Topilsky, Yan

BACKGROUND: Degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) due to valve prolapse predominates in men, but sex-specific differences are poorly understood due to a lack of quantitative and sex-stratified studies. METHODS: The international MIDA-Q (Mitral Regurgitation International Database-Quantitative) registry enrolled 3274 men and 2331 women with greater than or equal to mild DMR prospectively quantified, comprehensively characterized, and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Women were more symptomatic despite lower effective regurgitant orifice (ERO, 27±18 versus 38±22 mm 2 , standardized mean difference 0.54; P <0.0001) and regurgitant volume (46±26 versus 61±31 mL/beat, standardized mean difference 0.52; P <0.0001), even for similar mitral lesions. With increasing ERO, women showed lower regurgitant volume, higher heart rate, lower blood pressure, but left ventricular size response in women was smaller in absolute measures while larger when body surface area normalized, with higher ejection fraction and cardiac index (all P <0.0001). Incidence of mitral valve surgery was similar in symptomatic women and men, but lower in asymptomatic women versus men (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80 [0.69–0.94]; P =0.008) for similar ERO, linked to smaller left ventricular diastolic absolute diameter ( P <0.0001). Excess mortality under medical management (of severe versus mild ERO) was similar in women (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.67 [1.24–2.24]; P =0.0007) and men (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.63 [1.27–2.09]; P <0.0001) and versus expected survival (2.12 [1.51–2.98] in women and 2.27 [1.75–2.94] in men). However, moderate ERO (20–39 mm 2 ) was associated with significant excess mortality in women (1.47 [1.19–1.77] versus mild). In men, the corresponding hazard ratio did not reach statistical significance. Postoperative survival was similar in men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Women with DMR present with lower ERO and regurgitant volume than men and with considerable adaptive differences to increasing DMR severity versus men. Asymptomatic women are less referred to surgery than men of similar DMR severity, linked to smaller absolute left ventricular size. Severe DMR by similar quantitative thresholds causes similar excess mortality in men and women; moderate quantitative DMR shows a trend for higher excess mortality versus expected in women than men, requiring further confirmation. These data emphasize the importance of quantitative DMR and left ventricular remodeling assessment in men and women for appropriate clinical management.

Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is responsible for a considerable disease burden but is widely heterogeneous. The lack of a comprehensive prognostic instrument covering the entire MVP spectrum, encompassing the quantified consequent degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), hinders clinical management and therapeutic trials. Methods: The new Mitral Regurgitation International Database Quantitative (MIDA-Q) registry enrolled 8187 consecutive patients (ages 63±16 years, 47% women, follow-up 5.5±3.3 years) first diagnosed with isolated MVP, without or with DMR quantified prospectively (measuring effective regurgitant orifice [ERO] and regurgitant volume) in routine practice of 5 tertiary care centers from North America, Europe, and the Middle East. The MIDA-Q score ranges from 0 to 15 by accumulating guideline-based risk factors and DMR severity. Long-term survival under medical management was the primary outcome end point. Results: MVP was associated with DMR absent/mild (ERO <20 mm 2 ) in 50%, moderate (ERO 20–40 mm 2 ) in 25%, and severe or higher (ERO ≥40 mm 2 ) in 25%, with mean ERO 24±24 mm 2 , regurgitant volume 37±35 mL. Median MIDA-Q score was 4 with a wide distribution (10%–90% range, 0–9). MIDA-Q score was higher in patients with EuroScore II ≥1% versus <1% (median, 7 versus 3; P < 0.0001) but with wide overlap (10%–90% range, 4–11 versus 0–7) and mediocre correlation ( R 2 0.18). Five-year survival under medical management was strongly associated with MIDA-Q score, 97±1% with score 0, 95±1% with score 1 to 2, 82±1% with score 3 to 4, 67±1% with score 5 to 6, 60±1% with score 7 to 8, 44±1% with score 9 to 10, 35±1% with score 11 to 12, and 5±4% with MIDA-Q score ≥13, with hazard ratio 1.31 [1.29–1.33] per 1-point increment. Excess mortality with higher MIDA-Q scores persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and EuroScore II (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13 [1.11–1.15] per 1-point increment). Subgroup analysis showed persistent association of MIDA-Q score with mortality in all possible subsets, in particular, with EuroScore II<1% (hazard ratio, 1.08 [1.02–1.14]) or ≥1% (hazard ratio, 1.11 [1.08–1.13]) and with no/mild DMR (hazard ratio, 1.14 [1.10–1.19]) or moderate/severe DMR (hazard ratio, 1.13 [1.10–1.16], all per 1-point increment with P <0.0001). Nested-model and bootstrapping analyses demonstrated incremental prognostic power of MIDA-Q score (all P <0.0001). Conclusions: This large, international cohort of isolated MVP, with prospective DMR quantification in routine practice, demonstrates the wide range of risk factor accumulation and considerable heterogeneity of outcomes after MVP diagnosis. The MIDA-Q score is strongly, independently, and incrementally associated with long-term survival after MVP diagnosis, irrespective of presentation, and is therefore a crucial prognostic instrument for risk stratification, clinical trials, and management of patients diagnosed with all forms of MVP.