Al‐Kali, Aref

Background: Relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure after intensive induction and consolidation (CONS) therapy in older adults with AML. We therefore performed a prospective randomized phase II study to determine the safety and impact on DFS (relapse or death) and OS of DAC maintenance using an abbreviated 3-day schedule administered every 4 weeks for 1 year (per Lubbert et al, Haematologica 97:393, 2012) vs. Observation (OBS) after intensive AML therapy, conducted in the large multi-center E-A E2906 Phase III trial in patients (pts) age ≥60 yrs. Methods: The design and primary clinical results for E2906 (n=727) have been reported previously (Foran et al, ASH #217a, 2015), demonstrating superior OS following 'Standard' 7&3 (Daunorubicin 60mg/m2) induction and intermediate dose Ara-C consolidation (CONS) vs. single agent Clofarabine (CLO, provided by SANOFI), despite similar CR/CRi (CR with incomplete CBC recovery) and induction mortality rates. All CR/CRi pts after induction (n=311) were assigned to 2 cycles CONS with either Ara-C (1.5g/m2 x 12 doses; 6 doses if age >/=70 yrs), or single agent CLO, based on induction randomization. Ongoing CR/CRi after recovery from CONS was confirmed with restaging BM biopsy, and eligible pts offered participation in the 'Step 3' maintenance study, a 1:1 randomization (stratified by induction therapy, cytogenetic risk group, age <70 yrs) to either OBS vs. DAC (20mg/m2IV Days 1-3, q4 wks) for 1 year. DAC could be held for up to 4 weeks for delayed hematologic recovery, but dose reductions were not permitted per protocol, and DAC was not continued beyond 12 months. Patients in both arms were evaluated with CBC q4 weeks for 1 year, and surveillance BM biopsy every 3 months (or at the time of suspected clinical relapse) for 2 years. 'Step 3' was designed as a phase II pilot randomized study, with target accrual n=172, allowing 90% power to detect 36% reduction in DFS Hazard Ratio (HR) with DAC maintenance for 1 year (using protocol-specified 1-sided log-rank test significance level of 0.1), assuming 140 events & 2 years of follow-up from randomization. However, further accrual to E2906 was suspended in 2/2015 by independent DSMC due to superior OS observed with standard Arm, so that 'Step 3' completed only 70% of target accrual. P-values reported are two-sided by convention unless specified otherwise. Results: 'Step 3' total accrual was n=120 (of 172 planned) (DAC 61, OBS 59), with median age 69 yrs (range 60-85), and groups were very well balanced for baseline clinical characteristics; most pts had Intermediate risk cytogenetics (74.2%) and ECOG performance status (PS)=0/1 (96%). The median number of DAC cycles received was 6 (range 0-13), and analysis was 'intention-to-treat'. The median follow-up is 49.8 months. There were 90 DFS events (47 OBS, 43 DAC), with 82 deaths (46 OBS, 36 DAC). Univariate DFS and OS are shown in Figure, with associated two-sided p-values; using protocol-prespecified one-sided significance level of 0.1, OS was significant (one-sided p=0.06) for DAC v. OBS, and there was a statistical trend favoring DFS (one-sided p=0.11), particularly for CLO pts (Table). We also performed multivariate Cox model (after adjustment for ECOG PS, sex, secondary AML, and baseline hematologic parameters) which confirmed superior HR for DFS (one-sided p=0.10) & OS (one-sided p=0.07), per statistical design. FLT3-ITD status is available for n=96 pts, and 84 were FLT3-ITD-negative (46 OBS, 38 DAC). Importantly, we observed a significant association of DAC maintenance with superior OS in the large FLT3-ITD-neg subgroup (p=0.039) (Figure). DAC was generally well tolerated apart from grade 3 febrile neutropenia (9%) and reversible grade 4 cytopenias, with no grade 5 events. Conclusions: In this randomized phase II study, DAC maintenance for 1 year after intensive AML therapy was associated with improved HR for OS and a trend for DFS, using protocol-specified statistical design. Furthermore there was a significant impact on OS for the FLT3-ITD-negative population. We acknowledge limitations based on incomplete accrual due to early termination of the parent E2906 study, and inherent to the phase 2 design of this E2906 endpoint, but results suggest an important impact of DAC maintenance on survival. These data strongly support a definitive phase III randomized study of DAC maintenance, particularly focused on the large intermediate risk FLT3-ITD-negative subgroup. Disclosures Foran: Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Claxton:Daiichi Sankyo Co. and Ambit Biosciences Corp, Astellas Pharma, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Incyte Corporation, Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Celegene Corporation, Medimmune, Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding. Lazarus:Pluristem Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Biosight: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy. Rowe:BioSight: Consultancy. Altman:Cancer