Reynolds, Jordan

AbstractBackgroundAmyloidosis is a systemic disorder of abnormal protein folding and deposition resulting in a range of symptoms including neuropathy, heart failure, renal disease, and dermatologic findings. The two most common types of amyloidosis that affect the heart are transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis and light chain (AL) amyloidosis, which vary in clinical presentation. Skin findings such as periorbital purpura are considered more specific for AL amyloidosis. However, there are rare cases of ATTR amyloidosis causing the same dermatologic findings.Case SummaryA 69-year-old female presented for evaluation of amyloidosis after cardiac imaging done at the time of a recent atrial fibrillation ablation showed signs of infiltrative disease. On examination, she had periorbital purpura which she reportedly had for years without receiving a diagnosis, as well as macroglossia with teeth indentation. These exam findings, in addition to her transthoracic echocardiogram showing apical sparing, are typically considered characteristic of AL amyloidosis. Subsequent workup revealed the presence of hereditary ATTR (hATTR) amyloidosis with a heterozygous pathogenic variant in the TTR gene producing the p.Thr80Ala mutation.ConclusionSpontaneous periorbital purpura is thought to be pathognomonic for AL amyloidosis. However, we describe a case of hereditary ATTR amyloidosis with the Thr80Ala TTR genetic variant presenting initially with periorbital purpura, the first case documented in the literature to our knowledge.

AbstractBackgroundAutoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a known mimicker of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma both clinically and radiologically. In this study, the authors present their institutional experience in diagnosing AIP on cytology and correlate results with the histologic findings.MethodsA 14‐year computerized search for patients who had histologically confirmed AIP with concurrent or prior cytology was performed. Clinical data, cytology findings, and surgical pathology results were reviewed for analysis.ResultsEighteen patients were identified. The patients showed a male predominance, with a mean age of 59 years. Jaundice, weight loss, and abdominal pain were the most common clinical presentation. Five of 12 patients who were tested for serum immunoglobulin G4 had elevated levels. Cytologic findings of 16 cases that were available for review showed markedly inflamed fibrous stroma (54%) and cytologic atypia (50%). The final cytologic diagnoses were suspicious for adenocarcinoma (n = 1), atypical (n = 8), and benign/negative (n = 9). The corresponding surgical pathology diagnoses were classified as type 1 (n = 10), type 2 (n = 6), and AIP, not otherwise specified (n = 2). All type 2 AIP cases had at least atypical cytologic diagnoses, with one called suspicious for adenocarcinoma and another called adenocarcinoma at the time of rapid on‐site evaluation. In contrast, eight of 10 type 1 AIP cases were negative/benign, and two of 10 were atypical. In these two atypical cases, the possibility of AIP was raised because of the presence of inflamed stroma.ConclusionAIP is a pitfall in cytology because moderate‐to‐marked atypia can be present, especially in type 2 AIP. Because atypia can be severe, the presence of cellular fibrous stroma with lymphocytic stromal infiltrates and the integration of serum immunoglobulin G4 levels could be helpful in avoiding diagnostic overcall in AIP.

Context.— Epithelioid angiomyolipomas (eAMLs) are rare tumors of the kidney that occur in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex or in a sporadic setting; a subset of these tumors exhibit metastatic behavior. Objective.— To analyze molecular profiling data to identify pathogenic alterations in rare cases of metastatic eAML, and to identify immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based surrogate markers. Design.— Molecular profiling data from the American Association for Cancer Research GENIE registry was accessed for 23 patients with angiomyolipomas, and 9 of 16 patients with eAMLs in our institutional registry were evaluated with next-generation sequencing. IHC was performed to screen for alterations of P53, RB, and ATRX for all 16 institutional cases. Results.— Combined alterations of 5 tumor-suppressor genes (TP53, ATRX, RB1, APC, and NF1) were identified using next-generation sequencing in 7 of 8 (88%) patients with metastatic disease compared to a single patient with nonmetastatic disease (RB1 variant of uncertain significance; 1 of 24, 4%). No cases with abnormal IHC results were identified in 11 patients with nonmetastatic disease compared to 3 of 5 patients with metastatic disease. Conclusions.— Our results show that the majority of metastatic eAMLs have mutations of 5 tumor-suppressor genes (TP53, ATRX, RB1, APC, and NF1), while these are rare in patients with nonmetastatic disease. Furthermore, IHC for P53, RB, and ATRX may serve as a screen for a subset of these alterations in resource-limited settings. These findings, if validated in larger data sets, have the potential to predict metastatic behavior in eAMLs.

Abstract Objectives Oil Red O (ORO) positivity in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid macrophages in the setting of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use–associated acute lung injury (EVALI) has been frequently requested by clinicians based on rare reports and subsequent US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine the specificity of ORO staining in BAL specimens with disease states other than EVALI. Methods Consecutive BAL specimens (October-December 2019) were stained with ORO. The lipid-laden macrophage index (LLMI) was calculated for each case. Results We studied BAL samples from 50 patients. Indications for BAL were surveillance bronchoscopy for lung transplantation (27/50), suspected infection (12/50), sarcoidosis/suspected sarcoidosis (3/50), nodules or ground-glass opacities (3/50), hemoptysis (2/50), asthma or eosinophilic pneumonia (2/50), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (1/50). ORO staining was seen in BAL fluid macrophages in 45 of 50 cases (focal in 18, moderate in 23, diffuse in 4); LLMI ranged from 0 to 218. Using a threshold of LLMI of 85 or higher as positive, ORO was positive in 7 of 50 (14%) cases (range, 85-218). Conclusions ORO staining in BAL fluid macrophages is not specific for EVALI. Even when an LLMI of 85 or higher is used as a threshold for positivity, ORO positivity occurs in a significant subset of non–vaping-related cases.

