8%), compared to groups 3 and 4 that had a higher incidence of RCMD (37%/44% vs 17%/28%) (P <.001). The IPSS-R risk distribution was not significantly different; 17% very low, 36% low, 21% intermediate, 15% high and 11% very high risk with median survivals of 72, 43, 24, 18 and 7 months, respectively (P <.001). As expected, a higher proportion of pts in groups 3 and 4 (41% and 57% respectively) received "disease-modifying" therapy including allogeneic transplant and hypomethylating agents as opposed to only 6% and 22% in groups 1 and 2 respectively (P <.001). iii) Trends in OS and LT rate by year of diagnosis: The median OS of the entire cohort was 30 months, with median OS and LT rates being similar amongst groups 1 through 4 at 31 vs 33 vs 30 vs 27 months (P =.79) (Figure) and 10% vs 16% vs 12% vs 15% (P =.25), respectively. iv) Trends in OS by treatment received: In univariate analysis survival was significantly better in pts who underwent allogeneic transplant (n=65) with median survival of 55 months vs 26 months for non-transplant pts (P<. 001); and among non-transplant lenalidomide-treated pts (n=44) with median survival of 54 months vs 26 months for the remainder of pts (P =.02). However, these results lost significance on multivariable analysis with the addition of age as a co-variate for transplant pts (P =.28), and IPSS-R as a co-variate for lenalidomide treated pts (P =.10). Excluding transplant pts, pts that received hypomethylating agents (n=158) had similar survival to pts not treated with hypomethylating agents (27 vs 29 months; P =.19, age-adjusted P =.11). In addition, the 54 pts who received other chemotherapeutic agents had similar survival to pts not treated with these agents (33 vs 26 months; P =.57, age-adjusted P =.80). Supportive care alone was utilized in 702 pts that had comparable survival to the 298 pts that received "disease-modifying" therapy (27 months vs 34 months; P =.05, age-adjusted P =.11). Conclusions : In this single center analysis of 1000 pts with primary MDS, stratified by year of diagnosis, the poor outcome of these pts has not improved over the last two decades, in spite of the significantly higher utilization of "disease-modifying" therapy, including hypomethylating agents since 2005. The lack of improvement in survival with hypomethylating therapy is consistent with recently published results from the Spanish MDS registry (Bernal T, Leukemia 2015). However, our retrospective study is not designed to detect marginal survival benefit, which has thus far been reported in only one clinical trial. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding. Pardanani:Stemline: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Cytotoxic agents are a well-established risk factor for therapy related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN). The incidence of t-MN in patients (pts) with autoimmune diseases (AID) treated with cytotoxic and immuno-modulatory agents are not well described in the literature. Most case series assess an MDS/AML population and co-occurrence with an AID. To our knowledge, there exists no large case-control studies evaluating a primary AID population that developed therapy-related MDS or AML, and the relationship to detailed therapeutic intervention for AID. Our study queries the association of cytotoxic and immune-modulating agents to treat AID as risk factor for developing MDS or AML. Methods Between 2004-2014, 23,671 pts with an ICD-9 coded AID were seen at Mayo Clinic Arizona; 148 pts from this population had a concomitant coded diagnosis of MDS/AML. In an IRB approved, retrospective chart review we confirmed 61 cases meeting strict inclusion criteria. We performed a case-control match from the same primary AID population for age, gender, and autoimmune specific diagnosis at a 2:1 ratio. AML/MDS cases were compared to controls by use of chi-square test for frequency data. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were constructed using conditional logistic regression. Case incidence was compared to SEER data for the general population Results Of 61 cases 33 were MDS, 20 de-novo AML, and 8 MDS transformed to AML. Psoriasis 16 (26.2%) and rheumatoid arthritis 14 (23.0%) were the most common autoimmune diagnoses, followed by systemic lupus 11 (18%), Crohn's disease 7 (11.5%), and ulcerative colitis 5 (8.2%). 39 out of 61 cases (63.9%) received either a cytotoxic or immune modulating agent for AID, compared to 64/122 (52.5%) in the control group; p=0.140. 