Expert Now: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee; prIME Oncology: Speakers Bureau; PeerView: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Theradex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; France Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biosight: Other: US Lead. Luger:Ariad: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Biosight: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Onconova: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Genetech: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Cyslacel: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Zheng:Pfizer: Research Funding. Pratz:AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Powell:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Tallman:Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biosight: Research Funding; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Cellerant: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Disclosure: Use of maintenance Decitabine in AML

Background: Heterozygous somatic mutations in the genes encoding RNA splicing factors SF3B1, U2AF1, SRSF2 or ZRSR2 induce aberrant splicing in cancer cells and are among the most common mutations in patients with MDS, AML or CMML. H3B-8800 is an orally available small molecule that binds to the SF3b complex and induces alternative splicing changes in cells. Because splicing factor mutant cells depend on residual wild-type function of splicing factors for survival, we hypothesized that H3B-8800 would induce preferential cell killing of mutant cells by further perturbing splicing to synthetic lethality. In pre-clinical models, H3B-8800 preferentially kills spliceosome mutant cells and induces antitumor activity in xenograft leukemia models with core spliceosome mutations (Seiler M et al Nature Medicine 2018). Therefore, we conducted a phase I clinical trial (NCT02841540) of H3B-8800 in patients with MDS, AML or CMML. Here we describe the safety profile and clinical outcomes of the dose escalation cohorts in this phase I trial. Methods: This phase I trial explored the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of H3B-8800 in patients with myeloid cancers. Dose escalation cohorts, employing a standard 3+3 design, examined 2 different once daily dosing regimens (schedule I: 5 days on/9 days off; schedule II: 21 days on/7 days off) in a 28-day cycle, with stratification based on lower-risk (LR) versus higher-risk (HR) myeloid neoplasms. Results: As of June 16th, 2019, 84 patients were enrolled at 24 centers in the US and Europe. Dose ranged from 1-40 mg among 65 patients on schedule I, while 19 patients were enrolled with dose ranging from 7-20 mg on schedule II. The patient population included AML (n=38), CMML (n=4), HR-MDS (n=20), LR-MDS (n=21) and 1 MDS with unknown risk level. Most patients (88%) had spliceosome mutations of interest. The most common mutations were in SRSF2 (p.P95H in 17, p.P95L in 9, p.P95_R102Del in 4), SF3B1 (p.K700E in 11, p.R625C in 4), and U2AF1 (p.Q157P in 6, p.S34F in 4). Patients remained on treatment from 7 to 819 days; 25 patients (30%) had time on treatment greater than 180 days, 20% more than 1 year and 2% over 2 years. The median therapy duration for LR-CMML/MDS, HR-CMML/MDS, and AML patients were 216, 62, and 47 days respectively. Most observed treatment related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were Grade 1 or 2. The most common treatment-related (as judged by the investigator, >10% frequency) TEAEs in the patients treated on schedule I were diarrhea (75%), nausea (37%), fatigue (28%) and vomiting (27%). The most common treatment-related TEAEs in the patients treated on schedule II were diarrhea (68%), vomiting (42%), QTc prolongation (21%), nausea (16%), and fatigue (16%). The most common dose limiting toxicity was prolongation of the QTcF interval >500 msec (n=2, 40 mg on schedule I and n=1, 20 mg on schedule II, all ≥Grade 3) and bradycardia without other arrhythmias (n=1, 14 mg on schedule II, ≥Grade 3). No ophthalmic AEs were observed; 1 patient (LR-MDS) experienced durable marrow aplasia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has not been confirmed for either Schedule I or Schedule II. PK analysis indicates that H3B-8800 is rapidly absorbed and exhibits dose-proportional increase in plasma exposure. Consistent dose-dependent target engagement (i.e., alteration in mature mRNA transcripts) was observed in blood mononuclear cells from patients enrolled in the 2 mg up to 40 mg dose cohorts on both schedules. Despite this splicing modulation, no objective complete responses (CR) or partial responses (PR) meeting International Working Group criteria were observed. One patient with CMML had a durable platelet response that began in Cycle 1 and persisted through Cycle 13. Nine red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients with MDS or CMML and 2 patients with AML did not require RBC transfusions for ≥8 weeks (up to 28 weeks) while on