Objectives: Signet-ring cells (SRCs) in effusion specimens represent a diagnostic challenge. In this study, a consecutive series of pleural and peritoneal effusions with benign SRCs are examined and compared with malignant SRCs. Material and Methods: We reviewed consecutive Wright-stained serous effusion slides and searched for cases with SRCs. Corresponding ThinPrep slides and clinical histories were reviewed. Cytology cases with known signet-ring adenocarcinoma were retrieved and reviewed. Results: Four hundred Wright-stained serous effusions were reviewed. Eighteen cases were identified with SRC-like cells. Thirteen patients had liver cirrhosis, three patients had end-stage renal disease, one patient had a history of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and one patient had endometrioid carcinoma. For the latter two patients, the primary tumor showed no histologic findings of signet-ring features. In all cases, no SRCs were found on the corresponding ThinPrep slides. Five cytology cases with malignant SRCs were reviewed. Benign SRCs have a uniformly pale and markedly distended cytoplasm, and the nuclei are thin and curved. The malignant SRCs showed larger non-curved nuclei and bubbly mucin-containing cytoplasm. Conclusion: Mesothelial cells and histiocytes can mimic signet-ring adenocarcinoma cells on Wright-stained slides. Correlation with ThinPrep specimens is necessary before reporting, as the SRCs typically are not present in ThinPrep preparations.

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system classifies pancreatobiliary samples into six categories (I–VI), providing guidance for personalized management. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has been preparing an updated reporting system for pancreatobiliary cytopathology, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of each PSC category, also the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic FNA cytology using the current PSC system. Five databases were investigated with a predefined search algorithm. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the eligible studies for subsequent data extraction. A study quality assessment was also performed. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The ROM of the PSC categories I, II, III, IV, V, VI were in the ranges of 8–50%, 0–40%, 28–100%, 0–31%, 82–100%, and 97–100%, respectively. Notably, the ROM IVB (“neoplastic—benign”) subcategory showed a 0% ROM. Four of the included studies reported separately the ROMs for the IVO subcategory (“neoplastic—other”; its overall ROM ranged from 0 to 34%) with low (LGA) and high-grade atypia (HGA). ROM for LGA ranged from 4.3 to 19%, whereas ROM for HGA from 64 to 95.2%. When the subcategory IVO with HGA was considered as cytologically positive, together with the categories V and VI, there was a higher sensitivity of pancreatic cytology, at minimal expense of the specificity. Evidence suggests the proposed WHO international system changes—shifting the IVB entities into the “benign/negative for malignancy” category and establishing two new categories, the “pancreatic neoplasm, low-risk/grade” and “pancreatic neoplasm, high-risk/grade”—could stratify pancreatic neoplasms more effectively than the current PSC system.

The Paris System (TPS) for Reporting Urinary Cytology is a standardized, evidence-based reporting system, comprising seven diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), HGUC, low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), and other malignancies. This study aimed to calculate the pooled risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) of each category and demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology reported with TPS. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, while data were extracted and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The pooled ROHM was 17.70% for the nondiagnostic category (95% CI, 0.0650; 0.3997), 13.04% for the NHGUC (95% CI, 0.0932; 0.1796), 38.65% for the AUC (95% CI, 0.3042; 0.4759), 12.45% for the LGUN (95% CI, 0.0431; 0.3101), 76.89 for the SHGUC (95% CI, 0.7063; 0.8216), and 91.79% for the HGUC and other malignancies (95% CI, 0.8722; 0.9482). A summary ROC curve was created and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.849, while the pooled sensitivity was 0.669 (95% CI, 0.589; 0.741) and false-positive rate was 0.101 (95% CI, 0.063; 0.158). In addition, the pooled DOR of the included studies was 21.258 (95% CI, 14.336; 31.522). TPS assigns each sample into a diagnostic category linked with a specific ROHM, guiding clinical management.

Greater than 2000 cases of vaping‐associated pulmonary injury and 39 deaths reported in the United States have heightened public awareness and assumed major public health significance over recent months. Currently, knowledge of the effects of various vaping agents on the respiratory tract is in its infancy. Additional understanding of the agents implicated in these lung injuries as well as a correlation between bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy samples is required.

Introduction: The increasing use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology to examine pancreatic neoplasms has led to an increase in the diagnosis of metastases to the pancreas. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common metastasis to the pancreas. Our study examines 33 cases of metastatic RCC to the pancreas sampled by EUS-FNA from four large tertiary care hospitals. Materials and Methods: We searched the cytopathology database for RCC metastatic to the pancreas diagnosed by EUS-FNA from January 2005 to January 2015. Patient age, history of RCC, nephrectomy history, follow-up postnephrectomy, radiological impression, and EUS-FNA cytologic diagnosis were reviewed. Results: Thirty-three patients were identified. The average age was 67.5 years (range, 49–84 years). Thirty-two patients had a previous documented history of RCC. One patient had the diagnosis of pancreatic metastasis at the same time of the kidney biopsy. Thirty-one patients had been treated with nephrectomy. Twenty-seven patients were being monitored annually by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-five patients had multiple masses by imaging, but 8 patients had a single mass in the pancreas at the time of EUS-FNA. EUS-FNA of 20 cases showed classic morphology of RCC. Thirteen cases had either “atypical” clinical-radiologic features or morphologic overlaps with primary pancreatic neoplasms or other neoplasms. Cell blocks were made on all 13 cases and immunochemical stains confirmed the diagnosis. Conclusions: EUS-FNA cytology is useful for the diagnosis of metastatic RCC to the pancreas. Cytomorphology can be aided with patient history, imaging analyses, cell blocks, and immunochemical stains.