7/61 cases (11.5%) received both a cytotoxic and immune modulating agent as compared to 16/122 (13.1%) in controls; p=0.753. Overall, the case population received more agents than controls. No cytotoxic or immune-modulating treatment was documented in 16% of cases and 36% controls. Exposures to cytotoxic and immune-modulating agents were similar in both case and control cohorts. Exposure time was not statistically significant. Azathioprine was the only statistically significant agent exposure observed more often in the case cohort than control. Per SEER data, over a 10-year period in a general age-matched population that is comparable to our AID population cohort, we would expect 54 MDS and 35 AML cases. Table 1. Exposures and Timeline Cases (n=61) Controls (n=122) P value * Number of Systemic Agents, Total None 1 2 3 4+ - 10 (16.4%) 26 (42.6%) 12 (19.7%) 7 (11.5%) 6 (9.8%) - 44 (36.1%) 32 (26.2%) 31 (25.4%) 9 (7.4%) 6 (4.9%) 0.020 Exposure to Cytotoxic agent < 1 year 2-5 years 6-10 years 11 years or more Unknown (n=26) 7 (26.9%) 6 (23.1%) 5 (19.2%) 3 (11.5%) 5 (19.2%) (n=43) 5 (11.6%) 8 (18.6%) 6 (13.9%) 12 (27.9%) 12 (27.9%) 0.276 Exposure to Immune modulating agent < 1 year 2-5 years 6-10 years 11 years or more Unknown (n=20) 6 (30%) 6 (30%) 3 (15%) 1 (5%) 4 (20%) (n=37) 6 (16.2%) 10 (27.0%) 5 (13.5%) 3 (8.1%) 13 (35.1%) 0.661 Table 2. Treatments and Odds Ratio Odds Ratio 95% CI for OR P value * Cytotoxic OVERALLAzathioprine Cyclophosphamide Methotrexate Mitoxantrone 6-MP Mycophenolate 1.39 4.16 1.28 0.74 2.73 1.00 1.21 0.72, 2.67 1.29, 13.44 0.24, 6.89 0.29, 1.88 0.23, 33.0 0.23, 4.35 0.28, 5.21 0.322 0.017 0.773 0.528 0.429 0.999 0.803 Immune modulating agent OVERALLAnti-TNF Leflunomide Plaquenil 1.19 0.73 2.00 2.73 0.52, 2.73 0.24, 2.24 0.40, 9.91 0.80, 8.33 0.672 0.585 0.396 0.077 Discussion Treatment of AID does not seem to increase the incidence of MDS or AML. Furthermore, the incidence of myeloid neoplasm occurring in association with treatment of AID is not higher than expected in the general SEER population. However, the case cohort was exposed to more agents overall and more likely to have exposure to azathioprine than controls. Limitations of our study are associated with its retrospective nature, possible associated underrepresentation of t-MN, and autoimmune population profile. Nevertheless, this is the largest case study with detailed drug exposures with timelines for pts with AID, contributing to a better understanding regarding possible risk of developing MDS/AML in pts treated for AID. Confirmation of the same study at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Florida are ongoing. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 5226 Background Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal stem cell disorder with overlapping features between myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Allogeneic stem-cell transplant (SCT) is considered to be a potentially curative option (Eur J Haematol. 2013; 90:355); with karyotype and comorbidity index (CI) being independent prognostic factors. The role of newer CMML prognostic models remains to be elucidated. We carried out this study to analyze the predictive value of the Mayo model (Leukemia 2013; 27:1504) in assessing transplant outcomes for patients with CMML. Methods After due IRB approval, 25 patients with WHO-defined CMML that underwent allo-SCT at Mayo Clinic from 1992 through 2013 were identified. All patients underwent bone marrow examination and cytogenetic evaluation at diagnosis. Clinical features including status at transplant, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, donor-recipient HLA-matching, donor-recipient blood types and CMV status were documented. Patients were evaluated for development of GVHD, disease relapse, remission status, and death from all causes. We evaluated the prognostic relevance of clinical and laboratory parameters including those previously identified by the MDAPS (Blood 2002;99:840), Spanish cytogenetic stratification (Haematologica 2011;96:375), and the recently described Mayo model Results Among 25 study patients, 14 (56%) were males and 15 (60%) had WHO defined CMML-1 (6-symptomatic/transfusion dependent, 3-monosomy 7). The median age at transplant was 51 years (range, 18-66 years). Graft sources included: 19 (76%) peripheral blood, 5 (20%) bone marrow, and 1 (4%) double umbilical cord blood. Ten (40%) patients received a reduced intensity conditioning. At last follow up, 15 (60%) deaths were documented while the remainders are alive and disease free. There were six (25%) post-transplant relapses all resulting in mortality. The 5-year OS was 42% and the 5-year non relapse mortality was 35%. Based on the Mayo model, 15 (60%) patients received a high-risk prognostication, 6 (24%) were intermediate and 3 (12%) were low. In an univariate analysis that included: demographics, blood counts at diagnosis and transplant, WHO classification (p=0.19), Spanish karyotypic stratification (p=0.67), prognostication according to the MDAPS (p=0.35) and Mayo model, disease status at transplant, SCT comorbidity index (p=0.06), graft sources, transplant conditioning regimens (p=0.08), development