study. One platelet transfusion-dependent patient with LR-MDS did not require platelet transfusions for ≥8 weeks. Conclusion: Results from this first-in-human multicenter prospective clinical trial of a splicing modulator in myeloid neoplasms demonstrate dose-dependent target engagement and predictable PK profile of H3B-8800, and safety even with prolonged dosing. Although no objective CR or PR were achieved, decreased RBC or platelet transfusion requirements were observed in 12 (14%) of enrolled patients. Disclosures Steensma: H3 Biosciences: Other: Research funding to institution, not investigator.; Pfizer: Consultancy; Aprea: Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy; Arrowhead: Equity Ownership; Summer Road: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Wermke:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Greenberg:Notable Labs: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; H3 Biotech: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Font:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Komrokji:Agios: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy. Yang:Agios: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Brunner:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Ades:Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Silence Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Helsinn Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Al-Kali:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Coombs:H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Micol:AbbVie: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Perez De Oteyza:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Wang:Abbvie: Other: Advisory role; Kite: Other: Advisory role; Jazz: Other: Advisory role; Astellas: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; celyad: Other: Advisory role; Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Other: Advisory role, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi: Other: Advisory role; Amgen: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Other: Advisory role. Watts:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Buonamici:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Kim:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Gourineni:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Marino:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Rioux:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Schindler:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Smith:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Yao:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Yuan:Eisai: Employment. Yu:H3 Biomedicine: Employment. Platzbecker:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: H3B-8800 (experimental, unapproved)

Abstract Background : Momelotinib is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor that is currently being evaluated in phase-3 clinical trials for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) (NCT01969838, NCT02101268). In a phase-1/2 clinical trial of patients with MF, the drug was shown to improve anemia, reduce spleen size and alleviate symptoms (Leukemia 2013;27:1322). In the current study, we considered 100 consecutive patients from the Mayo Clinic who received momelotinib therapy, in order to identify molecular and cytogenetic predictors of treatment response and survival from the time of study entry. Methods : The study patients constituted part of a phase-1/2 clinical trial (NCT00935987) using momelotinib in MF. Details of the protocol, including inclusion and exclusion criteria were previously published (Leukemia 2013;27:1322). Response was determined by the 2006 response criteria published by the IWG-MRT. Data analysis and interpretation was carried out independent of any influence from the sponsor. Results : 100 patients with MF (median age 66 years; 58% males) were treated at the Mayo Clinic between 11/20/09 and 11/10/10. MF type was primary in 64% of the patients and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia in 36%. DIPSS-plus risk distribution was 63% high, 36% intermediate-2 and 1% intermediate-1. Red cell transfusion dependency was documented in 49% and palpable spleen size of >5 cm (median 19 cm) in 92%. All patients were annotated for JAK2/CALR/MPL mutations with respective frequencies of 73%, 16% and 7%. Frequencies for other mutations included 42% for ASXL1 (84 evaluable) and 18% for SRSF2(78 evaluable). All patients were evaluable for karyotype, which was unfavorable in 17%. Previous treatment included other JAK inhibitors in 21 patients, thalidomide/lenalidomide/pomalidomide in 31 and hydroxyurea or other cytoreductive agents in 55. Momelotinib was initiated at 100 mg/day in 3 patients, 150 mg/day in 21, 150 mg twice-daily in 20, 200 mg/day in 3, 300 mg/day in 47 and 400 mg/day in 6. The maximum momelotinib dose was 150 mg/day in 6 patients, 150 mg twice-daily in 20, 300 mg/day in 68 and 400 mg/day in 6. Treatment duration was <6 months in 12 patients, 