of acute (p=0.64) and chronic GVHD (p=0.06); thrombocytopenia at diagnosis (p=0.04), disease status at transplant (p=0.02), and a high risk prognostication using the Mayo model (p=0.01) were statistically significant. On a multivariable analysis only high risk prognostication by the Mayo model (p=0.02) retained its negative prognostic impact. In an univariate analysis for relapse-free survival, risk stratification by the Spanish cytogenetic system (p=0.04) and the Mayo model were prognostic (p=0.01), with the high risk prognostication by the Mayo model retaining its negative prognostic impact (p=0.01). Conclusions Allogeneic SCT remains a viable treatment option for patients with CMML. The Mayo model serves as a valuable tool, helping with the identification of high risk CMML patients. These patients seem to benefit from allo-SCT in comparison to non-transplant therapeutic options. Given the smaller sample size, validation in a larger patient cohort is needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2926 Background: RAS proteins are encoded by 3 proto-oncogenes (K-RAS, N-RAS, and H-RAS) and regulate the growth and differentiation of many cellular types, including the myeloid compartment. Codons 12, 13, and 61 (in N-RAS and K-RAS) have been reported to be common targets of mutations. These mutations result in constitutive activation of the RAS pathway by increasing intracellular RAS GTP levels, which result in activation of the RAS/MEK and the RAS/PI3K pathways. Its prognostic significance in MDS is yet to be clarified. Because the potential prognostic and therapeutic implications of RAS mutations in MDS, we decided to study the impact of RAS mutations in patients (pts) with MDS. Methods: Mutation analysis of KRAS and NRAS codons 12, 13, and 61 was performed by Pyrosequencing using biotinylated reverse primers. All pts referred to MD Anderson between 2000–2009 were reviewed. In addition to standard clinical characteristics, including karyotyping, mutational status of Flt3, c-Kit and JAK2 was also analyzed. Overall survival was calculated based on Kaplan-Meier. Results: Of the 1067 pts with MDS of age above 17 evaluated for RAS mutation, 43 pts (4%) were positive. Seventy nine percent of RAS mutations were of N-RAS type (codon12 (55%), codon 13 (12%), codon 61(12%)) with K-RAS 12 comprising the rest (21%). Median age was 68 years (range, 18–94) with 66% being males (703 pts). Their median white blood cell (WBC) was 3.3×109/L (range, 0.3–72.2), hemoglobin 9.8 (range, 3–17.5), and platelets 73×109/liter (range, 1–1040). Median bone marrow blast was 5% and 77 pts (7%) had leukemic transformation. More than half of the pts had RAEB or RAEB-t (44% and 9 % respectively) which translated into fewer patients in the low IPSS category (19%). The median age was 66 years (range 26–84) in the RAS mutated (muRAS) group compared to 68 in the wild type (wtRAS). WBC was higher in the muRAS group compared to wtRAS (6.8 ×109/L vs. 3.2 ×109/L, p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney median test (M-W-T)). Percent of bone marrow blasts was higher (9%) in muRAS group compared to 5% in wtRAS (p<0.001 by M-W-T). High (Int-2 and high) risk by IPSS was more frequent in muRAS 51% compared to 40% in wtRAS group (p=0.11). Leukemic transformation was 9% and 7% (p=0.61) in both muRAS and wtRAS groups respectively. RAS mutation was detected more frequently in the CMML subgroup (12/80 (15%) pts). There were no differences in terms of response to DNA methylating inhibitors (CR in 41% in muRAS versus 40% in wtRAS). ARA-C-based regimens resulted in better CR in wtRAS than muRAS (59% vs 25%); however, the size of muRAS group was too small (1 out 4 pts).There was a trend towards shorter overall survival (OS) in the muRAS group compared to wtRAS (395 vs. 500 days, p value=0.057). MuRAS RAEB (325 vs. 450 days, p= 0.13) and RAEB-t (125 vs. 375 days, p= 0.27) subgroups showed a trend towards worse OS compared to wtRAS group. There was a significant OS decrease in RCMD (150 vs. 700 day, p= 0.015). Surprisingly, muRAS CMML group showed a trend towards better OS compared to wtRAS (728 vs. 687 days, p=0.44). Additionally we analyzed patients for presence of Flt3 mutation. These were present in only 18 of the pts (4%) but none of them had also a RAS mutation. There was no c-Kit mutations found in this cohort of pts, compared to 9/37 (24%) pts tested positive for JAK2V617F. Conclusion: MuRAS occurs in 4% of pts with MDS. In the muRAS group, pts tended to have higher risk disease and risk of transformation to acute leukemia compared with wtRAS. OS tended to be worse in some subgroups in muRAS. Although the prognostic impact of RAS mutations in MDS appears to be limited, mutations could be used to develop targeted therapeutic interventions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background Cytogenetic abnormalities have significant prognostic role in AML at the time of diagnosis. Several prognostic groupings have been recommended including the NCCN and European LeukemiaNet classification. It is still unknown whether cytogenetic abnormalities have any prognostic role at the time of relapse for predicting clinical outcome. In addition, clonal evolution (CE) has been seen in many AML cases, but its prognostic value remains to be identified. Aim To study cytogenetic abnormalities and clonal evolution impact on clinical outcome for patients diagnosed with rAML Method A retrospective, single institution study through chart review of all cases diagnosed with rAML at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2003 to 2011 was performed. Pts who achieved complete remission and relapsed at our institution were included. Pts with PML-RARA and BCR-ABL rearrangements were excluded from this study. Pts with available cytogenetics data, both at presentation and relapse, were included. Response to treatment was defined as per international working group (IWG) criteria (Cheson JCO 2003). Appropriate IRB approval was obtained in accordance with Helsinki declaration. Comparison between groups’ medians was done using Wilcoxon test, while survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves using JMP V9. Results Out of 192 pts, 74 pts matched our inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis is 60 years (range 18-81), 53% were males. At relapse, median white blood cell (WBC) was 3.2 x109, hemoglobin 10.4 g/dL, platelet 59 x109, peripheral blood (PB) blast 2% (range, 0-96), bone marrow (BM) blasts 23% (range, 1-95) and cellularity 60%. Relapse site was mainly in the BM (95%). Flt3 mutation was found in 12/43 (28%), while NPM1 mutation in 2/7 (29%). Upon treatment with salvage therapy, 27 (36%) pts achieved complete remission (CR) and 16 (22%) pts partial remission (PR) for a total overall response (OR) of 58%. Twenty one (28%) pts were able to proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) after achieving remission. Median overall survival (mOS) was 198 days. Pts had a longer mOS if they proceeded to SCT (386 days vs 121 days, p =0.0003). Cytogenetic analysis (CG) were diploid in 32 (43%) of 74 pts at relapse. Five pts had favorable cytogenetics (3 pts with t(8,21) and 2 pts with inv (16)). CG was divided into favorable, intermediate and poor prognosis as per NCCN classification in 5 (7%), 45 (61%), 24 (32%), respectively. As per European LeukemiaNet, there were 4 CG groups divided into: favorable, Intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and adverse in 5 (7%), 33 (45%), 12 (16%), 24 (32%), respectively. Upon comparison of CG at diagnosis and relapse; clonal evolution (a change in CG due to gain or loss of chromosomal abnormalities) was found in 42/74 (57%) of pts. CG reverted back to diploid in 8/42 (19%) or gained additional CG abnormalities at relapse in 32 (76%) pts. CR2 was achieved in 80% of favorable CG (NCCN grouping), 40% (intermediate), and 21% in poor risk (p=0.01). Using NCCN CG grouping mOS was: 435 days (favorable), 266 (intermediate), and 104 (poor) (p value = 0.01). However, using European LeukemiaNet grouping mOS was: 435 days (favorable), 174 (intermeidtae-1), 363 (intermediate-2), and 104 (poor) (p=0.004). CE did not affect mOS (p =0.7). On multivariate analysis, response to salvage therapy (p<0.0001), NCCN CG grouping (p =0.03), wbc (p=0.045), and PB blasts (p=0.01) were significant but not age, BM blast, platelet and CE. Conclusion CG were diploid in 43% of relapsed pts. CE (gain or loss of cytogenetic abnormalities) was seen in 57% of CG at relapse compared to diagnosis but did not affect mOS. NCCN (and not European LeukemiaNet) cytogenetic grouping did affect clinical outcome through both achieving second CR and mOS (both on univariate and multivariate analysis). Our results confirm the prognostic value of CG on relapse, and need to be confirmed by larger studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background Tunneled central venous catheters have traditionally been used for administration of chemotherapy (chemo) for acute leukemia treatment. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are increasingly being used, but there is an increased risk of PICC-associated thrombosis (PAT). There is limited information on management of PAT in this subgroup of patients (pt). Methods In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the primary management of PICC related upper extremity venous thrombosis (TB) in pt with hematologic malignancy undergoing chemo at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Eligible pt were 18 years and older, had documentation of PICC placement at our institution, initiation of chemo within a week of PICC placement, and the TB was objectively documented by compression venous ultrasound (CVU). Superficial venous TB (SVT) was defined as TB of subcutaneous veins (basilic and cephalic) and deep venous TB (DVT) defined as TB of brachial, axillary, subclavian, or innominate superior vena cava and internal jugular veins. We retrospectively stratified initial management (IM) into 1) PICC removal alone (PR), 2) PR and therapeutic anticoagulation (AC), 3) AC alone, and 4) conservative management (CM) consisting of symptomatic care and observation. We also investigated factors influencing IM of PAT. Long term outcomes including incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), post phlebitic syndrome and recurrence of TB were noted. Results Between 2006 and 2012, 190 pt with AML (n=160), MDS or MDS/MF (n=10), or ALL (n=20) met our study criteria. Overall, 40/190 (21.6%) developed PAT: AML n=38, ALL n=1, MDS/MF n=1. SVT occurred in 16/40 (40%) pt and DVT occurred in 24/40 (60%) pt. IM is shown in Table 1. One pt with SVT received AC for 6 weeks as well as PR. In this pt, IM included AC because of proximity of TB to deep veins. 7 pt had a follow up (f/u) CVU within 3 months demonstrating: TB progression (prog, n=1, IM with PR alone but with prog AC was started); TB stability (stab, n=2, both IM with PR alone) and TB resolution/improvement (R/I, n= 4, 2 IM with PR and 2 IM with CM) In the 5 pt with CM, 2 pt had f/u CVU demonstrating improvement, one pt had charted clinical improvement , and 2 pt had no charted clinical f/u. Of DVT pt on AC (n=14), 5 pt completed at least 2 months of AC. Reasons for early cessation (n=9) of AC included thrombocytopenia (tcp, n=4), hematoma (n=1), hematuria (n=1), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=1), and unknown (n=1). One pt died 2 days after presence of DVT was noted. Two pt initially treated with PR alone developed a second TB with placement of a new PICC on contralateral arm and AC was subsequently initiated (duration: 3 months (n=1), and 8 days (n=1)). 14 pt with DVT had f/u CVU within 3 months which demonstrated prog (n=2), stab (n= 8), or R/I ( n=4) of TB (Table 2). The 2 pt with TB prog subsequently received longer term AC guided by platelet count. In 5 pt with PICC not initially removed, 3 pt had PR after completion of chemo. (1-4 days), one pt had PR at discharge (27 days from TB), and one pt had PICC in place on discharge. One pt with DVT experienced a PE within one year f/u. This pt had initially completed 3 days of AC which was stopped because of tcp. Conclusion In this cohort of patients with PAT, the most common IM consisted of PR, which appeared to result in a low recurrence rate among pt with SVT. In pt with DVT, the role of AC remains to be defined given the abbreviated course of AC in most pt. Though, the lack of CVU followup in all pt limits conclusions, there appeared to be a low rate of symptomatic prog. Initiation of AC was largely guided by platelet count and degree of occlusive symptoms. Thrombocytopenia was also the most commonly cited reason for discontinuing AC. Close clinical follow up aided by the use of CVU was integral to ensure that PAT did not lead to further adverse events. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background L-asparaginase (LASP) therapy in adults is associated with frequent hepatic and metabolic side effects, often resulting in dose adjustments and omissions. Pegylated asparaginase (PEGASP) substituted for LASP improves convenience of administration with comparable efficacy; however, adverse event (AE) management remains challenging. The incidence and management of LASP- and PEGASP-induced metabolic and hepatic complications in adult ALL patients is not well defined. Methods This single center, retrospective, observational study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Consecutive adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ALL receiving LASP or PEGASP containing chemotherapy regimens between January 2000 and October 2012 were evaluated. Patients were followed up to 60 days after the last LASP or PEGASP dose for development of biochemical and clinical pancreatitis, hypertriglyceridemia and hepatotoxicity. Hyperglycemia was not analyzed due to confounding variables, such as concomitant corticosteroid administration. AEs were graded as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) version 4.03. Analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard models with odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) reported to demonstrate the strength of association between group and AE rate. Results Of 74 adult patients, 54 (73%) met inclusion criteria. History of dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, cholelithiasis and coronary artery disease was documented at baseline in 13 (24%), 4 (7%), 4 (7%) and 10 (19%) patients, respectively. Twenty eight (52%) patients received