6-12 months in 22, 12-24 months in 19 and >24 months in 47. Genetic correlates of response to momelotinib : Overall response rate was 57% and included no complete remissions (0%), one (1%) partial remission and 57 (57%) clinical improvements (CI). Response rates for spleen/liver and anemia were 43% (91 evaluable) and 44% (68 evaluable), respectively. Transfusion independency was achieved in 25 (51%) of 49 evaluable cases. Spleen/liver response rate was significantly affected by JAK2/CALR/MPL mutational status (34% vs 73% vs 60%, respectively, and 50% in triple-negative; p=0.04), CALR mutated vs unmutated status (73% vs 37%; p=0.009), and unmutated vs mutated ASXL1 (53% vs 29%; p=0.035). Furthermore, all 8 (100%) patients who were CALR+/ASXL1- responded vs 6 (25%) of 24 CALR-/ASXL1+ vs 3 (50%) of 6 CALR+/ASXL1+ vs 16 (43%) of 37 CALR-/ASXL1- patients (p=0.003). Spleen/liver response rates were not affected by SRSF2 mutations (p=0.93) or karyotype (p=0.41). Anemia response rate was not affected by JAK2/CALR/MPL (p=0.81), ASXL1 (p=0.16), SRSF2 (p=0.12) or CALR/ASXL1 (p=0.42) mutational status or karyotype (p=0.65). The number of informative cases for EZH2, IDH, SF3B1 and U2AF1mutations were not adequate enough to warrant similar analysis. Genetic correlates of survival from time of protocol entry : Median follow-up after the institution of protocol drug therapy was 35 months (range 1-49). During this period, 57 (57%) deaths and 12 (12%) leukemic transformations were documented. On multivariable analysis, shortened survival was predicted by the presence of ASXL1 (p=0.01; HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.8) or SRSF2 (0.01; HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.8) mutations and the absence of CALR mutations (p=0.03; HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-8.9). Karyotype was significant on univariate (p=0.01) but not in multivariable (p=0.6) analysis that included the aforementioned mutations. The prognostic relevance of each specific mutation was DIPSS-plus independent. Conclusions : We demonstrate significant associations between CALR and ASXL1 mutational status and spleen response to momelotinib therapy in MF. We also show that momelotinib therapy did not overcome the inferior survival associated with the presence of ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutations or the absence of CALR mutations. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Over 10,000 new cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are diagnosed in the US annually (MA X, Cancer 2007). Hypomethylating agents (azacitidine and decitabine), immunomodulating drugs (lenalidomide) and erythropoietin stimulating agents (epoetin α and darbepoetin) have been approved for more than a decade for the treatment of MDS. However, changes in overall outcome after the approval of these treatments are unknown. We used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a nationwide oncology registry covering 70% of the US cancer population to answer these questions. Methods: We identified patients with MDS diagnosed from 2004-2013 using ICD-O-3 codes 9980-9983 and 9985-99912. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We compared OS using the log-rank test according to demographic subgroups (sex, age [<40, 41-65, and ≥65 years], race [White, Black, Native American, Asian/Pacific Islander, and other], and ethnicity) across years of diagnosis (Period 1: 2004-2006, Period 2: 2007-2009, and Period 3: 2010-2013). Results: i) Characteristics: There were 54,953 MDS patients in our study. The median age at diagnosis was 76 years (78.7% older than 65) and 44% were females. White race (88.9%) was the most common, followed by black (7%). Four percent were Hispanics. A third (30.8%) of all patients were treated in academic centers. Three quarters (75.8%) had either Medicaid or Medicare insurance. ii) MDS Subtypes: 5q Syndrome was seen in 2008 cases (3.7%) while the most common subtype was MDS-Unclassifiable (U) (55.6%). Therapy related MDS (t-MDS) was seen in 1125 cases (2%), however coding for t-MDS was discontinued in 2009. Refractory anemia (RA), refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS), refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), and refractory anemia with excess blasts were seen in 9%, 7.6%, 6%, and15.6%, respectively. iii) OS: Compared to their counterparts, patients who were male, older, had a diagnosis of RAEB, covered by Medicare insurance, and treated at non-academic centers had the worse OS (all P <0.001). Across Periods 1-3, we did not see improvement in OS among demographic subgroups except for those who were <40 years old (P=0.03). Conclusions: In the past decade, the overall outcome of MDS did not improve despite the advent of new therapies. More than half of the cases were classified as MDS-U reflecting the difficulty of subtyping MDS based on World Health Organization classification. We found disparity in outcomes by demographics and type of treatment facility. This