LASP, 22 (41%) received PEGASP and 4 (7%) received both. A total of 399 doses including 335 (84%) LASP and 64 (16%) PEGASP were administered. Distribution based on treatment schedules was as follows; CALGB 9111 (n=20 (37%), Larson et al, 1998), E2993 (n=13 (24%), Goldstone et al, 2008), C10403 (n=9 (17%), NLM: NCT00558519), CCG 1941 (n=7 (13%), Gaynon et al, 2006) and Augmented Hyper-CVAD (n=5 (9%), Faderl et al,2011). Six (11%), 20 (37%), and 53 (98%) patients experienced pancreatic, lipid (hypertriglyceridemia) and hepatic adverse events, respectively. In this group, CTCAE grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 0 (0%), 8 (15%), and 28 (52%) patients, respectively. No deaths were directly related to these complications. Patients receiving PEGASP were more likely to experience AE of any CTCAE grade (OR 11.5, 95% CI 4.4-30.3, p < 0.0001), including grade3/4 AEs (OR 27.9, 95% CI 11.4-68.2, p < 0.0001) in comparison to those receiving LASP. All cases of pancreatitis manifested as biochemical elevation in pancreatic enzymes, and were either grade 1 (n=4, 67%) or grade 2 (n=2, 33%). All patients were managed conservatively. Management of hypertriglyceridemia was heterogeneous across all grades and included observation (n=11, 55%), non-pharmacologic interventions (n=1, 5%), medication management (n=4, 20%) and combined strategies (n=4, 20%). The most common practice was a combination of fibrate derivatives (fenofibrate) and fish oil (n= 5). One patient with a peak triglyceride level of 2285 mg/dL was placed on an insulin/dextrose infusion for 4 days. Hepatic toxicity manifested as CTCAE grade 3/4 transaminitis in 13 (24%) patients, hyperbilirubinemia in 4 (7%) patients and both in 11 (20%) patients. Temporal correlation was used to best distinguish confounding variables including possible hepatoxicity from azole antifungals and other drugs. Management of hepatic toxicity included delay in dosing, subsequent LASP or PEGASP dose reduction and laboratory monitoring until resolution. Overall, deviations in LASP or PEGASP administration were documented in 18 (33%) patients due to metabolic or hepatic AEs. Eight (15%) patients required omission of at least 1 dose, 7 (13%) experienced delays of administration and 7 (13%) needed a dose reduction. Conclusion PEGASP administration resulted in significantly higher AE rates in comparison to LASP and this significance was retained when comparing AEs of CTCAE grade 3 and 4. Given the growing trend of using PEGASP combination chemotherapy in adults with ALL, a detailed analysis looking at the increase in side effects, their consequences (delayed tereatment and dose reductions) and the impact of these factors on disease remission and survival is needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background Imetelstat is a 13-mer lipid-conjugated oligonucleotide that targets the RNA template of human telomerase reverse transcriptase. A pilot study of imetelstat therapy in myelofibrosis showed the induction of complete (CR) or partial remissions, as well as molecular remissions, in a subset of patients (Blood. 2014;124:634). In the particular study, CR was significantly higher in patients with SF3B1 or U2AF1 spliceosome mutations, which provided the rationale for the current study; spliceosome mutations are closely associated with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts with (RARS-T) or without (RARS) thrombocytosis (Leukemia. 2013;27:1826). Methods Diagnosis of RARS and RARS-T was according to WHO criteria (Blood. 2009;114:937). Study patients were treated with a 2-hour intravenous infusion of 7.5 mg/kg imetelstat (Janssen Biotech Inc., Horsham, PA, USA) every 4 weeks. Drug activity was monitored by both formal response criteria (Blood. 2006;108:419) and effect on spleen size, thrombocytosis and leukocytosis. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Version 4.03). Laboratory correlative studies included analysis of mutations. Results Accrual to this signal study is now complete and median time from study registration, as of 5/10/2015, was 17.1 months (range 16.1-20.1). Among the 9 study patients, 5 had RARS-T, 3 had RARS and one had "MDS/MPN overlap". Median age was 70 years (78% males). 