is the largest study of MDS outcome to-date and should help in understanding the gaps and areas that need future research. Figure Figure. Disclosures Al-Kali: Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background : The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms has recommended distinction between "proliferative" (WBC ≥ 13 x 10(9)/L) and "dysplastic" (WBC < 13 X 10(9)/L) subtypes of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In addition, CMML is characterized by a spectrum of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities (Patnaik Leukemia 2014). In the current study, we looked for correlations between gene expression profiles (GEP) and morphologic or molecular categories of previously untreated patients with CMML. Methods : 35 patients with CMML were included in the study. Targeted capture assays were carried out on BM DNA specimens obtained at diagnosis for 28 myeloid-relevant genes (Patnaik Blood C. J.). RNA sequencing (Stranded Total RNA- Illumina, San Diego, CA), was performed on 9 normal BM controls, and 35 CMML samples (25 peripheral blood (PB) and 10 BM). The RNA-Seq data was analyzed using MAPRSeq v.2.0. Normalization and differential expression analysis was performed using edgeR 2.6.2. We selected genes that were differentially expressed with a False Discovery Rate (FDR) <0.1 and a fold change bigger than 2. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Results: Among the 35 study patients, 75% were males and median age was 71 years (range, 55-87). 21 (60%), 9 (25%) and 5 (15%) patients were classified as CMML-0, 1 and 2, respectively. 16 (45%) had a dysplastic while 19 (55%) had a proliferative phenotype. At a median follow-up of 16 months, 5 (14%) deaths and 4 (14%) leukemic transformations were documented. Mutational frequencies included; TET2 45%, ASXL1 45%, SRSF2 40%, NRAS 14%, SETBP1 13%, CBL 10%, JAK2 7%, RUNX1 6%, DNMT3A 6%, U2AF1 6%, SF3B1 5%, ZRSR2 4%, Tp53 4%, and IDH2 4%. Abnormal cytogenetics (n=9, 35%) included; -Y 8%, trisomy 8 6%, monosomy 7 3%, del(13q) 3% and monosomal karyotype 3%. i) Differential GEP in PB samples: 25 PB CMML samples were analyzed. Unsupervised GEP demonstrated two unique clusters (figure one); cluster one was enriched with dysplastic CMML (90%) and cluster two with proliferative CMML (64%). Consistent with the difference in the distribution of morphologic categories, in comparison to cluster one, patients in cluster two had a higher white blood count (p=0.003), higher monocyte count (p=0.02) and higher risk prognostication by the Mayo Model (p=0.016); there was no significant difference between the two clusters in terms of age and gender distribution, hemoglobin level, neutrophil and platelet counts, PB or BM blast content, cytogenetic risk stratification, ASXL1, TET2, RAS, CBL and SETBP1 mutational status. Genes significantly upregulated (FDR<1e-5 and fold change ≥ 16x); in cluster two (proliferative CMML) in comparison to cluster one included; PRG2, CTSG, BEX1, CD34, CRISP2, while those significantly down-regulated included (FDR<1e-15 and fold change ≥ 5x); IL2RB, PRF1, GNLY, PDGFRB. IPA analysis identified the following pathways preferentially expressed in cluster two (proliferative CMML) 1) mitotic roles of polo-like kinase (KIF23, WEE-1, PLK1, PLK4), 2) Cell cycle: G2/M checkpoint regulation (CDC25C, WEE-1, AURKA, CDK1), 3) Cell cycle: chromosomal replication (CDC45, RPA3, MCM2, CDC7), and 4) BRCA1 in DNA damage response (BARD1, RBBP8, PLK1, RAD51). Whereas in the cluster one (dysplastic CMML), preferentially expressed pathways included; 1) T-cell receptor signalling (CD247 PRKCQ, CD4, PLCG1, CD28) and 2) STAT3 signalling (SOCS3, MAP3K9). ii) Differential GEP in BM samples: 10 BM CMML samples were analyzed along with 10 normal controls. Samples and controls clustered separately and within the CMML samples two clusters were identified (figure two). These clusters had equal representations of dysplastic (n=5) and proliferative (n=5) CMML sub-types. Additional samples are being processed. Conclusions: Differential gene expression profiling in patients with CMML identifies two unique clusters, clinically demarcated, at least in PB samples, by "proliferative" and "dysplastic" CMML subtypes. The proliferative cluster is enriched in genes involved in cell cycle regulation and DNA damage response; whereas the dysplastic cluster is enriched in T-cell receptor and STAT3 signalling. The prognostic and therapeutic impact of these gene clusters remains to be assessed in a larger group of informative patients. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (rALL) carries a very poor prognosis with limited options for effective salvage therapy. To date, there has been only a single retrospective report on the use of clofarabine in adult rALL demonstrating CR rate of 31% in this setting (Barba P et al. 2012). Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of clofarabine based therapy in a relatively large cohort of adult rALL patients. Method: After IRB approval, a retrospective single institution study of all patients (pts) diagnosed with rALL treated with a clofarabine based regimen at Mayo Clinic between 2000 - 2014 was performed. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared test while continuous variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon / Kruskal-Wallis test with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and means were compared using log ranks. Results: Presenting features: We identified a total of 22 pts with a diagnosis of rALL who received clofarabine based therapy. 20 patients were evaluable and 2 were excluded (one received clofarabine as salvage for positive MRD and the other as systemic maintenance with CNS directed therapy for an isolated CNS relapse). Among evaluable pts, median age at time of Clofarabine based chemotherapy was 39 years (range 19-65) and 50% were males. Thirteen had B-ALL while 7 had T-ALL. Median leukocyte count was 6 x109 (0.2-28.7), hemoglobin 9.8 g/dL (7-12.9), platelet 65 x109 (12-493), peripheral blood blast 4% (0-88) and bone marrow blasts 80% (0-95) while five pts had extramedullary disease. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-7).. 8 (40%) pts were post allogeneic transplant Treatment and Response: 10 pts (50%) received clofarabine monotherapy, 7(35%) clofarabine and cytarabine, and 3 (15%) had clofarabine, etoposide and cyclophosphamide. Overall response rate (CR/CRi + PR) was 35%. Five (25%) achieved CR/CRi, and 2 achieved PR. Among those who achieved CR, 4 out 5 proceeded to further therapy; 2 to allogeneic stem cell transplant and two additional patients received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). One pt with PR also proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. In comparative analysis, there were more males 6 (86%) vs 1(14%) in the responding arm (P = 0.014), otherwise the number of regimens prior to clofarabine, type of clofarabine regimen, transplant status, T vs B cell ALL, did not impact response. Median overall survival was 2.4 months (1.3-2.9) in non-responders vs. 12.8 months (3-27.4) in responders (P =0.0007) (Figure 1). All pts who proceeded to transplant or DLI relapsed with a median time to relapse of 6.4 (4.8-13.7) months. Toxicity: Rash/Hand Foot syndrome was observed in 3 pts (19%), Grade III-IV liver toxicity occurred in 4 (26%) with no permanent sequela. Opportunistic infection occurred in 3 pt (17%). Conclusion: Clofarabine based chemotherapy was a well-tolerated salvage regimen in heavily pretreated patients and was an effective bridge to definitive therapy in a significant proportion of cases. Prospective evaluation of these findings is warranted. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: MDS is a clonal bone marrow disorder characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis with peripheral blood cytopenias and an increased risk for transformation to acute leukemia. Patients with MDS who have a history of prior exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are called therapy-related MDS (t-MDS). We hereby describe our experience with this entity and compare it to our experience with de novo MDS patients. Aim: To study the differences of clinical outcome between t-MDS and de novo MDS patients. Method: A retrospective single institution study chart review of cases with MDS at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1993- 2011 was performed. De novo MDS, t-MDS and leukemic transformation (LT) were defined according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification (Swerdlow et al 2008). Prior exposures to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/ or both were defined as t-MDS; while lack of any as de novo MDS. Appropriate IRB approval was obtained in accordance with the Helsinki declaration. Comparison between group medians was done using Wilcoxon test, comparison between values was done using contingency and One-way analyses (Means/Anova/Pooled t), while survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves JMP V10 Results: Out of 827 patients with MDS, 153 (19%) patients were t-MDS (group (Gr) 1) versus 674 (81%) (rest of patients, Gr 2). Out of the t-MDS, 79 (52%) pts had CTX, and 42 (27%) had XRT, and 32 (21%) pts had both CTX/XRT). Upon comparison between Gr 1 vs 2, statistical significant difference was seen in median age 69 vs 72 (p=0.01), Platelets 68 vs 114 x109(<p0.0001), and WBC 3.2 vs 3.6 x109(0.02), respectively. No significant statistical difference was found in median Hg 9.6 vs 9.7 gm/dL (p 0.6), peripheral blood (PB) blasts 0% in both groups, and bone marrow (BM) blasts 2% in both groups. IPSS was low, int-1, int-2, high in 16%, 40%, 34%, 9%in Gr 1 and 32%, 46%, 18%, 4% in Gr 2. IPSS-R was very low, low, int, high, very high in 9%, 24%, 18%, 20%, 28% in Gr 1 vs 18%, 36%, 20%, 16%, 10% in Gr 2. AML transformation (LT) was identical in both groups at 12%. Upon comparison between Gr 1 and 2, median time to AML transformation was 7.9 vs 13 months (p=0.08). Median overall survival (mOS) was shorter in Gr 1 vs 2 at 16 vs 34 months (P<0.0001). When analysis was limited to diploid cytogenetics, median OS was 63 vs 50 months, respectively (p=0.9). Both IPSS and IPSS-R were prognostic of mOS in t-MDS (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis; age (<0.0001), IPSS-R (p<0.0001) and previous CTX and/ or XRT (P=0.02) were the only variables that affected mOS. Conclusion: T-MDS comprises a small portion of all MDS cases (19%). Median overall survival in the de novo MDS group was longer than t-MDS group; however this difference was not maintained in patients with diploid cytogenetics. Similarly, time to AML was longer in de novo MDS compared to t-MDS (although similar rates of incidence). All of age, IPSS-R and t-MDS did affect median OS on multivariate analysis. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Momelotinib is a JAK 1/2 inhibitor that is active in the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF); a previous phase 1/2 study included 100 consecutive patients from the Mayo Clinic (Leukemia. 2015;29:741). In the current long-term study of these 100 patients, we provide a cumulative account of short and long term efficacy and toxicity data, as well as survival analysis. Methods: The current study represents sponsor-independent analysis. The study patients are part of a larger (n=166) phase-1/2 momelotinib study (NCT00935987), which was conducted in two dose-escalation (100 mg-400 mg daily doses) and dose-confirmation (300 mg daily dose) phases. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (Version 4.03) and responses by the International Working Group criteria (Blood. 2013;122:1395). All statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at the time of entry to study. Results: Baseline data: 100 patients with MF (median age 66 years; 58% males) were treated between 11/20/09 and 11/10/10; 64 patients had primary MF, 22 post-polycythemia vera MF and 14 post-essential thrombocythemia MF. 73 (73%) patients harbored JAK2 mutations, 16 (16%) CALR, 7 MPL and 4 were "triple-negative"; among the 16 CALR-mutated cases, 13 were classified as "type 1/type 1-like". DIPSS-plus risk distribution (JCO 2011;29:392) was 63% high, 36% intermediate-2 and 1% intermediate-1; 49% displayed red cell transfusion-dependency, 58% constitutional symptoms, 87% palpable splenomegaly >5 cm and 50% abnormal karyotype. 94 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations with 41 (44%) mutated and 78 for SRSF2 mutations with 14 (18%) mutated. 21 (21%) patients were previously treated with another JAK inhibitor. Current disposition: All information was updated in July 2016. To-date, after a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 88 drug discontinuations, 70 deaths and 14 leukemic transformations have been documented; median follow-up for living patients was 5.7 years (range 5.1-6.4). Among the 30 patients who are currently alive, 12 remain on study and another 5 have received stem cell transplant. Toxicity data: After a median treatment duration of 1.7 years, "momelotinib related" grade 3 or 4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (34%), neutropenia (9%), anemia (5%), increased lipase (7%), increased ALT (4%), increased AST (2%), increased ALP (2%) and headaches (2%). In addition, noteworthy grade 1 or 2 AEs included peripheral neuropathy (PN) 47%, increased lipase (14%), increased amylase (17%), increased bilirubin (13%), increased AST (21%), increased ALT (19%), increased APTT (17%), headaches (13%), dizziness (22%), nausea (23%) and diarrhea (20%). Most of the AEs, except PN, were reversible. Efficacy data and predictors of response and relapse-free survival: Clinical improvement (CI) was documented in 57% of patients, anemia response in 44%, and spleen response in 43%. 51% of transfusion-dependent patients became transfusion independent. The majority of patients also had marked improvement in their symptoms. 46 (81%) of the 57 responding patients discontinued treatment after a median treatment duration of 2.3 years. ASXL1 mutations predicted inferior CI (p=0.03) whereas relapse-free survival was adversely affected by absence of type 1/type 1-like CALR (p=0.03) or presence of unfavorable karyotype (p=0.002); among the 11 responding patients currently still receiving the drug, all had favorable karyotype and 5 had type 1/type 1-like CALR mutations. Survival analysis and risk factors : Median survival, calculated from the time of study entry, was 3.2 years with 5-year survival rate of 32%. In multivariable analysis of genetic markers, absence of type 1/type 1-like CALR (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.2) or presence of SRSF2 (2.9, 1.5-5.4) or ASXL1 (1.8, 1.1-3.2) mutations were independently predictive of shortened survival (Figure). Conclusions: Momelotinib therapy in MF provides effective palliation in terms of anemia, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. However, less than 20% of treated patients enjoy