8 (89%) patients were transfusion-dependent. One patient (RARS-T) had marked splenomegaly (palpable at 16 cm). Three patients each had leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. Seven (78%) patients had received prior treatments, including erythropoiesis stimulating agents in 6 (67%). Baseline international MDS prognostic scoring system scores were intermediate-1 (n=7) and intermediate-2 (n=2). Karyotype was normal in all but one patient with loss of Y chromosome. Drug activity Median duration of treatment with imetelstat was 13.7 months (range 6.6-17.9). Three (38%) patients achieved transfusion-independence (TI) during treatment, defined as not requiring transfusions for at least 8 weeks; 2 had RARS and one RARS-T. The median time to TI was 11 weeks (range 9-14) and the median TI duration was 28 weeks (range 9-37). One of the 3 "TI" patients also had resolution of leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. A 4th patient experienced >50% decrease in palpable spleen size as well as a decrease in transfusion need. In addition, imetelstat induced normalization of counts in two additional patients with thrombocytosis and leukocytosis. As of 5/10/2015, 4 (44%) patients remain on active treatment and one death had been recorded (deemed unrelated to imetelstat). The 5 treatment discontinuations were: death during active therapy, discovery of second malignancy, progression into acute leukemia and insufficient response (n=2). Safety Treatment-emergent grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 2 (22%) and 1 (11%) patients, respectively; neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 4 (44%), and 2 (22%) patients. Grade 3 anemia was seen in 6 (67%) of the patients, however baseline grade 2 anemia was noted in 2 (22%) and grade 3 in 3 (30%) patients. None of the grade ≥3 hematologic toxicities lasted ≥4 weeks.. The following grade 3 non-hematologic events occurred in 1 subject: aspiration, fatigue, and lipase increase and a patient with pre-existing cardiovascular disease history experienced a grade 5 heart failure. Treatment-emergent liver function test abnormalities affected: ALT (grade 1 56%/grade 2 11%), AST (grade 1 56%/grade 2 11%), ALP (grade 1 33%), and total bilirubin (grade 2 11%). For patients that discontinued treatment with imetelstat, these events were mostly reversible. Mutation studies Patients were screened for mutations involving JAK2, SF3B1, U2AF1 and SRSF2. Three patients were mutated for JAK2, 7 for SF3B1 (4 K700E, 2 H662Q, one K666N) and one for U2AF1 (Q157P). All three patients with "TI" (H662Q, K700E, K666N) and the 4th patient with spleen response (K700E) were SF3B1mutated. Post-treatment analysis showed no effect of imetelstat on mutations. Conclusions Treatment with imetelstat may offer clinical benefit in patients with RARS or RARS-T with generally acceptable safety profile and warrants further clinical investigation. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding. Wan:Janssen Research & Development: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematological diseases which present with cytopenias. Hematopoietic cell transplantation is usually limited to fit patients with higher risk MDS and donor availability. Hypomethylating agents (azacitidine and decitabine) have been the mainstay option for the management of MDS with different clinical efficacy in low versus high risk MDS trials. No trials have compared the two agents. Aim: To conduct a systematic review and network analysis comparing the efficacy of azacitidine to decitabine. Methods: The protocol of the systematic review was developed a priori. A comprehensive search of several databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) was conducted from each database's earliest inception through November 20th, 2014 without language restrictions. Trials enrolling adults diagnosed with MDS who received hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine) therapy were included. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers and differences were resolved by consensus. The Cochrane Risk of bias tool was used to appraise the trials. Random effects model was used to pool relative risks (RR) of outcomes (overall survival, overall response rate, hematologic improvement and grade 3 or 4 toxicity). Adjusted indirect comparisons were used to estimate RR for indirect comparisons (Glenny AM, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2005). All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA, version 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Results: Only four trials met the eligibility criteria (Figure 1). Two trials compared Azacitidine (75mg/m²/day SC x 7 days) to the best suppurative care (BSC) and included 549 patients (278 azacitidine and 271 BSC, age average: 69; range: 31-92), and the other 2 compared decitabine (15 mg/m² IV q 8 hours x9) to BSC and included 403 patients (208 Decitabine and 195 BSC, age average: 69.7; range: 60-90) (Table 1). The proportion of patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (based on International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)) in trials comparing decitabine to BSC was 82.21% and 83.08%; respectively, and in trials comparing azacitidine to BSC was 62.59% and 61.26%; respectively. The risk of bias was moderate overall. Compared to BSC, azacitidine was significantly associated with lower risk of death (RR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, p=0.002) whereas