durable long-term benefit and almost half experience drug-related and mostly irreversible peripheral neuropathy. Long-term survival and durability of response were superior in patients with type 1/type 1-like CALR mutations and inferior in those with ASXL1/SRSF2 mutations or unfavorable karyotype. Figure Figure. Disclosures Al-Kali: Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Introduction: It is known that overexpression of DNA methyltransferases (e.g., DNMT1) is frequent and changes of DNA cytosine methylation (5mC) are a constant feature of cancers. DNA methylation inhibitors, such as 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Dec), have been in clinics for patients with leukemia. It is classically believed that promoter hypomethylation coupled by reexpression of epigenetically-suppressed tumor suppressors is a core mechanism behind Dec-impaired leukemia cell growth. However, the fact that global DNA methylation profiling barely predicts Dec-response suggests a demethylation-independent mechanism of Dec-induced cell death. N6-methyladenine (m6A) has been identified recently as an abundant DNA modification in eukaryotes (Wu, Nature 2016;532:329). Importantly, m6A is extensively present in the human genome, and m6A abundance is associated with tumorigenesis (Xie, Cell 2018;71:306). Furthermore, the DNA m6A is dynamically modulated by the methyltransferases (i.e., METTL3, N6AMT1) and demethylases (i.e., ALKBH1), and changes in m6A predict gene expression (Wu, Nature 2016;532:329). Given a potential crosstalk between m6A and distinct epigenetic mechanisms (Yao, Nat. Commun 2017;8:1122), we hypothesized that the anticancer actions of Dec may partially result from changes in DNA m6A in leukemia cells. Methods: Protein expression of target genes was assessed by Western blotting. The levels of DNA cytosine methylation (5mC) and N6-methyladenine (m6A) were measured by dotblotting or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The cell viability and apoptosis were determined by the Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK8) assays as well as the Annexin V/Propidium Iodide staining and flow cytometry. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of leukemia patients from Mayo Clinic were prepared by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation. Results: To test our hypothesis, leukemia cells, Kasumi-1, MV4-11, K562 and KU812, were exposed to 2 µM Dec, a clinical achievable concentration, for 72 hours. As expected, Dec treatment led to a downregulation of DNMT1 and DNMT3a, a reduction of 5mC levels by dotblotting using anti-5mC antibody, a blockage of cell proliferation and a promotion of cell apoptosis. When genomic DNA was subjected to dotblotting using anti-m6A antibody, the results revealed a marked decrease of DNA m6A levels in all Dec-treated cells. Then genomic DNA from K562 and MV4-11 cells was enzymatically digested to 2'-deoxynucleosides. dA was quantified by HPLC-UV, while the amount of m6A was measured by isotope dilution HPLC-ESI-MS/MS using 15N labeled internal standard. The standard curves were generated using pure standards, from which the m6A/A ratio was calculated. In agreement with dotblotting results, Dec treatment significantly decreased DNA m6A abundance in both cell lines. Mechanistically, exposure to Dec led to a consistent increase of demethylase fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO), but not METTL3 nor ALKBH1 and ALKBH5. Further, knockdown of FTO increased DNA m6A, which was further confirmed by treatment with FTO inhibitors rhein and meclofenamic acid (MA). These data indicate that FTO may be responsible for Dec-induced m6A changes in leukemia cells. To investigate the clinical implications of DNA m6A, we obtained PBMCs from AML patients (n = 10), who received Dec therapy (20 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 4 weeks) in Mayo Clinic. These PBMCs were further cultured for 48 hours, frozen and stored in 100% ethanol before DNA extraction. The results from dotblotting using anti-5mC or anti-m6A showed that a trend of decrease in both m6A and 5mC abundance is observed, and the pattern of changes in m6A and 5mC displays a positive correlation. Finally, exposure of leukemia cells to the combination of Dec (2 µM) with FTO inhibitor MA (50 µM) induced more cell apoptosis and greater inhibition on cell proliferation as compared to single agent in vitro, supporting FTO inhibitors as new therapeutic agents in leukemia. Conclusion: Our studies suggest that the FTO-DNA m6A axis may partially mediate the therapeutic outcomes of Dec in leukemia. Our findings provide a new mechanistic paradigm for the anticancer activities of Dec, and define the m6A methylation status in leukemia cells as a new pharmacodynamic marker for their response to Dec-based therapy, pointing to a novel treatment strategy for incorporating m6A modulators to enhance the therapeutic index of Dec. Disclosures Al-Kali: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.