the effect of decitabine did not reach statistical significance (RR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.77-1.001, p=0.053). Both drugs were superior to BSC in terms of partial and complete response. Head to head comparisons were not statistically significant (except for the outcome of complete response where low certainty evidence suggested that azacitidine treated patients were less likely to have complete response compared to decitabine (RR=0.11, 95% CI= 0.01, 0.86, p=0.04). (Table 2). Conclusion: Azacitidine and decitabine are both superior to BSC. The available indirect evidence comparing the two agents warrants low certainty and cannot reliably confirm superiority of either agent. Head-to-head trials are needed. In the meantime, the choice of agent should be driven by patients' preferences, drug availability and cost. Table 2. Results of meta-analysis Outcome Azacitidine VS. Decitabine Azacitidine VS. BSC Decitabine VS. BSC RR LCI HCI P value RR LCI HCI P value RR LCI HCI P value Death 0.95 0.79 1.13 0.54 0.83 0.74 0.94 0.002 0.88 0.77 1.001 0.05 Complete response 0.11 0.01 0.86 0.04* 2.56 1.44 4.58 0.001 23.46 3.22 170.84 0.002 Partial response 0.35 0.04 3.03 0.34 4.91 2.27 10.63 <0.0001 14.02 1.87 105.08 0.01 Major erythroid improvement 0.47 0.03 8.37 0.60 6.37 3.93 10.33 <0.0001 13.67 0.79 235.57 0.07 Major platelet improvement 1.51 0.30 7.56 0.62 4.80 2.98 7.70 <0.0001 3.19 0.68 14.89 0.14 Major neutrophil improvement 2.89 0.56 14.82 0.20 2.63 1.68 4.12 <0.0001 0.91 0.19 4.38 0.907 Hematologic improvement 0.25 0.06 1.09 0.07 2.18 1.67 2.85 <0.0001 8.62 2.05 36.32 0.003 Anemia 1.18 0.53 2.63 0.69 0.89 0.75 1.06 0.198 0.76 0.35 1.66 0.49 Neutropenia 0.99 0.75 1.30 0.92 1.87 1.63 2.14 <0.0001 1.90 1.49 2.42 <0.0001 Thrombocytopenia 0.87 0.64 1.18 0.37 1.63 1.43 1.86 <0.0001 1.87 1.43 2.45 <0.0001 Infection 1.13 0.52 2.43 0.76 1.25 0.60 2.60 0.55 1.11 0.87 1.42 0.41 *These results warrant low certainty due to imprecision (very small number of events) and are driven by 14 patients achieving complete response in BSC arm in one trial. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor small-molecule inhibitor and is FDA approved for the treatment of lung and pancreatic cancers. In preclinical study, in vitro colony culture assays revealed that erlotinib at micro-molar concentrations effectively suppressed the growth and expansion of Polycythemia Vera (PV) hematopoietic progenitor cells while having little effect on normal cells. Several JAK inhibitors are being studied for the management of PV, one of which has been approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (ruxolitinib). Aim To study the clinical effect of erlotinib in pts diagnosed with JAK2V617F + PV. Methods We conducted a single arm, prospective phase II study at the University of Oklahoma and the Oklahoma City VA hospitals in pts with WHO defined JAK-2 V617F positive PV from June 2010 to August 2012. Appropriate IRB approval was obtained in accordance with Hilsinki declaration. Pts had to be requiring phlebotomy. Toxicity was assessed by treating physicians using NCI version 4. Dose modification for erlotinib was done using label recommendations. Results Five Caucasian pts were enrolled (3 (60%) males, with median age at enrollment of 63 years, range 26-79). Pts had pretreatment median hemoglobin14.4 g/dL (10.4 -19.2 g/dL), median platelet count 511 x109 (424-681 x109), median white blood cell (WBC) 14.4 x109(7.8- 18.3 x109). Three pts had splenomegaly prior to treatment. Median number of prior pharmacologic treatments (hydroxyurea, anagralide or interferon) was 1, range 0-2. Pts were given erlotinib 150 mg orally daily for 16 weeks: responders (phlebotomy free or decrease in spleen size) were allowed to continue a total of 1 year of treatment, while non-responders were taken off the study. Three (60%) patients received therapy for 16 weeks and did not achieve hematological response or improvement in spleen size. Two (40%) pts were taken off the study after 2 doses secondary to severe toxicities (grade 3 colitis in 1 case, and grade 3 facial rash in 1case). No therapy continued beyond 16 weeks (due to toxicity or lack of response). All pts in the study developed rash (grade 1 – 3) and diarrhea (grade 1 – 2). Three pts developed mucositis (see Table 1). No death was observed during the study and follow up period (median follow up was 23 months, range 12-37 months). Study was closed due to lack of efficacy. Conclusions Despite in vitro efficacy of erlotinib as potent inhibitor of JAK-2 activity, erlotinib is not effective in pts with JAK-2 V617F positive PV with poor toxicity profile. Poor accrual was related to potential toxicity of erlotinib compared to alternative treatments in view of lack of clinical efficacy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.